How face of a woman who lived 10,500 years ago, now reconstructed, challenges ‘genetic uniformity' among European hunter-gatherers
The team, led by scientists from Ghent University, used advanced genetic and archaeological methods to bring the prehistoric figure to life—revealing a woman with blue eyes, slightly lighter skin, and distinct facial features. Archaeologist Philippe Crombé told CNN 'good quaity' DNA was taken from the woman's skull.
The woman's facial reconstruction, including skin tone, hair, and eye colour, was derived from ancient DNA analysis, while other elements like her jewelry and tattoos were informed by broader archaeological evidence.
The findings challenge previous assumptions that European hunter gatherers shared the same genetic makeup, according to Project Lead Isabelle De Groote. It also shows that there was already considerable variation in skin color among different populations.
'She had lighter skin than many other Mesolithic people studied so far,' Groote said. 'From the skull, we could also tell she was between 35 and 60 years old…. She had a high nasal bridge and strong brow ridges,' she added, highlighting that the features were similar to the Cheddar Man in the UK.
Crombé noted that while most Mesolithic DNA samples belong to a similar genetic group, 'it is to be expected that in the wide area of Western Europe there's some variability, as there is today.'
The woman's remains were discovered in the Margaux cave in Dinant during an excavation in the late 1980s, alongside the bodies of eight other women.
Many of the bodies were sprinkled with ochre—an indicator of symbolic or ritual behavior—and covered with stone fragments. One skeleton bore post-mortem cut marks.
De Groote noted that the 'cave was used over several hundred of years so that they were places of memory that people would go back to despite their mobile hunter-gatherer lifestyle.'
'They were still moving around because they were entirely dependent on natural resources,' Crombé explained. 'That forced them to move their settlements regularly.'
The team is now working to analyse relationships among the buried individuals and studying dietary habits, including how much fish they consumed.
(With inputs from CNN)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
17 hours ago
- Mint
Britain has a rare opportunity to lure American talent
Americans like Britain. Ask restless American graduates where they would most like to move, and it often tops the list. So it is no surprise that, as the Trump administration has attacked America's top universities and slashed funding for research, American interest in British-based science and tech jobs spiked. Britain has a rare opportunity to snap up disillusioned American boffins, as well as global talent that might once have chosen America. Will it seize it? It faces competition. In April Canadian and European institutions pledged tens of millions of dollars to fund international talent. In May Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, urged researchers to 'choose Europe for science', with a package worth €500m ($580m) over three years. Britain was late to the party. On June 22nd it unveiled the Global Talent Fund, a £54m ($72m) scheme to support 11 'world-class' researchers to relocate to Britain with their teams, with funding for five years. Groups such as the Royal Society have set up their own schemes too, taking the UK's total commitments to around £115m. The point of such programmes is to lure the sort of researchers who might one day win Nobel prizes. But plenty of less-established talent is also up for grabs. Many American universities are cutting places on graduate programmes and have frozen hiring for postdocs. Academics in America also report that young researchers from overseas are turning down job offers there. Britain has some advantages to attract such people. Language is one. In data from Indeed, a jobs site, Anglophone countries have seen the biggest jumps in American interest in science and tech roles (see chart). In June more than a quarter of American clicks on international science positions went to Britain (Canada got more than a third). English-speaking countries also appeal to the same globally mobile cohort who like America. According to Studyportals, a directory of university courses, students who search for America-based bachelor's and master's degrees are most likely to browse for British ones too. Brand is another advantage. Britain has more stellar institutions than any other European country or Canada. It produces just 3.4% of the world's academic papers, according to one measure, but 6.1% of those in the top 1% of citations (the only country which does better by this criterion is Singapore). Britain's handicaps are cost and red tape. Moving there means a lengthy visa process, high visa fees and a hefty NHS surcharge—all to be paid upfront. For a family of four relocating for five years, the sum can exceed £20,000. Some British research funders will pay for the applicants' moving expenses, but few cover partners and dependents. And after all that a professor at Oxford may be paid half as much as one at Harvard. Alongside the Global Talent Fund, Britain has announced a task force to target and support incoming researchers. There is talk of fast tracks for some. But the world's best scientists won't come if they have to pay for the privilege.
Hindustan Times
20 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Britain has a rare opportunity to lure American talent
AMERICANS LIKE Britain. Ask restless American graduates where they would most like to move, and it often tops the list. So it is no surprise that, as the Trump administration has attacked America's top universities and slashed funding for research , American interest in British-based science and tech jobs spiked. Britain has a rare opportunity to snap up disillusioned American boffins, as well as global talent that might once have chosen America. Will it seize it? It faces competition. In April Canadian and European institutions pledged tens of millions of dollars to fund international talent. In May Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, urged researchers to 'choose Europe for science', with a package worth €500m ($580m) over three years. Britain was late to the party. On June 22nd it unveiled the Global Talent Fund, a £54m ($72m) scheme to support 11 'world-class' researchers to relocate to Britain with their teams, with funding for five years. Groups such as the Royal Society have set up their own schemes too, taking the UK's total commitments to around £115m. The point of such programmes is to lure the sort of researchers who might one day win Nobel prizes. But plenty of less-established talent is also up for grabs. Many American universities are cutting places on graduate programmes and have frozen hiring for postdocs. Academics in America also report that young researchers from overseas are turning down job offers there. Chart Britain has some advantages to attract such people. Language is one. In data from Indeed, a jobs site, Anglophone countries have seen the biggest jumps in American interest in science and tech roles (see chart). In June more than a quarter of American clicks on international science positions went to Britain (Canada got more than a third). English-speaking countries also appeal to the same globally mobile cohort who like America. According to Studyportals, a directory of university courses, students who search for US-based bachelor's and master's degrees are most likely to browse for British ones too. Brand is another advantage. Britain has more stellar institutions than any other European country or Canada. It produces just 3.4% of the world's academic papers, according to one measure, but 6.1% of those in the top 1% of citations (the only country which does better by this metric is Singapore). Britain's handicaps are cost and red tape. Moving there means a lengthy visa process, high visa fees and a hefty NHS surcharge—all to be paid upfront. For a family of four relocating for five years, the sum can exceed £20,000. Some British research funders will pay for the applicants' moving expenses, but few cover partners and dependents. And after all that a professor at Oxford may be paid half as much as one at Harvard. Alongside the Global Talent Fund, Britain has announced a task force to target and support incoming researchers. There is talk of fast tracks for some. But the world's best scientists won't come if they have to pay for the privilege.
News18
2 days ago
- News18
Indian Astronaut Steps Out Of Dragon Capsule After Splashdown
Indian Astronaut Steps Out Of Dragon Capsule After Splashdown Last Updated: July 15, 2025, 18:35 IST Breaking News Videos Indian Astronaut Steps Out Of Dragon Capsule After Splashdown homevideos Indian Astronaut Steps Out Of Dragon Capsule After Splashdown CNN name, logo and all associated elements ® and © 2024 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All rights reserved. CNN and the CNN logo are registered marks of Cable News Network, LP LLLP, displayed with permission. Use of the CNN name and/or logo on or as part of does not derogate from the intellectual property rights of Cable News Network in respect of them. © Copyright Network18 Media and Investments Ltd 2024. All rights reserved.
