Lynched at 18, College Student's Legacy Lives On as Nephew Accepts His Degree 95 Years Later: 'Martyr of Justice'
Almost 100 years later, his nephew, Imam Plemon El-Amin, gratefully accepted his honorary posthumous bachelor's degree
'People are conscious of his life, which means he's still alive," El-Amin said
Nearly a century after an 18-year-old Black college student was lynched at a Georgia playground, his nephew has accepted his honorary posthumous bachelor's degree.
Dennis Hubert, a sophomore divinity school student, received the posthumous degree from Morehouse College, a historically Black college in Atlanta, on Sunday, May 18, CNN and FOX affiliate WAGA reported. His nephew, Imam Plemon El-Amin, whom he never got the chance to meet, gladly accepted Hubert's Bachelor of Arts degree in religion.
During the graduation ceremony, David Thomas, the university's president, described Hubert as a 'son of Morehouse, a martyr of justice, and what history now sees as the Trayvon Martin of the 1930s in Atlanta,' according to CNN. The college and El-Amin did not immediately respond to PEOPLE's requests for comment.
For El-Amin, now 75, the moment was important to his family and resonated with a common sentiment in Islam: a person who dies leaves nothing behind except for their good deeds, knowledge and loved ones who pray for them.
'Many prayers were said in his name,' El-Amin told the outlet about the ceremony. 'Many people remembered him and were informed about his life and his legacy, and so the knowledge was there, as well as the charity of him sacrificing his life so that we would be more conscious of the value of young life and the value of human life, but also the value of justice.'
On June 15, 1930, Hubert had spent the day at his mother's and grandmother's houses before going to the playground of Crogman School, a segregated school for Black children. He was in the area for less than 15 minutes before seven white men came up to the college student and accused him of insulting a white woman, according to the Equal Justice Initiative (EJI). They began attacking him, despite Hubert saying he knew nothing about their allegations.
'What do you want of me? I have done nothing,' a witness recalled the young man saying.
'Without investigation, police involvement, or trial, one of the white men held a gun to the back of Dennis Hubert's head and shot him at point blank range in front of at least two dozen witnesses,' wrote the nonprofit organization, which was founded by lawyer Bryan Stevenson to end mass incarceration and fight against racial injustice.
The fatal attack was part of a wave of racially motivated killings during that era in the United States, especially in the south. There were more than 4,000 lynchings in the south between 1877 and 1950, the EJI reported.
After Hubert's death, which reverberated through the county because his family was so well known, the seven men were arrested — an unusual occurrence at the time. Two days after the men were denied bail, the home of Hubert's father, a beloved pastor, was intentionally burned to the ground, and a Baptist church that was attempting to raise money for the rebuilding and support the men's prosecution was tear-gassed.
'A few days later Dennis's cousin, Rev. Charles R. Hubert, narrowly escaped an attempted murder,' the EJI wrote, adding that the chapel for Morehouse sister college, Spelman College, 'was attacked by night riders who threw stones and shattered the Chapel's lamps.'
Despite the witnesses who saw Dennis's murder, the seven men involved were acquitted and were convicted of lesser offenses.
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
'One defendant received 12-15 years imprisonment for voluntary manslaughter, while the defendant who confessed to firing the fatal shot received a sentence of just two years,' according to the nonprofit.
Almost a century after the Hubert family was terrorized — and lost a promising son — they are grateful he is finally recognized.
'Ninety-five years later, people are conscious of his life, which means he's still alive,' El-Amin said, according to CNN, 'though not here with us physically or in body, but his life, his will, and he is providing inspiration for those of us left behind.'
Read the original article on People
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
9 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Can Trump defeat ‘woke AI?'
'Woke' is right-wing shorthand for a variety of liberal projects aimed at achieving racial and gender fairness, often using means that conservative voters reject, such as racial preferences in hiring and college admissions. The Trump administration believes that these values have been embedded in the large language models (LLMs) that power many popular AI products, such as ChatGPT, leading them to produce information outputs that are slanted with liberal biases. Advertisement There's considerable evidence that this is true. Multiple studies by scholars at US and foreign universities have found that when asked political questions, the leading AI systems often favor more liberal perspectives on issues like abortion, climate change, or immigration. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up In addition, there are high-profile examples of AIs generating false information in an apparent effort to reflect racial and ethnic diversity. Last year, a Google AI image generator depicted Black people when asked for images of Vikings and showed Black men and Asian women as World War II German soldiers. Of course, there's also evidence that AI is sometimes biased against minorities, women, and gay people. But this isn't a high priority for the Trump administration. Advertisement Instead, it's mainly worried about AIs that are trained to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion, or DEI. Hence, its new executive order seeks to purge DEI from all artificial intelligence systems used by the federal government. 'President Trump is protecting Americans from biased AI outputs driven by ideologies like diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) at the cost of accuracy,' said a statement issued by the administration. But Samir Jain, vice president of policy at the Center for Democracy and Technology, a tech-oriented political advocacy group, said the effort gets off to a bad start by mandating a ban on AI systems trained in DEI principles. 'The order itself is inherently contradictory,' said Jain, because eliminating DEI content from the training data will simply create a different form of bias. For example, he said, suppose the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which enforces civil rights laws, relies on an AI chatbot for researching racial or gender discrimination cases. If the chatbot is purged of DEI-related content, it might miss relevant court cases or academic research. 'Then that tool is no longer as useful,' Jain said. Massachusetts Democratic Senator Ed Markey went further, arguing that the Trump AI plan is unconstitutional. In a letter, Markey urged the heads of leading AI companies to resist the proposal. 'Republicans are using state power to pressure private companies to adopt certain political viewpoints, in this case by pressuring the Big Tech companies to ensure that responses from AI chatbots meet some unspecified, vague definition of ideological neutrality,' Markey said. Andrew Hall, professor of political economy at Advertisement For instance, the order states that government workers using AI should be able to request ideologically-slanted information if they see fit. Thus, an AI would be barred from automatically flagging evidence of racism in government contracting. But a federal worker would still be free to ask the AI to seek out such evidence. Still, purging all political bias from AI chatbots is probably impossible. 'Any model inherently reflects the priority viewpoints of the model builders,' said Jain. 'There's a real question whether there's anything you could call objective AI.' Hall agrees that political biases can never be completely purged from AI chatbots. But he notes that not all biases are bad. A chatbot ought to be biased against Nazi ideology, or lynchings, for example. The big challenge comes when dealing with less extreme controversies, where people of good will harbor major disagreements. How can an AI be trained to present a balanced point of view? Hall offers a possible solution. In a recent research paper, he concludes that people are good at spotting left-wing bias in AI-generated information, regardless of their own political views. 'Americans view the bulk of LLM output on hot-button political issues to be left-slanted,' said Hall. 'Even Democrats say this, on net.' His research also found that when people perceive an AI's output as unbiased, they are more inclined to trust it. Hall says that this discovery opens the door to 'a thoughtful approach that puts the American public in charge.' The leading AI bots could have their output regularly reviewed by panels of ordinary people, who'd grade the content for biases. Bot makers could tweak their output accordingly. Advertisement Whatever method might be used by AI vendors to comply with the executive order could be equally applied to commercial and consumer versions of their products. That could mean that in a few years all of us will be using AI systems that don't lean quite so far to the left. Hiawatha Bray can be reached at
CNN
36 minutes ago
- CNN
Brutal punishments are being meted out to Russian soldiers no longer willing to fight for Putin
Russian soldiers call the practice a sacrifice to Baba Yaga, a fearsome witch from Slavic folklore who feasts on her victims. A Russian serviceman is seen on video being tied up to a tree and abandoned to his fate – possibly death – at the hands of one of Ukraine's large attack drones. Why this is happening is clear from a radio intercept about a similar incident, shared with CNN, in which a Russian commander can clearly be heard ordering a subordinate be tied up in this way as punishment for desertion. The instruction is given twice: 'Hide him somewhere (while the fighting is ongoing) then take him out and tie him to a tree … in the next half hour.' A Ukrainian drone battalion commander, says he has observed it happen twice and heard it happening on radio intercepts many more times. 'Any large Ukrainian drone they call Baba Yaga. It spreads terrible panic in these damaged people. For them, it's some kind of scary myth that flies in and kills everyone,' the commander, who goes by the callsign Munin, told CNN. The practice is one of a sickening array of battlefield mistreatments recorded on video either by Ukrainian surveillance drones or Russian servicemen and then circulated on social media. As Moscow's forces make slow but seemingly inexorable progress inside Ukraine, the videos paint a grim picture of the realities of life inside Putin's army – a service which tens of thousands of Russian men are estimated to have fled since the start of the full-scale invasion in early 2022. In the video, apparently filmed last winter, the man is shown in close-up, tied to a tree. The man says he is from Kamensk-Uralsky, a city in Russia's center, on the eastern side of the Ural Mountains. He explains that he fled his post after being spooked by a Ukrainian drone flying overhead. A fellow soldier who caught up with him then made him an offer, he says. 'Let me make you '300' so you'll be withdrawn,' the soldier had said, using a term signifying a wounded fighter in the Russian army. Then came the quid pro quo. 'You shoot me, and I will shoot you.' The man tells the camera he refused but says the other soldier shot him anyway, rendering him an easy capture by men from his unit. With a thick cable now tethering him to the tree, he looks nervously to the skies as a voice behind the camera tells him there is a drone on the way. '(If the drone) comes here, she's going to drop everything on you,' the voice taunts. At this point, the clip ends, the soldier's fate unclear. In common with many armies, Russia does not talk publicly about desertion in the ranks. But social media channels – usually Telegram – provide a glimpse into the deep anxieties and desperation felt by many soldiers and their families and give a sense of why some Russian servicemen chose to quit. 'Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich,' begins one video posted to Telegram by a man identified as Yuri Duryagin, in what amounts to a personal appeal to Russia's President Putin for help. Duryagin says he was fighting in Ukraine's Donetsk region, where poor equipment and a lack of ammunition meant only 32 men from his company survived one particular assault. Typically, a company might have up to 150 personnel. He tells Putin he has received less than a fifth of his salary but adds his superiors tell him he would be wasting his time complaining. When deaths occurred on the battlefield, they were often covered up to avoid paying compensation to families of the bereaved. 'I personally saw comrades die before my eyes. They were killed. Parents tried to find out information about their relatives and loved ones, but they were told that the person was missing,' he says. Perhaps most damning of all, he appears to accuse one commander of shooting those who refuse to take part, saying he 'put people up against the wall because they simply refused to go up against a machine gun.' 'Violence is what is keeping the Russian army going and what is glueing it together,' said Grigory Sverdlin, founder of Get Lost, an organization helping Russian men to desert, or to avoid conscription in the first place. He spoke to CNN from Barcelona, Spain, where the organization is now based. Get Lost has helped 1,700 people to desert since it was launched six months into the full-scale invasion, Sverdlin claims. The total number of desertions from the Russian army is hard to determine but he estimates it to be in the tens of thousands. The Institute for the Study of War (ISW), a US-based analysis group, cites what it says is leaked data from Russia's Defense Ministry that suggests it could be as high as 50,000. Many desert before they are deployed, complaining of poor training lasting just one to three weeks, Sverdlin said, while those who quit during deployment often describe a culture marked by nihilism. 'Their lives are not worth anything to their commanders. For Russian officers, losing a tank, losing a vehicle, is much worse than losing, say, 10 or 20 people,' Sverdlin said. 'We often hear from our clients that officers tell them they will all be dead in a week. The officer will get another unit, so it's not a problem for them.' For Russian soldiers convicted of desertion, the sentence can be up to 15 years in prison. But the videos circulated on social media indicate ad hoc punishments are also widely carried out on the ground, with the same aim of deterring others from running away. In one, a man behind a camera approaches a large metal storage tank with a ladder on the side. 'Time to feed the animals! The ones who tried to f**k off! Let's find out what they are doing,' the man's voice says, sliding open the container lid to reveal three men stripped to their underwear hunkered down inside. 'You hungry?' the voice taunts. 'Do you want a cookie?' One of the men nods and a biscuit is crumbled into his outspread hands, which he quickly eats. Another video shows a man cowering on the ground as he is kicked repeatedly in the face. He has an orange belt tied to one of his ankles. The other end is attached to a jeep, which drives off at speed, circling a field, dragging the man bouncing behind it in a punishment known colloquially as 'the carousel.' And in another, a man is tied to a tree with a rusty bucket over his head. After the bucket is removed, he is kicked repeatedly in the face before apparently being urinated on. CNN reached out to Russia's Ministry of Defense for comment on the punishment of deserters shown in the videos but did not receive a reply. Estimates by Western governments and academic institutions put the number of Russians killed or wounded since February 2022 at about one million. NATO's secretary general said recently that 100,000 Russian soldiers had died in 2025 alone. Ukraine has its own problems with morale and desertion but one sentiment is likely far less prevalent among its ranks: lack of belief in the cause. Sverdlin said this is what he hears voiced most often from the Russian soldiers he helps to desert. 'Some of them just tell us 'I don't want to die here,' but I would say the most common words are 'it's not my war, it's not our war … I don't understand what the hell we are doing here.''
CNN
37 minutes ago
- CNN
Russians can now fly to North Korea. South Koreans still can't.
While Moscow and Pyongyang launch their first direct flights in decades, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's sister slams the door on any talks with South Korea. CNN's Will Ripley breaks down why.
