
Hundreds of books removed from stores, libraries and universities in Afghanistan
A committee involving four Taliban ministries has been formed to review books and refer any "suspicious content" to clerics for further scrutiny.
Hundreds of titles, including classic literature, historical works, and books on women's rights or secular governance, have already been pulled from circulation.
The Taliban justify the ban by claiming these books are "against national interests," "anti-Islam," or aim to "mislead and corrupt society," conflicting with Islamic and traditional Afghan values.
Publishers report that the censorship process is often arbitrary, leading to a collapse in the publishing industry and restrictions on book imports.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
8 hours ago
- The Independent
Kim Jong Un's sister says Trump must accept North Korea as a nuclear weapons state
The influential sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has dismissed the United States' stated intent to resume diplomacy on denuclearisation, urging Washington to accept her country as a nuclear weapons state. Kim Yo Jong insisted a new approach is needed to restart talks, suggesting Pyongyang would only return to the negotiating table if the US offers rewards for a partial surrender of its nuclear capability. This firm stance comes as some experts believe US President Donald Trump could still seek a diplomatic achievement with North Korea. Mr Trump has recently spoken of his personal ties with Kim Jong Un and expressed hopes of reigniting nuclear diplomacy between them. Their high-stakes discussions in 2018-19, which occurred during Mr Trump's first term, collapsed after he rejected Mr Kim's demands for extensive sanctions relief in exchange for dismantling his main nuclear complex, a limited denuclearisation step. Mr Kim has since executed weapons tests to modernise and expand his nuclear arsenal. In a statement carried by state media, Kim Yo Jong said the personal relationship between her brother and Trump 'is not bad'. But she said if their personal relations are to serve the purpose of North Korea's denuclearisation, North Korea would view it as 'nothing but a mockery'. She said North Korea's nuclear capability has sharply increased since the first round of the Kim-Trump diplomacy and that any attempt to deny North Korea as a nuclear weapons state would be rejected. 'If the US fails to accept the changed reality and persists in the failed past, the DPRK-US meeting will remain as a 'hope' of the US side,' Kim Yo Jong said, referring to her country by its official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. She said it would be 'advisable to seek another way of contact". Kim Yo Jong is a key official on the Central Committee of the North's ruling Workers' Party. She handles the country's relations with South Korea and the United States, and South Korean officials and experts believe she is the North's second-most powerful person after her brother. Kim Yo Jong said she was responding to reported comments by a US official that Trump is open to talks on denuclearisation. She likely was referring to a Saturday article by Yonhap news agency that cited an unidentified White House official as saying Trump 'remains open to engaging with Leader Kim to achieve a fully denuclearised North Korea'. 'North Korea wants to say it's not interested in talks on denuclearisation and the US must determine what benefits it can give to the North first,' said Nam Sung-wook, a former head of the Institute for National Security Strategy, a think tank run by South Korea's spy agency. Mr Nam said Mr Trump's likely desire to win a Nobel Peace Prize would prompt him to seek talks with Kim Jong Un and give him corresponding benefits for taking phased denuclearisation steps. Mr Nam said North Korea would want broad sanctions relief, a suspension of US-South Korea military drills that it regards as invasion rehearsals and other economic incentives. Kim Yeol Soo, an analyst at South Korea's Korea Institute for Military Affairs, said US and North Korean officials could meet if they narrow some differences on terms for restoring talks. But he said Mr Trump's unpredictability would make it extremely difficult to predict what concessions the Americans would offer. Other experts have earlier said that North Korea — now preoccupied with its expanding cooperation with Russia — sees no urgent need to resume diplomacy with the US and South Korea. On Monday, Kim Yo Jong rebuffed overtures by South Korea's new liberal government, saying its 'blind trust' in the country's alliance with the US and hostility toward North Korea make it no different from its conservative predecessor. Nam said prospects for an early resumption of US-North Korea diplomacy would depend on whether the Russia-Ukraine war ends soon and U.S. tariff negotiations with other countries are proceeded in a direction that Trump wants. Mr Kim said Mr Trump may use his likely attendance of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in South Korea this autumn as a chance to travel on to North Korea or a Korean border village to meet Kim Jong Un. Kim Yo Jong on Monday described as 'a daydream' a reported South Korean idea of inviting her brother to the regional summit.


The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
China's financial offer to boost births
China has introduced a nationwide annual childcare subsidy of 3,600 yuan (£376) for each child under three years old. The scheme, effective from 1 January 2025, aims to combat the country's declining birth rate and is projected to benefit nearly 20 million families. This initiative follows China's population falling for the third consecutive year, with a decline of 1.39 million in 2024. The long-term decline in birth rates is linked to the former one-child policy, rapid urbanisation, and a cultural preference for male children. Critics argue that financial incentives alone may not be enough, pointing to high childcare costs, job uncertainty, and gender discrimination as key factors discouraging family growth.


BreakingNews.ie
9 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
UK minister accuses Farage of being on side of ‘pornographers' in online safety row
A row has broken out between Labour and Reform after the British technological secretary accused Nigel Farage of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers' and 'Jimmy Savile' over his party's pledge to scrap the UK Online Safety Act. Mr Farage labelled the comments 'disgusting' and called on Peter Kyle to apologise, after the Cabinet minister said the Reform leader is 'on the side of turning the clock back' to when 'strangers can get in touch via messaging apps with children'. Advertisement Former Reform chairman Zia Yusuf claimed the remarks are 'one of the most outrageous and disgusting things a politician has said in the political arena'. Peter Kyle's comments on @SkyNews are disgusting. He should do the right thing and apologise. — Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage) July 29, 2025 Under rules that came into effect on July 25th, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. Mr Yusuf said on Monday that the party would repeal the legislation if they got into government, claiming it works to 'suppress freedom of speech' and 'force social media companies to censor anti-government speech'. Speaking to Sky News on Tuesday, Mr Kyle said that children have been living in a 'wild west' and labelled the new law 'a big step forward'. Advertisement He added: 'I see that Nigel Farage is already saying that he's going to overturn these laws. So you know, we have people out there who are extreme pornographers, peddling hate, peddling violence. Nigel Farage is on their side. 'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.' If you want to overturn the Online Safety Act you are on the side of predators. It is as simple as that. — Peter Kyle (@peterkyle) July 29, 2025 Asked to clarify his comments, Mr Kyle said: 'Nigel Farage is on the side of turning the clock back to the time when strange adults, strangers can get in touch via messaging apps with children.' Mr Farage reacted on X by calling Mr Kyle's remarks 'disgusting' and said 'he should do the right thing and apologise'. Advertisement Mr Kyle then doubled down on his comments in response, and said that 'if you want to overturn the Online Safety Act you are on the side of predators. It is as simple as that.' Mr Yusuf claimed that Mr Kyle's remarks showed 'how deeply unserious' the UK government was about child safety, adding: 'Talking about Jimmy Savile in that way does nothing other than denigrate the victims of Jimmy Savile.' He told Sky News that the comments are 'one of the most outrageous and disgusting things a politician has said in the political arena that I can remember. And that's quite a high bar, frankly.' Sir Keir Starmer jumped to defend the legislation from its critics when he met Donald Trump on Monday, telling reporters 'We're not censoring anyone'. Advertisement 'We've got some measures which are there to protect children, in particular, from sites like suicide sites.' He added: 'I personally feel very strongly that we should protect our young teenagers, and that's what it usually is, from things like suicide sites. I don't see that as a free speech issue, I see that as child protection.'