logo
UC Berkeley chancellor faces House questions on campus antisemitism

UC Berkeley chancellor faces House questions on campus antisemitism

UC Berkeley Chancellor Richard Lyons is expected to defend his university's handling of campus antisemitism Tuesday when he and the leaders of two other universities become the latest to be grilled on the subject by the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Joining Lyons in Washington will be Robert Groves, interim president of Georgetown University, and Felix Matos Rodriguez, chancellor of the City University of New York.
Ahead of the hearing, committee chair Rep. Tim Walberg, R-Michigan, characterized antisemitism as 'festering at schools across the country.'
Earlier this year, the Trump administration announced an investigation of UC Berkeley and other universities into whether an 'antisemitic hostile work environment' exists. It's unclear what the investigation turned up, if it happened at all.
Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice had already opened investigations into antisemitism at the school in 2024. In December, a House report noted that UC Berkeley had 'issued no suspensions and placed only one student on probation' after student protests that year.
The committee has held several such hearings with campus leaders since Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas militants attacked Israel and triggered the ongoing war in Gaza. The conflict prompted college students across the country to demonstrate throughout 2024 for Palestinian rights and against Israel. Their tent encampments and entrenched protests rocked the usual campus equilibrium, as university leaders struggled to navigate students' right to protest while trying to guard against hate speech and occasional violence targeting Jews and Muslims alike.
The committee's Republican majority has focused on antisemitism alone and typically has taken a harsh tone toward the academics, pushing for missteps during their testimony.
At stake is much of the federal funding that helps power the universities, and even whether the leaders' responses to the questioning could topple them from their posts.
The presidents of Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania resigned after the first such hearings in Dec. 2023 when their answers failed to deliver the sharp condemnations of antisemitism that committee members were looking for.
Since then, the presidents of Columbia and the University of Virginia have also stepped down, as the Trump administration has withheld billions of dollars from Harvard and Columbia, demanded operational changes at the universities — including the hiring of more conservative employees — and threatened to halt hundreds of millions of dollars more to other universities.
Committee member Elise Stefanik, a New York Republican known for her aggressive questioning of campus leaders, appeared to take glee in the resignations, remarking at one point: 'Three down, so many to go.'
At the most recent hearing in May, as the committee reiterated threats to halt federal funding over the schools' allegedly tepid response to antisemitism, the presidents of Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, Haverford in Pennsylvania and DePaul in Chicago each apologized to the committee for not doing more to tamp it down.
During the same hearing, David Cole, a former legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union who testified with the presidents, likened the antisemitism hearings to those of the House Un-American Activities Committee in the 1950s aimed at routing out hidden Communists.
Like those hearings, today's 'are not an attempt to find out what happened but an attempt to chill protected speech,' Cole said.
UC Berkeley has been the site of notable incidents, including the violent shut-down in Feb. 2024 of a speech by an Israeli lawyer invited by Jewish students to speak at Zellerbach Playhouse. Protesters broke a window, called an attendee a 'dirty Jew' and grabbed another by her neck.
For years, pro-Palestinian students have periodically set up mock Israeli checkpoints — used in Israel to prevent passage of Palestinians — at Sather Gate, a main campus entry, forcing students to detour if they did not want to pass through. After the Hamas invasion, such incidents prompted law Professor Steven Solomon to pen a widely read essay titled 'Don't Hire My Antisemitic Law Students,' and political science Professor Ron Hassner to stage a sit-in against campus antisemitism.
Student Karin Yaniv is also suing her campus union, UAW Local 4811, which represents graduate student workers, accusing it of repeatedly excluding and mocking Jewish members who tried to participate in meetings. Union leaders deny the allegations.
On Monday, as a counterweight to the perception of UC Berkeley as a pit of antisemitism, 82 Jewish faculty and senior staff submitted a letter to the hearing committee praising the way campus leaders — including Lyons, who took the helm a year ago, and his predecessor, Carol Christ — have handled the shifting landscape for Jewish students since Oct. 7, 2023.
'Teaching and research were not hindered, protests were confined, and the UC Berkeley administration made significant and impactful efforts to ensure that Jewish students, staff, and faculty were safe on campus and felt accepted and integral to the university community,' said the letter that commended leaders for negotiating a peaceful end to students' protest encampment and for supporting Jewish life on campus.
'We reject the claim that UC Berkeley is an antisemitic environment,' said the letter, which acknowledged that Jews on campus do face 'real challenges.' But the letter writers affirmed: 'We feel secure on campus and support the administration's efforts to balance safety with respect for free speech.'
A fact sheet provided by the campus lists many of them, including regular meetings between senior leaders and the university's Jewish community, and public statements condemning antisemitism. Other efforts include:
Financial support for the 'Antisemitism Education Initiative,' which helps campuses across the country tackle anti-Jewish discrimination.
Mandatory antisemitism training during new student orientation and for resident assistants in campus housing.
A new 'Berkeley Bridging Fellowship' Israel and Palestine dialogue group.
Since the Zellerbach violence, the school has spent more than $10 million on additional security 'to ensure all events can safely proceed as planned.'
UC Berkeley has not seen anti-Israel protests since about a year ago, when the University of California's systemwide President Michael Drake said that all campuses would enforce a policy banning tent encampments and masks intended to hide the identity of protesters. UC Berkeley officials have said they never arrested anyone in the Zellerbach incident because, even after studying footage, they could not identify any perpetrators.
In New York, anti-Trump and pro-Palestinian protesters from City University of New York criticized their chancellor, Matos, for skipping a scheduled talk on economic mobility in that city to 'capitulate to the federal government' by testifying before Congress.
Meanwhile, it's unclear how the committee selected Lyons and the other participants, who were not subpoenaed, but simply 'invited,' said a UC Berkeley spokesperson. Neither the university nor the committee would provide a copy of the invitation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas adds transgender bathroom bill to agenda for special legislative session to deal with deadly flooding
Texas adds transgender bathroom bill to agenda for special legislative session to deal with deadly flooding

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Texas adds transgender bathroom bill to agenda for special legislative session to deal with deadly flooding

A transgender bathroom bill was added to the agenda for Texas' special legislative session to deal with the deadly flooding event on July 4. The 30-day session was called by Governor Greg Abbott in June to deal with six bills he had vetoed. But when flash flooding in Central Texas devastated communities along the Guadalupe River earlier this month, disaster preparedness became a focal point of the session. More than 130 people have died, and just under 100 remain missing, Abbott said Monday. Following the disaster, questions have been raised over whether more could have been done to prevent at least some of the deaths. Last week, Abbott released an 18-point agenda for the special session, which included four points related to the flooding or natural disasters in general. A transgender bathroom bill was added to the agenda for Texas' special legislative session to deal with the deadly flooding event on July 4 () Last week, Governor Greg Abbott released an 18-point agenda for the special session, which included four points related to the flooding or natural disasters in general () Lawmakers will discuss legislation to 'improve early warning systems' and 'strengthen emergency communications' in flood-prone areas. Legislation to 'provide relief funding for response to and recovery from' the early July storms will also be discussed. There is also a more general agenda point to 'evaluate and streamline rules and regulations to speed preparedness for and recovery from natural disasters.' Besides the agenda points related to the flood disaster, Abbott included a point to discuss 'legislation protecting women's privacy in sex-segregated spaces' among other points, such as making it a crime to provide hemp-derived products to those under 21 years old and anti-abortion legislation. Monday was the first day lawmakers could file bills for the special session, and of the 82 bills filed, none were related to the deadly floods, NBC News reported, citing its Austin affiliate, KXAN-TV. Among the measures was a Republican-led bill, known as the Texas Women's Privacy Act, which requires transgender people to use bathrooms that align with their sex assigned at birth in public schools, government buildings and correctional facilities, per NBC News. Under the bill, these public entities could face financial penalties and be sued if they violate the bathroom rules. The regular legislative session, which ended in early June, saw 88 anti-LGBTQ bill proposals, according to the American Civil Liberties Union. Only four were signed into law. There are currently 19 states that have some sort of ban on transgender people using public bathrooms consistent with their gender identity, according to the think tank Movement Advancement Project. The bathroom bill would make transgender people use bathrooms that align with their sex assigned at birth in public places such as schools ()

Trump wields tariffs to sway Putin on Ukraine. Here's how they might work, or not
Trump wields tariffs to sway Putin on Ukraine. Here's how they might work, or not

San Francisco Chronicle​

time23 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Trump wields tariffs to sway Putin on Ukraine. Here's how they might work, or not

WASHINGTON (AP) — Russian President Vladimir Putin has sacrificed an estimated 1 million of his soldiers, killed and wounded, in a three-year campaign to crush Ukraine. Now President Donald Trump is betting that his go-to economic weapon — tariffs — can succeed where Ukrainian drones and rockets haven't, and finally persuade Putin to end his war. Tariffs, which the U.S. president has called ' the most beautiful word in the dictionary,'' are taxes on imports. They are Trump's all-purpose fix — a tool he deploys to protect American industry, lure factories to the United States, tackle drug trafficking and illegal immigration, and raise money to pay for his massive tax cuts. On the campaign trail last year, Trump promised he'd negotiate an end to the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 24 hours. But months have passed without a peace deal, and the president has recently expressed frustration with the Russians. 'We're very, very unhappy with them ... I thought we would have had a deal two months ago, but it doesn't seem to get there,' Trump told reporters Monday. So in addition to agreeing to send more weapons to Ukraine, he's once again unsheathing tariffs. He said Monday the U.S. would impose 100% tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil, natural gas and other products if there isn't a peace deal in 50 days. The levies are meant to cause Russia financial pain by making its trading partners think twice before buying Russian energy. 'I use trade for a lot of things,'' Trump said, "but it's great for settling wars.' 'Unilateral tariffs are likely to be ineffective in influencing Putin's actions,' said Douglas Irwin, a Dartmouth College economist who studies American trade policy. "Financial sanctions in cooperation with European and other allies are much more likely to damage Russian economy, but whether they soften Russia's approach is also uncertain.'' The secondary tariffs idea isn't new. Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut earlier this year introduced legislation that would impose a 500% tariff on countries that buy Russian oil, petroleum products and uranium. If Trump goes through with his threat, his 100% tariffs have the potential to disrupt global commerce and push oil prices higher. They might also complicate Trump's efforts to strike separate trade deals with countries like China and India. The 100% tariffs would likely target China and India Since December 2022, when the European Union banned Russian oil, China and India have bought 85% of Russia's crude oil exports and 63% of its coal, according to the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, a Finnish nonprofit. So they would likely be the two countries most affected by Trump's 100% import taxes. Trump has already tangled with China this year, and things did not go well. In April, Trump plastered a 145% levy on Chinese imports, and Beijing counterpunched with 125% tariffs of its own. The triple-digit tariffs threatened to end trade between the world's two biggest economies and briefly sent financial markets reeling. China also withheld shipments of rare earth minerals used in products such as electric vehicles and wind turbines, crippling U.S. businesses. After showing how much pain they could inflict on each other, the United States and China agreed to a ceasefire. A new 100% secondary tariff 'would blow up that deal,' said Gary Hufbauer, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. 'China is particularly well-placed to hold out,' said Nicholas Mulder, a Cornell University historian. "All this would get us back to a position of full confrontation that would be uncomfortable for all sides.'' Hufbauer also noted that the secondary tariffs would also likely end 'any rapprochement with India'' — the world's fifth-biggest economy and one with which Trump is pursuing a trade deal. Energy prices could climb If Trump goes ahead with the tariffs, 'it would invariably lead to higher global energy prices,'' especially for natural gas, economists Kieran Tompkins and Liam Peach of Capital Economics wrote in a commentary Monday. Other oil-exporting countries have enough spare capacity to ramp up production and offset any loss of Russian oil exports in global market. But if they did, the world would have no buffer to rely on if there were an oil shock caused by, say, conflict in the Middle East — and prices could skyrocket. 'Removing that spare capacity would be akin to riding a bike with no shock absorbers,'' Tompkins and Peach wrote. The Russian economy has been resilient After Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the United States and its allies slammed Russia with sanctions. Among other things, the U.S. froze the assets of Russia's central bank and barred some Russian banks from using a key international payments system run by Belgium. With its allies from the Group of Seven rich nations, it also capped the price that importers could pay for Russian oil. The sanctions were expected to crush the Russian economy, but they didn't. Putin put Russia on a wartime budget, and high defense spending kept unemployment low. Military recruits were given big sign-up bonuses and the families of the fallen received death benefits, pumping income into some of Russia's poorer regions. To keep its oil sales going, Russia deployed "shadow fleets,'' hundreds of aging tankers of uncertain ownership and dodgy safety practices that delivered oil priced above the G7 price cap. 'The experience of the G7 oil price cap against Russia showed how challenging the enforcement of measures against the Russian oil trade can be,' Mulder said. Last year, the Russian economy grew 4.1%, according to the International Monetary Fund. But strains are showing, partly because Putin's war has made Russia a pariah to foreign investors. The IMF forecasts growth will decelerate to 1.5% this year, and last month the Russian economy minister warned the country is "on the brink of going into a recession.'' Trump's tariffs could increase the pressure, in part by driving down Russia's energy exports — and the revenue the Russian government collects from an energy tax. Tariffs are mostly untried as a diplomatic lever 'To my knowledge, tariffs have never been applied as an explicit anti-aggression measure,' said Mulder, author of a 2022 history of economic sanctions. "I am skeptical that the secondary tariffs threat will be effective.'' For one thing, he said, it's unclear whether Trump will actually impose them after 50 days. The president has repeatedly announced tariffs against other countries, and then sometimes suspended or tweaked them. For another, the secondary tariffs would target countries — namely China and India — that might have some sway in Moscow. 'The United States needs cooperation and collaboration to bring Russia to the negotiating table,' said Cullen Hendrix, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute. "Threatening to harm the actors who actually have leverage over Moscow may backfire.''

Trump admin limits bond hearings for those seeking release from immigration detention
Trump admin limits bond hearings for those seeking release from immigration detention

The Hill

time23 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump admin limits bond hearings for those seeking release from immigration detention

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is directing attorneys to no longer allow bond hearings for those in the U.S. illegally, forcing them to remain in detention while fighting their deportation. A new memo, confirmed by the agency and the Department of Homeland Security, said migrants should be detained 'for the duration of their removal proceedings,' a process that can take months or years. Immigrants typically can move to be released on bond if they are not determined to be a public safety threat. A new memo from acting ICE Director Todd Lyons would largely end that practice, likely swelling the number of people held in detention centers as the Trump administration ramps up enforcement and targets more long-term residents. An ICE spokesperson framed the memo as 'clos[ing] a loophole to our nation's security based on an inaccurate interpretation of the statute.' The Washington Post first reported the memo. The move comes as the so-called Big, Beautiful Bill sets aside $45 billion in new funding to more than double current detention capacity, allowing the U.S. to hold more than 100,000 people in immigration detention. The Department of Homeland Security referenced the funding in the bill as aiding their efforts to detain those fighting their deportation implying without evidence that all those held without bond have criminal backgrounds. 'Politicians and activists can cry wolf all they want, but it won't deter this administration from keeping these criminals and lawbreakers off American streets—and now thanks to the Big Beautiful Bill, we will have plenty of bed space to do so,' Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store