Deal or no deal: What happens with Trump's July tariff deadline?
The tariffs taking effect July 9 are part of a package Trump imposed in April citing a lack of 'reciprocity' in trading ties.
He slapped a 10 per cent levy on most partners, with higher customised rates to kick in later in countries the United States has major trade deficits with.
But these were halted until July to allow room for negotiations.
Analysts expect countries will encounter one of three outcomes: They could reach a framework for an agreement; receive an extended pause on higher tariffs; or see levies surge.
'Framework' deals
'There will be a group of deals that we will land before July 9,' said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent last Friday on CNBC.
Policymakers have not named countries in this group, although Bessent maintains that Washington has been focused on striking deals with about 18 key partners.
'Vietnam, India and Taiwan remain promising candidates for a deal,' Asia Society Policy Institute (ASPI) vice president Wendy Cutler told AFP.
Without a deal, Vietnam's 'reciprocal tariff' rises from the baseline of 10 per cent to 46 per cent, India's to 26 per cent and Taiwan's to 32 per cent.
Josh Lipsky, international economics chair at the Atlantic Council, cited Indian negotiators' extension of their US trip recently in noting that it 'seems like a frontrunner.'
'Japan was in that category, but things have set back a little,' Lipsky said, referring to Trump's criticism Monday over what the president called Japan's reluctance to accept US rice exports.
The deals, however, will unlikely be full-fledged trade pacts, analysts said, citing complexities in negotiating such agreements.
Since April, Washington has only announced a pact with Britain and a deal to temporarily lower tit-for-tat duties with China.
Extended pause
Bessent has also said that countries 'negotiating in good faith' can have their tariffs remain at the 10 per cent baseline.
But extensions of the pause on higher rates would depend on Trump, he added.
'With a new government, (South) Korea looks well positioned to secure an extension,' Cutler of ASPI said.
Lipsky expects many countries to fall into this bucket, receiving an extended halt on higher tariffs that could last until Labour Day, which falls on September 1.
Bessent earlier said that Washington could wrap up its agenda for trade deals by Labour Day, a signal that more agreements could be concluded but with talks likely to extend past July.
Tariff reimposition
For countries that the United States finds 'recalcitrant,' however, tariffs could spring back to the higher levels Trump previously announced, Bessent has warned.
These range from 11 per cent to 50 per cent.
Cutler warned that 'Japan's refusal to open its rice market, coupled with the US resistance to lowering automotive tariffs, may lead to the reimposition of Japan's 24 per cent reciprocal tariff.'
Trump himself said on Monday that a trade deal was unlikely with Japan and the country could pay a tariff of '30 per cent, 35 per cent, or whatever the number is that we determine.'
Lipsky believes the European Union is at risk of having tariffs snap back to steeper levels too — to the 20 per cent unveiled in April or the 50 per cent Trump more recently threatened.
An area of tension could be Europe's approach to digital regulation.
Trump recently said he would terminate trade talks with Canada — which is not impacted by the July 9 deadline — in retaliation for the country's digital services tax, which Ottawa eventually said it would rescind.
This week, EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic is in Washington in a push to seal a trade deal, with the EU commission having received early drafts of proposals that officials are working on. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
33 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Ringgit rises as traders turn cautious ahead of US tariff move
KUALA LUMPUR : The ringgit opened higher against the US dollar on Thursday, rebounding from a weaker close the day before, as traders turned cautious and pared greenback holdings ahead of the July 9 expiry of the US 90-day tariff pause, an analyst said. At 8am, the local note stood at 4.2205/4.2295 against the greenback, up from Wednesday's close of 4.2245/4.2305. Meanwhile, the US Dollar Index eased 0.04% to 96.776, after US labour market data pointed to weakness in June. Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd chief economist Afzanizam Rashid said the US private sector shed 33,000 jobs in June, according to payroll data firm Automatic Data Processing (ADP), defying market expectations of a 99,000 increase. 'Job losses were most apparent in services sectors such as financial activities and professional and business services. Tonight's nonfarm payroll (NFP) report will be closely watched, given the positive correlation between ADP and NFP readings,' he told Bernama. Mohd Afzanizam said signs of a weakening labour market have started to emerge, which could influence the US Federal Reserve's interest rate outlook and strengthen the case for rate cuts. 'On Wednesday, the ringgit weakened to RM4.2275 from RM4.1980, marking a 0.7% depreciation. This was likely due to profit-taking ahead of the expiry of the US tariff pause,' he added. He also noted possible signs of concessions from the US government, citing the case of Vietnam, where reciprocal tariffs were reduced to 20%. 'Given these developments, the ringgit may remain range-bound as market participants stay cautious ahead of tonight's NFP data and the upcoming US tariff decision,' he added. At the opening, the ringgit was mixed against a basket of major and Asean currencies. It strengthened against the British pound to 5.7606/5.7728 from 5.7859/5.7941, but slipped versus the euro to 4.9793/4.9900 from 4.9748/4.9818 and fell against the Japanese yen to 2.9405/2.9470 from 2.9316/2.9360. The local note was firmer against the Singapore dollar at 3.3154/3.3230 from 3.3167/3.3217, edged up against the Indonesian rupiah to 259.7/260.4 from 259.9/260.5, and rose against the Philippine peso to 7.48/7.50 from 7.49/7.51. However, it eased against the Thai baht to 13.0391/13.0742 from 13.0233/13.0482.
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Tesla sales fall again but beat worst forecasts as Musk-Trump feud clouds outlook
NEW YORK, July 3 — Tesla reported another hefty drop in auto sales Wednesday, extending a difficult period amid intensifying electric vehicle competition and backlash over CEO Elon Musk's political activities. The EV maker reported 384,122 deliveries in the second quarter, down 13.5 per cent from the year-ago period. Shares rallied after the disclosure, which was better than some leading forecasts in recent days. The sales figures, which are global, reflect the more contested nature of the EV market, which Tesla once dominated, but which now also features BYD and other low-cost Chinese companies, as well as legacy western automakers like General Motors, Toyota and Volkswagen. But Musk's political activism on behalf of right-wing figures has also made the company a target of boycotts and demonstrations, weighing on sales. In recent days, Musk has revived a feud with US President Donald Trump, dragging Tesla shares lower on Tuesday. The figures portend another poor round of earnings when Tesla reports results on July 23. Analysts currently project a drop of 16 per cent to US$1.2 billion (RM5.07 billion) in profits, according to S&P Capital IQ. Tesla has faced questions about a lack of new retail auto products to wow consumers after Musk's futuristic Cybertruck proved polarising. Analysts will be looking for an update on the state of new offerings after Tesla said in April that it planned 'more affordable models' in the first half of 2025. The company has begun deliveries of its revamped Model Y in some markets, according to news reports. Tesla launched a long-discussed robotaxi venture in the Texas state capital Austin, lending momentum to Musk's branding of the company as at the forefront of autonomous and artificial intelligence technology. But reports that the self-driving cars have driven recklessly have prompted oversight from US regulators. Heading into Wednesday's data release, notes from JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche Bank had forecast bigger drops in second-quarter deliveries, citing poor figures in Europe in particular. The JPMorgan note was especially bearish, setting a December share price target of US$115, down more than 60 per cent from current levels and citing an expected drag from the elimination of US tax credits for EVs under Trump's signature domestic policy legislation moving through Congress. Following the results, Morningstar said in a note that Tesla would not see 'meaningful deliveries growth without a new lower-cost vehicle aimed at the affordable market.' For the second quarter in a row, Tesla produced more vehicles than it delivered, 'raising concerns regarding demand and inventory levels,' said a note from CFRA Research that called the figures 'a modest disappointment.' But Wedbush's Dan Ives said Wednesday's 'better-than-feared' report set the stage for growth. 'If Musk continues to lead and remain in the driver's seat, we believe Tesla is on a path to an accelerated growth path over the coming years with deliveries expected to ramp in the back-half of 2025 following the Model Y refresh cycle,' Ives said. Political wildcard A wildcard remains: how Musk's shifting relationship with Trump could affect Tesla. Musk donated more than US$270 million to Trump's presidential campaign, barnstorming key battleground states for the Republican. After the election, he oversaw the launch of the Department of Government Efficiency, a controversial initiative that eliminated thousands of government jobs deemed by DOGE to be part of a pattern of waste, fraud and abuse. But Musk has broken with Trump over the White House's flagship tax and spending bill, which Musk has called 'utterly insane and destructive.' In response, Trump has threatened to target Musk's business empire and warned of deporting the South African-born billionaire, sending Tesla shares plummeting. 'This high-profile feud introduces political risk,' said in a note Tuesday. 'The personal nature of the conflict, amplified by Trump's comments implying Tesla's reliance on subsidies for survival, has sparked fears of broader policy shifts targeting Musk's business empire.' Tesla shares rose 4.7 per cent early Wednesday. — AFP
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Raise technology sovereignty for national resilience and competitiveness — Ahmad Ibrahim
JULY 3 — Protectionism is on the rise. The US, through recent pronouncements, gave clear signals of this. The US is not alone. Many other economies are on a similar path. As a trading nation, this should be a concern to us as well. The global trade dynamics are changing. We need to restrategise. The global supply chains are at risk of being disrupted. Much of our manufacturing economy relies on such supply economics. To cope, we need to be more resilient. We must strive for greater economic independence. Since technology has become a critical factor in the economy, calls for technology sovereignty have grown louder. Some countries have developed indices to help monitor and make strategic changes to their technology ownership. Technology sovereignty refers to a country's ability to develop, access, and control key technologies that are critical for its economy, security, and society without being overly dependent on foreign powers. In an increasingly interconnected and competitive world, this concept has become central to national strategies. It matters for national security. Too much technological dependence on other nations, especially for critical infrastructure, exposes countries to risks such as cyberattacks, espionage, and supply chain disruption. Sovereignty ensures control over defence technologies and communication systems, protection from backdoors or surveillance by foreign powers, and continuity of critical services during geopolitical tensions. Countries that develop and retain their own technologies are better positioned to innovate and move up the global value chain, protect intellectual property, and foster homegrown industries. Sovereignty allows countries to shape their own industrial policies and ensure long-term growth. With data being the new oil, nations want to ensure personal and industrial data is stored, processed, and used according to local laws and ethical standards. Citizens' data is then not exploited or stored overseas without consent. National strategic data on health, education, and security remains protected. Technology sovereignty is closely linked to a country's ability to make independent decisions and avoid being caught in the crossfire of global tech rivalries. It enables control over critical sectors like health, energy, and transportation. It supports self-reliance during crises like pandemics or trade wars. Sovereignty allows countries to promote and preserve their cultural narratives in digital content and platforms, and develop ethical frameworks that align with local values. It will help countries resist technological colonialism and maintain political independence in the digital sphere. Technology sovereignty is closely linked to a country's ability to make independent decisions and avoid being caught in the crossfire of global tech rivalries. — Picture from Unsplash/Adi Goldstein Furthermore, developing local tech capacity drives education, STEM advancement, and job creation. It encourages innovation ecosystems, prevents brain drain, and builds domestic expertise — not to mention supports inclusive economic development by tailoring technologies to local needs. In the 21st century, technology sovereignty is as important as food, energy, and defence sovereignty. It empowers nations to shape their futures on their own terms. As technologies like AI, quantum computing, and biotechnology evolve rapidly, the gap between tech-sovereign and tech-dependent countries may define future global power dynamics. The EU has developed its own Technology Sovereignty Index (TSI). This measures a country's ability to control its critical technological supply chains without excessive reliance on foreign entities. Other countries should consider developing their own versions of such an index for several strategic reasons. Over-reliance on foreign technology can make a country vulnerable to supply chain disruptions or geopolitical coercion. Dependence on foreign tech increases exposure to espionage, backdoors, and cyberattacks. A TSI helps pinpoint gaps in domestic R&D, manufacturing, and innovation, allowing targeted investments. It would boost local tech ecosystems and can nurture homegrown tech champions. Countries like China and the EU use sovereignty frameworks to protect citizen data from foreign surveillance. Over-dependence on foreign big tech can undermine local digital autonomy. A TSI helps prioritise investments in technologies that will shape future economic power. Without sovereignty, smaller economies risk becoming mere consumers rather than innovators in the global tech hierarchy. Countries can benchmark their tech sovereignty against peers and adjust policies accordingly. Nations with aligned TSI goals can form tech blocs (US-EU Trade and Technology Council vs. China's Belt and Road digital expansion). COVID-19 and the Ukraine war exposed vulnerabilities in global tech supply chains (semiconductor shortages). Countries like Russia and Iran face tech embargoes. A TSI could help pre-emptively localise critical tech. A TSI is not just a metric. It is a strategic tool for security, economic growth, and geopolitical influence. As the EU has shown, countries that fail to assess their tech dependencies risk losing control over their digital futures. Nations like the US, India, Japan, and others are already moving in this direction. Those that don't may find themselves at the mercy of more technologically sovereign rivals. * Prof Dato' Ahmad Ibrahim is affiliated with the Tan Sri Omar Centre for STI Policy Studies at UCSI University and is an associate fellow at the Ungku Aziz Centre for Development Studies, Universiti Malaya. * This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
