logo
Amid acute teacher shortage in Jharkhand, many eligible aspirants say left out of recruitment process despite court directions

Amid acute teacher shortage in Jharkhand, many eligible aspirants say left out of recruitment process despite court directions

Indian Express3 days ago
Even after the Jharkhand High Court's directive and a clear timeline to begin the recruitment of 6,000 upper primary school teachers, the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission (JSSC) has invited only around 2,700 candidates for document verification.
The process was meant to address the acute shortage of teachers across the state, but has triggered fresh conflict.
Over 500 candidates, many of whom claim to have met the eligibility criteria, have been disqualified without a clear explanation. All of them belong to the Science category, whose document verification began in the first week of June, as per the High Court's instructions.
One of the affected candidates, Yogendra Vishwakarma, from a Backward Class I community, told The Indian Express that he scored 58 percent, well above the required 34 percent for his category, but was still not invited for document verification.
The same goes for Chandan Kumar, who secured 57 percent against the 40 percent required for the general category. Meanwhile, Yamuna Kumar Das, from a Scheduled Caste community, said he obtained 58.4 percent, compared to the 32 percent cutoff for SCs and STs candidates.
'We waited for years for this recruitment. Now, despite qualifying, we're being pushed out without reason. We will fight this legally,' said Vishwakarma.
As per the High Court order, a total of 15,001 upper primary teachers are to be appointed, 5,000 each for Science, Arts and Language. The current issue pertains only to the Science category, where the verification process was initiated first.
When contacted, JSSC member Pratap Singh acknowledged that fewer candidates were invited for verification in the science stream. 'The number of qualifying candidates in science was lower than the total number of posts available. Around 2,700 candidates were called, and the process has been completed for Science. However, we are open to reviewing cases,' he said.
He added that the final merit list will clarify many concerns and if any genuinely qualified candidate has been left out, they will consider calling them for document verification in a second list.
Singh also clarified that while the commission is trying to adhere to the Court's timeline, it may overshoot the deadline by up to two months due to the scale and complexity of the recruitment process. 'Currently, verification is underway for the social science category. Language and Arts subjects will be taken up afterward,' he said.
This development comes after the High Court, in April, ordered the JSSC to expedite the recruitment of 26,000 school teachers, directing it to complete the appointment of upper primary teachers by the first week of July and primary teachers by mid-September.
Earlier, during the April hearing, Chief Justice M. S. Ramachandra Rao had warned against delays, appointing the Attorney General to oversee the process. The Court's intervention came after a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by economist and activist Dr. Jean Drèze and co-petitioner Paran Amitava, who highlighted Jharkhand's chronic teacher shortage and under-enforcement of the Right to Education Act, 2009.
The Court that time also had asked the JSSC to submit a compliance report by June 30.
More than 8,000 schools in Jharkhand continue to be run by a single teacher, despite the RTE mandate that each school must have at least two teachers and a pupil-teacher ratio not exceeding 30:1.
Shubham Tigga hails from Chhattisgarh and studied journalism at the Asian College of Journalism. He previously reported in Chhattisgarh on Indigenous issues and is deeply interested in covering socio-political, human rights, and environmental issues in mainland and NE India.
Presently based in Pune, he reports on civil aviation, other transport sectors, urban mobility, the gig economy, commercial matters, and workers' unions.
You can reach out to him on LinkedIn ... Read More
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HC expresses deep concern over Rachakonda police meddling in civil disputes
HC expresses deep concern over Rachakonda police meddling in civil disputes

Hans India

timean hour ago

  • Hans India

HC expresses deep concern over Rachakonda police meddling in civil disputes

Hyderabad: The Telangana High Court single bench of Justice Tadakamalla Vinod Kumar on Tuesday expressed deep concern and strongly disapproved action of the Rachakonda police for meddling in civil disputes and settling them in the Nagole police station itself in lieu of Rs.55 lakh. The judge was astonished to know from the counsel for petitioner Pamu Sudershanam that the Nagole police had confined him from morning to evening on June 19. The court while expressing shock at such an appalling action of the police, summoned Sudheer Babu, Rachakonda Commissioner and Nagole SHO to appear before it and explain reasons for the SHO in registering a crime against Sudershanam in a civil dispute, which is pending before a court since 2000. However, in adherence to court orders, Babu appeared before the judge 'through video conference'; the SHO appeared in person. Justice Vinod Kumar found fault with the police in interfering in a civil dispute… showing over indulgence in settling it in the station pertaining to a private property in plot 65, Krushi Nagar, Bandlaguda, despite the fact that three civil cases were in a court, apart from an injunction order in favour of the petitioner. The judge observed how the police can be so oblivious about court orders, showing scant regard… and show deep interest in solving a civil dispute. He observed that 'police stations in the State have became 'settlement addas'. This trend is at its peak, after the Telangana State was formed'. The Nagole SHO detained Sudershanam in PS and threatened him to settle the dispute pertaining to the property with S Janga Reddy, Thurpati Krishna and Thurpati Ramchander, who paid the SHO Rs. 55 lakh to ensure the dispute is settled in their favour. The petitioner was threatened with criminal cases by the police. The judge said the DGP should take action in enlightening the police officers in State on 'civil disputes'. Justice Vinod Kumar adjudicated the writ filed by Sudharshanam, who complained that the Nagole police indulged in settlement of civil disputes in PS pertaining to his plot in Nagole circle with real estate agents by paying Rs 55 lakh. Hearing in the case was adjourned to second week of July. Batch of six writ petitions seeking 'judicial probe' into Group-1 exam On Tuesday the High Court single bench of Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao heard the batch of six writ petitions filed by candidates who were not able to get a rank in the general ranking list of Group-1 Main exam seeking a direction to order a judicial probe into the entire selection process of candidates. Rachna, senior counsel for petitioners in one writ, contended that the Telangana Public Service Commission erred in issuing two different hall-tickets to the candidates. She said all the candidates who cleared the Preliminary Group 1 exam were issued only one hall-ticket, whereas the TGPSC vide its web note of October 9, 2024 had directed the successful candidates to download second fresh hall-ticket, in sheer violation of rules. She contended that the practice of issuing two hall-tickets--one for Preliminary and another for the Mains--is not followed by the UPSC. On April 17, 2025, Justice Rao had directed TGPSC 'not to issue appointment orders' to all selected candidates in Group-1 exam, but directed the TGPSC to go ahead with certificate verification of the selected candidates. Counsels for the petitioners sought a 'stay' on the notification and evaluation process for the recruitment notification no 02/2024, dated February 19, and a 'judicial probe' into the evaluation alleging that several irregularities and inconsistencies had cropped up while conducting the Group-1 exam on October 21. The judge heard the writ filed by Parmesh Matta and 19 others and five other petitions. The hearing was adjourned to Wednesday for further arguments.

HC gives 4 months to state to finalise Pune floodline
HC gives 4 months to state to finalise Pune floodline

Hindustan Times

time5 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

HC gives 4 months to state to finalise Pune floodline

The Bombay high court has directed the state government and an expert committee to finalise decisions regarding Pune's floodline within four months. The court made it clear that the expert committee must submit its report within two months, following which the state government must act on the recommendations therein within the next two months. The PIL requested that no permission should be granted for DPs on land within 100 metre of the demarcated floodlines. (HT) The directive came in response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed in 2021 by Pune-based civic activists Sarang Yadwadkar, Vivek Velankar and Vijay Kumbhar, raising concerns over the flawed floodline demarcations in the 2017 Development Plan (DP) of Pune city. The court had earlier instructed the state to form an expert committee chaired by the additional chief secretary of the Water Resources department, but the committee had neither convened nor submitted its report, prompting the petitioners to file an interim application. In the latest order passed on June 30, a division bench of justices Alok Aadhav and Sandeep Marne stated: 'The expert committee shall positively submit a report to the state government within a period of two months from June 30. The state government, on receipt of the report, shall take appropriate action on the recommendations of the expert committee within a further period of two months.' The bench also stated that once the expert committee submits its report, it will be open to the petitioners to make additional suggestions to the state government. Petitioners Yadwadkar and Kumbhar said the PIL sought replacement of the existing flood lines shown in the DP with more accurate ones based on scientific mapping. 'We have objected to the current floodlines and have demanded that no new construction permissions be granted within 100 metres of the existing floodline,' they said. The PIL requested that no permission should be granted for DPs on land within 100 metre of the demarcated floodlines, citing the risk of flooding due to poor planning and outdated hydrological assessments. The petitioners also alleged that despite an earlier court order, the expert committee did not make any effort to come up with a plan. Yadwadkar, who has been raising the issue for several years now, warned that the city faces serious risks of floods if the flood line demarcations are not corrected and enforced.

Judiciary should not override executive's decision to deport a foreign national: Home Ministry
Judiciary should not override executive's decision to deport a foreign national: Home Ministry

The Hindu

time12 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Judiciary should not override executive's decision to deport a foreign national: Home Ministry

The Union Home Ministry's (MHA) appeal against a Jammu and Kashmir High Court order to repatriate a 62-year-old housewife who was deported to Pakistan post Pahalgam terror attack said the 'judiciary should not override' the executive's decision to deport a foreign national. It said the High Court order was constitutionally impermissible and unsustainable, as it directed the enforcement of a judicial writ beyond the sovereign territory of India to Pakistan, where she was deported and was thus ultra vires. The Ministry also said that the court's direction was 'legally unenforceable and diplomatically untenable.' 'There exists no extradition treaty, legal instrument, or international obligation binding Pakistan to return her to India. The Indian government cannot, under existing international law, compel a sovereign nation to surrender a non-citizen,' the MHA said. The Home Ministry said 'courts must preserve the institutional boundaries necessary for effective governance' and the order, if allowed to stand, would establish a dangerous precedent. Staying for 38 years The MHA filed a Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) before a Division Bench of the High Court against a June 6 order by judge Rahul Bharti who directed the Union Home Secretary to bring back the petitioner Rakshanda Rashid in 10 days. Married to an Indian, Ms. Rashid had been staying in Jammu for 38 years on a Long-Term Visa (LTV), which was extended annually even as her citizenship application is pending with the MHA since 1996. On April 29, at the time of deportation, the LTV did not exist, the MHA said. Ms. Rashid had said in her petition that she applied for LTV renewal in January and the application was never rejected. After the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, where 26 people were killed, the MHA cancelled the visas of all Pakistani citizens and asked them to leave the country by April 29. The order exempted those with LTVs or Pakistani women married to Indian citizens. The Ministry said that while passing the order, the single judge 'failed to appreciate the circumstances and the national security considerations and the reasonable apprehension posed by the Pakistani nationals staying in India on account of war-like situation between India and Pakistan.' It added that the order is 'contrary to the principles of judicial restraint in the matters concerning national security and international relations, particularly in dealing with the national of a hostile country.' It said the order was 'based on assumption that marriage to an Indian citizen entitles her to claim a right to reside in India or to have her deportation reopen.' 'Subject to control' 'It is well settled law that a foreign national does not acquire Indian nationality or legal residency rights solely by virtue of marriage. A foreigner does not possess a fundamental right to reside in India and their entry and stay are subject to regulatory control of the state under Foreigners Act, 1946. Because it is a trite law that a foreign national do not enjoy rights guaranteed under Article 19. The only fundamental right available to a foreigner is under Article 21 of the Constitution of India which does not confer any right to remain in India once a visa expires or is revoked,' the MHA said. The Ministry said the order would set a dangerous precedent and 'may be cited by foreign nationals to invoke Article 226 for personal repatriation' and the outcome 'threatens the integrity of constitutional separation and immigration enforcement alike.' The judiciary, by ordering the repatriation of a foreign national from another sovereign country, had encroached on into the domain of the Union Executive, whose functions under Article 73 include decisions regarding foreign relations, immigration policy, and national security, the Home Ministry said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store