Emergency vaccines slash deaths by 60%
GENEVA : Emergency vaccination during outbreaks of diseases like cholera, Ebola and measles have over the past quarter-century reduced deaths from such illnesses by nearly 60%, according to a new study.
A similar number of infections are also believed to have been prevented, while billions of euros have been generated in estimated economic benefit.
The Gavi vaccine alliance, which backed the study, said it collaborated with researchers at Burnet Institute in Australia to provide the world's first look at the historical impact of emergency immunisation efforts on public health and global health security.
'For the first time, we are able to comprehensively quantify the benefit, in human and economic terms, of deploying vaccines against outbreaks of some of the deadliest infectious diseases,' Gavi chief Sania Nishtar said in a statement.
'This study demonstrates clearly the power of vaccines as a cost-effective countermeasure to the increasing risk the world faces from outbreaks.'
The study, published this week in the British Medical Journal Global Health, examined 210 outbreaks of five infectious diseases – cholera, Ebola, measles, meningitis and yellow fever – in 49 lower-income countries between 2000 and 2023.
Vaccine roll-outs in these settings had a dramatic impact, with the study showing they reduced both the number of infections and deaths by almost 60% across the five diseases.
For some of the diseases the effect was far more dramatic.
Vaccination was shown to decrease deaths during yellow fever outbreaks by a full 99%, and 76% for Ebola.
At the same time, emergency vaccination significantly reduced the threat of outbreaks expanding.
It also estimated that the immunisation efforts carried out during the 210 outbreaks generated nearly US$32 billion in economic benefits just from averting deaths and years of life lost to disability.
That amount was however likely to be a significant underestimate of overall savings, it said, pointing out that it did not take into account outbreak response costs or the social and macro-economic impacts of disruptions created by large outbreaks.
The massive Ebola outbreak that hit West Africa in 2014, before the existence of approved vaccines, for instance saw cases pop up worldwide and is estimated to have cost the West African countries alone more than US$53 billion.
The study comes after the World Health Organisation warned in April that outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases such as measles, meningitis, and yellow fever are on the rise globally amid misinformation and cuts to international aid.
Gavi, which helps vaccinate more than half the world's children against infectious diseases, is itself currently trying to secure a fresh round of funding in the face of the global aid cuts and after Washington last month announced it would stop backing the group.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
20 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Humans beat AI gold-level score at top maths contest
Google's Gemini chatbot solved five out of the six maths problems set at the IMO. (EPA Images pic) SYDNEY : Humans beat generative AI models made by Google and OpenAI at a top international mathematics competition, despite the programmes reaching gold-level scores for the first time. Neither model scored full marks – unlike five young people at the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO), a prestigious annual competition where participants must be under 20 years old. Google said yesterday that an advanced version of its Gemini chatbot had solved five out of the six maths problems set at the IMO, held in Australia's Queensland this month. 'We can confirm that Google DeepMind has reached the much-desired milestone, earning 35 out of a possible 42 points – a gold medal score,' the US tech giant cited IMO president Gregor Dolinar as saying. 'Their solutions were astonishing in many respects. IMO graders found them to be clear, precise and most of them easy to follow.' Around 10% of human contestants won gold-level medals, and five received perfect scores of 42 points. US ChatGPT maker OpenAI said that its experimental reasoning model had scored a gold-level 35 points on the test. The result 'achieved a longstanding grand challenge in AI' at 'the world's most prestigious math competition', OpenAI researcher Alexander Wei wrote on social media. 'We evaluated our models on the 2025 IMO problems under the same rules as human contestants,' he said. 'For each problem, three former IMO medallists independently graded the model's submitted proof.' Google achieved a silver-medal score at last year's IMO in the British city of Bath, solving four of the six problems. That took two to three days of computation – far longer than this year, when its Gemini model solved the problems within the 4.5-hour time limit, it said. The IMO said tech companies had 'privately tested closed-source AI models on this year's problems', the same ones faced by 641 competing students from 112 countries. 'It is very exciting to see progress in the mathematical capabilities of AI models,' said IMO president Dolinar. Contest organisers could not verify how much computing power had been used by the AI models or whether there had been human involvement, he cautioned.
Malay Mail
a day ago
- Malay Mail
Regulation can curb social media addiction — Siti Umairah Mohamad Idris and Mohd Istajib Mokhtar
JULY 22 — We all know the feeling — reaching for the phone without thinking, just to scroll, like, or watch something, anything. These little moments fill the gaps in our day: waiting in line, before bed, in between tasks. But somewhere along the way, checking social media stopped being a choice and started becoming a reflex. So, the question is — are we just passing time, or are we caught in something deeper? Many of us don't realise how quickly casual use can slip into dependency. What starts as boredom relief becomes a habit, and soon enough, not touching your phone for a whole day feels like a personal milestone. The line between control and compulsion has grown thinner, especially in a world where apps are carefully designed to keep us hooked. Let's face it: social media is both a blessing and a burden. On the bright side, it helps us stay informed, entertained, and connected. It gives people a voice, raises awareness, and fuels creativity. For example, researcher Pia Juliebø-Jones noted that young people often rely on platforms like Instagram and TikTok to keep up with news, especially health-related topics. But while social media opens up new possibilities, it also opens the door to manipulation, distraction, and misinformation. How many times have you opened an app just to 'check something quickly,' only to find that an hour has passed? That's not random — it's by design. Platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram use algorithms that track what you watch, then serve more of it to keep you engaged. Daniel Campbell, who studies digital ethics, calls this a cycle of 'bad habits,' driven by systems that are less about helping you and more about holding your attention. Then there's the problem of misinformation. You watch one video on a topic, and suddenly your feed is full of similar content — whether it's accurate or not. YouTube, in particular, has been called out for leading users into echo chambers, where the same opinions are repeated and reinforced, often without fact-checking. These feedback loops can be dangerous, especially when it comes to sensitive issues like politics, health, or personal identity. How many times have you opened an app just to check something quickly, only to find that an hour has passed? — Picture by Hari Anggara But that's only one side of the coin. Social media has also transformed marketing and personal branding. As pointed out by digital media expert Z. Ghafar, it's never been easier for individuals and businesses to reach massive audiences. A small business can now build a following, promote products, and engage with customers without spending a fortune. In many ways, social media has made the world feel smaller and more accessible. Yet beneath the surface, darker truths are coming to light — especially about how these platforms affect mental health. One of the most significant moments came in 2021, when Frances Haugen, a former Facebook employee, leaked documents showing the company was well aware of Instagram's harmful effects on teens. Internal research revealed that Instagram contributed to anxiety, depression, and body dissatisfaction, especially among young girls. Haugen revealed that Instagram's algorithms create 'dopamine loops' — feedback systems that reward users with just enough pleasure to keep them coming back. At first, users see content from friends. But the longer they stay, the more the algorithm stretches to find new, often more emotionally charged content to keep them engaged. This design isn't accidental — it's intentional, and it's powerful. Despite knowing the risks, Facebook (now Meta) didn't act. Instead, it kept optimising its platform for user engagement — because more engagement means more profit. The company denied wrongdoing, with CEO Mark Zuckerberg claiming their research was misunderstood. But public trust was already damaged. The leaks led to a wave of criticism, congressional hearings, and fresh calls for regulation. This situation raised serious ethical questions: Should platforms be allowed to keep such research secret? Do users, especially young ones, have the right to know how their mental health is being affected? Many ethicists say yes. Transparency, accountability, and user protection should be basic responsibilities — not optional extras. From a design perspective, social media algorithms aren't neutral. They're built to trigger emotions, prolong screen time, and create habits. That's not always a bad thing — but when these systems start affecting mental health, they cross an ethical line. The problem isn't just the content — it's how that content is delivered, curated, and pushed. So, what can be done? First, platforms need to be more transparent about how their algorithms work. If users understand why they're seeing certain content, they're better equipped to make informed choices. Second, developers should build features that protect users — like limits on doom-scrolling, more accessible screen time alerts, and content diversity tools. Some platforms have already introduced features like time tracking and wellness reminders. But as critics point out, these tools often feel more like public relations than real solutions. The responsibility can't fall on users alone — especially when the technology is working against them. Governments also have a part to play. Regulations like the European Union's Digital Services Act are trying to hold tech companies accountable by demanding better data protection, user safety, and ethical use of AI. International cooperation will be essential, since these platforms cross borders and affect billions of people. At the same time, we — users — need to step up. That means learning how to spot addictive behaviours, fact-checking information, and setting healthy boundaries. Digital literacy should be taught in schools, workplaces, and homes. Knowing how to scroll smart is as important today as knowing how to read. In the end, social media isn't going away — and it shouldn't. It has immense potential to do good. But to unlock that good, we must rethink how it's built, used, and regulated. If we don't, we risk raising a generation that's not just bored — but quietly addicted. So the next time you find yourself swiping out of habit, ask yourself: who's really in control — you, or your feed? * The authors are from the Department of Science and Technology Studies, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya, and may be reached at [email protected] ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
How effective are emergency vaccines during outbreaks?
Doctors Without Borders (also known by its French acronym MSF) staff disinfecting body bags containing deceased Ebola patients with chlorine before they are incinerated in a crematorium during the 2014 outbreak in West Africa. This was before the Ebola vaccine was available. — MSF filepic Emergency vaccination during outbreaks of diseases like cholera, Ebola and measles have over the past quarter-century reduced deaths from such illnesses by nearly 60%, according to a new study. A similar number of infections are also believed to have been prevented, while billions of euros have been generated in estimated economic benefit. The Gavi vaccine alliance, which backed the study, said it collaborated with researchers at Burnet Institute in Australia to provide the world's first look at the historical impact of emergency immunisation efforts on public health and global health security. 'For the first time, we are able to comprehensively quantify the benefit, in human and economic terms, of deploying vaccines against outbreaks of some of the deadliest infectious diseases,' Gavi chief Sania Nishtar said in a statement. 'This study demonstrates clearly the power of vaccines as a cost-effective countermeasure to the increasing risk the world faces from outbreaks.' The study, published on July 12 (2025) in the British Medical Journal ( BMJ ) Global Health , examined 210 outbreaks of five infectious diseases – cholera, Ebola, measles, meningitis and yellow fever – in 49 lower-income countries between 2000 and 2023. Vaccine roll-outs in these settings had a dramatic impact, with the study showing they reduced both the number of infections and deaths by almost 60% across the five diseases. For some of the diseases, the effect was far more dramatic. Vaccination was shown to decrease deaths during yellow fever outbreaks by a full 99%, and 76% for Ebola. At the same time, emergency vaccination significantly reduced the threat of outbreaks expanding. It also estimated that the immunisation efforts carried out during the 210 outbreaks generated nearly US$32bil (RM136bil) in economic benefits just from averting deaths and years of life lost to disability. That amount was however likely to be a significant underestimate of overall savings, it said, pointing out that it did not take into account outbreak response costs or the social and macro-economic impacts of disruptions created by large outbreaks. The massive Ebola outbreak that hit West Africa in 2014 before the existence of approved vaccines, for instance, saw cases pop up worldwide and is estimated to have cost the West African countries alone more than US$53bil (RM225bil). The study comes after the World Health Organization (WHO) warned in April (2025) that outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases such as measles, meningitis and yellow fever are on the rise globally amid misinformation and cuts to international aid. Gavi, which helps vaccinate more than half the world's children against infectious diseases, is itself currently trying to secure a fresh round of funding in the face of the global aid cuts and after the US government announced last month that it would stop backing the group. – AFP
