
‘Jurassic World: Rebirth' Defies Rotten Tomatoes, May Make A Billion Dollars
If you're wondering why they're continuing to make Jurassic Park movies over and over again despite the quality being consistently sub-par, look no further than Jurassic World: Rebirth, which is now mirroring the box office haul of the last poorly reviewed Jurassic Park movie, Jurassic World: Dominion.
Box office estimates for Jurassic World: Rebirth continue to climb. The film did $25 million in Thursday previews, and that will rise on Friday. The outpacing of expectations indicates that Rebirth may end up nabbing a $145 million opening in the US.
Why is that number key? Because a $145 million haul would exactly mirror the domestic opening weekend of Jurassic World: Dominion, which went on to make $1.001 billion by the end of its global run, almost two-thirds of that outside the US. So, if the figures hold, Rebirth might hit that as well.
This is a prime example of a split opening between critics and audiences, where lower critic scores have little effect on audience enjoyment and a big box office. The split of these two movies on Rotten Tomatoes sits at:
The success of Rebirth is additionally impressive because the series has switched over from its core cast of Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard to being led by Scarlett Johansson, Mahershala Ali and Jonathan Bailey. Great actors, but generally not thought of as massive box office draws, despite their fame.
Jurassic World Rebirth
If you look back even further, even lower audience scores cannot stop the Jurassic Park behemoth. 2018's Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom got a 47% critic score and an also-bad 48% audience score. Want to guess how much money it made? $1.3 billion. The original Jurassic World, which was well-liked by both groups, made $1.67 billion.
The point being, audiences are going to show up for a Jurassic Park movie (now Jurassic World) no matter what. Yes, the box office has 'dropped' over time, but…dropped to a billion dollars. Few other franchises can boast that, and Jurassic Park has outlived the box office runs of most recent Marvel and Star Wars films at this point.
It is not really a question at all whether another Jurassic World movie will be made, and best guess is probably another three years from now. Whether it stars these current actors remains to be seen, as it could be the start of another Pratt multi-film run led by Johansson. Given its performance, I'm sure everyone would love to return for more, including its director, Gareth Evans, where this is his first Jurassic film after directing several monster movies before this, including Godzilla.
Jurassic World: Rebirth is a huge hit once again proving that critics don't always matter (somewhat of a bummer as a critic myself, but it's true).
Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, Bluesky and Instagram.
Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Aquarius Daily Horoscope Yahoo Life Astrology: July 06, 2025
Your ability to see people's strengths, and especially how those strengths can mesh with those of others, makes you the perfect candidate to help organize a massive group activity today. Find out how you and your partner rate with the ultimate compatibility report, your Love Score.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jennifer Aniston teases ‘emotional' season four of The Morning Show
Jennifer Aniston has revealed the plot of the forthcoming fourth season of The Morning Show will be 'complicated'. The 56-year-old stars in the Apple TV+ drama, which follows a fictional breakfast show in the aftermath of a prominent news anchor being hit with a series of allegations, alongside Reese Witherspoon, Billy Crudup and Julianna Margulies. Aniston – who plays the TV anchor Alex Levy on the show alongside executive producing the series with co-star Witherspoon – told People that The Morning Show 'is just a beast to film'. 'It is layered, it's complicated, it's emotional, it hits on a lot of topics and current events, so let's just say, it's not Friends,' she added, referencing the Nineties show in which she played Rachel Green from 1994 to 2004. She continued: 'We're involved in every single aspect of the show, on top of just the performance side, which is a big piece of it. But I've got incredible support, and we have such an incredible team.' Season four of The Morning Show finished shooting in December last year, according to a post from Witherspoon's media company, Hello Sunshine. 'And that's a wrap on Season 4 of #TheMorningShow!' it read. 'Thank you to our incredible cast and crew for bringing this season to life. We can't wait for you all to see what's in store on @AppleTV!' Season three of The Morning show saw a romance begin between Aniston's Alex and the space tech billionaire Paul Marks, played by Jon Hamm. Elsewhere, Witherspoon's Bradley attempted to salvage her reputation as a journalist after she chose not to reveal video evidence of her brother taking part in the insurrection at the US Capitol. Speaking to Deadline, showrunner Charlotte Stoudt said the next season of the show would explore deepfakes and artificial intelligence. 'We blew everything up last year with the biggest bomb we could possibly build,' she said. 'So, we have to ask ourselves how is the band going to get back together, and what will that look like? 'We get into the world of deepfakes and AI and the misinformation in the fog of war that we're seeing now in the Middle East and stuff. 'We're looking at who can trust. And can you trust what you're seeing? Can you trust yourself? Can you trust your news outlet?' The Morning Show returns for season four on Wednesday, 17 September on Apple TV+
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Husband Says He Doesn't Want Wife Using Baby Name He 'Secretly' Hates Because It Sounds Like a 'Forest Fairy'
A man says he "hates" the name his wife wants to use for their future child, but waited so long to tell her that she is now mad In a post on Reddit, he writes that he held off on telling the woman he dislikes the name, "because I didn't want to kill her vibe" But now, he feels he has to offer up his opinion, adding, "I want our daughter to have a name that'll command respect in a boardroom, not at a Renaissance Faire"A man says he "secretly hates" the name his wife wants to use for their future child, writing in a Reddit post that the name sounds like something out of a "Renaissance Faire." "We've both been throwing around names for a while, but there's one she's been dead set on ever since we found out we were having a girl: 'Elowyn,' " the anonymous 35-year-old writes in the post. "She says it's 'magical and lyrical' and reminds her of a forest fairy or something." He continues: "I've been nodding along because I didn't want to kill her vibe, pregnancy hormones and all, but honestly, I can't stand it. It sounds like a name someone would give their Dungeons & Dragons character. I want our daughter to have a name that'll command respect in a boardroom, not at a Renaissance Faire." He writes that last week, he finally told his wife that he isn't comfortable with the name. "I suggested alternatives that are still beautiful but more grounded (like Claire or Julia), and she got really upset. She accused me of 'waiting too long' to say something and said I'd been 'deceptive.' I told her I was trying to be supportive and avoid unnecessary stress, but that this is my child too," he writes. Now, his wife isn't speaking to him, other than to say she is 'mourning" the name. "I get that pregnancy is emotional, but that feels a bit theatrical to me," he writes. "I told her we still have 21 weeks to decide and that maybe this is a sign to keep looking." He then asks if he's wrong "for holding my ground and not wanting to name my daughter something that sounds like a Tolkien side character?" Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. While many commenters agree that the name is not their favorite, some are also chiding the man for not being honest sooner. "Why would you not just be honest from the beginning? That makes no sense to hide your feelings from your partner, especially about something they seem dead set on and you are adamantly against," wrote one. Added another commenter: "Naming a baby is like making one: both parties need to agree or it shouldn't happen. The best time to say no might have been earlier, but the second best time is right now. Both are infinitely preferable to never." Read the original article on People