Labour v Reform UK: on the road in Runcorn
Helen Pidd has been out in the town to find out what voters think about the government and Nigel Farage. She spoke to voters who are angry at Reform's tactics of focusing on migration, but who also feel let down by Labour. She visits Labour's almost empty electoral nerve centre and notices the optimism in Reform's office. Even a passing Liberal candidate is struck by the efficiency of the Reform machine and the apparent enthusiasm for it. And she also heads to a hotel that has been housing asylum seekers to see how it has become a flashpoint in local politics.
The Guardian's political correspondent, Kiran Stacey, tells Helen how the byelection may show how much of a risk Reform could be to Labour, and how the mayoral and local elections could play for the Conservatives, the Lib Dems and the Green party. What will they tell us about the state of politics in the UK today?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
New proposals to cut PIP and disability benefits ahead of full review
The Centre for Social Justice has called for emergency measures to be brought in to reduce the number of people currently on the benefit New plans to slash Personal Independence Payment (PIP) have been put forward, aligning with a forthcoming Government review of the benefit. Currently, Labour has paused any steps regarding PIP within its welfare overhaul due to a backlash from MPs and activists for disability rights. Originally, there was a move to impose a four-point rule to tighten PIP accessibility. This would've meant claimants needing at least one tally of four points in assessed daily living activities to qualify. However, modifications to PIP are now set to follow only after Sir Stephen Timms, Minister for Social Security and Disability, conducts a thorough examination. READ MORE: 'I'm a beauty writer - the new ghd curling wand gave me perfect waves in 15 mins' Slated for completion by Autumn 2026, the 'Timms Review' vows to be "co-produced with disabled people, along with the organisations that represent them, experts, MPs and other stakeholders, so a wide range of views and voices are heard." The Centre for Social Justice (CSJ), a centre-right think tank, is urging for an expedited review and argues for a significant reform of PIP to "redirect funding from long-term cash payments." In the updated 'Change the Prescription' report, the CSJ outlines several proposals concerning eligibility for PIP and the health component of Universal Credit, reports Birmingham Live. Amongst their suggestions is the ceasing of PIP and Universal Credit health benefits for individuals experiencing slighter forms of anxiety, depression, and ADHD - a change that could impact over a million beneficiaries, including those currently receiving standard-rate PIP for such conditions. For those who continue to be eligible due to receiving the enhanced rate of PIP, their payments would be cut by roughly £80 a week to match the standard rate. The report estimates this would save £7.4 billion annually by 2029/2030 and suggests that £1 billion of this could be reinvested in frontline mental health services such as NHS Talking Therapies, local support groups, work coaches and community interventions. The think tank suggests that limiting eligibility for PIP and the UC health element to the most severe cases of anxiety, depression and ADHD would save approximately £8.8 billion. Joe Shalam, policy director at the CSJ, said: "Liz Kendall deserves credit for tackling the perverse incentives that have crept into the welfare system since Covid. "People who cannot work due to sickness or disability must always be protected, but as our research shows, too many people are trapped in a cycle of dependency and wasted potential. "By tightening eligibility for mental health benefits and investing in therapy and employment support, ministers can save public money and transform lives. The Timms Review must be brought forward to Autumn, there is no time to lose." Labour's welfare reforms bill was supported by MPs only after a £5 billion reduction to PIP was dropped. However, the CSJ argues that the rising number of PIP claims are contributing to a significant gap between welfare and work that needs immediate attention. The report suggests that a person who is economically inactive and on Universal Credit, including the average housing element to cover their rent, and also receiving PIP, would have a taxpayer-funded Government income of around £25,000 - this increases to £27,500 for those awarded the highest rate of PIP. However, this amount drops to £22,550 once the welfare bill's cut to the Universal Credit health element for new claimants is considered. In contrast, a full-time worker earning the National Living Wage (NLW) is projected to make £22,500 after paying income tax and National Insurance, creating a £2,500 disparity between work and welfare for existing claimants. The CSJ argues that the gap widens even further when additional benefits are factored in. For instance, an unemployed single parent, claiming PIP for anxiety and disability allowance for a child with additional needs such as ADHD, would receive £36,900, which is over £14,000 more than the net wages of a full-time worker on the National Living Wage.
Rhyl Journal
3 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Rupert Lowe cleared of breaching MPs' rules over grooming gang inquiry donations
An investigation was opened into the independent MP after a member of the public raised concerns about the donations he had received through a crowdfunder launched in March to support a national inquiry into the scandal of children being groomed and abused by gangs across the UK. Mr Lowe claimed the complainant had a 'clear and evidenced connection to Reform', his former political party. The MP for Great Yarmouth set up his investigation before Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced there would be a new Government-backed inquiry in June. The fundraiser has so far raised more than £600,000, and the standards commissioner launched the investigation over concerns that Mr Lowe was yet to declare the money on his register of interests. MPs are required to update their register of interests within 28 days once they receive a donation from a single source of more than £1,500, or more than £300 in gifts or earnings. Concluding his investigation, Daniel Greenberg, Parliament's standards commissioner, wrote: 'Following a complaint from a member of the public that Mr Rupert Lowe MP had failed to register donations made to a crowdfunder organised by him in connection with his parliamentary activities, I opened a formal inquiry on 10 July 2025. 'My inquiry sought to confirm whether these donations qualified as registrable interests and whether Mr Lowe had failed to register them within the 28-day window set by the House.' Mr Lowe 'provided evidence that a number of donations made to the crowdfunder did cross the threshold for registration' the commissioner said. But the MP also provided evidence they were not accepted until June 23, which is within the 28-day window. Mr Greenberg added: 'As such, the 28-day window set by the House for the registration of those interests has not passed and no breach of the Rules has occurred.' Writing on social media site X after the conclusion of the investigation, Mr Lowe said: 'This complaint was a malicious attempt to shut me down and undermine our inquiry. 'The complainant, who held the leaked details of the 'confidential' investigation, has a clear and evidenced connection to Reform – you can draw your own conclusions about how this information reached the media.' The MP said he had 'immediately provided undeniable proof that all was done within the rules' when asked by the parliamentary watchdog. The complaint against me and our Rape Gang Inquiry has been cleared by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. This complaint was a malicious attempt to shut me down and undermine our inquiry. The complainant, who held the leaked details of the 'confidential'… — Rupert Lowe MP (@RupertLowe10) July 11, 2025 Mr Lowe added: 'It's a hit job. Another hit job. 'I do not think that it is a coincidence that this complaint has come just a few days before we are welcoming 40 rape gang survivors to Parliament.' Mr Lowe plans to welcome a group of women, who experienced abuse at the hands of grooming gangs, to Westminster next week. 'Every MP will be invited to come and speak individually with survivors. Hear their stories, understand what actually happened – and what is still happening,' the MP said on X. Mr Lowe was elected as a Reform UK MP, but was suspended by the party in March amid claims he had threatened then-party chairman Zia Yusuf. He denied the allegations, and the Crown Prosecution Service said no criminal charges would be brought against him in relation to alleged threats towards Mr Yusuf. Mr Lowe has since accused his ex-colleagues of engaging in a 'sinister' attempt to use the police to silence him, and called Reform's leader Nigel Farage a 'coward and a viper'. Not long after he was suspended, Mr Lowe launched his private investigation into the grooming gang scandal, amid pressure from the Government's opponents for a new inquiry.
Sky News
3 hours ago
- Sky News
Starmer aims to break cabinet away day curse
Sir Keir Starmer was hoping to break the curse of the cabinet away day as he summoned his ministers to Chequers for the launch of a summer "refresh" of his troubled government. The aim: to plot a course for a recovery during Labour's second year in power after a first 12 months blighted by economic woes, rows over freebies, humiliating U-turns and rebellions. In the past, the away day rules from the No 10 high command have included no woolly jumpers and no sandwiches. This time, the rule to ministers was: "Don't call it a reset." The curse of this away day could turn out to be the threat of a looming ministerial reshuffle, which some MPs predict could come as early as next week. Could some of those present face the axe? According to the official readout of Sir Keir's away day, the prime minister chaired a session on how the government will use AI "to turbocharge its Plan for Change". But that was just a small part of the discussions. Top of the agenda for a "political cabinet", without civil servants, were the storm clouds over the economy and the options for Chancellor Rachel Reeves in her make-or-break autumn budget. And based on the experience of previous cabinet away days, from Sir Tony Blair and Gordon Brown to Theresa May, Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak, the omens were not good. Away days may seem like a good idea at the time, but most end badly. The idea of Chequers away days has been to hold a brainstorming session in the privacy of the Buckinghamshire countryside without distractions or prying photographers, reporters or TV crews. But over the years, like most family get-togethers, there have been personality clashes, squabbles about what to eat and what to wear, disputes about who takes centre stage, and even backstabbing and walkouts. The last Chequers cabinet away day, held by Mr Sunak in January 2023, took place with two senior figures facing official investigations. Tory chair Nadhim Zahawi was engulfed in a tax scandal and deputy prime minister Dominic Raab was facing bullying allegations. Mr Zahawi was out within a week after this away day and Mr Rabb within three months. Without doubt, the most disastrous cabinet awayday at Chequers was in July 2018, when Ms May thought she'd persuaded her cabinet to back her Brexit deal. Then, as now, the heat was sweltering. But two days later, David Davis quit as Brexit secretary and Mr Johnson - who was said to have proposed a champagne toast to the prime minister at Chequers - resigned as foreign secretary the following day. Ms May thought she had a deal that would keep the UK closely tied to the EU's customs union and single market. But it was doomed even during that away day. It was reported that ministers were warned that anyone who resigned would have to walk a mile down the drive and get a lift home with the local taxi firm, whose cards had been left in the foyer. When he resigned, Mr Davis was said to have been livid about hostile briefing from senior figures in Downing Street about how the Brexiters would be treated at Chequers, including the taxi threat. And Mr Johnson not only launched a "Chuck Chequers" campaign opposing Ms May's deal, but also a campaign to chuck her out of Downing Street and seize her job for himself. As prime minister, he also held a cabinet awayday, not at Chequers, but at a pottery in the heart of the "red wall" in Stoke-on-Trent, in 2022. The venue might have been different, but that was cursed too. Just weeks later Mr Johnson's cabinet shattered like broken Wedgwood china following the resignations of Mr Sunak and Sajid Javid. The modern trend for cabinet away days was started by Sir Tony - who else? - in 1998. The rules for ministers were laid down by his chief of staff Jonathan Powell, now Sir Keir's national security adviser. In a memo to cabinet ministers attending, he wrote: "TV will film people arriving and going, so there can be no woolly jumpers." Mr Powell was rebuffed by Sir Tony, however, when he suggested in a memo to the prime minister that Mr Brown should start the meeting with a discussion on the economy. "No," Sir Tony replied bluntly in a handwritten note. Peter Mandelson, now Britain's ambassador in Washington, demanded "something nicer than sandwiches" for lunch and got his wish when a buffet was laid on. Sir Keir's Chequers away day also began with lunch, then the short formal cabinet meeting with the discussion about AI, then the political cabinet, which was the real reason for the away day. No need for woolly jumpers in the 32C heat. Just don't call it a "refresh".
