UK to lower national voting age to 16 under government proposals
If passed by the parliament, the proposed reforms, unveiled Thursday, would bring national votes in line with elections in Scotland, Wales and the Channel Islands, where younger voters already cast ballots.
'Young people deserve to have a stake and to have a say in the future of our democracy,' said Rushanara Ali, parliamentary under-secretary for local government in the House of Commons on Thursday.
'When we came into power just over a year ago, the government committed through its manifesto to bring forward measures to strengthen our precious democracy and uphold the integrity of our elections.'
The UK's move, which could be in place for the next general election, follows a growing global trend toward younger enfranchisement.
Darren Hughes, chief executive of the Electoral Reform Society, welcomed the proposed reforms, telling CNN that lowering the voting age would 'help more young people to cast that all-important, habit-forming vote at a point when they can be supported with civic education.'
'Participation is a vital sign of the health of our democracy. If fewer people vote, our democracy becomes weaker,' he added.
In 2008, Austria became the first European country to lower its national voting age to 16, with Malta adopting the change a decade later. In South America, countries including Brazil, Nicaragua, Ecuador and Argentina have permitted voting from age 16 for years.
Across much of the world, however, 18 remains the standard minimum voting age. In Asia, countries such as Indonesia and East Timor have set the threshold at 17, while Singapore, Lebanon, and Oman require citizens to wait until 21 to cast a ballot.
Within the UK, the government's intentions have drawn scrutiny.
James Yucel, head of campaigns at the center-right thinktank Onward, told CNN that the proposal was 'not some noble push for democracy' but instead 'political engineering aimed at boosting (Labour's) support.'
In both opinion polls and votes, younger voters tend to skew more heavily towards Labour than the main opposition Conservatives.
The proposed reforms drew criticism from the Conservative Party on Thursday, with lawmaker and shadow cabinet member Paul Holmes saying in the House of Commons: 'Why does this government think a 16-year-old can vote, but not be allowed to buy a lottery ticket, an alcoholic drink, marry, or go to war, or even stand in the elections they are voting in?'
The reforms would also expand acceptable voter ID to include digital formats of existing IDs, such as driving licenses and armed forces' veterans' cards. UK-issued bank cards would also be accepted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says major US banks 'discriminated against me' as White House preps debanking executive order
Debanking is back in the spotlight this week after President Trump said Tuesday that the country's two largest US banks, JPMorgan Chase (JPM) and Bank of America (BAC), denied him as a customer. "The banks discriminated against me very badly, and I was very good to the banks," Trump said on CNBC's "Squawk Box," adding that "they discriminate against many conservatives." For years, Republicans have claimed that US banks have denied accounts to certain customers for political reasons. Crypto companies have warned more recently that they weren't permitted to get banking services during the Biden era. "I had hundreds of millions. I had many, many accounts loaded up with cash. I was loaded up with cash, and they told me, 'I'm sorry, sir, we can't have you. You have 20 days to get out,'" Trump said of his experience losing bank accounts with JPMorgan Chase. The president said he then went to Bank of America "to deposit a billion dollars plus" and was similarly denied. "He said, 'We can't do it,'" Trump told "Squawk Box" while also referencing pressure on banks from Washington, D.C., regulators as a key reason for why he and others have been denied banking services. "I ended up going to small banks all over the place," Trump added. The president's comments came in response to a Wall Street Journal report late Monday stating that the White House is preparing to draft a related executive order around debanking that would fine banks found discriminating against customers on political grounds. Bank of America did not immediately offer a response to Trump's comments. "We don't close accounts for political reasons, and we agree with President Trump that regulatory change is desperately needed. We commend the White House for addressing this issue and look forward to working with them to get this right," a JPMorgan spokesperson said in emailed comments. Both of these giant lenders and their CEOs have denied debanking customers on political grounds. Learn more about high-yield savings accounts, money market accounts, and CD accounts. Trump first brought visibility to the debanking issue back in January when he confronted Bank of America's Brian Moynihan about it during a live Q&A at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. "I hope you start opening your bank to conservatives," Trump told Moynihan. The president also appeared to include JPMorgan Chase CEO Jame Dimon in his confrontation. "I don't know if the regulators mandated that because of Biden or what, but you and Jamie and everybody else, I hope you open your banks to conservatives, because what you're doing is wrong," Trump added. Two months later, the Trump Organization sued major credit card lender Capital One (COF) for allegedly debanking hundreds of its accounts following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol in Washington, D.C. Bank regulators have already eliminated one element in supervision that has been pointed to as a culprit of debunking, known as reputational risk. Critics said this element of supervision was previously too subjective, allowing regulators additional room to penalize lenders for taking on customers they deemed risky. "The heart of the problem is regulatory overreach and supervisory discretion," a spokesperson for the Bank Policy Institute, a D.C. banking industry advocacy group, said in an emailed statement. "The banking agencies have already taken steps to address issues like reputational risk, and we're hopeful that any forthcoming executive order will reinforce this progress by directing regulators to confront the flawed regulatory framework that gave rise to these concerns in the first place," BPI added. Each of the bosses for these big banks has addressed the issue by also pointing a finger at regulators. "We have not debanked anyone because of political or religious relationships, period," JPMorgan's Dimon said during a podcast interview earlier this year, in which he acknowledged that debanking happens. "The reality is that if they gave us clarity from the regulatory thing and avoid the second-guessing, that would be helpful," Bank of America's Moynihan said in a CBS interview on Sunday. David Hollerith is a senior reporter for Yahoo Finance covering banking, crypto, and other areas in finance. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
SNP slammed as number of police officers cut by 1,000 over five years
The Scottish Government have been accused of 'hollowing out Police Scotland' as new figures show the number of police officers in Scotland has plummeted in recent years. The total number of police officers has also fallen sharply the past five years, declining by 1,000 after reaching a high of just over 17,400 at the beginning of 2020. However, the numbers show a marginal increase on 2024, where full-time police officers dropped to a 16-year low of just over 16,200. Labour MSP Pauline McNeil has spoken out. (Image: PA) Pauline McNeil MSP, Scottish Labour's Justice spokesperson in Holyrood has accused the Scottish Government of 'blowing apart Scots' basic right to have a crime reported and responded to quickly." Ms McNeil added: 'Police Scotland is already stretched to breaking point and communities often feel that police response times are becoming unacceptably long. 'The SNP's failure to protect police officer numbers has blown apart Scots' basic right to have a crime reported and responded to quickly. 'Each time these figures come out we see more evidence of the SNP's neglect and its failure to protect Scotland's police force or retain an effective policing model. 'The SNP has hollowed out Police Scotland over recent years, forcing police officers and staff to go above and beyond to paper over the cracks. 'The SNP cannot keep playing fast and loose with the safety of our communities – a Scottish Labour government will support policing and make sure our country has the police officers it needs.' Joani Reid, the newly-elected [[Scottish Labour]] Party MP for East Kilbride and Straven said the figures were 'hugely disappointing." She added: "Cutting police numbers is a false economy, adding to overtime bills and placing more strain on officers still in post. It's another sign of how the [[SNP]] government in Edinburgh has lost its way. "Instead of their forever war over another divisive independence referendum SNP ministers should be focusing on things that really matter to people: like stopping crime and arresting and convicting offenders. 'But all week long we've just seen one SNP figure after another argue about the constitution. Public services are very obviously not their top priority despite that being literally what they are paid to care about." Read more: Major Glasgow construction company makes key appointment Death of boy who fell down manhole at construction site could have been avoided Crown Office warned of human rights violations over Palestine Action crackdown Ms Reid added: "The SNP aren't concentrating on what matters to ordinary folk because they are stuck in a 2014 referendum time warp. The rest of Scotland has moved on but they haven't. "My constituents want action on knife crime, on drug deaths, on child sexual exploitation - all things where a cut in police numbers is absolutely the wrong way to go. "The SNP are out of energy, out of ideas and really should be out of office." In a statement, Justice Secretary Angela Constance said: 'We are investing a record £1.64 billion for policing this year, and our continued investment enabled Police Scotland to take on more recruits in the last financial year than at any time since 2013. "There has been a further intake of recruits since this statistical reporting period and more intakes are planned this year. 'Scotland continues to have more police officers per capita than England and Wales and recorded crime has fallen by more than half since 1991.'
Tom's Guide
13 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
An extra 5 million age checks a day are being completed thanks to the UK's Online Safety Act
New data suggests there has been an additional five million age verification checks every day in the UK since the introduction of the Online Safety Act. Sites hosting content deemed harmful for under 18s must now verify the age of visitors. But many see this as a significant privacy and cybersecurity risk – and have turned to the best VPNs in an attempt to bypass the checks. The Online Safety Act has triggered an important discussion about online privacy and there are strong views from both supporters and critics of the law. Those backing the law, including the UK government, have said it's doing a vital job at protecting children online. However, the law's opponents have said it comes with significant cybersecurity risks and compromises online privacy. One cybersecurity expert called it a "disaster waiting to happen." According to the Age Verification Providers Association (AVPA) there has been a significant increase in daily age verification checks online. As reported in the Guardian, the AVPA's Executive Director, Iain Corby said: "As a result of new codes under the Online Safety Act coming into force on Friday, we have seen an additional five million age checks on a daily basis, as UK-based internet users seek to access sites that are age-restricted." The AVPA said it couldn't share a baseline comparison to this figure, but some sites introduced age verification checks before the Online Safety Act became law. Reddit, X, and Spotify are just some of the sites you might have to verify your age to access all its content. But there have also been reports of overreach and content not traditionally seen as harmful being blocked. The UK government said "platforms should not arbitrarily block or remove content and instead must take a risk-based, proportionate approach to child safety duties." It went on to say "the act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children." However research by the BBC found that reports on the conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine have been blocked as a result of the Online Safety Act. There has been vocal opposition to the law and a petition demanding the UK government repeals the act is approaching 500,000 signatures. The UK government has said it wouldn't repeal the act, adding that it is "working closely with Ofcom to implement the Act as quickly and effectively as possible to enable UK users to benefit from its protections." "Proportionality is a core principle of the act and is in-built into its duties," the UK government said. "As regulator for the online safety regime, OFCOM must consider the size and risk level of different types and kinds of services when recommending steps providers can take to comply with requirements." MP Peter Kyle, Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, is one of the law's biggest supporters. He said the law "marks the most significant step forward in child safety since the internet was created" and that "age verification keeps children safe." However Kyle has also made controversial comments towards opponents of the law and in a tweet said you "are on the side of predators" if you wanted to overturn the Online Safety Act. The law has received support from an array of children's charities and YouGov research found that 69% of Britons are in favor of age verification checks. However, this is down from the 80% support recorded prior to the law's introduction and only 26% had encountered age checks online. Furthermore, 64% said it would be "not very / not at all effective" in preventing under 18s from accessing harmful content. Regardless of the positives, and the well intentioned nature of the law, there are fundamental privacy and cybersecurity concerns that need to be addressed. People don't feel comfortable handing over sensitive personal information to third-party age check providers such as AgeGO, Persona, and Yoti. Each provider has a different approach to data security, with some deleting it straight away and others holding it for some period of time. Any data being stored is at risk of a breach and the impact of one could be catastrophic. The recent Tea app breach exposed the ID of thousands of women in the US – an age verification provider breach could be even worse. Major VPN providers surged up the UK Apple App Store charts as people looked for ways to avoid age verification checks. Suspect free VPNs also rose in popularity and put people's data at risk in different ways. These privacy and cybersecurity concerns must be appropriately addressed, and not cast aside, should the UK government want the Online Safety Act to succeed in the best way it can. We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.
