Trump gives another country a tariff extension ahead of deadline: Recap
Irked by Canada's support for Palestinian statehood, India's purchases of Russian oil and Brazil's prosecution of its former president, Trump threatened to punish the nations with higher tariffs, regardless of whether the actions directly harm U.S. exports or exacerbate existing trade deficits.
In a Truth Social Post, the U.S. president linked Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's announcement that his country would recognize Palestinian statehood to the negotiations with Ottawa to stop a 35% tariff from going into effect at 12:01 am ET on Aug. 1.
More: Judges question whether Trump tariffs are authorized by emergency powers
"Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine. That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them. Oh' Canada!!!" Trump said.
Trump has made a flurry of deals with America's trading partners as his Aug. 1 deadline approaches, including agreements with South Korea and Pakistan and a trade pact with the European Union. Other countries that are currently paying a baseline tariff of 10% and have not entered into a separate arrangement with the United States may see their fees go up.
Here's where Trump's tariffs and trade negotiations stand:
Trump expected to sign executive order Thursday setting new tariffs
Trump will sign an executive order during the afternoon or evening of July 31 setting the new tariff rates for countries around the world, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said.
Trump has already announced several of those rates, ranging from 50% on imports from Brazil to 15% tariffs on goods from several countries including South Korea and the European Union.
In April, Trump imposed a baseline 10% tariff that applied to most countries. Trump has said he is likely to raise the baseline to either 15% or 20% beginning Aug. 1. - Joey Garrison
Countries to receive new tariff rates before midnight, White House says
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said countries that have not received notice of their new U.S. reciprocal tariff rates will be alerted by the administration before midnight Aug. 1.
'Tomorrow, Aug. 1, the reciprocal rates will be going into effect,' Leavitt said during a July 31 briefing with reporters.
Trump has pointed to Aug. 1 as the marker for higher reciprocal tariffs on goods from nearly 200 countries across the world to go into effect. Trump has already announced new tariff rates for several countries and reached deals with other nations, including Japan, Vietnam and the European Union, that includes their new tariff rates.
'We've sent out 17 letters to countries around the world, and the rest those countries that either do not have a deal or have a letter, they will be hearing from this administration by the business deadline tonight,' Leavitt said. - Joey Garrison
Mexico trade deal extended for 90 days
Trump says he's giving Mexico another 90 days to come to a longer term agreement with the United States to avoid higher tariffs.
After speaking by phone to Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, he said in a Truth Social post that he was extending existing tariffs on Mexico for 90 days, and possibly longer, while the countries continued to negotiate.
"The complexities of a Deal with Mexico are somewhat different than other Nations because of both the problems, and assets, of the Border," he said. "We have agreed to extend, for a 90 Day period, the exact same Deal as we had for the last short period of time, namely, that Mexico will continue to pay a 25% Fentanyl Tariff, 25% Tariff on Cars, and 50% Tariff on Steel, Aluminum, and Copper."
Trump said that Mexico also agreed to "immediately terminate" all of its non-tariff barriers, without providing further details on that part of the agreement.
"There will be continued cooperation on the Border as it relates to all aspects of Security, including Drugs, Drug Distribution, and Illegal Immigration into the United States," he said.
Mexico had been facing a 30% tariff on non-exempt goods. - Francesca Chambers
Trump admin defends use of emergency power to impose tariffs in federal court
President Donald Trump's tariffs may be headed for some rocky legal terrain. U.S. appeals court judges indicated during oral arguments on July 31 that they were skeptical the president has the legal authority to impose tariffs without congressional approval.
Department of Justice lawyer Brett Shumate argued in opening remarks that Trump should be able to continue using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose sweeping tariffs. "But IEEPA has rarely been used, hasn't it," a judge immediately interjected.
More: Judges question whether Trump tariffs are authorized by emergency powers
Shumate said that since its inception in 1977, the statute has frequently been used by the government. "This is the first time IEEPA has been used for tariffs," Shumate acknowledged.
But he said Trump's actions incorporated language that former President Richard Nixon used in 1971 to impose tariffs that were later upheld by the court, and Congress was aware of the case when it passed a law giving the U.S. president emergency powers. - Francesca Chambers/Reuters
Trump cites Bolsonaro prosecution in Brazil tariff hike
In a July 30 executive order hiking tariffs on Brazil to 50%, he cited the nation's prosecution of former Brazilian president, Jair Bolsonaro, as a reason for higher import fees on some goods. The order moved an earlier deadline for the tariffs to go into effect to Aug. 6.
He said that Bolsonaro, who's charged with plotting a coup, had been "politically persecuted." The administration also sanctioned the judge in the case in a separate action on the same day. - Francesca Chambers
India in the crosshairs for Russian oil purchases
Trump blasted India for purchasing Russian oil, which has helped to prolong Vladimir Putin's war against Ukraine. He said in a social media post that he'd hit India with a 25% tariff.
He also took aim at the country's participation in the BRICS economic group. The club rivals the Group of Seven economic alliance for advanced economies and includes Russia, Brazil, China and South Africa.
In an overnight post on social media, Trump hit India again — and needled former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev.
More: Trump's trade talks intensify with tariff deadline fast approaching
"I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. We have done very little business with India, their Tariffs are too high, among the highest in the World," Trump wrote. "Likewise, Russia and the USA do almost no business together. Let's keep it that way, and tell Medvedev, the failed former President of Russia, who thinks he's still President, to watch his words. He's entering very dangerous territory!"
Medvedev had previously issued a sharp warning to Trump over his threats to put steep tariffs on purchasers Russian oil.
"Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with (Trump's) own country," the former Russian president said. - Francesca Chambers
U.S. closes in on a China deal
Trump's administration has continued negotiate with China, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a July 31 interview with CNBC that the United States' believes a deal is close at hand.
"I believe that we have the makings of a deal," Bessent said.
Bessent was expected to update Trump on the status of negotiations later in the day. China faces an Aug. 12 deadline to reach an agreement with the United States.
The tariffs will also face a key legal test this week as the U.S. Court of Appeals hears arguments in a case challenging Trump's authority to tap into emergency powers to impose unilateral tariffs.
"If our Country was not able to protect itself by using TARIFFS AGAINST TARIFFS, WE WOULD BE 'DEAD,' WITH NO CHANCE OF SURVIVAL OR SUCCESS," Trump said on social media ahead of oral arguments. - Francesca Chambers
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Midnight deadline looms for countries facing Trump tariffs
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Philip Morris Stock Outlook: Is Wall Street Bullish or Bearish?
With a market cap of $253.7 billion, Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) is a global tobacco company focused on delivering a smoke-free future. Its product portfolio includes traditional cigarettes, smoke-free alternatives like IQOS and ZYN, and expanding offerings in wellness and healthcare. Shares of the Stamford, Connecticut-based company have outperformed the broader market over the past 52 weeks. PM stock has surged 38.3% over this time frame, while the broader S&P 500 Index ($SPX) has gained 18.4%. Moreover, shares of Philip Morris are up 35.4% on a YTD basis, compared to SPX's 7.6% increase. More News from Barchart Dear Nvidia Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for August 27 Options Traders Expected Palantir Stock's Tamest Earnings Reaction in a Year. Did They Get It Right? Tesla Gains on Elon Musk's New Pay Package. Is TSLA Stock a Buy? Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. Narrowing the focus, the tobacco giant stock has also outpaced the Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund's (XLP) 1.6% rise over the past 52 weeks. Despite reporting a better-than-expected Q2 2025 adjusted EPS of $1.91, shares of Philip Morris tumbled 8.4% on Jul. 22. Total sales rose 7.1% to $10.1 billion and ZYN shipments came in at 190 million cans, both missing analysts' estimates. For the fiscal year ending in December 2025, analysts expect PM's adjusted EPS to grow 14.3% year-over-year to $7.51. The company's earnings surprise history is promising. It beat the consensus estimates in the last four quarters. Among the 14 analysts covering the stock, the consensus rating is a 'Strong Buy.' That's based on nine 'Strong Buy' ratings, two 'Moderate Buys,' and three 'Holds.' On Jul. 14, UBS maintained its 'Neutral' rating on Philip Morris but raised its price target to $181, citing strong smoke-free margin growth driven by IQOS and ZYN, with robust U.S. volume projections and revised earnings estimates through 2027. As of writing, the stock is trading below the mean price target of $193.38. The Street-high price target of $220 implies a potential upside of nearly 35% from the current price. On the date of publication, Sohini Mondal did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Alcon Expands Vision Correction Portfolio With STAAR Surgical Acquisition
On Tuesday, the eye care company Alcon Plc (NYSE:ALC) agreed to acquire STAAR Surgical Company (NASDAQ:STAA), the manufacturer of the implantable collamer lens (ICL). The acquisition includes the EVO family of lenses (EVO ICL) for vision correction for patients with moderate to high myopia (nearsightedness), with or without astigmatism. Alcon will purchase all outstanding shares of STAAR common stock for $28 per share in cash, which represents approximately a 59% premium to STAAR's 90-day Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP) and a 51% premium to the closing price of STAAR common stock on August 4, transaction represents a total equity value of approximately $1.5 billion. Alcon intends to finance the transaction by issuing short- and long-term credit facilities. The transaction is anticipated to close in approximately six to 12 months and is expected to be accretive to earnings in year two. 'With the number of high myopes rising globally, the acquisition of STAAR enhances our ability to offer a leading surgical vision correction solution for those who are not ideal candidates for other refractive surgeries such as LASIK,' said David Endicott, CEO of Alcon. An estimated 50% of the world will be myopic by 2050, and today, nearly 500 million people are considered high myopes. The EVO family of ICLs are implanted between the iris (the colored part of the eye) and the natural crystalline lens during a procedure that does not remove corneal tissue. This move follows Alcon's recent announcement in July regarding its intention to acquire LumiThera, Inc. and its Photobiomodulation (PBM) Device for dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Data from the LIGHTSITE I, II, and III clinical trials consistently showed that PBM treatments provide visual acuity improvement with no treatment-related serious adverse events reported. PBM received FDA de novo market authorization in November 2024 and CE Mark in November 2018. PBM is available in Europe, Latin America, Singapore, the U.K., and the U.S. The transaction does not include the acquisition of AdaptDx and Nova/Diopsys diagnostic devices, which will be separated and spun off to LumiThera's shareholders before Alcon's acquisition and will continue to be marketed and sold by the LumiThera spin-off. Alcon and LumiThera anticipate the acquisition to be completed in the third quarter of 2025. Price Action: ALC stock is trading lower by 1.17% to $86.79 premarket, and STAA stock is trading higher by 44.9% to $26.78 at last check Tuesday. Read Next:Photo via Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? STAAR SURGICAL (STAA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Alcon Expands Vision Correction Portfolio With STAAR Surgical Acquisition originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘We are at war': Democrats reach breaking point over Republican threats in political map arms race
Democrats have spent years issuing warnings over Republican threats to redraw the political maps that could determine the balance of power for years to come. Now, they're prepared for 'war.' After protracted legal battles to unwind Donald Trump's executive actions and unsuccessful attempts to derail the president's agenda in Congress, Democrats appear to have reached a breaking point and are ready to do some map-making of their own, reluctantly preparing to fight fire with fire. They have repeatedly stressed that the GOP's gerrymandering imperils American democracy. But Democratic officials across the country are now embracing the idea, reasoning that years-long legal challenges and public pressure over illegal voter suppression are no longer enough to keep up with the GOP's power trip. 'All's fair in love and war,' New York Governor Kathy Hochul said Monday as she signaled efforts to draw up new maps in her state 'as soon as possible.' 'This is a war. We are at war,' she added. 'And that's why the gloves are off, and I say, 'Bring it on.'' Trump is looking to avoid a repeat of his first term, when Democrats flipped the House at the midpoint and largely stalled his agenda from advancing through Congress. This time around he wants Republican-led states to redraw their congressional districts to ensure the GOP remains in power in 2026. Last month, the president commanded Texas Republicans to do a 'simple redrawing' of the state's congressional maps, the heavily-contested boundaries that establish districts for each member of the House of Representatives. Texas Governor Greg Abbott had summoned state lawmakers to the state capitol in Austin for an emergency session to do just that. Days after Trump's demands, Texas Republicans put together a map that gives them five more seats in the House. On August 1, the Texas House redistricting committee held the only public hearing on the proposal. Republicans voted it out of committee the next morning on a party-line vote, setting up a quick vote in the full state House of Representatives, which Republicans control. 'I'm not beating around the bush,' Texas state Rep. Todd Hunter told the committee. 'We have five new districts, and these five new districts are based on political performance.' Contra Abbott and the Justice Department, he admitted the map was being redrawn 'for partisan purposes.' Committee chair Cody Vasut also admitted the move was purely about 'improving political performance.' But by the time Texas Republicans were prepared to vote on the new maps on August 4, Texas Democrats had already left the state. Nearly 60 Democratic members of the state House have fled elsewhere, breaking quorum to derail a vote and promising to stay away from Texas for the duration of Abbott's 30-day session. Texas Republicans subsequently ordered arrest warrants and directed state marshals to haul Democrats back to the capitol — a largely symbolic maneuver confined by state lines. It's also expensive; missing members are racking up $500 in daily penalties for every day they miss work. But for Democrats, it's a high-profile act of obstruction that puts Republicans on notice. 'This is not a decision we make lightly, but it is one we make with absolute moral clarity,' Democratic state Rep. Gene Wu said from Illinois after leaving the state with several Texas Democrats. Wu, the state's Democratic caucus chair, said the GOP has put forward a 'racist, gerrymandered map' that 'seeks to use racial lines to divide hard-working communities that have spent decades building up their power and strengthening their voices.' Governor Abbott has done so 'in submission of Donald Trump, so Donald Trump can steal these communities' power and voice,' Wu continued. 'We will not be complicit in the destruction of our own communities.' The developing war over congressional maps follows a series of Supreme Court decisions that have gradually chipped away at the Voting Rights Act and constitutional guardrails to protect against racial gerrymandering, or carving up electoral maps to prevent racial minorities from electing their preferred candidates. Federal courts have generally blocked the creation of congressional districts that 'crack' or 'pack' communities of color to dilute their voting strength. After Texas redistricted in 2021, voting rights advocates challenged the new maps in court, arguing that state lawmakers drew up racially gerrymandered districts that discriminated against minority voters. Currently, Texas has nine districts where no one racial or ethnic group has a majority; in eight of them, Black, Hispanic and Asian voters combined create a so-called "coalition district' majority. Trump's Department of Justice claims that three of those districts are unconstitutional 'coalition districts' — which constitutional law scholars and voting rights advocates say is a deliberately bad-faith reading of the law. Trump's demands to redraw maps in the middle of the decade, largely to hold on to power to avoid any political blowback in 2026, could trigger what Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin has called 'a race to the bottom' nationwide. Former attorney general Eric Holder, who chairs the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, has spent the last several years fighting off partisan gerrymanders, including Democratic-led maps. But in the wake of Trump's threats, Holder is now telling Democratic officials to embrace what leverage they have and be 'unabashed in our desire to acquire power.' 'This midcycle redistricting ploy in Texas, and potentially in other states, is something that has to be met in the moment,' Holder told The New York Times. 'Our commitment to fairness didn't blind us to this new reality, and I think that we've got to take these extraordinary steps, with the hope that we can then save democracy and ultimately heal it. If you give Donald Trump unchecked power for two years beyond 2026, given what they've done in six months, I just wonder what kind of shape will the nation be in come Jan. 20, 2029.' The Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee has also called on Democratic state legislatures to 'pursue redistricting mid-cycle,' but Democrats don't hold 'enough legislative majorities to win an all-out, state-by-state battle.' Republican state legislatures oversee 55 Democratic congressional seats. Democratic state legislative majorities, meanwhile, oversee only 35 GOP districts. 'All options must be on the table — including Democratic state legislatures using their power to fight back and pursue redistricting mid-cycle in order to protect our democracy,' committee president Heather Williams said in a statement. Republicans are preemptively trying to stop Democratic states from joining the fight. Republican Rep. Kevin Kiley of California wants to 'stop a damaging redistricting war from breaking out across the country,' brushing up against demands from his party leaders for the by-any-means-necessary battle to preserve, and expand, the House majority next year. California Governor Gavin Newsom, whose state holds a whopping 52 House seats, has also planned retaliatory map-making to target vulnerable Republican seats in the state. Other Democratic-led states are expected to follow, potentially blowing past the guidance from independent redistricting commissions that are designed to prevent lawmakers from crafting partisan, racist and otherwise discriminatory maps. Hochul has considered disbanding New York's commission altogether. 'I'm tired of fighting this fight with my hands tied behind my back,' she said this week. 'When we say we cannot use that power to the fullest, we're abdicating the responsibility we all have. Republicans take over the legislature? They can have it. Until then, we're in charge, and we're sick and tired of being pushed around.' Republicans only have Trump to blame, she said. 'The playing field has changed dramatically, and shame on us if we ignore that fact and cling tight to the vestiges of the past,' she said. 'That era is over. Donald Trump eliminated that forever.'