Wall Street likes Trump's economy more than voters
Why it matters: While investors are pricing in a post-tariff rebound, the general public is still concerned about economic issues like inflation — a reminder that the stock market is not the economy.
By the numbers: Despite a volatile April off the back of tariff announcements, the S&P 500 is up 7% year to date — outpacing the historical average.
Meanwhile, 70% of survey respondents say the administration is not focusing enough on lowering prices, according to a CBS News / YouGov poll released Sunday.
The administration is focusing too much on tariff policy, according to 61% of those surveyed, and 60% said they oppose tariffs entirely.
What they're saying: " The broader economy is slowing" and "capital markets are comfortable with the idea of a slowdown," Eric Freedman, chief investment officer at U.S. Bank Asset Management, told Axios.
Markets are forecasting a "bounce back" once tariff discussions are in the rearview mirror, meaning investors aren't too concerned about any near-term weakness, according to Freedman.
Between the lines: Looked at in this way, it's not that investors necessarily disagree with voters about the state of the economy.
Instead, traders are just pricing in the post-tariff rebound, while constituents are worried about their financial lives before that rebound kicks in.
Yes, but: While voters may not feel great about the economy, their spending patterns indicate otherwise.
Retail sales jumped more than expected last month.
Big banks largely reported increased card spending over the quarter.
GDP growth, which is driven mainly by consumer spending, is expected to come in above 2% for the quarter
Be smart: "There's a lot of divergence within consumers," said Freedman, who is monitoring middle-income consumer behavior to get a better sense of the economic path forward.
High stock prices are fueling spending for higher income consumers, according to Freedman, in a phenomenon known as the wealth effect.
If increased spending is coming from largely higher-income folks, that could be clouding the full economic picture.
The bottom line: If stocks are up, that does not necessarily mean investors think the economy is in great shape.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EMCOR Group (EME) Sees EPS Surge as Net Income Climbs to US$241 Million
EMCOR Group recently announced a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.25 per common share, to be paid on July 31, 2025. This steady dividend approach aligns with the company's robust quarterly performance, which saw net income rise to $241 million and EPS increase substantially year-over-year. Additionally, the ongoing share buyback program has strengthened shareholder returns. Despite the broader market's moderate growth of 1.4% over the past week and 17% over the past year, EMCOR's notable share repurchases and solid financial outcomes appear to have amplified investor confidence, contributing to the company's impressive 55% stock price surge last quarter. We've spotted 1 risk for EMCOR Group you should be aware of. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 22 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. EMCOR Group's recent announcement of a quarterly dividend and the implementation of its share buyback program underline its commitment to enhancing shareholder returns. Despite a potential downside to the current share price of US$635.06, which exceeds the consensus analyst price target of US$549.57 by 13.46%, these actions could continue to buoy investor confidence. The company's performance over the past five years, with a total return exceeding 844.60%, showcases its robust long-term trajectory. In the last year, EMCOR's share performance exceeded both the broader market's 17.2% and the US Construction industry's 54.2% return, highlighting its strong standing relative to peers. The successful integration of acquisitions and strategic diversification into sectors like data centers and healthcare is anticipated to impact future revenue positively. This, coupled with operational efficiencies and strong revenue collaboration, may reinforce earnings projections. However, EMCOR's earnings forecasts of a 6.2% annual growth rate lag behind the broader market's 14.9% forecast, which could present challenges in meeting broader industry expectations. The company's impressive share price rise of 55% last quarter signals optimism, though its current value being above the target may indicate overvaluation concerns. Nevertheless, the consistent cash flow and healthy margins underscore its potential resilience against margin pressures, supply chain challenges, and other economic uncertainties. As analysts estimate revenue growth to 7.9% annually over the next three years, any tangible improvement in operational metrics could shift the valuation outlook positively. Unlock comprehensive insights into our analysis of EMCOR Group stock in this financial health report. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include EME. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Boston Globe
23 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Pope Leo says migrants and refugees can bring light and aspiration from dark corners of the world
'In a world darkened by war and injustice, even when all seems lost, migrants and refugees stand as messengers of hope,' he said. 'Their courage and tenacity bear heroic testimony to a faith that sees beyond what our eyes can see and gives them the strength to defy death on the various contemporary migration routes.' Advertisement The remarks from Leo, who ascended to the papacy earlier this year to become the first American pope, come amid the Trump administration's crackdown on immigration. In recent months, Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in Los Angeles and other cities have sparked protests across the country, and a surge in detentions has led to immigrants being held in overcrowded facilities with deteriorating conditions. Pope Leo showed a special interest in the well-being of immigrants during his work before the Vatican and has been described as the 'first modern immigrant pope.' In a May meeting, he emphasized this side of his past to diplomats, telling them, 'My own story is that of a citizen, the descendant of immigrants, who in turn chose to emigrate.' Advertisement 'All of us, in the course of our lives, can find ourselves healthy or sick, employed or unemployed, living in our native land or in a foreign country, yet our dignity always remains unchanged: It is the dignity of a creature willed and loved by God,' he said. Before his papacy, Leo served the poor in Peru for decades and was especially concerned about Venezuelan migrants who fled there, opening churches as soup kitchens and asking priests to convert free spaces into makeshift refuges while bishop of Chiclayo. That side of his work has resonated with other leaders in the church. The Rev. Russell Pollitt, a Jesuit priest at Holy Trinity Catholic Church near Johannesburg, said in May that Leo 'seems to have been someone who was on the side of migrants and refugees flocking to Peru from Venezuela.' 'I think that's important, that we don't lose that. Migrants and refugees are becoming a sort of scapegoat for politicians,' he said. In this past week's letter, Leo stressed that communities that welcome migrants and refugees can become living witnesses to hope. 'In this way, migrants and refugees are recognized as brothers and sisters, part of a family in which they can express their talents and participate fully in community life.' He wished for spiritual protection for 'all those who are on the journey, as well as those who are working to accompany them.'
The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
Tech companies building massive AI data centers should pay to power them
The projected growth in artificial intelligence and its unprecedented demand for electricity to power enormous data centers present a serious challenge to the financial and technical capacity of the U.S. utility system. Appreciation for the sheer magnitude of that challenge has gotten lost as forecast after forecast projects massive growth in electric demand over the coming decade. The idea of building a data center that will draw 1 gigawatt of power or more, an amount sufficient to serve over 875,000 homes, is in the plans of so many data center developers and so routinely discussed that it no longer seems extraordinary. The challenge, when viewed in the aggregate, may be overwhelming. A recent Wood Mackenzie report identified 64 gigawatts of confirmed data center related power projects currently on the books with another 132 gigawatts potentially to be developed. 64 gigawatts are enough to power 56 million homes — more than twice the population of the 15 largest cities in America. The U.S. electric utility system is struggling to meet the projected energy needs of the AI industry. The problem is that many utilities do not have the financial and organizational resources to build new generating and transmission facilities at the scale and on the data center developers' desired timeline. The public policy question now on the table is who should pay for and bear the risk for these massive mega-energy projects. Will it be the AI developers such as Amazon, Microsoft, Meta and Alphabet — whose combined market value is seven times that of the entire S&P 500 Utility Sector — or the residential and other customers of local electric utilities? The process to answer this and related questions is underway in the hallways of the U.S. Congress, at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and other federal agencies, in tariff proceedings before state regulatory authorities and in public debate at the national, state and local levels. Whether they are developed at the federal, state or local level, the following values and objectives should form the core of public policy in this area: Data centers developers that require massive amounts of electric power (e.g. above 500MW or another specified level) should be required to pay for building new generating and transmission facilities. The State of Texas recently enacted legislation that requires data centers and other new large users to fund the infrastructure necessary to serve their needs. Although it is customary to spread the cost of new facilities across the user base of a utility, the demands that data center developers are placing on utility systems across the country are sufficiently extraordinary to justify allocating the costs of new facilities to those developers. Moreover, data center developers have the financial resources to cover those costs and incorporate them into the rates charged to users of their AI services. The developers of large data centers should bear the risk associated with new utility-built generating and transmission facilities, not the utility. As an example of such a policy, the Public Utility Commission of Ohio just approved a compromise proposed by American Electric Power of Ohio that would require data centers with loads greater than 1 gigawatt and mobile data centers over 25 megawatts to commit to 10-year electric service contracts and pay minimum demand charges based on 85 percent of their contract capacity, up from 60 percent under the utility's current general service tariff. Another option included in the Texas legislation requires significant up-front payments early in the planning process and mandates that data center developers disclose where they may have simultaneously placed demands for power. It is not unusual for data center requests for service to be withdrawn once they decide on the best location and package of incentives. Data center developers have the financial capacity and ability to manage this risk, utilities do not. Generating facilities that are co-located at large data centers should be integrated with the local utility electric grid, with appropriate cost allocation. Although a few projects have examined the option of a co-located power generation 'island' fully independent of the grid, most projects intend to interconnect with the grid system for back-up power and related purposes. Properly managed, this interconnection could be advantageous for both the data center and the utility system, provided that costs are appropriately allocated across the system. The U.S. government should continue to support the development of nuclear technology, including small modular reactors. U.S. utilities do not have the financial resources to assume the risk of building new nuclear-powered generating facilities. The emergence of a new set of customers, data center developers with enormous needs for electric power and deep pockets, changes the equation. The U.S. government has provided billions of dollars of support for new nuclear technologies and should continue to do so for the purpose of bringing their costs down. The U.S. government should continue to support energy efficiency improvements at data centers. Data centers use massive amounts of power for running servers, cooling systems, storage systems, networking equipment, backup systems, security systems and lighting. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory has developed a 'handbook' of measures that data centers can implement to reduce energy usage and achieve savings. In addition, there now are strong market forces to develop new super-efficient chips that will lower the unit costs of training and using AI models. The U.S. government should help accelerate the development of these chips given their leverage on U.S. electricity demand. The stakes in this public policy debate over our energy future could not be higher. If we get these policies right, AI has the potential to remake the U.S. economy and the energy infrastructure of this country. If we get it wrong, the push to build new generating and transmission facilities to provide gigawatts of power has the potential to overwhelm the financial and operational capacity our electric utility system, impose burdensome rate increases on homeowners and businesses, undercut efforts to reduce the use of fossil fuels to meet climate-related goals and compromise the reliability of our electricity grid for years to come. David M. Klaus is a consultant on energy issues who served as deputy undersecretary of the U.S. Department of Energy during the Obama administration and as a political appointee to two other Democratic presidents. Mark MacCarthy is the author of 'Regulating Digital Industries' (Brookings, 2023), an adjunct professor at Georgetown University's Communication, Culture & Technology Program, a nonresident senior fellow at the Institute for Technology Law and Policy at Georgetown Law and a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.
