Education Department staff warned that Trump buyout offers could be canceled at any time
The Office of Personnel Management sent notices last week to federal employees that if they resign by Feb. 6, they could continue receiving pay and benefits until the end of September. The Trump administration is hoping to get as many as 10% of the workforce to quit as part of a plan to shrink the federal bureaucracy.
But three Education Department officials told NBC News that Rachel Oglesby, the department's new chief of staff, and Jacqueline Clay, chief human capital officer, described significant caveats to the so-called Fork in the Road offer in an all-staff meeting held over Zoom on Wednesday. The officials did not want to be named for fear of retaliation.
The Education Secretary would be allowed to rescind the agreement, or the government could stop paying, and employees who took the deferred resignation package would waive all legal claims, the three officials said they were told in the meeting. The three employees say they have only seen sample resignation agreements so far, and would need to agree to resign by Thursday evening before they see the actual terms of their separation.
'It sounded like a commercial for a used car dealership, like, 'Act now, one day only,'' said one department official who attended the meeting.
The Education Department did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday.
A spokesperson for the Office of Personnel Management said that this was false, and pointed to a memo that states the resignation offer's 'assurances are binding on the government. Were the government to backtrack on its commitments, an employee would be entitled to request a rescission of his or her resignation.' However, the memo includes a sample agreement that includes a clause that agency heads retain the sole discretion to rescind the deal, and employees waive the right to challenge it before the Merit Systems Protection Board, "or any other forum.'
A sample deferred resignation agreement specific for Education Department employees includes similar language, according to a copy obtained by NBC News.
Across the federal government, pressure has been mounting from the Trump administration to take the buyout offer. In an email to federal employees Tuesday following up on the original buyout proposal, OPM wrote, 'Please note the Deferred Resignation program ('Fork in the Road') expires at 11:59 p.m. ET on Thursday February 6th. There will not be an extension of this program.'
More than 40,000 people have taken the buyout offer so far, according to a White House official, out of a federal workforce composed of over two million individuals.
There is deep concern among federal workers that the Trump administration's buyout offer could turn out to be a bait-and-switch, with the government potentially failing to hold up its end of the bargain. The comments from Education Department management only worsened those concerns, the three employees said.
'The morale is pretty bad,' a second official said. 'One of the managers I work with just said he hasn't seen any emails in the last four hours since the meeting ended, because everybody just kind of had the life sucked out of them.'
A third employee described the tone of the call as angry, as workers put questions in Zoom's chat box but then did not receive responses.
The unusual buyout offer has upended Washington, D.C., amid a flurry of executive orders and maneuvers by Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk, who is head of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, an office within the White House. In the span of two weeks, Trump and Musk have launched a sweeping effort to remake the federal government, slash spending and even eliminate some agencies.
Many Democrats and some Republicans say that Trump and Musk are violating constitutional limits on the presidency in ways that are unlawful and that are precipitating a constitutional crisis.
Some labor unions for federal workers have sued to stop the deferred resignation program, arguing that the Trump administration does not have legal authority to offer such buyouts. Federal government labor unions and Democratic attorneys general have warned federal workers that they may never receive the promised resignation benefits, and characterized the offers as an attempt to intimidate them into quitting.
Trump has nominated Linda McMahon, the former World Wrestling Entertainment CEO and head of the Small Business Administration in his first administration, to be Education Secretary. No confirmation hearing is scheduled yet.
There are other staffing changes coming to the Education Department that may arrive before McMahon does. The department expects to conduct layoffs, known as Reduction in Force, the three department officials said they were told during Wednesday's meeting. Oglesby, the chief of staff, and Clay, the human capital officer, did not share when those will take place or which offices will be hit hardest by them during the meeting.
Education Department staff will also need to come into the office daily by Feb. 24. Clay told staff that department leadership is working to find another federal building for remote employees to work from within 50 miles of their home.
Trump has said he wants to eliminate the Education Department, which would fulfill a longtime dream of the Republican base, but is supposed to take an act of Congress to achieve. The Wall Street Journal reported Monday that the White House is weighing executive action that could dismantle the department in a piecemeal fashion, citing unnamed people familiar with the matter.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's tariffs on Canada might be here to stay, U.S. Secretary of Commerce says
With less than two weeks to go for Canada to make a trade deal with the U.S., Prime Minister Mark Carney and the nation's premiers are set to tackle the issue during a three-day meeting in Ontario. As Mackenzie Gray reports, Trump's commerce secretary is making it clear the U.S. is firmly committed to imposing substantial levies if American demands are not met.
New York Post
21 minutes ago
- New York Post
NY awarded more than $600M to ‘sanctuary' groups helping defy Trump, federal immigration law
Legal and migrant advocacy groups fighting to block New York from helping the Trump administration enforce US immigration laws have been awarded more than $600 million in taxpayer dollars from the city and state governments, a Post review of contracts revealed. The Bronx Defenders alone has received more than $500 million in city contracts since fiscal year 2018 to provide a host of legal services to poor criminal and civil defendants, including migrants, according to a review of contracts from 2009 to the present. 7 The Bronx Defenders alone has received more than $500 million in city contracts. The Bronx Defenders/ Facebook And the legal aid group raked in another $32 million from the state over the years, records kept by the state comptroller's office show. Other groups were also funneled big bucks as they worked to undermine federal immigration policy, including Make the Road NY — which received $56 million to provide legal, health and other services mostly to immigrants, state and city contract records. The group helped organize a rally at the state Capitol last month urging passage of a sanctuary bill as rally goers chanted, 'No hate, no fear. Immigrants are welcome here.' 7 The legal aid group raked in another $32 million from the state over the years. X / @thenyic The New York Immigration Coalition received $46 million. 'New York City should not be in the business of carrying out Donald Trump's mass disappearance agenda, which is in fact illegal under our local laws,' said Murad Awadeh, executive director of the NYICC, on his X handle @HeyItsMurad. Awadeh also reposted an interview he did with New York Public News Network on May 30. 'Sanctuary policies are public safety measures,' he said. 'They encourage people to participate within our society so that they're able and comfortable enough to report things that are happening and without them, a lot of people won't do that, because they are fearful, and rightfully fearful, especially in the world that we're living in today, that they may end up entrapped in this ICE enforcement that's happening.' 7 Portrait of Murad Awawdeh, CEO of the New York Immigration Coalition. X / @HeyItsMurad Additionally, New Yorker Lawyers for the Public Interest received $19 million, including about $5 million from 2022 to present, city and state records show. The Bronx Defenders have been part of a wider push for a statewide sanctuary bill — the New York for All Act — that would bar state and local law enforcement from cooperating with US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement agents. That would include assisting in providing information, turning over or deporting illegal immigrants. Another bill with a push from activists called the Dignity not Detention Act would ban local jails from renting space to ICE to increase their detention capacity for suspected illegal migrants. 7 The New York Immigration Coalition received $46 million. Robert Mecea 'State leaders are not powerless against the federal administration's mass deportation agenda,' the Bronx Defenders said in a June 11 statement on X. 'We have a couple ideas: pass New York For All and Dignity Not Detention now, before it's too late.' The state Senate adjourned for the summer without passing either of the bills. Passage could become a political liability for Democrats who control the state government and US House of Representatives members who are running for office next year, including Gov. Kathy Hochul. 7 New Yorker Lawyers for the Public Interest received $19 million, including about $5 million from 2022 to present. X / @MaketheRoadNY Meanwhile, New York City is slated to spend $75 million on immigration legal services in its new budget, under a spending agreement approved by Mayor Eric Adams and the City Council. That spending plan includes $41.9 million in free legal assistance for migrants facing deportation But politicians who back President Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration fumed that groups helping break federal immigration law are receiving massive taxpayer funding. 'Non-governmental organizations that help shield criminals from deportation should not receive a single penny,' said Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-Staten Island/Brooklyn). 7 New York City is slated to spend $75 million on immigration legal services in its new budget. Robert Mecea 'While I don't have much faith in Governor [Kathy] Hochul and New York Democrats to stop funding left wing groups who work against law enforcement and the interests of citizens, we're taking decisive action on the federal level to end the Biden-Schumer gravy train of years past and put that money towards border security and enforcement to get foreign gangs and criminals out.' Staten Island Borough President Vito Fossella said, 'Hundreds of millions of dollars are being spent to undermine public safety and our immigration laws. They are fighting to protect those who are dangerous criminals. 'It's a poke in the eye to hard working taxpayers. Is the money well spent?. The answer is no.' 7 Politicians who back Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration fumed that groups helping break federal immigration law are receiving massive taxpayer funding. X / @MaketheRoadNY State Conservative Party chairman Gerard Kassar: 'There is no excuse for New York authorities not to cooperate with federal authorities. New Yorkers should not be spending hundreds of millions of dollars on groups fighting to keep illegal aliens in the United States.' The staggering tally comes after an off-duty US Customs and Border Protection agent was shot in the face in New York City during a robbery — with the shooter allegedly an illegal migrant. President Trump also ripped Democrats for flooding 'our Nation with Criminal Invaders.'
The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
We can't win the fight to end HIV if we cut funding and access to medication
The fight to end HIV in our lifetimes just received a game-changing innovation. In June, the FDA approved Yeztugo (lenacapavir), a groundbreaking HIV prevention treatment that requires just two injections per year — and scored 99 percent effectiveness in trials. This monumental scientific breakthrough is poised to transform the lives of people who have found it hard to keep up with daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis, providing an option that fits better into their everyday lives. But as exciting as this development is, it could be undermined by the Trump administration's proposal to cut nearly $1 billion from federal HIV prevention programs. Innovations like lenacapavir could be a key tool to ending the epidemic, but only if we have the resources and policy to deliver it directly to those who need them most. Although lenacapavir's efficacy is groundbreaking, access remains another story. With a price tag hovering around $28,000 a year, this medication risks being out of reach for the very communities who need it most. We're still waiting to see how programs managed by Gilead Sciences, which developed the treatments, and the broader insurance markets will step up. And it's not just the cost of the drug itself. It's the labs, the provider visits, the follow-ups — each one a potential roadblock for someone trying to stay safe. Federal leadership is essential to ensuring this new HIV prevention tool reaches the communities who need it most. This includes updating clinical guidelines, funding support services and supporting the infrastructure that makes access possible. Unfortunately, the Trump administration and the Republican majorities in Congress are putting access to lifesaving innovations at risk. The administration's attacks on HIV prevention, including its proposals to eliminate the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's HIV budget and efforts to dismantle public health systems, threaten progress. The Republican budget reconciliation bill that President Trump signed over the July 4 weekend includes deep cuts to Medicaid — the largest payer for HIV care in the U.S. Without strong federal investment and coordination, expanding access to new tools and ending the HIV epidemic is at serious risk. Despite the real strides we have made in HIV prevention, those of us in the lesbian, gay, and transgender community — especially non-white Southerners in rural areas or navigating poverty — know that not every prevention strategy reaches us, works for us, or is built with us in mind. Our realities demand options that reflect the full truth of who we are and how we live. Lenacapavir offers real, powerful hope, but let's be clear: Science alone won't save us. What will make the difference is equitable and intentional policies that center our communities and a public health infrastructure that doesn't leave us behind. These numbers don't shift on their own. Yes, we have made progress over time. But the hard truth is that Black Americans still account for 43 percent of all new HIV diagnoses in the U.S., despite being just 13 percent of the population. The data is even more stark for Black transgender women: 44 percent are living with HIV, and their lifetime risk remains unacceptably high. And we cannot ignore the geography of this epidemic. The South accounts for 52 percent of all new HIV diagnoses in the U.S. That's not a coincidence — it is the result of systemic failures: limited access to healthcare, persistent stigma, lack of comprehensive sex education and the absence of strong non-discrimination protections. These barriers don't just prevent care — they trap people in cycles where prevention tools are out of reach. Among gay and bisexual Black men, the risk of contracting HIV is still 50 percent over a lifetime. Prevention tools like pre-exposure prophylaxis and lenacapavir hold promise, but they only matter if people can actually access them, without fear, shame or coercion. Ending this epidemic means creating environments where people are safe to make informed choices about their own health. The fight to end the HIV epidemic is not just about what happens in labs — it's about how we make these innovations real for our communities. Science is doing its part. Now is the time to urge Congress to reject any cuts to CDC HIV prevention efforts and to fully fund the HIV response. We have the tools to end this epidemic, but not if we dismantle the very systems our communities rely on to survive. The promise of lenacapavir, and the hope it represents, is too great to let fall through the cracks of policy neglect. The question is, will we make the choice to ensure that this breakthrough reaches all of us? Science has given us the tools. Now, we must ensure that everyone has the opportunity to use them.
