Former Australian National University chancellor slams 'gobsmacking' proposed university cuts
In a letter addressed to current Chancellor Julie Bishop, Vice-Chancellor Genevieve Bell, and Federal Education Minister Jason Clare, Mr Evans expressed concerns with the university's recently released College of the Arts and Social Sciences organisational change proposal.
Mr Evans said the changes had ignored the maintenance of the National Institutes Grant, which the ANU receives from the federal government for research "supporting the development of Australia's national unity and identity".
He said that during his time as ANU chancellor from 2010 to 2019 he could not have been more conscious of how important the grant had been to the ANU's viability.
The ANU faces a $250 million budget shortfall and has announced plans to cut around 100 jobs in recent months.
Mr Evans said he found it "gobsmacking" the ANU was looking to abolish the National Dictionary Centre (ANDC) and downsize the National Centre for Biography (NCB).
The NCB maintains the Australian Dictionary of Biography (ADB), a huge database of Australian stories and the evolution of Australian English, started in 1957.
Mr Evans said to drastically diminish the role of the ADB "makes no sense at all".
Mr Evans condemned the abolition of freestanding centres such as the Humanities Research Centre (HRC) and the Centre for European Studies (ANUCES).
He said the HRC had been "hugely respected both nationally and internationally for the last 50 years", and the ANUCES was "making a significant contribution to the government's trade and security policymaking with the EU".
The former chancellor also raised concerns with a move to remove the Crawford School of Public Policy from the College of Asia and the Pacific.
An ANU spokesperson said the university "welcomes a diversity of views and encourage constructive feedback including ideas to help meet the University's financial sustainability".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
11 minutes ago
- ABC News
'What choice do we have?': SA Premier grapples with mounting demands for taxpayer bailouts
Who deserves a lifeline? That's the awkward question Premier Peter Malinauskas has been fielding during an eventful first week back from annual leave. In the government's view, the Whyalla steelworks and its more than 1,000 employees certainly fall into the deserving category. On Wednesday, the Premier announced the state government would stump up another $137.5 million to keep the steelworks running through its government-enforced administration process. That's on top of $192 million the government had already allocated to keep the steelworks afloat, bringing the total state contribution to $329.5 million. The Commonwealth has pledged an equal amount. Wednesday's extra funding, while lower than expected, is still a hefty chunk for a state government that's flagged it has limited capacity to fund major projects due to rising debt levels. And the steelworks are not the only ones in need of help. The Port Pirie lead smelter, which employs about 900 people on the Spencer Gulf, is losing tens of millions of dollars a month, according to owner Nyrstar Australia. The company, which also owns a zinc smelter in Hobart, is negotiating with the state and federal governments over a support package that could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Then, on Thursday, it was revealed SA's largest disability employment provider, Bedford Industries, was on the brink of administration — raising fears for the future of 1,400 people with disability. In both situations, the SA Premier has indicated the state government is ready to help with public money if need be. But does this set a precedent for every business or industry that is struggling? Asked this on Wednesday, the Premier said: "Well, what choice do we have?" "I think we have to be balanced and careful in the approach that we take and deliberate in our considerations," he said. "But I don't think there's anybody seriously suggesting that we should allow Port Pirie or Whyalla or our farmers or for people operating our coastline [affected by the algal bloom] just to be left to rack and ruin — that's not my view. "Governments have always played a role. Whenever there's been a crisis or a challenge, people turn to government, and that's a responsibility you have to be willing to take on." On Friday, after the Bedford situation came to light, Mr Malinauskas said: 'It's not my DNA just to sit back and watch a group of vulnerable people potentially be left in a situation where they're more vulnerable than they are already". James Hancock, deputy director of the University of Adelaide's SA Centre for Economic Studies, said the situations with Whyalla, Port Pirie and Bedford had left the government "between a rock and a hard place". He said government intervention to save a business meant "you then potentially have a queue of other businesses approaching you for support when they're in difficulty". "The state budget can afford to do it for an extended period, but the real issue is if you're doing this for an extended period, what are you doing for other sectors that come under pressure?" he said. "If it's not just Whyalla [and] you sort of end up with five, 10 sectors that need a lot of help on an ongoing basis, then that actually starts to become a really large budget burden. "There's a tension there and there's no easy answer." South Australia is not short of examples of what happens when a long-standing industry collapses and there is no white knight to save it. The death of the car manufacturing industry left its mark on Adelaide following the closure of Mitsubishi in 2008 and Holden in 2017. Meanwhile, the end of coal mining in Leigh Creek in 2015 saw that town's population shrink from 2,000 residents to just 100. Mr Hancock said the stakes were particularly high for regional cities that were reliant on a major employer. "Holden was located in the Adelaide metropolitan area … and people that were displaced from Holden in many instances were able to get employment elsewhere," he said. "If you think about the house values of those workers, there was no sort of real impact of any significance. "If you compare that with Whyalla, and if you had a situation where half the town was out of work and having to leave a job, it becomes almost impossible for people to sell housing. "The human consequences of a Whyalla closure would really be very large." That's the case Port Pirie Mayor Leon Stephens is now making amid the troubles associated with the Nyrstar plant. Mr Stephens, who is also a Liberal Party candidate at the 2026 state election, said the closure of the Port Pirie smelter would cause economic "devastation". "My perception of what a government should be doing, it should be looking after all sectors of community," he said. "When you've got … a major employer in a city and that person is struggling and it looks like it will bring the city to its knees, I think there's definitely a catalyst [for intervention]." The Premier was asked on Wednesday where he drew the line on whether to give an industry a bailout. He said it depended on "whether or not there's a future" for the industry in question. "While it is true that there's creative disruption in the marketplace all the time and we see businesses that's better years are past, the question is what are the years in front of us," he said. "Unless you can see a future, then maybe you have to say, 'look, something hit the fence and that's life'. "But for steelmaking … we know this country needs steel, for critical minerals [like at Port Pirie], the demand is going up not down. "So, there are futures there that are worthy of contemplation."
ABC News
11 minutes ago
- ABC News
NSW MP Gareth Ward likely to be removed from parliament after conviction for sex crimes
A sitting member of the NSW parliament has been convicted of serious sexual offences — so what happens next? The independent member for Kiama, Gareth Ward, was found guilty of four offences relating to the sexual abuse of two young men after a nine-week trial in the NSW District Court. Following the verdict, the NSW government swiftly called for the 44-year-old to resign from parliament — claiming his position was "no longer tenable". Even the Liberal Party — the previous party of Ward — said the politician had breached public trust and his crimes were an "abuse of power". The conviction of a sitting politician for serious crimes is a rare event. Ward was previously barred from parliament when the allegations first surfaced, but his shock re-election saw him return. Now that he has been found guilty by a jury, will he be removed from office? The NSW Constitution contains provisions for expelling sitting members convicted of an "infamous crime" — that is an offence that carries a maximum sentence of more than five years. All four of Gareth Ward's offences meet that criterion, with the most serious offence — sexual intercourse without consent — carrying a maximum prison term of 14 years. However, the politician's seat will not be vacated just yet. Ward has 28 days to lodge an appeal in the NSW District Court, and his seat in parliament will not be declared vacant until the challenge is resolved. However, these provisions do not interfere with the powers of the House to expel members. Election analyst Ben Raue is a close observer of Australian politics. He said the NSW parliament has powers to remove politicians. "I can't imagine they would have issues passing a motion of suspension, I think that would be the bare minimum to be honest," he said. Mr Raue said NSW parliament is in unchartered waters with this case. "It is very unusual," he said. After the verdict, Ward was granted bail release to return home ahead of a hearing on Wednesday where the Crown will seek to have the politician taken into custody ahead of his sentence. The verdict was handed down more than three years after Ward was first charged. The then-Liberal politician was stood down from his portfolio as the NSW Minister for Families, Communities and Disability Services after it emerged that he was the subject of a police investigation. In 2022 he was suspended from parliament after he refused to resign over the allegations. "That is one of the things that is so odd about this case is normally when people are facing serious criminal charges like this, they resign from their public office," said Mr Raue. Despite the case hanging over his head and his inability to represent his community in the parliament — constituents in Kiama re-elected him in 2023, allowing him to return to parliament. "I think it is a sign of how popular he had been that he managed to get re-elected," said Mr Raue. "I think there was a recognition that the voters had their say and until he is convicted, he is a member of parliament." Mr Raue said the conviction means voters in Kiama are likely to be returning to the polls. "I think it is likely now we will see a by-election at some point — either he resigns, or he is expelled," he said.
ABC News
41 minutes ago
- ABC News
Victorian government housing agency hires home-buyer as part of public housing demolition plans
The Victorian government's housing agency is hiring an internal home-buyer as it works to find new homes for residents displaced by its controversial plan to redevelop Melbourne's public housing towers. The successful candidate will work with Homes Victoria to identify properties that are suitable for leasing or purchase, "including bulk and off-the-plan purchases". They will also have a thorough understanding of the property market and transaction process, according to a job advertisement that closes tomorrow. Homes Victoria regularly purchases and leases properties to add to the state's social housing stock, but the job ad's mention of a "high priority Tower Relocations program" suggests acquisitions could scale up as the 44 towers are progressively retired over the next 25 years. While the move will likely help residents remain close to their existing communities, the government's critics say it could add more pressure to the strained property market. "Our concern is the government obviously has absolutely no plan for how they are going to house 10,000 people that they are relocating in the middle of a housing crisis," the Victorian Greens' housing spokesperson, Gabrielle de Vietri, said. "The government has said that it's simply too expensive for them to refurbish these public housing towers. "Yet what they are engaging in is an incredibly expensive and inefficient process of buying up and head-leasing private homes to move public housing residents into." The government has been under fire over the effect its plan to progressively redevelop the ageing towers, which generally house hundreds of people, will have on housing demand across the city. It is unclear how many private market homes could be required over the life of the plan, with many tenants likely to be moved into existing social housing properties. A Homes Victoria spokesperson declined to say how many private market homes would be required across the first three towers to be retired — in North Melbourne and Flemington — but the government has previously revealed four dwellings were leased and 16 dwellings purchased in surrounding suburbs in the first half of the year. It is understood the homes were acquired at market value. The Real Estate Institute of Victoria also said it was aware of a government initiative to purchase private dwellings for social housing, but its members had not reported any significant activity in that area. "Increasing supply through new builds is the most effective way to address affordability and availability over the long term," a spokesperson said. "However, we acknowledge that in some circumstances, the time frames associated with new developments may not meet urgent demand, and the use of existing stock may be a necessary interim measure." Meanwhile, the Victorian Greens say they were recently contacted by a constituent claiming a real estate agency working on behalf of the government had approached multiple owners in their inner-west Melbourne apartment block about potential sales. The movement comes as Melbourne's overburdened property market suffers from a citywide vacancy rate of 1.4 per cent, a near-record low according to property research body Cotality. Head of research Tim Lawless said additional demand against this backdrop of low supply would generally place upward pressure on rents and property prices in the inner-city suburbs where the towers were located. "I suppose from a positive perspective, it's good to see the state government looking after those tenants in government-owned properties and looking to relocate them," he said. "I think the challenge is actually going to be finding enough housing to ensure those people have a quality lifestyle and a reasonable level of comfort." The tower refurbishment plan is the focus of a current parliamentary inquiry that has heard evidence from distressed residents, legal centres and housing groups, as well as a resident-led class action that was dismissed but is currently being appealed. However, the government argues the ageing towers have reached the end of their useful life and do not meet modern standards of design, comfort and energy efficiency. It has promised to increase social housing by 10 per cent at each site when the estates are rebuilt, with a mix of social and private market housing. More than 55,500 households were waiting to enter public housing in March this year, while a further 10,500 existing tenants had applied for transfers.
