'JAC nominations not legally binding unless Constitution amended'
Until then, she said the JAC's role is only to screen, evaluate, and recommend candidates to the prime minister.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BusinessToday
an hour ago
- BusinessToday
Malaysian Bar Dispels Misconception On Planned 'Walk To Safeguard Judicial Independence'
The Malaysian Bar today (9 July) issued a strong statement clarifying that the true intent behind its upcoming 'Walk to Safeguard Judicial Independence' scheduled for Monday, July 14, 2025, is to voice grave institutional concerns regarding the state of the Judiciary, the pressing issue of prolonged vacancies, and the need for leadership continuity. It also aims to urge reforms vital for safeguarding the independence of this crucial democratic institution. The Bar firmly rejected recent media reports stating that the walk, which was sanctioned by the Bar Council,' was a protest against the Government's decision not to extend the tenures of the former Chief Justice of Malaysia and the President of the Court of Appeal. 'The Walk is not about individuals; it is a stand for institutional integrity. Any attempt to frame it otherwise is misleading and undermines the Bar's position,' the statement emphasized. The Bar asserted that its focus is squarely on the structural and systemic issues affecting the Judiciary. It highlighted recent developments, including 'unexplained delays in appointments and troubling references to possible interference in judicial affairs,' as having raised deep concerns. The Malaysian Bar underscored the public's entitlement to a Judiciary that is not only independent but is also seen to be independent, warning that anything less erodes confidence in the administration of justice. Describing the Walk as a 'lawful, peaceful, and symbolic act of civic responsibility,' the Malaysian Bar affirmed its unwavering commitment to upholding the Federal Constitution, the separation of powers, and the rule of law. It stressed that the event serves as a collective statement that 'judicial independence is not negotiable, and that the Judiciary must be insulated from external influence, whether political, Executive, or otherwise.' The statement concluded with a powerful call to action, asserting that the Walk is 'not just a Walk for lawyers; it is a Walk for the Judiciary, the Bar, and for every Malaysian who values justice. When judicial independence is weakened, the whole nation suffers.' Reaffirming the Judiciary's role as the 'final bulwark of justice,' the Bar vowed that it 'must be protected fiercely, fearlessly, and without apology.' Related
Malaysiakini
an hour ago
- Malaysiakini
LFL: Will govt arrest thousands who have read, shared JAC leak?
The Lawyers for Liberty has slammed authorities for threatening action under the Official Secrets Act (OSA) over the alleged leak of Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) meeting minutes. The legal rights group's director Zaid Malek said the move is unnecessary and shows a disconnect with public concerns over alleged interference with judicial independence. 'Is the government intending to...
Malaysiakini
2 hours ago
- Malaysiakini
Boosting judicial integrity, regional representation
LETTER | I, Chin Tek Ming, a practising lawyer based in Sabah, fully support the recent remarks made by former MACC chief commissioner Latheefa Koya, as reported by Malaysiakini on July 13. In the report, Latheefa urged for constitutional amendments to enhance the independence, integrity, and transparency of the judiciary - especially through reforms to the Judicial Appointment Commission (JAC). Her call is both timely and necessary. Our judiciary faces a credibility crisis that demands urgent institutional reform. Most notably, the recent leak of the JAC meeting minutes has seriously undermined public confidence in the impartiality and transparency of judicial appointments. When such sensitive internal discussions are exposed, it not only damages trust in the institution but also exposes the vulnerability of judicial independence to political or external influence. Further compounding this concern is the retirement of two top judges without term extensions, despite precedent suggesting otherwise: Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, the chief justice, retired on July 1, without a six-month extension. Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim, the Court of Appeal president, retired on July 2, also without an extension. These abrupt transitions raise pressing questions about the continuity, independence, and succession planning within the judiciary. Greater Sabahan representation In light of these developments, I wish to reaffirm my earlier public statement published on Malaysiakini on June 9, which called for greater Sabahan representation in the higher judiciary and the JAC. As Malaysia continues to mature as a federation, it is vital that the spirit and terms of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) are respected and realised, particularly in key national institutions. I reiterate the following points: Judicial appointments must reflect regional balance, especially for Sabah and Sarawak. The omission of East Malaysian representation risks alienating a significant part of the Federation. The appointment of respected and experienced Sabahan jurists - such as Richard Malanjum and David Wong - to the JAC would enhance public trust, bring a regional perspective, and add legal wisdom to the selection process. The separation of powers between the executive, legislature, and judiciary must not only exist in principle but also be clearly seen in practice. Without visible independence and impartiality, the public's faith in the rule of law will continue to erode. In conclusion, I urge the government to take Latheefa's recommendations seriously and to ensure that any forthcoming constitutional amendment includes provisions that promote judicial independence, public accountability, and regional inclusivity, especially for Sabah and Sarawak. Only through such reforms can we rebuild confidence in our legal system and uphold the foundational democratic principle that justice must not only be done, but must also be seen to be done. The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.
