
What is ‘mothballing' and what rights do parents have?
Although the Scottish Government provides guidance on the process, local authorities have taken very different approaches in recent years.
So, what is mothballing, and what rules govern it?
Mothballing is a term for the temporary closure of a school, stage of education, or nursery class. Guidance explains that it is only to be used when a local authority believes permanent closure is the only other option.
Mothballed schools must be reviewed every year and either have their mothballed status renewed or be reopened.
If the local authority decides neither of these options is suitable, then it must begin the formal process of permanently closing the school, which includes a statutory consultation with the community.
Historically, it is rare for a school to reopen once it has been mothballed.
Particularly in rural communities where the school or nursery in question is the only educational option, temporary closure can dissuade new families from moving to the area and eventually lead to a more long-term decline in demand for the service and overall population.
This has led many parents and education campaigners to refer to the mothballing process as 'closure by stealth.'
Although mothballing a setting does not require councils to conduct an official statutory consultation as defined by the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010, statutory guidance for the Act explicitly states that it should not 'be a way of denying parents access to the statutory consultation process.'
In recent years, however, councils have used a number of strategies to attempt to close schools and nurseries and have not always engaged with the community ahead of the decision.
This has highlighted potential loopholes or points of confusion in the legislation, to the point that First Minister John Swinney recently promised the government was 'reviewing' its mothballing policy in order to better protect rural schools and nurseries.
How is mothballing described in the guidance?
Statutory guidance defines mothballing as a temporary closure which is 'only appropriate in very restricted circumstances.'
These circumstances are exclusively related to enrolment:
'A school can be mothballed where the school roll has fallen to zero and continues to be zero. It may also be appropriate where the roll or potential roll is very low and the authority considers the only other option to be closure.'
The guidance places emphasis on the term 'may.'
It goes on to state that, if there are children in the catchment area of the school in question then any mothballing decision should be made 'in consultation' with the parents involved. This means that, although the council does not have to follow the official requirements for a statutory consultation laid out in the 2010 Act, they must carry out some for of engagement with the community 'as early as possible, in order to ensure that families can understand the options open to them.'
According to the guidance, this step is important because councils need to be able to gauge whether affected families are for or against mothballing the school, nursery or stage of education. If a majority of parents oppose mothballing, then the council should begin the process of opening a statutory consultation on permanent closure.
'Mothballing should not be a way of denying parents access to the statutory consultation process required under the 2010 Act,' the guidance explains, and the statutory consultation process contains safeguards and includes a review of the decision by Scottish Ministers.
Where does the confusion come in?
Word choice is not consistent in the statutory guidance on mothballing. In the first mention of 'a school', the guidance specifies that it is also referring to 'a stage of education or a nursery class.'
This parenthetical is not repeated every time 'a school' is referenced, however. Section 65 of the guidance explains when mothballing is justifiable: when school roll falls to zero or where the roll has fallen so low that the council believes closure to be the only other option. The section does not repeat the clarification that it is also referring to a stage of education or a nursery class.
This may be what has led some councils to suggest that the full guidance does not apply to nursery classes.
When asked about a recent decision to mothball four nurseries–a decision made by officers with no input from the communities–an Aberdeenshire Council spokesperson told The Herald: 'The statutory guidance under the 2010 Act provides no specific guidance on circumstances where mothballing a 'stage of education' or 'nursery class' might be appropriate.'
However, statutory definitions state that the "schools" referred to in the guidance include nurseries under local authority management.
The Scottish Government has repeatedly weighed in on the question, telling The Herald that 'mothballing should only take place where the nursery roll falls to zero or is very low, and that decisions should be taken in consultation with the parents involved.'
Is anything being done to address the confusion?
During a recent session of First Minister's Questions, John Swinney was asked about an ongoing process in the Scottish Borders, which began when a council committee passed a motion to being the process of mothballing five nurseries.
The council has since voted to undo the initial decision and is now carrying out a separate consultation on alternative strategies. In response, Mr Swinney said that the government was already working to address the issue.
'We are reviewing guidance on mothballing to provide greater clarity on whether it is an appropriate action to take.
'This will ensure local decisions are based on effective engagement with communities and better reflect the needs of rural families.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
4 minutes ago
- BBC News
Greens issue new Holyrood candidate list after 'software error'
The Scottish Greens have had to issue a revised set of candidate lists for next year's Holyrood election after an error was discovered in how selection votes were counted. The results, originally announced on Monday, sparked a row with members which saw the party's internal election officer resign. The new lists have the same candidates in the top positions, with most of the party's MSPs securing key places which give them an easier path to re-election. However there are changes further down the Edinburgh and Lothian East and South Scotland lists, with some members being moved up and down the rankings. Under the electoral system for Holyrood, the regional list vote involves parties ranking their higher an individual appears on the list, the better their chance is of becoming an had been raised by party members regarding a number of the internal include that of the Scottish Greens' current co-leader Patrick Harvie, and North East MSP Maggie Chapman who failed to secure top spot in her party has now blamed a "software error" at the external company used to process the has apologised for the "inconvenience and concern" caused by the third-party software it used to count votes. A Scottish Greens spokesperson party officials were assured on Monday afternoon that the counting "had been completed and confirmed to meet the standards requested under our internal party rules".But following further investigation the software error was detected in an external programme used to count votes. The party said was first made aware of this on Tuesday spokesperson added: "Party officials were not aware of this error at the time of previous statements, and had been reassured by the third-party provider on Monday afternoon that all counting had been completed and verified."Following a full revised count with oversight and verification from current party officials and those involved in previous Holyrood selections, we can confirm our full list of candidates for the Holyrood 2026 campaign. "All of the previously announced 15 lead candidates remain duly selected and will continue to lead the party's campaign to elect a record number of MSPs."The party acknowledged it had been a "stressful process" for candidates and members and thanked them for their "vigilance, patience and trust". Mi-Voice 'sincerely apologise' for anomalies Simon Thomson, director of Mi-Voice, said a review triggered by concerned party officials identified a "technical fault" with the vote counting Thomson said the party was notified at 10:00 on Tuesday and the issue was reported to the software also confirmed the updated candidate lists then underwent "additional manual validation" to ensure they represented "the final and accurate outcome". Mr Thomson said: "We acknowledge the concern this has raised for party members and candidates. "We understand the frustration and confusion, and we sincerely apologise for the inconvenience and concern it has caused." On Tuesday, Kate Joester, who was the party's internal elections officer, said she had not spotted the issue when the figures were first sent to initially endorsed a statement from the party reassuring campaigners that there were "no realistic doubts" about the after quitting her post Joester said she should not have given her backing amid concerns about how some votes were cast.


Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
It's Turnberry's turn in 2029
Donald Trump is about to fly into the UK, not on a state visit or diplomatic mission but something that to his mind is almost as important, if not more so. He is visiting the golf courses he owns in Aberdeenshire and at Turnberry on Scotland's west coast. Every golfer who has had the privilege to play both in recent years will attest to the work and investment made by Mr Trump and his son Eric to turn them into some of the country's best resorts. The Ailsa course at Turnberry, with its spectacular views of the granite craig in the Firth of Clyde and across to the Isle of Arran and the Mull of Kintyre, is ranked in the top five in the British Isles. It has hosted the Open championship, held last week at Royal Portrush, on four occasions. The first, in 1977, has entered golfing folklore for its extraordinary final round battle between Jack Nicklaus and Tom Watson, known as The Duel in the Sun. In 2009, Watson almost became the oldest player to win a major golf championship at the age of 59, but lost in a play-off. That was the last time the Open was staged at Turnberry, even though it is considered a superior course to many others on the Royal and Ancient's rotating 10-venue list. So when will it get the Open again? The next empty slot is 2028, but its connection to President Trump poses a security problem. Police Scotland are laying on a massive presence for his four-day visit. The R&A wants the focus to be on just the golf and believe transport connections must be improved. The answer, surely, is to earmark 2029 or 2030 for Turnberry. Better road and rail links should be built by then. But more importantly, Mr Trump will no longer be in office and the brouhaha surrounding his presidency might have died down.


The Sun
34 minutes ago
- The Sun
Fury as Royal Navy has NO attack submarines at sea to defend its surface fleet in ‘ridiculous shambles'
THE Royal Navy has no submarines at sea to defend its surface fleet. HMS Anson arrived back at its Scottish base on Friday, leaving no attack subs currently on patrol. It means the UK's warships have no homegrown underwater protection against potential threats. One former senior officer called it embarrassing and a shambles, brought on by years of poor planning. The five Astute-class nuclear powered attack subs are meant to play a key role defending the Carrier Strike Group, currently in the Indo-Pacific, off Australia. But it is understood the US Navy is providing submarine protection for our aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales. Two other Astute-class subs have not put to sea for more than two years, and another is being refitted in Plymouth, where a fifth is also in dry dock. A sixth sub, which is under construction, is unlikely to be operational for at least 18 months. Britain's four Vanguard-class subs, armed with long-range nukes, are not designed to attack other submarines or surface ships. One is permanently at sea to provide a nuke deterrent. Falklands veteran Rear Admiral Chris Parry said: 'The whole nuclear enterprise is a shambles. 'It's ridiculous we can't send an attack sub on deployment. Incredible moment a Royal Navy warship destroys a supersonic missile off Scots coast 'These submarines are the one thing the Russians and Chinese really fear.' The Navy said its subs 'continue to deploy globally on operations, protecting national interests and keeping us safe'. 1