GP shares how many drinks it takes to get a hangover
A GP has revealed exactly how many drinks a person needs to consume to experience a hangover the next day, warning that taking it too far can result in poisoning. According to the expert, it doesn't take long for alcohol to impair the nervous system and brain.
Drinking alcohol is a regular part of life for many Brits. A poll conducted by YouGov shows that around 82 per cent of people in the UK say they drink.
Findings from 2022 showed that six per cent of British adults above have an alcoholic drink every day, while another four per cent drink five or six days a week.
One in seven (14 per cent) drink on three or four days out of the week, 23 per cent drink alcohol on one or two days, while one in three (33 per cent) say they have alcohol less often (but do still drink). While we are all aware that drinking has a negative impact on our health, it remains a popular habit.
Ahead of Alcohol Awareness Week on July 7, a doctor shared more about the immediate impact it actually has on the body. Doctor Bhavini Shah, GP at LloydsPharmacy Online Doctor, explained the different stages of drinking.
'One or two units of alcohol increases the heart rate, expands blood vessels, and gives a slight 'buzz' which commonly makes people feel more sociable or talkative,' she said. One unit equals 10ml or eight grams of pure alcohol, which is around the amount of alcohol the average adult can process in an hour.
The number of units in a drink is based on the size of the drink, as well as its alcohol strength. For example, the NHS states that a pint of strong lager contains three units of alcohol, whereas the same volume of lower-strength lager has just over two units.
Dr Shah continued: 'After four to six units, alcohol begins to impact your nervous system, decreasing reaction time and affecting areas of the brain associated with decision making, resulting in poorer judgement and potentially more reckless behaviour.' At around eight units is where the average person can expect a hangover.
This is equal to around four pints of low-strength cider or beer (3.6 per cent) or four standard glasses of wine (175ml). 'After eight units, your vision and sleep will be affected and you will have consumed more alcohol than your liver can process in one night, resulting in a hangover,' Dr Shah said.
'And after ten units, your coordination will be highly impaired and you can expect symptoms of nausea, diarrhoea, and vomiting, as well as dehydration and headaches.'
However, drinking eight or more units of alcohol is considered 'binge drinking' for the average man, while six or more is considered a binge for women. The NHS states that adults should not be drinking more than 14 units a week on a regular basis.
It advises: 'Spread your drinking over three or more days if you regularly drink as much as 14 units a week.' Dr Shah added that, 'after 12 units, you are at great risk of alcohol poisoning.'
How to get rid of alcohol in your system
Dr Shah said: 'Your body will metabolise alcohol at its own rate and there is not much evidence that you can speed up this natural process. However, there are steps you can take to reduce the symptoms of your hangover.
'Going to sleep is a good way to let your body naturally remove alcohol from your system by itself. Drinking water is also essential as it will prevent the dehydrating effects of the alcohol and reduce the impact of headaches.
'You should also try to eat bland foods as these will increase your blood sugar without upsetting your stomach.' For advice on cutting back on alcohol, visit the NHS website here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
14 minutes ago
- Times
Times letters: NHS to prefer homegrown doctors and nurses
Write to letters@ Sir, As a hard-working British medical student who will have benefited from six years of taxpayer-funded investment and education at UK medical school, I welcome the government's commitment to give priority to British doctors for NHS jobs (reports, Jul 1). Reform to relieve the bottleneck in access to specialty training programmes is long overdue. The plan recognises that solely pledging to increase the number of medical students is not enough to sustainably bolster our workforce. International medical graduates play a crucial role in supporting the needs of a desperately understaffed health service, but this should never come at the cost of stifling opportunities for homegrown SahUCL medical student; Warwick Sir, The suggestion of placing work coaches in GP surgeries will be met with dismay by many in primary care. Although the idea of supporting patients is to be applauded, how is space to be found for these coaches? With the rise in other supporting roles, including physiotherapists and pharmacists, over the past few years, practices are already struggling — and that is without any funding for the necessary increase in consulting space. Perhaps the only solution would be for doctors to undertake more remote working from home to free up space, reducing the number of face-to-face appointments — something that might not go down well with Jeremy SK Phipps MRCGPWothorpe, Cambs Sir, I represent the industry that supplies four out of five NHS medicines and welcome the news that the UK's two drug regulatory bodies (the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) will collaborate to improve efficiency. Crucially, their task force must enable more patients to access appropriate medicines, regardless of whether the drug is new. As a result of competition, prices typically drop by up to 90 per cent when a drug's patent expires, saving the NHS more than £18 billion last year and meaning that the UK has the lowest drug prices in Europe. About 250 medicine patents are set to expire during this parliament, which, if adopted without delay, could save the NHS an extra £3 billion a year; just a day's delay in licensing an off-patent medicine can cost the NHS millions. Meanwhile, Nice continues to focus on high-cost, patented drugs because its funding model depends on fees from evaluating them. This structure is fundamentally unsuited to the generics sector that supplies most NHS medicines. Officials across Whitehall and NHS England are working hard to realise the full benefits of off-patent medicines, but looming budget cuts now threaten these very SamuelsChief executive, Medicines UK Sir, Your news report might give the impression that overseas qualified doctors are being employed in preference to UK-trained doctors. This could not be further from the truth (bar a few exceptions). Your article rightly notes the rising number of unemployed British graduates. This is entirely the result of the increasing practice of employing physician associates to undertake jobs that should be done by resident Arun BaksiEmeritus consultant physician,Wootton Bridge, Isle of Wight Sir, I totally agree with Robin Allum's letter (Jul 1) on Martha's Rule. I am a retired consultant radiologist, also with 50 years' experience in the NHS. During that time I was, for five years, responsible for the medical training and welfare of 150 junior doctors. In 1998 I was on a government committee to advise on the application of the European working time directive to junior doctors and their training. The government did not listen to a word of our advice . Thus a young doctor could fulfil all the 48 hours allowed over a weekend shift and have no hours left in the week for essential training on ward rounds, in theatre etc. The young doctors became very disillusioned and did not work as a team, as they had previously. Continuity of care was lost and also the camaraderie involved in teamwork. That working directive changed the face of medicine. Previously doctors had a separate dining room; they could eat a sandwich together and discuss various difficult-to-diagnose patients. That has all gone. As Allum says, the medical profession should be very grateful to the Mills and James families for the pressure to apply Martha's Rule. How sad that it has become Luck FRCRAscot, Berks Sir, Michael Johnstone (letter, Jul 1) may congratulate himself on asking for a table for two in full knowledge that he will be dining alone, and thus ensuring he will not be given an inferior table. But it is dishonest. And it denies the restaurant the chance to use that table for a genuine party of two and to increase its income in these difficult times for the hospitality industry — rather like paying for one train seat and then using a second seat for your luggage and denying a paying passenger a chance to sit down. His tactic may work once but he may well find himself, deservedly, asked to move right out of the restaurant the next time he tries it NeubergerLondon NW11 Sir, Further to Michael Johnstone's letter, I always feel it adds credence to my table for two if I order two glasses of wine on arrival. The second rarely goes to WilliamsAston Rowant, Oxon Sir, If Bobby Vylan's racist diatribe had contained the n-word or the P-word, we can be sure that the BBC would — rightly — have pulled the plug ('BBC boss left Glastonbury death chants on livestream', news, Jul 1). The BBC's apology is necessary but insufficient. The key point that requires both investigation and personal (not just institutional) responsibility is why a stream of anti-Jewish invective didn't trouble a single pair of ears within the large BBC production team at Wolfson of Tredegar KCShadow attorney-general; justice minister 2020-22 Sir, In his excellent comment article ('What's Starmer's big idea? He needs to tell us', Jul 1), William Hague says that 'the prime minister could stand up after a year in office and explain the world he has now seen'. Given that the gift of the gab may be not one of Sir Keir Starmer's sterling qualities, which communication channels would Hague suggest to the prime minister, in a world in which adults spend more time on their phones than watching television and reading newspapers? A prime ministerial broadcast monthly or quarterly perhaps? It must be more difficult getting messages and ideas, sometimes complex, across in a world of soundbites on social ChapmanLondon SE1 Sir, The letter from IH Piper (Jun 26) illustrates one of the core problems in maternity care: the belief that women's health issues can be fixed with a scalpel and a bit of surgical bravado. Forced episiotomy and repair are not the silver bullets he imagines. In fact, they sit among the reasons women feel traumatised and ignored by the very system meant to care for them. Those who think the answer to maternity failings is 'cut more, stitch better' have not been listening — to clinicians, to evidence and, most importantly, to women. His throwaway line about non-qualified staff also reveals the deeper rot: the devaluation of women's health, where under-resourced services are patched up with cheap fixes and the myth that technical interventions can substitute for compassion, time and trust. We don't need 'birthing technicians'. Rather, we need to support obstetricians and midwives, whose expertise in holistic, safe and respectful care is too often sidelined or Dalton MRCOGLeeds Sir, You report that players and spectators are struggling to hear Wimbledon's AI line calls ('Players call out whispering AI judges', Jul 1). I suggest a Dalek is employed at each court to announce the calls, as their distinctive diction is easily understood. Also, and to emphasise that they have called out, the Dalek should waggle its forehead-mounted exterminator. The umpire could be issued with a sonic screwdriver to adjust the volume as RileySandhurst, Berks Sir, Your report on healthcare advice in the Middle Ages ('First catch a lizard: beauty tips from the Middle Ages', Jun 30) calls to mind the writings of the Benedictine nun Hildegard of Bingen (1098-1179). She suggested recipes for healthy eating, with recommendations that 'Butter should be eaten in moderation by those who are fat lest his weak flesh becomes fatter' and 'salt is good but not to excess' (Physica, Book 2), which seem ubiquitous in guidance on modern healthy living. Hildegard also extolled the benefits of camomile, but her advice to 'drink water with the dried liver of a lion as an aid to digestion' did not seem to catch on. Her recipes for 'boiling hedgehog with wine and cinnamon recommended for a good healthy supper' and 'earthworms mashed to a paste with wine, vinegar and flour for scrofula' are less appealing. She said slugs could be used if there were no earthworms to hand (Physica, Book 7).Dr Valerie ShrimplinSt Albans Sir, Further to Joanna Williams's comment article (Jun 30; letters, Jul 1), communications to clergy from our diocesan office seem more interested in net zero, church buildings and community events than in sharing the Gospel. Nationally, the fact that many of our bishops seem content in debates to jettison Christ's teaching suggests a lack of personal conviction about the core truths of Christianity. Inevitably, this leads to decline. But those churches that unashamedly teach Scripture — however counter-cultural this is — are bucking the trend, being attended by many of all ages. This is not down to great talent on their part, but simply the truth and power of the good news about PaineVicar, St Andrew the Great, Cambridge Sir, I read with interest Lucy Cavendish's article about Mounjaro and how it affected her family (Times2, Jun 30). I lost three stone over a couple of years using Dr Michael Mosley's advice simply to eat less. I followed a normal healthy diet involving fresh ingredients such as meat, fish and vegetables and ate less each day — eg, instead of two pieces of toast for breakfast, I ate one. I ate a light lunch such as soup and a sandwich and a normal evening meal. It was very easy, and as I cooked for my family they had larger portions. I avoided puddings and ate fruit but had a piece of dark chocolate with my coffee after supper. Much easier than taking Mounjaro and I am still three stone NaylorWivenhoe, Essex Sir, Researchers in Canada report that eating cheese in the evening may disturb your sleep (Jul 1). Charles Dickens, then, was ahead of his time when, in A Christmas Carol, Scrooge encounters Marley's ghost and tells him he doubts his senses, stating: 'A little thing affects them. A slight disorder of the stomach makes them cheats. You may be an undigested bit of beef, a blot of mustard, a crumb of cheese, a fragment of an underdone potato. There's more of gravy than grave of you, whatever you are!'Stephen BussSeaford, E Sussex Write to letters@
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Digital ‘one stop shop' for NHS will speed up care for patients, Government says
A new 'one stop shop' will showcase cutting-edge technologies to NHS hospitals while also slashing red tape, the Government has announced. The digital platform – MedTech Compass – aims to bring together technologies that are good for patients with an 'innovator passport' to cut the time firms spend on making repetitive data submissions to NHS trusts. The aim, set out in this week's 10-year plan for the NHS, is to get technology into the hands of NHS staff and patients quicker than before. Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting said: 'For too long, Britain's leading scientific minds have been held back by needless admin that means suppliers are repeatedly asked for the same data in different formats by different trusts – this is bad for the NHS, patients and bad for business. 'These innovator passports will save time and reduce duplication, meaning our life sciences sector – a central part of our 10-Year Health Plan – can work hand-in-hand with the health service and make Britain a powerhouse for medical technology. 'Frustrated patients will no longer have to face a postcode lottery for life-saving products to be introduced in their area and companies will be able to get their technology used across the NHS more easily, creating a health service fit for the future under the Plan for Change.' Writing in The Independent, Mr Streeting said the plan would put nursing at the heart of transforming the NHS, including training them on the latest technology and help 'shift our NHS from analogue to digital'. He said plans would cut red tape to enable nurses to start working on wards quickly after finishing training, faster payment of expenses and training in communities. The passport will be introduced over the next two years and will mean technology that has been robustly assessed by one NHS organisation can easily be rolled out to others. The Department of Health said this would remove 'needless bureaucracy' and create a 'dynamic best buyer's guide', while also helping boost economic growth. In on example, special wound dressings which are already cutting infections after surgery by 38% at Barking, Havering & Redbridge University Hospitals could be adopted across the country, the Department said. Meanwhile, at Barts Health Trust in London, the use of antimicrobial protective coverings for cardiac devices have cut infections and saved more than £103,000 per year. The Department of Health also said rapid flu testing at University Hospitals Dorset has cut the time patients spend in hospital alongside antibiotic use – something that could benefit other hospitals. MedTech Compass aims to make these innovations, and the evidence underpinning them, clearer to buyers within the NHS. Dr Vin Diwakar, clinical transformation director at NHS England, said: 'We're seeing the impact improvements to technology are having on our everyday lives on everything from smartwatches to fitness trackers – and we want to make sure NHS patients can benefit from the latest medical technology and innovations as well. 'The new innovator passports will speed up the rollout of new health technology in the NHS which has been proven to be effective, so that patients can benefit from new treatments much sooner.' Chief executive of NHS Providers, Daniel Elkeles, said: 'We welcome any measures which cut red tape and help trusts get proven and effective technology onto the frontline faster to boost patient care and free staff from time-consuming admin.' Professor Peter Bannister, medtech expert and fellow at the Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET), said: 'This centralisation and simplification of adoption across the NHS will be welcomed by industry – including both large corporates and innovative UK small businesses – as well as by patients and clinicians. 'However, there must be clear evidence standards for manufacturers that recognise the diversity and health inequalities of the UK population, while the variation in digital readiness and workforce skills between different healthcare providers must also be factored in.'
Rhyl Journal
4 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Breast cancer patients ‘denied life-extending drugs because of unfair system'
Breast Cancer Now has demanded 'immediate action' from Health Secretary Wes Streeting, urging him to scrap spending restraints. It is also calling for the NHS spending watchdog the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) to lower the bar for what it classes as a very severe health condition. Nice's severity modifier, introduced in 2022, gives treatment for more severe illnesses more weight, meaning the health benefits of certain drugs are valued more highly and more likely to be recommended for NHS use. According to Nice, the process raises the threshold for what it considers to be a cost-effective treatment, meaning it can give more expensive drugs the green light. However, a new report from Breast Cancer Now claims the system means women with incurable breast cancer with months to live may be told their condition does not qualify for the most severe rating. The call comes after it emerged that the life-extending drug Enhertu will not be made available for women with incurable breast cancer on the NHS in England and Wales. In November, Nice said talks with manufacturers AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo over the price of the medication had broken down for the third time with no agreement. Claire Rowney, chief executive at Breast Cancer Now, said: 'The terrifying reality is that unless urgent action is taken thousands of women in the UK with incurable secondary breast cancer could be denied access to vital life-extending treatments because of an unfair system. 'We're talking about patients missing out on access to cutting-edge, effective treatments that could give them more time to be there for special moments such as birthdays or seeing their children or grandchildren start school. 'Treatments, such as Enhertu, that patients in other countries, including Scotland, can access, giving them the chance to live longer. 'Women with secondary breast cancer tell us they feel their lives are being deprioritised by the changes to the system. 'We will not stand by and witness more drugs being rejected or not taken forward, when the devastating cost is thousands more people with secondary breast cancer across England, Wales and Northern Ireland having their lives cut short.' Paula Van Santen, 50, was diagnosed with secondary breast cancer in July 2022, two months after her diagnosis of primary breast cancer. The mother-of-three, from Banbury in Oxfordshire, said: 'Secondary breast cancer has changed the lives of both myself and my family beyond belief. Coming to terms with my diagnosis is the hardest part because I've had to grieve for the life I had, but also the life that I'm not going to have. 'If a new drug can give me another six months, if it gives me another year, it's worth it. 'It could allow me to see my daughter get to 21, see my children get married or meet grandchildren. Just to have a picture with a grandchild so they would know that I existed would be so precious. That's what this could give.' Ms Rowney called for 'change' and said Mr Streeting should scrap 'opportunity-cost neutral' restraints. Opportunity cost neutrality in the Nice severity modifier aims to ensure the new system does not require more or less overall NHS funding than the old one. According to the Breast Cancer Now report, this is 'at the root of the issues with the modifier'. It added: 'It pits end-of-life cancer treatments against other severe conditions like cystic fibrosis in a way that's reductive and unfair to patients. And, ultimately, it creates barriers to the approval of drugs for advanced cancers.' Ms Rowney said: 'The system for deciding whether drugs are approved for use on the NHS must change now. 'We're calling for immediate action from Wes Streeting, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, to urgently scrap 'opportunity-cost neutral' restraints and for Nice to lower the bar for what it defines as 'a severe condition'. And we stand ready to work with them.' Dr Samantha Roberts, chief executive of Nice, welcomed the report from Breast Cancer Now, saying: 'The independent analysis we commissioned recently showed the new severity weighting is working as intended and expected. 'It is able to be applied more widely – for example to treatments for cystic fibrosis, hepatitis D and Duchenne muscular dystrophy – and has contributed to an increase in positive decisions for cancer medicines and non-cancer medicines. 'And other breast cancer treatments have been recommended since we introduced the severity modifier – including for advanced breast cancer. 'We remain deeply disappointed that we were unable to recommend Enhertu for HER2-low advanced breast cancer. We know this was devastating to all those hoping for a different answer. 'It remains the only breast cancer treatment we have been unable to recommend in seven years.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said the upcoming 10-year health plan will 'transform the NHS and improve care for those facing cancer'. 'This includes rolling out DIY screening kits for cervical cancer, more radiotherapy machines in every region and opening more Community Diagnostic Centres closer to where people live,' they added. 'We know how disappointing it is to many families that the manufacturers of Enhertu are unwilling to sell this life-extending treatment to the NHS at a fair and reasonable price. Our door remains open to supporting the introduction of medicines at a cost-effective price.'
