
Peace is our nature, not violence
We all must realize that good or evil are in fact the traits of the human soul and even after death these traits or sanskar are carried on to the next birth. These sanskar may change or become stronger as per the person's karma in the next life. Hence, it follows that one may kill an evil person but one cannot destroy the evil in that person. It would instead increase due to feelings of hatred and revenge. Remember!! An evil act is bound to be punished as per the Law of Karma in the present or the next birth, because there is a natural justice system that works infallibly and eternally. Hence, one must never think that if someone avenges a wrong by doing wrong in turn, he/she will not suffer. No!!the truth is that in this case, both the persons will have to pay for their respective wrong actions by undergoing some suffering, because any act done with ill will towards others is violence and it is bound to bring sorrow for the doer. Hence, a person may escape the laws of the land but his karma will catch up with him sooner or later for sure. The world that God created for us was a completely non-violent and harmonious world where no evil existed. Goodness exists eternally; it is when we begin to lose touch with our real values that we are enslaved by negative tendencies.
We are all children of 'Almighty' who is the ocean of love, peace and joy, so his qualities are our qualities too eternally, aren't they? That is why all humans resist hatred. They never resist love or joy. HE never forsakes and forgets his values while we do so due to our own ignorance. HE is always merciful and benevolent towards all, so how can he justify violence? Hence one should be very clear on this issue that wars and calamities are not the curse of almighty, but the results of our own actions & wrong doings. And the only way to bring peace & harmony back on earth is to empower ourselves spiritually and rid our minds of all negativities. This will uproot violence completely out of the world and the world would become the one that it was, serene& peaceful.
(Writer is a spiritual educator & popular columnist for publications across India, Nepal & UK. Till Date 8500+ Published Columns have been written by Him)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
5 days ago
- Indian Express
‘Vindication of law': Relief as Delhi HC quashes charges against 70 in Tablighi Jamaat Covid case
A narrow lane towards the dargah of Hazrat Nizamuddin Auliya first leads to a tall nondescript white building before twisting towards the tomb of the famous Sufi saint. On Thursday evening, as scores of tourists and visitors flocked to the dargah for its famous Qawwali performance, a smaller, more somber group of men assembled in front of the tall white building, awaiting the time for the evening prayers. This is the Nizamuddin Markaz, also known as the Banglewali Masjid Markaz. Five years ago, the building was at the centre of a storm after the Tablighi Jamaat was accused of spreading Covid by organising an international congregation in Delhi. On Thursday, the Delhi High Court quashed charges in 16 FIRs and chargesheets filed in related cases involving 70 Indian citizens. The atmosphere at the Markaz remained almost nonchalant after the verdict. 'We are God's people. We don't bother with what happens on this earthly plane, we only care about what happens before life and after death,' said one person who wished to remain unidentified. In March 2020, a series of gatherings had been organised at the Markaz by the Jamaat. Over 3,000-odd people gathered at the mosque for the month-long events, with people coming from across the country and the world. However, on March 13, the Delhi government passed an order saying that gatherings of over 200 people for sports events, conferences and seminars will not be allowed due to the growing fears of the Covid-19 pandemic. By then, hundreds of people had already reached the Markaz and were accommodated inside. By the time the Janata Curfew was declared on March 22, the Markaz was in utter chaos over where to move the hundreds of people stuck inside. However, a day prior to the Janata Curfew being declared, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) had already drawn up a list of 800 foreigners associated with Tablighi activities across the country. According to the MHA, it had received information of a Tablighi-associated Covid patient in Telangana by March 18. What followed was a rush to track all those who had congregated at Nizamuddin and spread out into the country. Medical screening of those at the Markaz started only on March 26, after the death of a Tablighi-associated Covid patient in Telangana. When the Delhi government eventually released its Covid health bulletin, it made a separate section indicating how many participants of the Tablighi gathering had tested positive. By March 30, the then Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal had ordered an FIR against the organisers. The 70 named as accused across 16 FIRs were charged primarily under sections of the IPC, including criminal conspiracy, for allegedly accommodating foreign nationals in mosques and their homes during the pandemic from March 24-30, 2020. The FIRs had also listed 195 foreign nationals but they were not named as accused in most chargesheets — the magistrate court did not take cognizance of the remaining chargesheets on the principle of double jeopardy. Fuzail Ayyubi, who represented 44 attendants of the Tablighi in the Supreme Court, said, 'When amidst a pandemic that no one understood, an entire body of individuals was criminalised as being 'super-spreaders' and prosecuted criminally, we were able to see through the facade and know that no criminality could be attached at all. Today's judgment is a vindication of that belief in law and courts' adjudicatory role…'


News18
6 days ago
- News18
Crush At Gaza Aid Site Kills At Least 20, GHF Blames Armed Agitators
The GHF, which is supported by Israel, said 19 people were trampled and one fatally stabbed during the crush at one of its centres in Khan Younis in southern Gaza. At least 20 Palestinians were killed on Wednesday at an aid distribution site run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, in what the U.S.-backed group said was a crowd surge instigated by armed agitators. The GHF, which is supported by Israel, said 19 people were trampled and one fatally stabbed during the crush at one of its centres in Khan Younis in southern Gaza. 'We have credible reason to believe that elements within the crowd – armed and affiliated with Hamas – deliberately fomented the unrest," GHF said in a statement. Hamas rejected the GHF allegation as 'false and misleading", saying GHF guards and Israeli soldiers sprayed people with pepper gas and opened fire. GHF said Hamas' account was 'blatantly false". 'At no point was tear gas deployed, nor were shots fired into the crowd. Limited use of pepper spray was deployed, only to safeguard additional loss of life," GHF said in a written response to Reuters via e-mail. 'Today's incident is part of a larger pattern of Hamas trying to undermine and ultimately end GHF. It is no coincidence that this incident occurred during ceasefire negotiations, where Hamas continues to demand that GHF cease operations." Witnesses told Reuters that guards at the site sprayed pepper gas at them after they had locked the gates to the centre, trapping them between the gates and the outer wire-fence. 'People kept gathering and pressuring each other; when people pushed each other…those who couldn't stand fell under the people and were crushed," said eyewitness Mahmoud Fojo, 21, who was hurt in the stampede. 'Some people started jumping over the netted fence and got wounded. We were injured, and God saved us. We were under the people and we said the Shahada (death prayers). We thought we were dying, finished," he added. There was no immediate comment from the Israeli army on Hamas and eyewitness accounts. Palestinian health officials told Reuters that 21 people had died of suffocation at the site. One medic said lots of people had been crammed into a small space and had been crushed. On Tuesday, the U.N. rights office in Geneva said it had recorded at least 875 killings within the past six weeks in the vicinity of aid sites and food convoys in Gaza – the majority of them close to GHF distribution points. Most of those deaths were caused by gunfire that locals have blamed on the Israeli military. The military has acknowledged that Palestinian civilians were harmed near aid distribution centres, saying that Israeli forces had been issued new instructions with 'lessons learned". The GHF uses private U.S. security and logistics companies to get supplies into Gaza, largely bypassing a U.N.-led system that Israel alleges has let Hamas-led militants loot aid shipments intended for civilians. Hamas denies the accusation. The U.N. has called the GHF's model unsafe and a breach of humanitarian impartiality standards – an allegation GHF has denied. Amjad Al-Shawa, director of the Palestinian NGOs Network, accused the GHF on Wednesday of gross mismanagement. 'People who flock in their thousands (to GHF sites) are hungry and exhausted, and they get squeezed into narrow places, amid shortages of aid and the absence of organization and discipline by the GHF," he told Reuters. The war in Gaza, triggered in October 2023 by a deadly Hamas attack on Israel, has displaced almost all of the territory's population and led to widespread hunger and privation. ISRAELI ARMY ROAD Earlier on Wednesday, the Israeli military said it had finished paving a new road in southern Gaza separating several towns east of Khan Younis from the rest of the territory in an effort to disrupt Hamas operations. Palestinians see the road, which extends Israeli control, as a way to put pressure on Hamas in ongoing ceasefire talks, which started on July 6 and are being brokered by Arab mediators Egypt and Qatar with the backing of the United States. Palestinian sources close to the negotiations said a breakthrough had not yet been reached on any of the main issues. Hamas said it rejected an Israeli demand to keep at least 40% of Gaza under its control as part of any deal. Hamas also demanded the dismantlement of the GHF and the reinstatement of a U.N.-led aid delivery mechanism. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says the war will end once Hamas is disarmed and removed from Gaza. Gaza local health authorities said Israeli military strikes have killed at least 87 people across the enclave in the past 24 hours. Israel's campaign in Gaza has killed more than 58,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities. Almost 1,650 Israelis and foreign nationals have been killed as a result of the conflict, including 1,200 killed in the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack, by Israeli tallies. (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - Reuters) Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! view comments Location : Palestine First Published: July 17, 2025, 07:29 IST News world Crush At Gaza Aid Site Kills At Least 20, GHF Blames Armed Agitators Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
6 days ago
- First Post
Now, Nimisha Priya case rests on Qisas: What is this Islamic law?
Indian nurse Nimisha Priya's execution in Yemen has been stayed for now. However, her future remains uncertain as the victim's family rejects offers of blood money and insists on Qisas, the Islamic law that is derived from the 'eye for an eye' principle. So what can we expect next? read more She has escaped the noose for now, but Indian nurse Nimisha Priya's fate still remains in the balance. The Kerala-born nurse, who is facing the death sentence in Yemen, has only one option left in her quest for freedom — clemency from the victim's family. However, it seems quite unlikely that she will be granted forgiveness from the family. The victim's brother, Abdelfattah Mahdi, told the BBC on Monday, before the execution was postponed, 'Our stance on the attempts at reconciliation is clear; we insist on implementing God's Law in Qisas [retaliation in kind], nothing else.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He further stated, 'Any dispute, whatever its reasons and however big, can never justify a murder —let alone dismembering, mutilating and hiding the body.' But what does this mean? More importantly, what does this mean for Nimisha's future? We examine and get you the answers. Nimisha Priya's victim's brother rules out mercy Following the stay on Nimisha's execution, scheduled for July 16, the family of the victim, Talal Abdo Mahdi, has spoken out, indicating that they won't grant her request of forgiveness. Following up on their previous stance, the brother, Abdelfattah, wrote in a lengthy Facebook post that the family has rejected all efforts at reconciliation, including offers of diyyah or blood money. 'Now it's been (execution) postponed and we were not expecting that — unfortunately — especially that those who have stopped the implementation know our absolute refusal to any attempt to reconcile in any form… 'In any case, what is after setting the execution date is more difficult than before. We shall follow execution till execution. 'Delay won't flex, pressure won't move us, blood can't buy… And the truth is not forgotten… Retribution will come no matter how long the road takes, it's a matter of time, and from God help.' For those who need a quick recap, Nimisha Priya, a nurse from Kerala's Palakkad, had gone to Yemen in 2011 in search of a better life. Over there, she joined hands with a Yemeni local, Talal Abdo Mahdi, and opened a clinic. In 2017, fed up with the alleged abuse she was suffering at his hands, she sedated him in an attempt to retrieve her passport. However, her plan went totally awry and he died of an overdose. She subsequently dismembered his body and dumped it in a water tank. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD For this, she was found guilty and sentenced to death, which was later upheld by the Yemeni Supreme Court. Later, the president of Yemen also approved her sentencing, setting her up for execution. A day before her scheduled execution, the 38-year-old nurse, however, received a reprieve as a result of hectic negotiations and even the intervention of India's 'Grand Mufti' from Kerala. Understanding Qisas in Islamic Law But what does it mean when the victim's family insists on implementing God's Law in Qisas? What exactly are Qisas? The principle of Qisa is derived from the primary source of Islamic law: the Quran. The Quran uses the term 'qisas' in the sense of 'equality'. Islamic scholars explain that Qisas refers to the concept of retaliation. It permits a victim's family the right to choose retributive justice, most commonly the death penalty in murder cases. For instance, it allows for a family to choose the punishment for that person who has wronged them. Quite simply put, it's the 'eye for an eye' concept. The Quran allows for Qisas in cases of intentional murder: 'O you who believe, qisas has been prescribed for you in cases of murder… But if any remission is made by the brother of the slain, then grant any reasonable demand, and compensate him with handsome gratitude, this is a concession and a mercy from your Lord. After this whoever exceeds the limits shall be in grave penalty.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The reasoning for it is human equality. In the past, the blood of some influential tribes and individuals were considered more valuable than that of the poor. Moreover, the blood of women and slaves was also considered less valuable. However, the Quran prohibited this practice and hence made the blood of everyone equally precious: life for life, but allowed an exception — forgiveness for merciful objectives. The Quran warns of painful punishment for those who transgress these rules. Qisas are recognised and enforced in multiple countries such as Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan, Sudan, Yemen, Afghanistan (under Taliban rule), and parts of Nigeria where Sharia law is practised. If not retribution, then forgiveness Islamic scholars note that forgiveness is also a crucial aspect of Qisas. While Qisas allows for retribution, Islamic teachings strongly encourage forgiveness and reconciliation. In the context of Qisas, forgiveness can be exercised by accepting compensation — known as diyyah, or blood money. If accepted, this payment can lead to a pardon and nullify the death sentence, emphasising reconciliation over retribution. In Nimisha Priya's case, Nimisha's family and friends have offered $1 million (Rs 8.6 crore) as blood money to the Mahdis. However, they have shown no inclination to accept it. And going by the current situation, it seems clear that the Mahdis seek retribution and not reconciliation. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies