
The four-day work week gets a new booster: AI
If you can get more done in less time using AI, why not work fewer hours?
Why it matters: The idea is gaining traction among proponents of the four-day work week, and at least one software startup CEO tells Axios that he's moved his company to a 32-hour week — with no change in pay — because of AI.
Where it stands: Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) brought it up on the Joe Rogan podcast recently.
"You're a worker, your productivity is increasing because we give you AI, right?" Sanders said. "Instead of throwing you out on the street, I'm going to reduce your workweek to 32 hours."
Sanders is a four-day work week booster, having introduced a 32-hour workweek bill last year, though such a proposal is unlikely to get far in Congress.
How it works: Instead of firing people, proponents argue that firms share the gains of improved technology by giving workers some of their time back.
Instead of fearing AI will replace them, workers welcome its advancements and figure out creative ways to leverage the tech.
The four-day work week community, which took off in the post-pandemic pro-worker era, is buzzing about AI right now, says economist Juliet Schor, who has a new book out this month called " Four Days a Week."
Schor is also lead researcher for 4DWG, a global nonprofit that's piloted shorter work weeks with 245 organizations in the U.S., U.K. and elsewhere.
"The ability of large language models like ChatGPT to wipe out millions of good-paying positions means we need to be intentional about how we adjust to that technology," she writes in the book. "Reducing hours per job is a powerful way to keep more people employed."
Reality check: Smaller firms can more easily implement a big change like a four-day week — larger companies are likely to have a harder time making it happen, experts say.
Firms also have a strong preference for layoffs to appease investors.
But reducing work hours to make sure a lot of people don't lose their jobs when technology advances isn't a new idea.
Shortening work hours as a way to reduce unemployment was one of the arguments wielded by advocates for five-day work weeks back in the early 20th century. (That used to be a wild idea, too.)
Earlier this month, Roger Kirkness, the CEO of a small software startup called Convictional moved the company to a four-day workweek — without reducing anyone's pay.
"Look at Fridays like weekends," he wrote in an email announcing the change, to the delight of his 12 employees. (One must be on-call each week, on a rotating schedule.)
"Oh my god, I was so happy," says Nick Wehner, a software engineer at the company. Wehner said he's been amazed at how much faster he can work using AI.
Kirkness tells Axios that using AI accelerates writing code but it doesn't speed up everything — teams still need to be able to think creatively to solve problems and get real work done.
The four-day work week is meant to keep everyone fresh, with enough time to recharge so they can do deep-thinking.
"(Nearly) all that matters in work moving forward is the maximization of creativity, human judgment, emotional intelligence, prompting skills and deeply understanding a customer domain," he wrote in his all-staff email.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate Republicans search for support Trump's big bill in overnight session
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate is slogging through an overnight session that has dragged into Tuesday, with Republican leaders buying time as they search for ways to secure support for President Donald Trump's big bill of tax breaks and spending cuts while fending off proposed amendments, mostly from Democrats trying to defeat the package. An endgame was not immediately in sight. Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota is working for a last-minute agreement between those in his party worried the bill's reductions to Medicaid will leave millions without care and his most conservative flank, which wants even steeper cuts to hold down deficits ballooning with the tax cuts. Thune declared at one point they were in the 'homestretch' as he dashed through the halls at the Capitol, only to backtrack a short time later, suggesting any progress was "elusive.' At the same time House Speaker Mike Johnson has signaled more potential problems ahead, warning the Senate package could run into trouble when it is sent back to the House for a final round of voting, as skeptical lawmakers are being called back to Washington ahead of Donald Trump's Fourth of July deadline. 'I have prevailed upon my Senate colleagues to please, please, please keep it as close to the House product as possible,' said Johnson, the Louisiana Republican. House Republicans had already passed their version last month. It's a pivotal moment for the Republicans, who have control of Congress and are racing to wrap up work with just days to go before Trump's holiday deadline Friday. The 940-page 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' as it's formally titled, has consumed Congress as its shared priority with the president. In a midnight social media post urging them on, Trump called the bill 'perhaps the greatest and most important of its kind.' Vice President JD Vance summed up his own series of posts, simply imploring senators to 'Pass the bill.' The GOP leaders have no room to spare, with narrow majorities in both chambers. Thune can lose no more than three Republican senators, and already two — Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who warns people will lose access to Medicaid health care, and Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, who opposes raising the debt limit — have indicated opposition. Tillis abruptly announced over the weekend he would not seek reelection after Trump threatened to campaign against him. Attention quickly turned to key senators, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine, who have also raised concerns about health care cuts, but also a loose coalition of four conservative GOP senators pushing for even steeper reductions. And on social media, billionaire Elon Musk was again lashing out at Republicans as 'the PORKY PIG PARTY!!' for including a provision that would raise the nation's debt limit by $5 trillion, which is needed to allow continued borrowing to pay the bills. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said his side was working to show 'how awful this is.' 'Republicans are in shambles because they know the bill is so unpopular,' Schumer said as he walked the halls. A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law. The CBO said the package would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion over the decade. Senators to watch Few Republicans appear fully satisfied as the final package emerges, in either the House or Senate. Tillis said it is a betrayal of the president's promises not to kick people off health care, especially if rural hospitals close. Collins had proposed bolstering the $25 billion proposed rural hospital fund to $50 billion, but her amendment failed. And Murkowski was trying to secure provisions to spare people in her state from some health care and food stamp cuts while also working to beef up federal reimbursements to Alaska's hospitals. They have not said how they would vote for the final package. 'Radio silence,' Murkowski said when asked. At the same time, conservative Senate Republicans proposing steeper health care cuts, including Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, filed into Thune's office for a near-midnight meeting. The Senate has spent some 18 hours churning through more than two dozen amendments in what is called a vote-a-rama, a typically laborious process that went on longer than usual as negotiations happen on and off the chamber floor. The White House legislative team also was at the Capitol. A few of the amendments — to strike parts of the bill that would limit Medicaid funds to rural hospitals or shift the costs of food stamp benefits to the states — were winning support from a few Republicans, though almost none were passing. Sen. Mike Crapo, the GOP chairman of the Finance Committee, dismissed the dire predictions of health care cuts as Democrats trafficking in what he called the 'politics of fear.' What's in the big bill All told, the Senate bill includes $4.5 trillion in tax cuts, according to the latest CBO analysis, making permanent Trump's 2017 rates, which would expire at the end of the year if Congress fails to act, while adding the new ones he campaigned on, including no taxes on tips. The Senate package would roll back billions of dollars in green energy tax credits, which Democrats warn will wipe out wind and solar investments nationwide. It would impose $1.2 trillion in cuts, largely to Medicaid and food stamps, by imposing work requirements on able-bodied people, including some parents and older Americans, making sign-up eligibility more stringent and changing federal reimbursements to states. Additionally, the bill would provide a $350 billion infusion for border and national security, including for deportations, some of it paid for with new fees charged to immigrants. Democrats fighting all day and night Unable to stop the march toward passage, the Democrats as the minority party in Congress are using the tools at their disposal to delay and drag out the process. Democrats forced a full reading of the text, which took 16 hours, and they have a stream of amendments. Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, the ranking Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, raised particular concern at the start of debate late Sunday about the accounting method being used by the Republicans, which says the tax breaks from Trump's first term are now 'current policy' and the cost of extending them should not be counted toward deficits. She said that kind of 'magic math' won't fly with Americans trying to balance their own household books. ___ Associated Press writers Ali Swenson, Fatima Hussein, Michelle L. Price, Kevin Freking, Matt Brown, Seung Min Kim and Chris Megerian contributed to this report.


The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
18 GOP senators vote to raise taxes on the rich to pay for rural hospital fund
Eighteen Republican senators, including former Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.), voted to advance an amendment sponsored by Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) to raise taxes on ultra wealthy income earners to help rural hospitals facing steep Medicaid cuts. The GOP senators voted for a motion to waive a budget point-of-order against Collins's amendment to establish a new $39.6 percent tax bracket for individuals who earn more than $25 million in annual income and married couples who earn more than $50 million annually. The proposal would be used to double the size of the rural hospital relief fund in the GOP megabill from $25 million to $50 million. The procedural motion failed on a lopsided vote of 22 to 78, but the result surprised some Senate insiders. One senior Republican aide expressed shock that so many Republicans voted to raise taxes, even if on the nation's very richest income earners. 'There was a time when Republicans used to have discipline on tax increases. Grover must be pulling his hair out,' the aide said, referring to Grover Norquist, the president of Americans for Tax Reform, an anti-tax advocacy group that asks members of Congress to pledge not to raise taxes. 'I guess it's Trump's Republican Party,' the source observed, referring to President Trump's more populist view of economic policy. Trump wrote on social media last month that he would be 'OK' with raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans. Trump broached the subject again in the Oval Office last month when asked about raising taxes on the very richest individuals to offset tax cuts for middle- and working-class families. 'I would love to do that, frankly,' Trump told reporters. Republican Sens. Shelley Moore Capito ( Bill Cassidy (La.), John Curtis (Utah), Deb Fischer (Neb.), Lindsey Graham (S.C.), Josh Hawley (Mo.), Jon Husted (Ohio), Cindy Hyde-Smith (Miss.), John Kennedy (La.), Roger Marshall (Kan.), McConnell, Jerry Moran (Kan.), Bernie Moreno (Ohio), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Dan Sullivan (Alaska), Roger Wicker (Miss.) and Todd Young (Ind.) voted to support the measure. Collins also voted to waive the point-of-order objection against her proposal.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
MAGA Civil War Takes Ugly New Turn As Musk And Trump Trade Late-Night Threats
President Donald Trump and Elon Musk renewed hostilities Monday night as the two traded barbs on social media. Musk spent the evening threatening to defeat many of the same Republican lawmakers he helped elect last year if they vote for Trump's signature 'big, beautiful bill,' while Trump threatened to cut the government contracts and subsidies that benefit Musk's businesses. The tech billionaire railed against the growing government debt and called the legislation an 'insane spending bill.' 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!' he wrote on X. 'And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.' He previewed what his attacks on those lawmakers would look like: Anyone who campaigned on the PROMISE of REDUCING SPENDING , but continues to vote on the BIGGEST DEBT ceiling increase in HISTORY will see their face on this poster in the primary next year — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 1, 2025 Trump fired back on Truth Social by suggesting that the DOGE unit Musk set up to fight waste, fraud, and abuse in government could next target Musk's own companies. Trump wrote: Musk said he had no problem with that, writing on X: 'I am literally saying CUT IT ALL. Now.' He agreed with another message saying that should include oil and gas subsidies as well. He even threatened to form a new political party, the America Party, if the bill passes. Musk spent roughly $291 million during the 2024 election cycle, most notably to help Trump, according to He became a top campaign surrogate for Trump and ― after the election ― the two seemed almost inseparable. Once in office, Trump tasked Musk with setting up his DOGE unit to cut government spending. When Musk's time in government came to an end ― as a 'special government employee,' he was limited by law to 130 days ― Trump held an Oval Office event in May honoring the billionaire. Trump gave Musk a ceremonial key to the White House and thanked him for bringing 'a colossal change.' But only days later, Musk turned on Trump, slamming the 'big, beautiful bill' as a 'disgusting abomination' and urging Americans to kill the legislation. He also said Trump hasn't released the files related to late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein because he's in them. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk wrote. 'Have a nice day, DJT!' Musk admitted about a week later that he 'went too far' in his attacks on Trump and deleted the Epstein tweet and a number of others, and things seemed to cool off... until Monday.