
Cheap For A Reason? Why Investors Are Avoiding Gap
Note: Gap's fiscal year concluded on February 1, 2025
Despite a surprisingly robust Q1, investors are avoiding Gap Inc. stock (NYSE: GAP) — and for valid reasons. Although the stock appears inexpensive at first glance, with valuation indicators significantly lower than the overall market, underlying problems are affecting sentiment: resurgence of tariff concerns, stagnant forward guidance, and tenuous consumer confidence. The outcome? A 6.1% decline on July 14, even as the S&P 500 managed a 0.1% increase and rival Guess (NYSE: GES) fell just 1%. For those in pursuit of more stable long-term growth, diversified approaches like the Trefis High Quality portfolio have yielded over 91% returns since inception and provide a smoother journey. Separately see – Trump's Russia Math, Simplified
What Is Affecting Gap?
The selloff was a follow-up to a brief rally after earnings, but enthusiasm diminished swiftly. In its Q1 report, Gap disclosed full-year gross tariff costs between $250–$300 million, with $100–$150 million impacting the bottom line despite mitigation efforts. This risk became increasingly tangible following recent court decisions that allowed for the reinstatement of Trump-era tariffs. Additionally, Gap forecasted flat revenue in Q2, a warning sign for a firm attempting to demonstrate it has shifted direction.
Consumer Confidence: A Weak Spot
Consumer sentiment, which is crucial for apparel demand, is on the decline. The U.S. Consumer Confidence Index dropped to 93.0 in June, down from 98.4 in May and significantly lower than its pre-pandemic level of 132.6 in February 2020. A smaller number of Americans anticipate improvements in the job market (15.4%, down from 18.6%) or business conditions (16.7% vs. 19.9%), indicating a weakening environment for spending.
Q1 Overview: Solid, But with Flaws
In Q1 (which concluded on May 3, 2025), Gap reported a 2.2% year-over-year revenue increment to $3.46 billion and earned $0.51 per share, an increase of 24% and surpassing expectations. Gross margin grew to 41.8%, while operating margin improved to 7.7%, boosting net income by 22% to $193 million. Comparable sales rose by 5% for the Gap brand and 3% for Old Navy, but Banana Republic experienced flat comps, and Athleta's comps dropped about 8%. Online sales increased by 6%, now accounting for 39% of total revenue. Despite holding almost $2 billion in cash, the company reported negative free cash flow of $223 million, reflecting regular seasonal trends. Gap reaffirmed its full-year guidance for 1–2% revenue growth and 8–10% operating income growth, excluding the anticipated tariff impact.
Valuation: Deal or Value Trap?
Gap is trading at a significant discount compared to the broader market, with a price-to-sales ratio of 0.6 (compared to 3.1 for the S&P 500), a price-to-free cash flow of 9.9 (vs. 20.9), and a price-to-earnings of 9.4 (vs. 26.9). While these numbers imply a bargain, they also reflect investor skepticism regarding the company's fundamentals and long-term growth prospects.
Growth & Profitability: Mixed Signals
Over the last three years, Gap's revenue has contracted at an average annual rate of 2.1%, in contrast to the S&P 500's 5.5% increase. Sales have remained stable over the past year, and Q1's 2.2% revenue growth remains modest. Profitability continues to lag behind its peers, with an operating margin of 7.7%, a net margin of 5.8% (versus 11.6% for the S&P 500), and an operating cash flow margin of 8.7% (versus 14.9%). Although operational execution is improving, Gap is still significantly trailing industry leaders.
Gap's balance sheet is sound but not flawless. The company has $5.5 billion in debt compared to an $8 billion market cap, leading to a debt-to-equity ratio of 63.4%, which is over three times the S&P 500 average. On a positive note, a healthy cash-to-assets ratio of 19.2% provides a buffer as the company navigates cost pressures and ongoing brand transformation.
Final Thoughts
Indeed, Gap appears inexpensive. However, there's a reason for it. The Q1 performance is promising, but investors are justifiably wary given the tariff risks, lukewarm guidance, uneven brand performance, and a deteriorating consumer environment. Until the fundamentals show broader improvement, the discount may persist.
Investing in a single stock carries risks. For those seeking growth with lower volatility, diversified portfolios such as the Trefis High Quality portfolio present an attractive alternative. Why is that? As a group, HQ Portfolio stocks have delivered superior returns with lesser risk compared to the benchmark index, leaning away from extreme fluctuations, as illustrated in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
12 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump says Japan will invest $550 billion in US at his direction. It may not be a sure thing.
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump is bragging that Japan has given him, as part of a new trade framework, $550 billion to invest in the United States. It's an astonishing figure, but still subject to negotiation and perhaps not the sure thing he's portraying. 'Japan is putting up $550 billion in order to lower their tariffs a little bit,' Trump said Thursday. 'They put up, as you could call it, seed money. Let's call it seed money.' He said 90% of any profits from the money invested would go to the U.S. even if Japan had put up the funds. 'It's not a loan or anything, it's a signing bonus,' the Republican president said, on the trade framework that lowered his threatened tariff from 25% to 15%, including on autos. A White House official said the terms are being negotiated and nothing has been formalized in writing. The official, who insisted on anonymity to detail the terms of the talks, suggested the goal was for the $550 billion fund to make investments at Trump's direction. The sum is significant: It would represent more than 10% of Japan's entire gross domestic product. The Japan External Trade Organization estimates that direct investment into the U.S. economy topped $780 billion in 2023. It is unclear the degree to which the $550 billion could represent new investment or flow into existing investment plans. What the trade framework announced Tuesday has achieved is a major talking point for the Trump administration. The president has claimed to have brought trillions of dollars in new investment into the U.S., though the impact of those commitments have yet to appear in the economic data for jobs, construction spending or manufacturing output. The framework also enabled Trump to say other countries are agreeing to have their goods taxed, even if some of the cost of those taxes are ultimately passed along to U.S. consumers. On the $550 billion, Japan's Cabinet Office said it involves the credit facility of state-affiliated financial institutions, such as Japan Bank for International Cooperation. Further details would be decided based on the progress of the investment deals. Japanese trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa, upon returning to Japan, did not discuss the terms of the $550 billion investment. Akazawa said he believes a written joint statement is necessary, at least on working levels, to avoid differences. He is not thinking about a legally binding trade pact. The U.S. apparently released its version of the deal while Japanese officials were on their return flight home. 'If we find differences of understanding, we may have to point them out and say 'that's not what we discussed,'' Akazawa said. The U.S. administration said the fund would be invested in critical minerals, pharmaceuticals, computer chips and shipbuilding, among other industries. It has said Japan will also buy 100 airplanes from Boeing and rice from U.S. farmers as part of the framework, which Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said would be evaluated every three months. 'And if the president is unhappy, then they will boomerang back to the 25% tariff rates, both on cars and the rest of their products. And I can tell you that I think at 25, especially in cars, the Japanese economy doesn't work,' Bessent told Fox News' 'The Ingraham Angle.' Akazawa denied that Bessent's quarterly review was part of the negotiations. 'In my past eight trips to the United States during which I held talks with the president and the ministers,' Akazawa said. 'I have no recollection of discussing how we ensure the implementation of the latest agreement between Japan and the United States.' He said it would cause major disruptions to the economy and administrative processes if the rates first rise to 25% as scheduled on Aug. 1 and then drop to 15%. 'We definitely want to avoid that and I believe that is the understanding shared by the U.S. side,' he said. On buying U.S. rice, Japanese officials have said they have no plans to raise the current 770,000-ton 'minimum access' cap to import more from America. Agricultural Minister Shinjiro Koizumi said Japan will decide whether to increase U.S. rice imports and that Japan is not committed to a fixed quota. Trump's commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, has suggested that the Japanese agreement is putting pressure on other countries such as South Korea to strike deals with the U.S. Trump, who is traveling in Scotland, plans to meet on Sundayv with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to discuss trade. 'Whatever Donald Trump wants to build, the Japanese will finance it for him,' Lutnick said Thursday on CNBC. 'Pretty amazing.'
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Milei Cuts Export Levies on Argentine Soybeans in Nod to Farmers
(Bloomberg) -- President Javier Milei said he's chopping tariffs on Argentina's exports of meat and crops including soybean products to appease the country's farmers, who view the libertarian leader as falling short on his free-trade promises. Trump Awards $1.26 Billion Contract to Build Biggest Immigrant Detention Center in US The High Costs of Trump's 'Big Beautiful' New Car Loan Deduction Can This Bridge Ease the Troubled US-Canadian Relationship? Trump Administration Sues NYC Over Sanctuary City Policy Argentina's influential farming associations have been seeking relief from the levies, which have held back rural development in Argentina and helped make Brazil the region's undisputed agricultural powerhouse. Tariffs on soy meal and soy oil — Argentina is the top exporter of both — will fall to 24.5% from 31%. For soybeans, the rate drops to 26% from 33%, and for corn to 9.5% from 12%. Several beef cuts will now be taxed 5% instead of 6.75%. Argentina's export tariffs are 'a great scourge that should never have existed,' Milei said at an annual cattle show in Buenos Aires. 'These reductions are permanent and won't be reversed while I'm in power. Extinguishing export tariffs is an obsession of our administration.' Lower rates will make Argentina more competitive as global trade is redrawn by US President Donald Trump's tariffs. While Milei is ideologically opposed to the levies, he still needs the billions of dollars in annual revenue that come from crop and meat cargoes, especially soy, to achieve his priority of posting budget surpluses. While Milei has been unshackling agriculture from years of government intervention, export tariffs remain the elephant in the room. The cuts announced Saturday will help growers, who have strongly backed Milei but are struggling to turn a profit amid low global crop prices. Nicolás Pino, head of the Argentine Rural Society, called on Milei to keep shrinking the tax burden on farmers. 'That includes, above all else, scrapping export tariffs,' he said, addressing the event just before Milei. 'They're worse than the plague, floods or drought.' Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash Confessions of a Laptop Farmer: How an American Helped North Korea's Wild Remote Worker Scheme It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk A Rebel Army Is Building a Rare-Earth Empire on China's Border ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CEO of Russia-backed Indian refiner Nayara resigns after EU sanctions, sources say
(Refiles to fix formatting) By Nidhi Verma NEW DELHI (Reuters) -Russia-backed Indian refiner Nayara Energy has named a new chief executive after its previous CEO resigned following European Union sanctions that targeted the company, four sources with knowledge of the matter said on Friday. The reshuffle at the top is the latest disruption for the company since the EU announced a new round of sanctions last Friday directed at Russia over its war in Ukraine. This week, a tanker carrying Russian Urals crude was diverted away from Nayara's Vadinar port to unload its cargo at another port in western India, Reuters reported. That came after two other tankers skipped loading refined products from Vadinar, Reuters reported. Mumbai-based Nayara has appointed company veteran Sergey Denisov as chief executive to replace Alessandro des Dorides, the sources said. Denisov's appointment was decided at a board meeting on Wednesday, they said. Nayara Energy did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Des Dorides, who joined Nayara Energy in April 2024, for a three-year term, did not immediately respond to a message sent on LinkedIn. In its announcement of his appointment last year, Nayara described Des Dorides as a 24-year veteran of the energy industry. He left Italian major Eni in 2019 after about six months as head of oil trading and operations. Denisov has been with Nayara since 2017. His LinkedIn profile describes him as Nayara's chief development officer. In recent days, Nayara's website has no longer carried pages listing its leadership. The company is one of India's two major private-sector refiners, along with the larger Reliance Industries. The pair have been India's biggest buyers of discounted Russian crude. Nayara, which operates India's third-biggest refinery at Vadinar in western Gujarat state, typically exports at least four million barrels of refined products per month, including diesel, jet fuel, gasoline and naphtha. It also operates more than 6,000 fuel stations. The 400,000 barrels per day (bpd) Vadinar refinery is equivalent to nearly 8% of India's total refining capacity of about 5.2 million bpd. Nayara Energy has criticised the EU's "unjust and unilateral" decision to impose sanctions. Russia's Rosneft holds a 49.13% stake in Nayara and a similar stake is owned by a consortium, Kesani Enterprises Co Ltd, led by Italy's Mareterra Group and Russian investment group United Capital Partners, according to a 2024 note by India's CARE Ratings agency. India, which has become the top importer of seaborne Russian oil in the aftermath of Moscow's Ukraine invasion, has also criticised the EU's sanctions. Rosneft, which said the sanctions on Nayara were unjustified and illegal, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.