Indiana Secretary speaks on energy
She said Hoosiers should be excited, not worried about the future.
Jaworowski ran President Trump's 2016 campaign for Indiana and has served as Chief of Staff at the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Nuclear Energy and the International Atomic Energy Agency in Austria.
She said Governor Braun is currently focused on a reliable energy grid and affordability for Hoosiers, while keeping the state's natural resources healthy.
However, she said this is a unique time with the demand for energy across the state.
'Right now, we are at an unprecedented, historic time for energy demand', Jaworowski said. 'Our energy needs are surging because of AI data centers, steel manufacturing, reshoring of manufacturing and industry, but also just our everyday electrification. Think about all of the things we plug in every single day and it's driving our need for electricity far more than we've ever had in our lifetime.'
Jaworowski said that one of the governor's goals is to deploy nuclear energy in the state. She said it is the right time for everyone involved.
'Nuclear is large scale, always available, carbon free, clean electricity that will last for 80 to 100 years to come', Jaworowski said. 'It's extremely important for the state of Indiana to be able to deploy that energy source while we need it right now, while the federal government is helping to support the development of it and industry is ready to partner with us to help pay for it, which makes it much more affordable for Hoosiers.'
Jaworowski also said Governor Braun has developed an executive order to do a state-wide water inventory and management plan.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
7 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
How Indiana's U.S. representatives voted on the 'Big Beautiful Bill'
Hoosiers in the U.S. House of Representatives on July 3 voted along party lines for the final approval of President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill," with Indiana's seven Republicans voting in favor of the bill and the two Democrats voting bill now goes to the president's desk for his signature ahead of the Fourth of July. The massive budget reconciliation bill, which narrowly passed the U.S. Senate on July 1, passed the House on a vote of 218-214. It is likely to impact Hoosiers through tax cuts and spending cuts to federally supported programs, such as Medicaid. Thousands of Indiana residents could lose access to the public health insurance program for low-income Americans, as well as SNAP benefits. But the bill also makes permanent the 2017 tax cuts from the first Trump term, which were due to expire at the end of this year and would have resulted in a $1,900 average tax increase for Hoosiers in 2026. The bill goes further on other tax cuts, eliminating clean energy tax credits and instituting a short-term tax break on tips and overtime wages. More: From taxes to Medicaid, 4 ways Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' could impact Hoosiers Indiana representatives' votes remained unchanged from their initial votes on the bill when it left the House in late May, despite skepticism some Republican members expressed over changes in the Senate that are expected to increase the national debt. U.S. Rep. Victoria Spartz threatened to withhold her vote on a procedural step to advance the bill but later voted with Republicans to allow the bill to proceed. U.S. Rep. Marlin Stutzman posted on X July 1 that changes made in the Senate include "unacceptable increases to the national debt and the deficit." In the post Stutzman said he was "willing to work through the 4th" to improve the bill but voted for its passage on July 3. "This bill was not perfect, but it gives all Americans a fresh start by curbing the last 4 years of disaster under Joe Biden," Stutzman said in a July 3 post following the passage of the bill. U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan, a Democrat representing Northwest Indiana, said in a post on X he voted against the measure because it creates uncertainty for Hoosiers. "I opposed this measure because I cannot in good conscience leave people behind," Mrvan said. "The Republican Majority made a decision to prioritize their elite donors and corporations, and now our seniors, veterans, hard-working Americans, women, children and those yet to be born will pay with increased costs and possibly their lives." The House vote follows a Senate vote earlier this week where Vice President J.D. Vance cast a tie-breaking vote to advance the bill on a 51-50 vote. Both U.S. Sens. Todd Young and Jim Banks voted in favor of the bill. Big Beautiful Bill 101: What you need to know about Trump's tax bill USA TODAY contributed to this story. Contact IndyStar state government and politics reporter Brittany Carloni at and government accountability reporter Hayleigh Colombo at hcolombo@
Indianapolis Star
17 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
IDEM issues deregulation report under Gov. Braun's orders. Advocates question need, impact
The state agency charged with protecting Indiana's environment and Hoosiers from industrial pollution completed its first step to 'reduce excessive environmental regulation' and fulfill obligations imposed by Gov. Mike Braun. Braun issued an executive order earlier this year requiring state agencies to revisit any environmental regulations that 'impose unnecessary burdens on businesses, communities, agencies or industries' in the state. The order also requires agencies to identify 'overly burdensome' regulations and policies and report ways to revisit or rescind them no later than July 1. The Indiana Department of Environmental Management fulfilled this requirement in a new report that outlines 10 items for review. These regulations and policies range from streamlining pollution and discharge permits to making it easier for firefighters to conduct open-burn training. The agency not only plans to pursue changes in state regulations, but says it wants to encourage federal agencies such as the EPA to also change regulations. In a letter of support for IDEM's report, Braun said states going beyond federal environmental standards create complexity for businesses and farmers, and federal baselines are an appropriate limit. 'We need to unleash the productive side of our economy, while protecting and preserving our state's natural resources,' Braun wrote. IDEM said in its report it remains committed to reducing regulatory burdens that do not benefit Hoosiers and the environment. Industry groups said they welcome the changes in regulations and believe quicker permitting and fewer regulations will bring economic benefits. But environmental advocacy groups oppose the roll-back and contend the state is already behind on protecting Indiana's air and water and the health of Hoosiers. They also questioned why IDEM is tasked with protecting business interests over the environment. Kim Ferraro, managing attorney at Conservation Law Center, said Braun's executive order reinforces a false premise that regulating the environment is bad for the economy. 'There is no evidence to support that,' Ferraro said. 'It's dangerous that we keep putting it out there as the choice we have to make because that's a false choice.' The Conservation Law Center joined with other advocacy groups to submit comments to IDEM, but Ferraro said the premise of Braun's executive order was aimed at getting input from industry and did not focus on the burdens deregulation would have on Hoosiers. 'Current regulation doesn't meet the law in that it doesn't go far enough,' Ferraro said. 'That imposes many costs on Hoosiers in terms of medical costs and health care bills. It's bad for human health and the environment and not based in reality or best available science.' These burdensome costs on human health and the environment are what IDEM should be paying attention to, not the monetary costs of doing business, she said. 'Why is this on environmental agencies to roll back policies?' Ferraro asked. 'There are many other state agencies charged with promoting business interests, are they not doing their job? It seems strange to have (IDEM) promote industry interests.' The groups also argue in their comments that Indiana already faces serious environmental challenges that require the state to go beyond federal standards, and Braun's order imposes an unnecessary burden on state agencies. Others, however, are eager to see Braun's order play out. 'By making sure that our environmental regulations through IDEM match up closely or exactly with the federal regulations, it provides employers with regulatory certainty,' said Ashton Eller, the vice president of governmental affairs at the Indiana Manufacturers Association. He believes manufacturers who operate nationwide will be enticed to come to Indiana when they see the state's regulations are streamlined with the federal government. Eller said he's aware of the potential health impacts of environmental deregulation, but views Braun's directive as a modernization of regulations — not an elimination. 'Manufacturers are aware of the environmental outcomes upon health,' Eller said. He noted the report acknowledges it's possible to be good stewards of the environment without stifling growth through excessive government mandates. "We couldn't agree more,' he said. IDEM sought public input as part of its effort evaluating existing regulations. A selection of those comments was included in the agency's report to Braun. The department received about 1,000 comments from various groups and will review them all while it considers the next steps. Some farming groups submitting comments thought the state could do more than the federal standards. Two comments focused on Indiana's confined animal feeding operation laws on farms. The state's regulations are stricter than federal guidelines, but both commenters supported IDEM's current regulations. They cited how Indiana's regulation offers protection to farmers against nuisance lawsuits and environmentally related litigation. A large selection of the comments IDEM provided in its report came from industrial groups. One submission asked IDEM to change the verification timeline for wastewater discharge lagoons from once yearly to every five years to coincide with federal permit renewals, while another expressed support for streamlining state permits for coal mining facilities. Earlier this year, the U.S. EPA announced it also would look into permitting reforms across the country to streamline energy investment, and one coal-mining company urged IDEM to continue to review and update state regulations in alignment with these changing federal priorities. If IDEM decides state laws that exceed federal regulations should stay in place, the department has until Oct. 31 to review those rules and regulations. The agency must then provide a written report to Braun and the Legislative Council by Dec. 31. The 10 regulations and policies IDEM outlined in its report to Braun were chosen so the agency may clarify or rescind them. The agency in its report said it is committed to making sure its regulations are consistent with current law, supported by best available science and are not 'unduly burdensome.' Here are the 10 items with brief descriptions of what they are: Underground storage tank forms: IDEM says these forms, used during changes in facilities with these tanks, are redundant and duplicative due to federal requirements. Prior approval for fire training at an open burn: IDEM says fire departments requesting prior approval to train with an open burn is burdensome and recommends removing this requirement. Streamline pollution discharge permitting: Facilities currently have three years to come into compliance with pollution discharge permits known as NPDES. IDEM believes this timeline is out-of-date and recommends extending it to five years, in line with U.S. EPA. Redefining biomass and feedstock: The state wants to look at new definitions for biomass and feedstock to clear up confusion on what can be used in anaerobic digesters used for recycling items like manure and food waste. Emissions Reduction Plan for malfunctions: IDEM is considering revising or removing the requirement that air pollution-permitted facilities submit a plan to reduce emissions that resulted from a malfunction. Remove IDEM certification requirement for some tax deductions: IDEM is currently required to certify if certain systems or devices qualify for tax deductions. IDEM says the process is unnecessary and recommends removing the requirement. Electronic waste fund flexibility: Revenue from electronic waste registration and recycling is currently limited to the administration expenses. IDEM recommends expanding what the fund can be used for, like outreach and collection. Extend some waste permits: Solid and hazardous waste permits range from three to five years in length. IDEM proposes extending certain permits to 10 years to reduce the paperwork burden for applicants. Streamline application for alternative water discharge limits: Facilities, like steam-powered electricity generators, which release heated water into rivers and streams are typically bound by temperature limits, unless they can prove their proposed limit won't harm the natural environment. IDEM suggests streamlining the application process to remove burdens and uncertainty for facilities. Rescind environmental penalty guidance: Documents guiding civil penalties for breaches of environmental regulations and penalties for leaking storage tanks will be rescinded. IndyStar's environmental reporting project is made possible through the generous support of the nonprofit Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust. Karl Schneider is an IndyStar environment reporter. You can reach him at Follow him on BlueSky @ or X @karlstartswithk.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Purdue opts to cut or consolidate 7 programs ahead of new state law; more to be evaluated
WEST LAFAYETTE, IN — Some of Indiana's public colleges, including Purdue University, have opted to cut or consolidate a selection of degree programs ahead of a new state law that went into effect on July 1. The Indiana Commission for Higher Education said in a release Monday those 400 programs cut or consolidated across the state were those with "zero-to-low enrollment and completions." Gov. Mike Braun said in the release that one of the state's top agenda items included ensuring that Indiana's higher education institutions are preparing students for career opportunities in the "most in-demand fields of today and the future." 'Just in the past month, our state institutions have taken bold, proactive steps to increase the value of higher education for both students and families, first, through keeping tuition flat, and today, by beginning the process to streamline degree offerings," Braun said in the release. "This will help students make more informed decisions about the degree they want to pursue and ensure there is a direct connection between the skills students are gaining through higher education and the skills they need most.' Public Law 213, born out of House Bill 1001 in the 2025 legislative session setting Indiana's state budget, states that academic programs must meet a three-year average number of students who graduate from the program to automatically continue. That threshold is 10 students for an associate's degree program, 15 students for a bachelor's degree program, seven students for a master's degree program, or three students for a doctorate degree program. Indiana state Rep. Chris Campbell in a statement Tuesday called the new law an "overreach of government into higher education, echoing a dangerous national trend." "The majority isn't outright controlling students' education, but they're restricting it, which achieves the same goal," Campbell said. "Students should be able to study whatever they choose, especially since they're paying hundreds of thousands of dollars for it. Programs impacted include economics, secondary education, finance and three engineering disciplines. I was especially shocked to see special education degrees on the list." The seven degrees Purdue University's West Lafayette campus submitted to the commission to be suspended, classified as "teach-out toward elimination," are bachelor's degrees in microbiology, mathematics with computer science, design and production, art history, and a master's degree program in health sciences. A master's and doctoral program in comparative literature were proactively identified by Purdue's West Lafayette campus for merger or consolidation. Indiana Sen. Spencer Deery said he sees the new law as an opportunity for public institutions, but he noted things to be cautious about. "From my experience in higher education, these are very political environments, and sometimes there are actions that need to be taken that can be hard," Deery said. "Sometimes that's investing money in a program because it is being underserved, or it may not make financial sense to continue doing so. Which sometimes that could be because it is a program popular with a certain influential faculty member. So, I think it's a good idea to go back and evaluate, and this is that opportunity." In its guidance to institutions, the commission said it didn't expect this voluntary round to encapsulate all "under-threshold" programs. Students currently enrolled in any eliminated or suspended degree program will have the opportunity to complete their studies through an orderly teach-out, the release said, echoing a June 10 statement by Purdue officials. Newer degree programs will receive special consideration as they need time to grow enrollment and produce graduates, the commission said. Those programs, however, must still obtain approval to continue. "In requesting approval to continue an under-threshold degree program, institutions will have the opportunity to contextualize data through a fact-based, context-dependent narrative justifying the approval to continue category requested," the commission said in its guidelines. "It must elaborate on the program's essentialness to mission and planned fiscal support, as well as its relative importance in relation to evolving program offerings, career relevance, student outcomes, and service to the region/state/nation." Campbell, who graduated from Purdue with a master's degree in audiology, recalled in her statement the small size of her own graduate program. "It was offered because students were interested, and even though the discipline is small, audiologists provide essential services," Campbell said. "Our public university is arguably our state's greatest strength. Purdue is globally recognized. But to continue their record of success, Purdue has to be a great place to work and study. The General Assembly has continued to undercut these efforts with tenure reviews, monitoring instruction and now eliminating degree programs. It will get harder and harder for Purdue to pitch itself to out-of-state students and the nation's top researchers." Looking at enrollment for programs such as soil science and artificial intelligence at Purdue, Deery said he was unaware those numbers were low enough to fall into consideration of the new law. He said his worry would be if the commission implemented the new requirements in a "heavy-handed or nonstrategic way." "I don't think that's their intent, but I think there is some opportunity here and we have to watch out for it," Deery said. "My concern is in the next round if they start saying no on things like AI or soil sciences, if they cross those lines, I won't hesitate to voice displeasure." In conversations with colleagues, Deery said he has found himself educating others on the reality of what cuts like this would do to a public university, explaining that cost savings by cutting a program aren't always so cut and dry. "Elimination doesn't mean immediate cost savings," Deery said. "There are faculty teaching more than one class, and I would anticipate there will be some form of savings. Maybe it doesn't make sense to have an art history major, but we still want to offer that opportunity as a class to students." Data from the 2024 fiscal year will be validated by the commission in early July, the commission said. The decisions will then be provided to Indiana's public institutions by mid-July. "The commission and institutions will collaborate to validate and arrive at a Mutual Consensus List of under-threshold degree programs with newer degree programs flagged," the commission said. "Only degree programs on the Mutual Consensus List must obtain approval to continue from the commission." Jillian Ellison is a reporter for the Journal & Courier. She can be reached via email at jellison@ This article originally appeared on Lafayette Journal & Courier: Purdue opts to cut or consolidate 7 programs ahead of new state law
