Peterborough school launches legal action over playing fields
The decision came after the Four Cs Academy Trust proposed fencing off 77% of the fields to safeguard its pupils.On a map the council labelled part of the fields "Area C" and then split the space into two. One part of the divided fields has been named "Area C1", which the council has agreed to lease to the school.The academy claimed the authority's decision to split the area into C1 and C2 was "unlawful". The trust stated it now wants to use the entire area of the fields labelled Area C for its lessons and school activities, and has called for the council's decision made in March to be quashed.
It was previously agreed that the academy trust and council would split the cost of the fencing, which was thought to be about £80,000.According to Local Democracy Reporting Service the trust has now said that it "does not accept" it must pay a contribution towards the fencing and argued that it was the council's responsibility as the freeholder.The trust also said the council should pay its costs for any court proceedings.
Save Werrington Fields, a residents' campaign group, is involved in the legal proceedings as an interested party.A spokesperson for the group said it felt the judicial review application showed a "level of contempt" for the community and councillors. They added the organisation hoped the council would "stand up to the bullying tactics" of the academy trust.Nyree Ambarchian, one of the group's members, said: "From our point of view it just seems like a real smack in the face for local democracy."She added: "Everybody's got to a place where they agree, and the academy trust are the ones delaying the process."
A spokesperson for Peterborough City Council said: "Following the decision of full council in March, we remain committed to reaching a conclusion on this matter as quickly as possible in the best interests of everyone involved."In a letter written by the city council to the academy trust's solicitor, the council argued that the academy's claims were "no more than generalised assertions".It added that the council does not agree to paying the trust's costs of threatened legal proceedings, does not agree to lease the entirety of Area C to the trust and does not agree that it would bear the entire cost of erecting the fences.The Four Cs Academy Trust was approached for comment.
Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
10 minutes ago
- The Guardian
It's not just about building houses – communities need infrastructure to grow
There is a very real danger that, in its bid to reform the planning system and build 1.5m homes across England at pace, the government will neglect the basic requirements of livable communities ('No shops, no schools': homes in England built without basic amenities, 27 July). As your article makes clear, already 'thousands of homes across England are being built without urgently needed community infrastructure'. The planning system cannot allow such fundamental aspects of quality, sustainable placemaking to be neglected. It would do well to recognise the solution offered by a landscape-led approach to development. Landscape is everywhere – not just in protected countryside, but in every high street and cul-de-sac. It is the setting in which we all live, study, work and play. By thinking landscape first and engaging landscape architects early, planners and developers can design-in essential community infrastructure from the outset, creating resilient places that deliver what people need. So, let's build quality as well as quantity by prioritising GöhlerPresident, Landscape Institute One of the problems with the way we build homes in England is that local people have no role beyond complaining and objecting. In one case in your article, the community offered to finish off and run a community centre if the developer would just build the shell. But the idea that communities could roll up their sleeves and build, own, run these things just isn't considered by our housing and planning systems. The developer considered and rejected the idea; the community had no say. In a small but growing number of places this opposite is happening. Communities are gaining a seat at the table in the design and build-out of new homes, and taking ownership of shops, playgrounds, open space, community centres and affordable homes. Developers have to work with, and negotiate with, local people over what is built. This little bit of leverage and agency, achieved through a community land trust, builds better places with a stronger sense of community. The Labour government has talked a lot about supporting communities. The prime minister recently spoke of people tired of being excluded from decisions about their own lives. Here's your chance, Sir Keir, to include them in decisions about housing by wiring community agency and ownership into the planning ChanceChief executive, Community Land Trust Network
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
How Leftists seized control of Britain's doctors' union
The origins of the transformation stretch back to 2020, when a grouping of Corbynite doctors within the union formed the Broad Left coalition. The name stems from a Communist Party strategy to 'capture positions within a union' and take it over. Its logo is a stethoscope arranged to look like a hammer and sickle. By 2022, the coalition seemed to have increasingly joined hands with a larger group of young activist doctors called DoctorsVote – which is mainly dedicated to winning massive pay rises for resident doctors. And in the spring of that year, the two groups combined to seize dozens of seats on the BMA council, the union's foremost decision-making body. In a vote to determine the makeup of the council for the following four years, Broad Left/DoctorsVote candidates secured 26 of the 69 places up for grabs. Since then, their influence has only grown. Indeed, a 2023 Policy Exchange report – 'Professionalism is not relevant' – concluded the union had been 'taken over by young, self-declared 'entryists' in a planned campaign similar to that [orchestrated] in the Labour Party at the time of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership'. 'It is very sad to see what was basically a well-rounded organisation that covered so many issues of importance to a wide range of doctors being hollowed out by the angry activism around residents' pay, Gaza and LGBT issues,' says Mark Pickering of the Christian Medical Fellowship, which counts many BMA members in its ranks. 'It is very similar to the way Momentum took over the Labour Party from the inside. We saw then how people started using democracy to try to dismantle democracy and that's what it seems has happened here. 'You had these two groups come in and they all vote for each other… and that's shifted what happens at the annual meetings, where BMA policy is formed.' As the union has become ever more of a crucible for Left-wing politics, members appalled by the takeover have begun to leave. First out the door have been many Jews, who have been dismayed by the union's response to the war in Gaza. Last month veteran doctor Robert Winston told The Telegraph he had resigned as a member of the BMA after 61 years due to a combination of his disgust with the strikes, the union acting 'highly politically' in recent times and its failure to tackle anti-Semitism among doctors.
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
SNP pays growing number of ‘fat cat' civil servants £100k
The number of senior Scottish civil servants earning more than £100,000 a year has grown under the SNP, figures show. The Scottish Government currently employs 73 senior civil servants (SCS), who are the heads of various departments and directorates. The highest paid is Caroline Lamb, the director-general of the health department and head of the Scottish NHS, whose annual salary is listed as between £205,000 and £209,000. Last year, only 66 staff were on six-figure salaries, adding up to a total of £7.5m. But the top tier of civil servants now costs taxpayers £8.6m a year in wages with many earning in excess of £110,000 – three times the average annual salary in Scotland. Levels of pay for SCS are set by the UK Government in Westminster, but the size of the civil service in Scotland is determined by Holyrood. There were 52 senior officials earning salaries of more than £100,000 in 2023, 38 in 2021 and just 14 as recently as 2018. This year, top earners included Joe Griffin, now the permanent secretary to the Scottish Government, who was paid £140,000 per year in his former role of director general of strategy and external affairs, and Alyson Stafford, who earns £160,000 per year as director general of the Scottish Exchequer. The growing wage bill has emerged after the Scottish Government launched a round of cuts to the budgets of NHS and mental health services citing growing financial pressures. Last September, Shona Robison, the finance secretary, announced £115.8m in cuts to health and social care as part of the SNP government's savings plan. Critics have criticised the 'out of control' cost of civil service wages to taxpayers, and accused the SNP of having the wrong priorities. Craig Hoy, the spokesman for finance and local government for the Scottish Conservatives, told the Mail: 'The civil service, and the cost of it, have ballooned out of control under the SNP's watch, and by far the biggest expansion has been in those on the highest salaries. 'When Scots are paying the UK's highest taxes, but seeing worsening services, there's no excuse for fat cat pay packages of this sort.' Equalities and rights roles also surged In May, it emerged that the number of civil servants working on equalities and human rights in Scotland had also grown under the SNP, surging by almost 50 per cent in two years. Scottish Government figures released under Freedom of Information laws showed the costs of its Equalities and Human Rights Directorate had risen sharply after a huge increase in staffing and salary levels. The number of officials on the department's payroll rose from 105.6 in 2022-23 to 152.7 in 2024-25 – an increase of 44.6 per cent. The period of the increase coincided with Nicola Sturgeon's government tabling the Gender Recognition Reform (GRR) Bill, which would have allowed biological men to change legal gender by simply signing a declaration.
