Democratic Debate Over Private School Choice Reveals Post-Election Tensions
chapter of the national organization that advocates for school choice.
Among the biggest wins of her tenure, she counts increases in charter funding and twice electing Democrat and school reformer Gov. Jared Polis as governor. After serving as chief of staff for the Denver Public Schools, she fully expected to finish her career at DFER.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
'We worked hard to build power in the Democratic Party specifically around accountability, choice and the role of public charter schools,' she said. 'Everything had always been grounded 100% in public education.'
But last year, she said she 'saw the writing on the wall' when the organization's leader embraced Education Savings Accounts and other forms of private school choice. She is among several who have since left the group over the issue.
In a May 5 policy paper, DFER CEO Jorge Elorza, former two-term mayor of Providence, Rhode Island, suggested that instead of 'rejecting them offhand,' his party should explore how ESAs can advance Democratic values like uplifting needy families and protecting civil rights. Eighteen Republican-led states now have such programs, which parents can use for private school tuition or homeschooling. Most Democrats say vouchers and ESAs lack accountability and threaten funding for public schools.
To Alisha Searcy, who joined DFER just last year, Elorza's about-face felt like a betrayal.
'DFER has done extraordinary work to get courageous Democrats elected to push bold policies that would truly improve public education,' said the former Georgia state legislator. She was hired last year to expand the organization's reach into her state, Alabama and Tennessee, but resigned in May. 'We need a strong Democratic voice, now more than ever. This move to embrace vouchers and ESAs is the exact opposite.'
Related
The issue has brought bubbling to the surface a debate that was previously restricted to Democratic backrooms. Elorza took the helm of DFER at a time when polls began to show that voters were losing confidence in Democrats as the party they most trusted on education. Parents, the surveys suggested, were more preoccupied with whether their kids were recovering from pandemic learning loss than how schools were teaching issues of race or gender in the classroom. The soul searching only intensified in the aftermath of President Donald Trump's election.
Founded in 2007, DFER always advocated for wider public school options. Leaders worked with the Obama administration and reform-minded Democrats to support policies like magnet schools, dual enrollment and lifting state caps on charter schools. Now, Republicans and their push for parental rights are dominating the education conversation, including a recent proposal to enact a national tax credit for private school choice. Elorza is among those who say the party needs to be open to more options for families if it's going to regain its edge with voters, especially parents. But he recognizes the risks.
'There are a lot of Democrats who are choice curious,' he told The 74. 'They'll say privately that they're open to the idea of choice, including private school choice, but that the politics of it are just so darn challenging.'
In a recent op-ed, he pointed to Pennsylvania as the best opportunity for a swing state to pass an ESA program. Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro came close to supporting such a bill in 2023.
Some observers say Shapiro and Elorza are outliers in the party. During the Obama years, DFER 'nudged' the party toward school reform policies like merit pay for teachers and maintaining strong assessment systems, said David Houston, an assistant education professor at George Mason University in Virginia. But now it's 'further from the center of Democratic politics.'
The recent departure of other DFER staff offers further evidence that Elorza's position doesn't reflect the Democratic mainstream.
Will Andras served as political director in Colorado for Education Reform Now, a think tank affiliated with DFER that Elorza also leads. Andras left last year, shortly after DFER joined the No More Lines Coalition, a group of organizations that advocate for open enrollment and removing school attendance boundaries.
The member organizations, funded largely by the conservative Koch network, also support vouchers and ESAs. In his resignation letter, Andras referenced the change in direction since Elorza came on board in 2023.
'The last six months have shown that the organization I have devoted a substantial portion of my professional career to help build no longer aligns with my political or personal values,' he wrote.
Jessica Giles, who led the D.C. chapter, posted similar words when she walked away in May. It's one of several chapters to close since Elorza became CEO. The Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts and DFER South chapters have also shut down.
Elorza said he respects their stance.
'There are a lot of folks who put a great deal of stock into this public-private distinction, and I think it comes from a principled place,' he said. 'But I truly believe that it is in the party's political best interest to be open minded to any approach that moves the needle for kids and families.'
Related
Backed by far-right billionaires, the private school choice movement has been on a winning streak since 2022, when Arizona passed the first universal ESA. 'The political winds are shifting,' Corey DeAngelis, a self-described 'school choice evangelist' and fellow at multiple think tanks, said at a conference in Atlanta in April. 'If Democrats are smart, they'll stop the Republicans from being able to pick up the football and win on this issue.'
He pointed to Louisiana, where six House Democrats — one-fifth of the party's caucus — voted last year for the LA GATOR Scholarship, an ESA that starts this fall. One of them, Rep. Jason Hughes, passionately defended his vote on the House floor.
'As I watch children in poverty, trapped in failing schools, who can hardly read, I'll be damned if I will continue to defend the status quo,' he said.
Rep. Marlene Terry, a Missouri Democrat, delivered an equally heartfelt speech in May after caucus leaders took away her committee assignments when she supported a $50 million increase to the state's ESA program.
'I will vote how I please, when I please and where I please,' she said. 'No one can take away my voice. I will not be silent.'
While her own children attended public school, she said families in the St. Louis-area district she represents are frustrated that their schools have lacked full accreditation for 15 years.
'That's a long time for families to wait for improvement,' Terry told The 74. Riverview Gardens, a majority Black, high-poverty district, regained local control from the state in 2023, but leaders are still working to make continued gains in attendance and teacher retention. 'That's why I support giving families a range of high-quality public options, including public charter schools, and — when absolutely necessary — scholarships to attend other schools if no viable public options exist.'
Some Democrats agree with Elorza that the party shouldn't distance legislators like Terry. In a recent blog, Virginia Board of Education Member Andy Rotherham, who served in the Clinton White House and co-founded Bellwether, a think tank, said Democrats need to welcome 'a much wider range of perspectives on these questions,' given school choice's surge in popularity since the pandemic.
'This is America — we like choice,' he wrote. 'Being on the wrong side of that culturally and politically is not a great place to be.'
Related
Using an ESA can be particularly uncomfortable for a lifelong Democrat — especially In Arizona, where Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs has called the program a 'billion dollar boondoggle' and wants to set income caps on families using it. Kathy Visser, who administers a ESA Facebook group for parents and vendors, knows some who left the forum because they felt that it was 'not a safe space for Democrats.'
'I hate election time because it's always a mess in the group,' she said. 'People think we should be able to talk about ESAs without talking about politics, but when you've got one party so solidly entrenched against it, it's really hard.'
Some Democrats who use ESAs say they hold their noses when it comes to other aspects of the Republican agenda.
Christina Foster, whose daughter has used an ESA in the past, said she gets 'heart palpitations' when she has to decide on a candidate. She's board chair for Arizona's Black Mothers Forum, which runs microschools serving students using ESAs, and wants to protect the program. But in the 2024 election, she voted for Democrats.
'Some of those Republicans were not supportive of minority rights, immigration rights, women's rights. Those are very important to me,' she said. 'I said 'OK, unfortunately, I'm going to have to vote against the ESA.'
For those within the traditional K-12 system, the choice to use an ESA can be tricky. As a kindergarten teacher in Arizona's Peoria district, Melanie Ford is familiar with anti-ESA talking points about how the program undermines funding for traditional schools and is susceptible to waste and fraud.
But she overlooked those arguments when public school no longer seemed like a safe place for her transgender son Ash. He avoided using the bathroom all day because students said he didn't belong in the boys' or the girls' restroom.
For the 2023-24 school year, Ash used an ESA to attend the Queer Blended Learning Center, a microschool for middle schoolers in Phoenix that incorporates LGBTQ history into the curriculum. Ford told her colleagues that despite her support of public schools, she had to think first about her son. Ash has since returned to a public high school, where he plays on a drumline in the marching band and has straight A's, his mother said. But using the ESA allowed him to transition in a more supportive setting.
'He didn't have to deal with the comments from peers that slowly rip a person apart from the inside out,' she said. 'He could grow into himself without judgement from others and this was so important for his mental health.'
While some Democrats, as Elorza suggested, may think an ESA is the best option for their children, that interest hasn't risen to the national level. No Congressional Democrats, for example, have endorsed the federal Educational Choice for Children Act, the tax credit scholarship program tucked into the Republicans' reconciliation bill.
In some states, vouchers remain unpopular, said Joshua Cowen, an education professor at Michigan State University and a strong opponent of directing public funds to private schools.
He points to Kentucky, where 65% of voters rejected a private school choice measure last November. Coloradans also defeated a school choice-related proposition, and voters in Nebraska repealed a voucher program.
While the Democratic party may embrace vouchers in the future, that day is a long way off, said Ravi Gupta, a former Obama staffer who runs a nonprofit media company. On an intellectual level, he's intrigued by ESAs. Democrats, he said, would never say Medicaid should only be used at a public hospital or Section 8 vouchers only in a housing project, so why doesn't the same principle apply to education?
'Twenty years from now, do I think that could be the reality?' he asked. 'I think it's very likely, but it will take some time.'
Disclosure: The Charles Koch Foundation funds Stand Together Trust, which provides funding to The 74. Andy Rotherham sits on The 74's board of directors.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
25 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Long before calls to disband ICE, there was a movement to end the INS
On May 23, 1980, around 1,000 people, representing some 200 organizations from every border state, Colorado, Chicago and nearby Tijuana, assembled in San Diego for the National Chicano Immigration Conference by the Committee on Chicano Rights (CCR), a local grassroots activist group advocating for its community's self-determination. The historic meeting was a culmination of years of collective rage against increasing violence emanating from the U.S. Border Patrol, police and vigilantes against Mexican migrants. Attendees determined that the current immigration system, built by Republicans and Democrats, could not be reformed, noting that the very category of 'illegal alien' was invented to exploit Mexican immigrants' labor. And so, they put forward a call for the 'abolishment of the INS/border patrol,' rejecting militarization as a solution to the U.S. immigration issue. 'Abolishment' was not a cynical call to start over. It was a means to imagine a more democratic border policy from the perspective of those most affected by it and end a system that took advantage of virtually rightless laborers. That framework continues to guide social movements seeking the abolition of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) today. While people had always moved between the U.S.-Mexico border, migration increased exponentially after the U.S. government, facing a labor shortage in World War II, established the Bracero Program, which brought millions of Mexican contract workers to the U.S. After the program's termination in 1964, U.S. employers — now dependent on cheap, imported labor — continued recruiting Mexican migrant workers at the same pace. They did so despite a 40,000-person cap imposed by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. This created a growing population of vulnerable, undocumented workers in the 1960s and '70s who increasingly faced brutal apprehensions. The aggression was especially evident in the San Diego-Tijuana region, where migrants reported experiencing police brutality, family separation through deportation, wage theft and other types of abuse. Chicano activists mobilized resistance. They documented reports of heinous strip-searches by border agents from hundreds of women of Mexican origin, along with other accounts of Border Patrol violence, and angrily wrote to government officials. In 1972, they succeeded in obtaining a congressional hearing that brought widespread attention to the issue of Border Patrol violence, but little structural change. As apprehensions surpassed 1 million and continued climbing during President Jimmy Carter's administration, the CCR was among the Chicano Movement activist confronting the police violence, media scapegoating, and deportations targeting their communities. Despite their efforts, elected officials continued to make concessions to employers who hired undocumented migrants and increase border policing. By the time the CCR convened the 1980 conference, the continued escalation of violence had convinced activists: abolishment, not reform, was the only way forward. There, in San Diego's St. Rita Catholic Church, under banners of Cuban revolutionary hero Ernesto 'Che' Guevara and Mexican Revolution leader Emiliano Zapata and the flags of Mexico, the U.S., and the United Farm Workers, conference attendees broke out into workshops to come up with solutions to immigration policy problems. The Chicano/Mexicano Perspective Workshop, notably, considered an argument La Raza Unida Party had introduced as early as 1972 — that the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which ended the 1848 U.S.-Mexico War and granted U.S. citizenship to Mexicans living on land captured by the U.S., should also apply for 'easy entry of Mejicanos into the U.S. at any time.' This perspective defied the notion that Mexican-origin people were foreigners, positing that in fact they held legal rights to the territory. Activists also extended this anti-imperialist analysis to call for 'abolishing all quotas on immigration from countries where the USA has political, economic and military domination.' The following year, attendees reconvened at the 1981 National Chicano Immigration Tribunal, where migrants and advocates testified to further incidents of violence, including the deaths of two children denied access to crossing the border. CCR sent these accounts, as well as the resolutions that had come out of the 1980 conference, to the presidents of the U.S. and Mexico, Ronald Reagan and Jose López Portillo. This laid the groundwork for the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), which created a pathway to citizenship protection for 3 million. However, the IRCA ignored Chicano abolitionists' fundamental call for change. Instead, it further militarized the border by allocating resources for more police, military equipment and infrastructure. In 2025, immigration policy in the U.S. remains compromised by bipartisan interests that rely on immigrant labor but perceive immigrants themselves as a threat. But CCR's conference and tribunal show there is another way forward. And their proclamation 45 years ago — to reject the exploitation and racial violence of U.S. immigration system and to create something better led by those most impacted by the policy — continues to be advanced by advocates, organizers and community members who push for fundamental change today. It's no coincidence that the 1,000-page tribunal document activists sent to Reagan and López Portillo began with the words of the formerly enslaved leader, Frederick Douglass. 'Power concedes nothing without a demand,' it noted. 'The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.'


New York Post
42 minutes ago
- New York Post
Cincinnati official under fire for celebrating brutal attack: ‘They begged for that beat down!'
A city councilwoman in Cincinnati is under fire for comments posted on Facebook in the wake of a brutal downtown beatdown last weekend. Under a post from a Facebook user called Leohna Alia La JCannon that shows the vicious assault, an account that appears to belong to Councilwoman Victoria Parks commented, 'They begged for that beat down!' Advertisement 'I am grateful for the whole story,' the comment continues. The comment links back to a Facebook account for Victoria Parks, who lists her job title as City Council Member at City of Cincinnati Government. The account also says she was formerly the commissioner at Hamilton County, Ohio Government and the former Chief of Staff to Hamilton County Commissioner Todd Portune at Hamilton County. That information lines up with Parks' biography on the City of Cincinnati's official website. Advertisement Cincinnati's city council is officially nonpartisan, but Parks, like all nine members of the governing body, was endorsed by the local Democratic party. The Facebook page has posts dating back several years, mostly relating to work experience. 5 A woman lies on the street after being knocked unconscious during a brawl in Cincinnati, Ohio. X 5 Cincinnati City Councilwoman Victoria Parks. Victoria Parks/Facebook Advertisement Parks appears to have a second Facebook page as well, which last posted on May 27. A third account, last posted updated 2022, also appears to belong to Parks. The comments sparked an online firestorm, with a screenshot of the post being circulated widely. 'Cincinnati Councilwoman Victoria Parks must resign immediately! Defending violent criminals who viciously beat innocent people is disgusting,' Ohio's 39th District State Rep. Phil Plummer said on X. 'Her words 'They begged for that beat down!' are outrageous. Prosecutors must charge the attackers with a hate crime. We must protect our streets!' Advertisement 5 A crowd forms in downtown Cincinnati during the nighttime brawl. X 5 Several people throw punches at others during the chaotic scene. X 'You're a racist pig, Victoria Parks,' said another post. 'THIS IS INSANE!' said a third person, calling for Parks' resignation. The beatings occurred on the corner of Fourth and Elm Street in Cincinnati's downtown business district in the early morning hours on Saturday. 5 Victoria Parks announced that she would not seek reelection, and will retire after her current term ends. Victoria Parks/Facebook Video that has been shared widely online shows a group of people savagely assaulting two others during a confrontation, with a woman being knocked out cold in the street. In her official city biography page, Parks says she 'led the charge in passing Racism as a Public Health Crisis' when working for the Hamilton County governor. Advertisement It also says she 'introduced, and passed, Juneteenth as a paid holiday for Hamilton County employees.' In January, Parks announced that she would not seek reelection, and will retire after her current term ends. 'It's unconscionable that an elected official would be celebrating violence in the very city she was voted to serve,' Cincinnati Fraternal Order of Police President Ken Kober told Fox News Digital. 'This highlights the poor political environment that police officers, residents and visitors are currently enduring. Thankfully, there's an election in November. I urge voters to vote for change!' Advertisement Parks did not return requests for comment. An email to the entire city council also went unreturned. A representative for the city council declined to comment by phone, directing Fox News Digital to Parks herself. Mollie Lair, the Communications Director for the Cincinnati City Manager's Office, viewed the photo in person at cityhall, but declined to comment.

Washington Post
43 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Most Democrats vote for failed resolutions to block arms sales to Israel
More than half of Senate Democrats voted for two resolutions Wednesday night to block weapons sales to Israel, highlighting the party's growing frustration with Israel's handling of the war in Gaza nearly two years after Hamas's attack on Israel. The Senate rejected both resolutions introduced by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont). The first, which would block the sale of tens of thousands of assault rifles, failed 70-27. The second, which would block the sale of $675.7 million of bombs and other materiel to Israel, failed 73-24.