
What is ‘mothballing' and what rights do parents have?
Although the Scottish Government provides guidance on the process, local authorities have taken very different approaches in recent years.
So, what is mothballing, and what rules govern it?
Mothballing is a term for the temporary closure of a school, stage of education, or nursery class. Guidance explains that it is only to be used when a local authority believes permanent closure is the only other option.
Mothballed schools must be reviewed every year and either have their mothballed status renewed or be reopened.
If the local authority decides neither of these options is suitable, then it must begin the formal process of permanently closing the school, which includes a statutory consultation with the community.
Historically, it is rare for a school to reopen once it has been mothballed.
Particularly in rural communities where the school or nursery in question is the only educational option, temporary closure can dissuade new families from moving to the area and eventually lead to a more long-term decline in demand for the service and overall population.
This has led many parents and education campaigners to refer to the mothballing process as 'closure by stealth.'
Although mothballing a setting does not require councils to conduct an official statutory consultation as defined by the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010, statutory guidance for the Act explicitly states that it should not 'be a way of denying parents access to the statutory consultation process.'
In recent years, however, councils have used a number of strategies to attempt to close schools and nurseries and have not always engaged with the community ahead of the decision.
This has highlighted potential loopholes or points of confusion in the legislation, to the point that First Minister John Swinney recently promised the government was 'reviewing' its mothballing policy in order to better protect rural schools and nurseries.
How is mothballing described in the guidance?
Statutory guidance defines mothballing as a temporary closure which is 'only appropriate in very restricted circumstances.'
These circumstances are exclusively related to enrolment:
'A school can be mothballed where the school roll has fallen to zero and continues to be zero. It may also be appropriate where the roll or potential roll is very low and the authority considers the only other option to be closure.'
The guidance places emphasis on the term 'may.'
It goes on to state that, if there are children in the catchment area of the school in question then any mothballing decision should be made 'in consultation' with the parents involved. This means that, although the council does not have to follow the official requirements for a statutory consultation laid out in the 2010 Act, they must carry out some for of engagement with the community 'as early as possible, in order to ensure that families can understand the options open to them.'
According to the guidance, this step is important because councils need to be able to gauge whether affected families are for or against mothballing the school, nursery or stage of education. If a majority of parents oppose mothballing, then the council should begin the process of opening a statutory consultation on permanent closure.
'Mothballing should not be a way of denying parents access to the statutory consultation process required under the 2010 Act,' the guidance explains, and the statutory consultation process contains safeguards and includes a review of the decision by Scottish Ministers.
Where does the confusion come in?
Word choice is not consistent in the statutory guidance on mothballing. In the first mention of 'a school', the guidance specifies that it is also referring to 'a stage of education or a nursery class.'
This parenthetical is not repeated every time 'a school' is referenced, however. Section 65 of the guidance explains when mothballing is justifiable: when school roll falls to zero or where the roll has fallen so low that the council believes closure to be the only other option. The section does not repeat the clarification that it is also referring to a stage of education or a nursery class.
This may be what has led some councils to suggest that the full guidance does not apply to nursery classes.
When asked about a recent decision to mothball four nurseries–a decision made by officers with no input from the communities–an Aberdeenshire Council spokesperson told The Herald: 'The statutory guidance under the 2010 Act provides no specific guidance on circumstances where mothballing a 'stage of education' or 'nursery class' might be appropriate.'
However, statutory definitions state that the "schools" referred to in the guidance include nurseries under local authority management.
The Scottish Government has repeatedly weighed in on the question, telling The Herald that 'mothballing should only take place where the nursery roll falls to zero or is very low, and that decisions should be taken in consultation with the parents involved.'
Is anything being done to address the confusion?
During a recent session of First Minister's Questions, John Swinney was asked about an ongoing process in the Scottish Borders, which began when a council committee passed a motion to being the process of mothballing five nurseries.
The council has since voted to undo the initial decision and is now carrying out a separate consultation on alternative strategies. In response, Mr Swinney said that the government was already working to address the issue.
'We are reviewing guidance on mothballing to provide greater clarity on whether it is an appropriate action to take.
'This will ensure local decisions are based on effective engagement with communities and better reflect the needs of rural families.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BreakingNews.ie
25 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Trump plays golf as supporters urge him ‘don't trust Starmer'
US President Donald Trump made an appearance at his Turnberry golf course as he teed off on Sunday morning, being welcomed by supporters who urged him 'don't trust Starmer'. The Republican leader arrived around 11am at the coastal course in Ayrshire and played golf with his son, Eric. Advertisement Police were seen patrolling the golf course as associates played earlier in the morning before a huge motorcade of golf caddies arrived around 10.40am. Dressed in a white baseball cap branded 'USA', Mr Trump waved at journalists who shouted questions at him as he teed off. Supporters of the president carrying placards stood in the dunes urging him, 'Don't trust Starmer', also shouting, 'We love you Trump'. US President Donald Trump plays golf at his Trump Turnberry golf course. Photo: Jane Barlow/PA Wire. Three people gathered to support the Republican leader, carrying a hand-painted placard which read: 'President Trump don't trust Starmer'. Advertisement It branded the UK prime minister an explicit term, and was jointly held by a man dressed in black, who wore an Adidas baseball cap. A woman holding the sign wore a red baseball cap reading 'Make America Great Again' with fake hair attached and appeared to laugh as she watched. Another female supporter dressed in a floral anorak, held an American flag and wore a baseball cap reading 'Make England Great Again'. She carried a smaller sign that also branded Starmer an explicit term. Advertisement US President Donald Trump steers a golf cart at his Trump Turnberry golf course (Jane Barlow/PA) A female well-wisher could be heard repeatedly shouting 'We love you Trump' and 'thank you'. Someone else shouted: 'Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump'. The sound of cheering could be heard as Mr Trump took a shot. He appeared to shout back at his supporters but his response could not be heard. Advertisement Later on Sunday, he will meet European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen for talks on the trading relationship between Europe and the US. These talks come ahead of discussions with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer on Monday, which are also expected to focus on trade issues. A Donald Trump supporter who travelled from Liverpool to Ayrshire in the hopes of seeing the US President at his Turnberry golf course has said he is 'chuffed' to have interacted with the President. Tom English, 37, who made the four-and-a-half hour journey with some other Trump supporters, explained: 'We rushed up here hoping to get a glimpse of him. And that's happened this morning when we've got to interact with him a little bit. Advertisement 'We couldn't really hear him because he was trying to shout to us in this wind, in the Scottish wind on the coast. 'So it was kind of hard to hear what he said. 'But he blew a kiss to the girls. Gave us a little wave. 'Trump junior gave us a little wave. And that's what it was about. 'We just wanted to see him in the flesh, and to get that interaction was an added bonus.' When asked what he and the other supporters had said to the American President, Mr English recounted: 'Just that we love him, basically. The UK loves Trump. Don't believe the mainstream media.' Police said that only one person has been arrested at any anti-Trump protests. A man was arrested at Prestwick Airport on Friday evening for allegedly carrying a placard calling Donald Trump an offensive word. The man, aged 20, was arrested next to the military airport in Ayrshire where Air Force One landed 'for abusive behaviour and refusing to stop', according to Police Scotland. The force said on Saturday that no arrests had been made, although a 50-year-old woman was issued with a recorded police warning in connection with alleged threatening behaviour at a Stop Trump Scotland protest outside the US consulate in Edinburgh on Saturday. A Police Scotland spokesperson said: 'A 20-year-old man was arrested next to Prestwick Airport on Friday for abusive behaviour and refusing to stop. 'He was given a recorded police warning.'


Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump says US, EU have 'good chance' of reaching trade deal
TURNBERRY, Scotland, July 27 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump on Sunday said there is a good chance that the United States and European Union would reach a trade agreement, citing three or four main sticking points. Trump made the comment at the start of a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his golf property in Turnberry, on Scotland's western coast. Trump said the main sticking point was "fairness," citing barriers to U.S. exports of cars and agriculture.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
We must arm ourselves, say trans activists
Trans activists have called for their community to be 'armed' after a Supreme Court ruling barred biological men from women-only spaces. A protester on the London Trans+ Pride march on Saturday carried placards reading: 'DIY or Die. Trans emancipation. Not rainbow capitalism. Arm trans people.' Another sign read: 'B---- trolls from hell,' with pictures of JK Rowling and the bosses of For Women Scotland, who won the Supreme Court case against the Scottish Government on gender in April. Saturday's march to Parliament Square Gardens was the biggest annual trans protest in the UK, with about 100,000 people in attendance, according to organisers. The ruling from the Supreme Court redefined 'biological sex' in a way that enables the exclusion of trans women from single-sex spaces and services. Organisers said this year's message was centred around the theme of 'existence and resistance'. Its key demands included an outright ban on conversion therapy, fully funded gender-affirming healthcare and a legal acknowledgement for non-binary people. Helen Joyce, the director of advocacy for human rights charity Sex Matters, which campaigns for clarity about biological sex in law and life, said the signs revealed the 'central hatred of women is to trans activism'. She said: 'The reason this movement treats JK Rowling and the grassroots campaigners of For Women Scotland as enemies is simply that they dare to say no to men who want to transgress women's boundaries. 'One side in this debate stands up for everyone's rights to safety, dignity, and privacy in single sex spaces. 'The other calls for violence against women. It shouldn't be hard for politicians and public figures to decide which side they are on.' Susan Hall, the leader of the Conservatives in the London Assembly, said: 'If trans activists are claiming that they should be armed and are calling JK Rowling (a wonderful woman) and women activists to b-----s in hell then they can't be surprised when people don't take them seriously and in fact are repelled by their odious stand.' Trans activists have called on Sir Keir to back transgender rights after Sir Sadiq Khan supported the march. The Mayor of London wrote on X: 'Today, our capital proudly marks seven years of London Trans+ Pride. 'As trans rights come under increasing pressure across the UK, this year's march is a vital reminder: London is a city that stands for equality, dignity and pride - for everyone.' The Prime Minister signed up to a pledge 'that trans women are women' when he was a Labour leadership candidate, but appeared to change his position following the Supreme Court ruling. 'The Supreme Court judgment has made clear that when looking at the Equality Act, a woman is a biological woman,' his spokesman said in April. 'Lost, scared and angry' Vicky Lee, the director and founder of the Way Out Club, said: 'Over the last 32 years, I have been a Labour Party member and a diversity advisor for the Metropolitan and City of London Police. 'I was proud of where we were under Tony Blair with LGBT liaison officers in every London borough, anti-trans hate policies, Trans inclusivity, and trans rights. 'Keir Starmer, I can tell you now, under your watch, we have lost 15 years of progress. 'Trans people are now lost, scared and angry. Trans Pride on Saturday is a celebration, but this year it will also be a protest. 'Please listen to the community of unique trans people. We are also nurses, doctors, scientists, lawyers, soldiers, and voters.' Lewis G Burton, one of the founding members of London Trans+ Pride, said: 'This year's London Trans+ Pride made history once again, with over 100,000 trans+ people and allies marching through central London – smashing our own world record of 60,000 and continuing our legacy as the biggest trans+ pride event in history. 'It was an emotional and powerful day. 'At a time when the Supreme Court is making sweeping decisions about trans people without consulting a single trans person or organisation, and when a small, well-funded lobby of anti-trans campaigners continues to dominate headlines and waste public resources, our community came together to show what real strength, solidarity and care looks like. 'The message was clear: we will not be erased. Our existence is natural, historic, and enduring. 'You can try to take away our rights, but you will never remove us from society. We are a part of humanity – and the public will not stand by while harm is done to our community.'