logo
Judge recommends that case against Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan proceed

Judge recommends that case against Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan proceed

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A federal magistrate judge recommended Monday that the case proceed against a Wisconsin judge who was indicted on allegations that she helped a man who is in the country illegally evade U.S. immigration agents seeking to arrest him in her courthouse.
Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan was arrested in April and indicted on federal charges in May. She pleaded not guilty.
The case highlighted a clash between President Donald Trump's administration and local authorities over the Republican's sweeping immigration crackdown.
Democrats have accused the Trump administration of trying to make a national example of Dugan to chill judicial opposition.
Dugan filed a motion in May to dismiss the charges against her, saying she was acting in her official capacity as a judge and therefore is immune to prosecution. She argued that the federal government violated Wisconsin's sovereignty by disrupting a state courtroom and prosecuting a state judge.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph on Monday recommended against dropping the charges. The ultimate decision is up to U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman, who can accept the other judge's recommendation or reject it.
'We are disappointed in the magistrate judge's non-binding recommendation, and we will appeal it," Dugan attorney Steven Biskupic, a former federal prosecutor, said in a statement. "This is only one step in what we expect will be a long journey to preserve the independence and integrity of our courts.'
Joseph wrote in her recommendation that while judges have immunity from civil lawsuits seeking monetary damages when engaging in judicial acts, that does not apply to criminal charges like those in this case. Joseph also rejected Dugan's other arguments in favor of dismissal.
'It is important to note that nothing said here speaks to the merits of the allegations against Dugan,' the judge said in the recommendation. 'Dugan is presumed innocent, and innocent she remains, unless and until the government proves the allegations against her beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury at trial.'
No trial date has been set.
Dugan is charged with concealing an individual to prevent arrest, a misdemeanor, and obstruction, which is a felony. Prosecutors say she escorted Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, 31, and his lawyer out of her courtroom through a back door on April 18 after learning that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents were in the courthouse seeking to arrest him for being in the country without permanent legal status.
Dugan could face up to six years in prison and a $350,000 fine if convicted on both counts.
Her case is similar to one brought during the first Trump administration against a Massachusetts judge, who was accused of helping a man sneak out a courthouse back door to evade a waiting immigration enforcement agent. That case was eventually dismissed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Amid bipartisan concern, NOAA nominee pledges to make Weather Service staffing a ‘top priority'
Amid bipartisan concern, NOAA nominee pledges to make Weather Service staffing a ‘top priority'

The Hill

time8 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Amid bipartisan concern, NOAA nominee pledges to make Weather Service staffing a ‘top priority'

As lawmakers from both parties raised concerns about staffing at the National Weather Service (NWS), President Trump's pick to lead the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) promised Wednesday to make the matter a 'top priority.' Neil Jacobs, who led the agency in an acting capacity during the last Trump administration, said, 'If confirmed, I will ensure that staffing the Weather Service offices is a top priority. It's really important for the people to be there because they have relationships with the people in the local community.' The matter was particularly top-of-mind in the wake of last week's deadly floods in Texas that killed more than 100 people. Questions were particularly raised in light of across-the-board layoffs and buyouts conducted by the Trump administration in order to reduce the size of the government. After those layoffs, the administration has sought to shuffle staffers or hire more people as some Weather Service offices were deemed 'critically understaffed.' One employee who took a Trump administration buyout was the warning coordination meteorologist in the Austin/San Antonio office of the NWS, a job that includes making sure the public is aware of the forecasts. Jacobs heard concerns about Weather Service staffing from several lawmakers during his confirmation hearing. Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) said that an office in his state was 'short' meteorologists because there had been a hiring freeze. Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) lamented that at the Weather Service 'a decision was made to close overnight service in Cheyenne and route evening coverage' through a town hundreds of miles away called Riverton. Several Democrats raised similar worries about staffing levels. 'NOAA has lost at least 1,875 employees, totaling a combined 27,000 years of experience and institutional knowledge, and now has over 3,000 vacant staff positions,' said Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.). During the hearing, Jacobs also promised to try to improve community warning systems. 'I think there's an opportunity to modernize NOAA Weather Radio, and then potentially also look at some satellite capabilities,' he said. 'An all-the-above approach and modernizing the way to distribute these watches and warnings is something that is going to be a top priority of mine.' Meanwhile, several Democrats also raised issues with proposed research cuts at the agency — arguing that those cuts could make the agency less able to understand the weather. 'I support the president's budget,' Jacobs said when asked by Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) about proposed cuts to weather and climate research in the administration's proposed budget. Markey said he believed the administration's proposed cuts would hamper the agency, saying 'a 27 percent cut is going to have an impact, because there's a definite ripple effect that occurs when that kind of funding is slashed.' Asked about climate change, Jacobs cited both human activity and 'natural signals.' 'Obviously there's a lot of natural signals that are mixed in there too and so in the absence of any natural signals that might dominate that, yes there's human influence,' he said. When Sen. Andy Kim (D-N.J.) followed up and asked if human influence was 'part of the concern' about climate change, Jacobs responded, 'Yes, there's influence.' Human activities that emit greenhouse gases are the main driver of climate change. Jacobs had been a central figure in the 2019 Sharpiegate controversy, in which Trump edited a map with a Sharpie to bolster his claims that Hurricane Dorian could hit Alabama. At the time, NOAA released a statement backing the president and rebuking a NWS tweet that contradicted him. Asked about the incident on Wednesday, Jacobs said, 'There's probably some things I would do differently.' Asked by Sen. Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) whether he would 'sign off on an inaccurate statement due to political pressure in the same event,' Jacobs said no.

Voters now say its Trump's economy as they pin current economic conditions on him over Biden
Voters now say its Trump's economy as they pin current economic conditions on him over Biden

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Voters now say its Trump's economy as they pin current economic conditions on him over Biden

Voters now overwhelmingly say President Donald Trump is responsible for the current state of the economy, according to late June survey data. Overall, 55 percent of respondents to a Wall Street Journal / YouGov survey said the president is responsible for the economy. That's more than double those who pinned current conditions on former President Joe Biden. That analysis held true among Trump voters, too, many of whom said the Biden economy, including its record inflation during the pandemic, was a key reason for turning out. Among the MAGA faithful, 46 percent of respondents to the survey, conducted June 17 - 20, said it was Trump's economy. As for the underlying indicators about the Trump economy, recent data paints a mixed picture. The economy added about 147,000 jobs in June, beating forecasts and surpassing May's 144,000-person increase. Unemployment also declined a tenth of a percent. Consumer sentiment, meanwhile, rose compared with May readings, according to the University of Michigan consumer survey, despite a period of domestic unrest that included mass protests against immigration raids in Los Angeles and the fatal shooting of a Minnesota lawmaker. But private sector hiring fell by half, and the overall labor market shrunk by 130,000 people. Considerable uncertainty remains about the long-term fate of the Trump economy with the administration's 90-day freeze on tariffs with international trading partners set to end on July 9. The tariffs could cost midsize American firms at least $82 billion in value from projected price hikes, layoffs, hiring freezes, and reduced margins, according to a JPMorganChase Institute study. Moreover, as the president himself has acknowledged, the scope of the administration's deportation campaign could pose a major threat to industries heavily reliant on migrant labor such as agriculture and hospitality. In immigrant communities across the country, residents have described decreased consumer traffic and employees skipping work. The White House's signature 'Big, Beautiful Bill' spending package could also impact the country's economy in longer-term ways. The bill, which passed the House of Representatives on Thursday and is heading to the president's desk, extends 2017 tax reductions and makes major cuts to Medicaid and nutrition assistance programs for low-income people. The legislation will add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the next decade, and 11.8 million more people will go without health coverage, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Trump plans to delay tariff start to August 1 as he announces 25% levy for Japan and South Korea
Trump plans to delay tariff start to August 1 as he announces 25% levy for Japan and South Korea

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump plans to delay tariff start to August 1 as he announces 25% levy for Japan and South Korea

President Donald Trump has once again delayed the sweeping import tax hikes he has threatened to impose on imports from nearly every single country by extending a Wednesday deadline to August 1 while he continues to push for foreign nations to enter into trade negotiations with him and his administration. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Monday told reporters that Trump would sign an executive order delaying the new taxes by three and a half weeks along with letters to a dozen foreign leaders threatening specific import tax rates unless countries take as-yet unspecified actions to reduce trade deficits. 'The President will also sign an executive order today delaying the July 9 deadline to August 1 so the reciprocal tariff rate, or these new rates that will be provided in this correspondence to these foreign leaders will be going out the door within the next month, or deals will be made, and those countries continue to negotiate with the United States,' she said. 'We've seen a lot of positive developments in the right direction, but the administration, the President and his trade team, want to cut the best deals for the American people and the American worker, that's what they're focused on.' The announcement that Trump would once again delay implementing new import taxes on almost every American trading partner came just one hour after he told the Japanese and South Korean heads of government that he will force Americans to pay a 25 percent import tax on all goods imported from their countries starting August 1. In a pair of letters addressed to Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru and South Korean President Lee Jae-myung, Trump falsely claimed that the United States would 'charge each country a tariff of only 25 percent' on 'any and all ... products sent into the United States, separate from all Sectoral Tariffs.' Trump also released similar letters to heads of state or government in Burma, Cambodia, Kazakstan, Laos, Malaysia, Thailand, Tunisia and South Africa, in which he threatened to tax imports from those countries at rates ranging from 25 percent to 'only 40 percent,' citing trade deficits with each nation. The president described his threatening letter as an invitation for each country, already an important ally and trading partner for America, to 'participate in the extraordinary Economy of the United States, the Number One Market in the World, by far.' 'We have had years to discuss our Trading Relationship ... and have concluded that we must move away from these longterm, and very persistent, Trade Deficits engendered by ... Tariff, and Non Tariff, Policies and Trade Barriers. Our relationship has been, unfortunately, far from Reciprocal,' Trump said. Trump frequently claims tariffs are paid by foreign governments, even though they are import taxes charged by the federal government and paid by importers who often pass them along to consumers in higher prices. The president added that any retaliatory tariffs imposed by either government would result in equal amounts added to the import taxes paid by Americans. The president claimed that the 25 percent being charged on Japanese and South Korean imports is 'far less than what is needed to eliminate the Trade Deficit disparity we have with your Country' and suggested that both governments — or companies in both countries — could avoid having their products taxed by deciding to 'build or manufacture product within the United States.' He added that his administration would do 'everything possible to get approvals quickly, professionally, and routinely — In other words, in a matter of weeks' to allow companies to build facilities for manufacturing within the U.S. even though that process and the investment required to do so often takes years. 'Please understand that these Tariffs are necessary to correct the many years of ... Tariff, and Non Tariff, Policies and Trade Barriers, causing these unsustainable Trade Deficits against the United States. This Deficit is a major threat to our Economy and, indeed, our National Security!' he said. Trump also claimed that he might revisit the 25 percent tax if either country would 'open your heretofore closed Trading Markets to the United States, and eliminate your Tariff, and Non Tariff, Policies and Trade Barriers.' 'These Tariffs may be modified, upward or downward, depending on our relationship with your Country. You will never be disappointed with The United States of America,' he added. Trump's announcement comes just days before what had been a July 9 deadlines for countries to enter into agreements with his administration that would avoid the outsized 'liberation day' import taxes he announced in April before backing down and extending the initial deadline for imposing them after markets reacted poorly to his attempt to upend the global trading system. The 25 percent taxes are similar to what Trump had planned to impose as part of that initial package of taxes and are far higher than what Japanese and South Korean negotiators have pressed for in talks with the administration. American stock markets lost ground in trading on Monday after the president's announcement, with the S&P 500 index falling 0.9 percent in the first day of trading in the U.S. after a holiday-shortened week, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 526 points, or 1.2 percent, as of midday. The Nasdaq composite was 1 percent lower as well.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store