UN expert Francesca Albanese rejects ‘unprecedented' US sanctions on her Israel criticism
She labelled the sanctions a violation of her immunity.
She criticised US companies who trade with Israel.
The UN's unflinching expert on Palestinian affairs Francesca Albanese said on Tuesday that Washington's sanctions following her criticism of the White House's stance on Gaza are a 'violation' of her immunity.
The United Nations' Special Rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories made the comments while visiting Bogota, nearly a week after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the sanctions, calling her work 'biased and malicious'.
'It's a very serious measure. It's unprecedented. And I take it very seriously,' Albanese told an audience in the Colombian capital.
Albanese was in Bogota to attend an international summit initiated by leftist President Gustavo Petro to find solutions to the Gaza conflict.
The Italian legal scholar and human rights expert has faced harsh criticism for her long-standing accusations that Israel is committing 'genocide' in Gaza.
'It's clear violation of the UN Convention on Privileges and Immunities that protect UN officials, including independent experts, from words and actions taken in the exercise of their functions,' Albanese said.
Rubio on 9 July announced that Washington was sanctioning Albanese 'for her illegitimate and shameful efforts to prompt (ICC) action against US and Israeli officials, companies, and executives'.
Abed Rahim Khatib/Anadolu via Getty Images
The sanctions are 'a warning to anyone who dares to defend international law and human rights, justice and freedom', Albanese said.
On Thursday, the UN urged the US to reverse the sanctions against Albanese, along with sanctions against judges of the International Criminal Court, with UN chief Antonio Guterres's spokesperson calling the move 'a dangerous precedent'.
On Friday, the European Union also spoke out against the sanctions facing Albanese, adding that it 'strongly supports the United Nations human rights system'.
Albanese, who assumed her mandate in 2022, released a damning report this month denouncing companies - many of them American - that she said 'profited from the Israeli economy of illegal occupation, apartheid, and now genocide' in the occupied Palestinian territories.
READ | UN expert slams companies which 'profited from the violence, the killing' trading with Israel
The report provoked a furious Israeli response, while some of the companies also raised objections.
Washington in June slapped sanctions on four ICC judges, in part over the court's arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, barring them from the US.
UN special rapporteurs like Albanese are independent experts who are appointed by the UN human rights council but do not speak on behalf of the United Nations.
The war in Gaza was triggered on 7 October 2023 after Hamas militants killed 1 219 people in Israel and took hostages, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.
More than 58 479 Palestinians have been killed in ongoing retaliation operations, according to data from the Health Ministry of the Hamas government, considered reliable by the UN.
Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence has surged in the territory since October 2023.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wall Street's China Exit? U.S. Firms Slash Investment Plans to 20-Year Low
Investor appetite for China is coolingand fast. According to the latest US-China Business Council survey, only 48% of U.S. firms plan to invest in China in 2025. That's a staggering drop from 80% just a year ago, and the lowest reading since the question was first asked in 2006. The reasons? Think tariffs, slower growth, and shifting industrial policy. While tensions between Beijing and Washington have eased slightly after recent talks in London, many firms remain in holding pattern mode. They are riding out the uncertainty, said Kyle Sullivan, VP of the Council's advisory services. And when you look under the hood, the sentiment shift makes sense: nearly one-third of companies say they've lost market share in China over the past three years, and almost 70% expect more of the same ahead. The push to diversify is gaining traction. A record 27% of companies said they've either moved or plan to move parts of their operations out of China. That's the highest since at least 2016. These aren't small playersover 40% of respondents earn more than $1 billion annually from their China business. Yet the mounting cost of retaliatory tariffs, particularly for firms sourcing inputs from the U.S., is proving difficult to absorb. About three-quarters of companies flagged tariffs as their top cost concern. Some are turning to alternative markets, while others are renegotiating with suppliers or passing higher costs down the chain. Each option comes with tradeoffs, and none offer clear-cut solutions. Meanwhile, China's policy landscape isn't helping. More than 80% of U.S. companies say Beijing's industrial policy is propping up once-uncompetitive Chinese firms, while nearly 60% believe it's steering customers toward local products. And although recent export approvals and a modest rebound in Chinese shipments to the U.S. offer a glimmer of stabilization, underlying trade friction remains. Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) and other U.S. multinationals with deep ties to China may have to navigate a tougher operating environment heading into 2025. Investors should watch how this plays outespecially with the political calendar heating up and policy decisions on both sides still in flux. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Listen to Mr. Rogers' defense of public media funding in 1969
The Senate recently passed a bill that would decimate public media, clawing back roughly $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which helps fund NPR and PBS. The bill, which contains a total of $9 billion in spending cuts, now goes to the House. This is not the first time the government has tried to cut funding to public broadcasting. In 1969, Fred Rogers, the creator and host of "Mister Rogers' Neighborhood," testified before the US Senate Subcommittee on Communications to defend the continued funding of public broadcasting after President Richard Nixon proposed cuts.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Listen to Mr. Rogers' defense of public media funding in 1969
The Senate recently passed a bill that would decimate public media, clawing back roughly $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which helps fund NPR and PBS. The bill, which contains a total of $9 billion in spending cuts, now goes to the House. This is not the first time the government has tried to cut funding to public broadcasting. In 1969, Fred Rogers, the creator and host of "Mister Rogers' Neighborhood," testified before the US Senate Subcommittee on Communications to defend the continued funding of public broadcasting after President Richard Nixon proposed cuts.
