Former Australian National University chancellor slams 'gobsmacking' proposed university cuts
In a letter addressed to current Chancellor Julie Bishop, Vice-Chancellor Genevieve Bell, and Federal Education Minister Jason Clare, Mr Evans expressed concerns with the university's recently released College of the Arts and Social Sciences organisational change proposal.
Mr Evans said the changes had ignored the maintenance of the National Institutes Grant, which the ANU receives from the federal government for research "supporting the development of Australia's national unity and identity".
He said that during his time as ANU chancellor from 2010 to 2019 he could not have been more conscious of how important the grant had been to the ANU's viability.
The ANU faces a $250 million budget shortfall and has announced plans to cut around 100 jobs in recent months.
Mr Evans said he found it "gobsmacking" the ANU was looking to abolish the National Dictionary Centre (ANDC) and downsize the National Centre for Biography (NCB).
The NCB maintains the Australian Dictionary of Biography (ADB), a huge database of Australian stories and the evolution of Australian English, started in 1957.
Mr Evans said to drastically diminish the role of the ADB "makes no sense at all".
Mr Evans condemned the abolition of freestanding centres such as the Humanities Research Centre (HRC) and the Centre for European Studies (ANUCES).
He said the HRC had been "hugely respected both nationally and internationally for the last 50 years", and the ANUCES was "making a significant contribution to the government's trade and security policymaking with the EU".
The former chancellor also raised concerns with a move to remove the Crawford School of Public Policy from the College of Asia and the Pacific.
An ANU spokesperson said the university "welcomes a diversity of views and encourage constructive feedback including ideas to help meet the University's financial sustainability".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
16 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Double Bay waterfront sale falls over, then sells for $2m less
A historic sandstone waterfront mansion in Double Bay exchanged at $22m more than a year ago but the sale fell through ... now, a new deal has just been done. The five-bedroom estate on a 978sqm block at 21 Gladswood Gardens, which was the coach house of the Gladswood Estate, has been owned by the MacMahon family since it was bought for $782,000 in 1983. The sold sticker went up last May, and sources say the expat purchaser back then couldn't sell their Hong Kong property so couldn't proceed. Enter Cohen Handler buyer's agent, Tom Penfold, who's scooped it up for his eastern suburbs lady client at $2m less than the original agreed price. 'A waterfront in Double Bay for $20m — it's a beautiful old sandstone building,' Penfold said. 'My client fell in love with it straight away and we secured it very quickly. 'She love the rawness and the potential.' He says she will do a sympathetic reno — 'she's not going to go crazy' — and move in. The Double Bay case mirrors another in Vaucluse involving one of multi-millionaire William Wu's properties investment properties. The 32-year-old investor and his property developer mother Jing Wang amassed a $100m portfolio of houses from Bellevue Hill to Vaucluse in 2021, including a six-bedroom, seven-bathroom mansion with eight-car garage at 31 Vaucluse Rd, Vaucluse bought for $13.32m. The home, on an 879sqm block and with sweeping iconic views, went up for sale with a $23.8m guide in 2023 and later exchanged for about $24m. But local sources say that deal, too, fell through. That's just exchanged again via Bradfield BadgerFox Double Bay agents Alexander George and Peter Leipnik for about $21m to a local buyer.
News.com.au
16 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Barnaby Joyce warns future generations facing China ‘threat'
Nationals maverick Barnaby Joyce says Australia's approach to defence is 'putting the future of your children and grandchildren at threat' amid fears over China's military build-up and aggression toward Taiwan. The warning comes as Talisman Sabre, Australia's biggest war-games, reaches its tail end. Some 35,000 troops from 19 of the country's allies are taking part in the military exercises — drills Taiwan is pushing to be part of in the future. Mr Joyce, a former deputy prime minister, said on Monday Australia's 'strategic ambiguity' on Taiwan must be 'backed up with incredible strength'. 'There's not multiple rules-based orders in the world — there's one,' he told Seven's Sunrise, citing French President Emmanuel Macron. 'If a country wants to be outside that by just taking the South China Sea, by what we've seen with journalists in Hong Kong just (being) taken off the street, with tennis players who disappear if they say the wrong thing. 'We've had a massive build-up of (China's) armed capacity, including their nuclear capacity, and no real explanation as to why and (Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong) brought that to our attention lately.' Mr Joyce went on to say the 'Australian people really haven't grasped exactly what's before us'. 'We need to become as strong as possible as quickly as possible,' he said. 'We really are putting the future of your children and grandchildren at threat. 'China does not believe in a democratic world order. 'They believe in an alternate order that does not include democracy and ultimately … where we lie in that, if we don't get this right, is as a vassal state. 'You will be dominated by economically, socially in your media, by a totalitarian regime.' Adding that Australia is 'not as strong as we should be at the moment', Mr Joyce said the answer was working with allies to bolster collective defence. Bringing Taiwan into the fold would mean Australia needs to 'look like you are strong enough to back yourself in'.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Criterion: Don't horse around with the Magnificent Seven dividend stocks this reporting season
• Dwindling yields from the dividend favourites mean investors should saddle up elsewhere • Led by the CBA, the 'Magnificent Seven' account for half of all dividends paid • Investors should avoid swapping growth thoroughbreds for high-yielding donkeys that won't last the distance On the cusp of the August profit reporting season, dividend yield chasers are mulling the top stocks likely to impress with their payouts. This year, they will need to look harder. Combined with elevated share valuations, subdued earnings are likely to diminish the appeal of the dividend faves. Historically, Australian investors have not looked too far in their quest for income. Of the ASX200 stocks, a mere seven account for half of all ASX dividends in 2024. For the record, they are the Big Four banks, BHP (ASX:BHP), Fortescue (ASX:FMG) and Woodside Energy Group (ASX:WDS). (This Magnificent Seven shouldn't be confused with the top US tech stocks which share the same nomenclature). The top dividend payer, the Commonwealth Bank (ASX:CBA) yields a sub-par 2.5% after its monstrous share run. The top 100 stocks account for 97% of the ASX200 index dividends. The average pre-tax yield has fallen to 3.2%. This compares to the historic run rate of 4.5% over the last ten years and 4-6% over the last five decades. "Airbag" protection The manager of Ausbil's active dividend income fund, Michael Price cautions that chasing dividends should not come at the cost of losing capital. With that in mind, the fund positions itself to capture the best dividends from events such as the upcoming reporting season, 'rather than passively buying and holding for a long time'. Atlas Funds Management's Hugh Dive counsels investors to pay close attention to capex requirements: companies needing to replace or upgrade assets won't be going on a dividend spree. Companies exposed to the US are likely to be preserving funds, given the 'what will Donald do next?' uncertainties. But Dive says dividend-paying stocks provide 'airbag' protection in a downturn: when yields become high enough, investors will jump back in. Don't bank on the banks Price says of the banks: 'I don't see much dividend growth coming over the next two or three years.' That said, the CBA remains the fund's biggest holding, as it's the next Big Four bank to pay a dividend (the others have a September 30 balance date). Ausbil's preferred Big Four bank is the runt of the litter, the Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (ASX:ANZ). But Price believes there's better value in Macquarie Group (ASX:MQG), which pays a lower div than the Big Four but makes up for this with its superior growth potential. 'It's always hard to know exactly where Macquarie will make its money, but it is a well-run business that benefits from volatility," he says. Insurers offer premium yields Price says domestic insurers such as Suncorp Group (ASX:SUN) and Insurance Australia (ASX:IAG) continue to post strong premium growth whilst managing claims pressure. The same applies to the listed health insurer Medibank Private (ASX:MPL) and NIB Holdings (ASX:NHF). Ausbil has also got back on the old dividend warhorse Telstra (ASX:TLS), given more rational competition in the mobile sector. Price cites the 'quality end' of discretionary retailing: stocks such as JB HiFi (ASX:JBH), or the nation's biggest car yard, AP Eagers. But for the first time in years, Ausbil won't be riding into the reporting season with dividend faithfuls Woolworths (ASX:WOW) and Coles Group (ASX:COL). These grocers have been stabled because of competitive pressure (read Aldi), regulatory scrutiny over profit gouging claims, management upheaval and elevated capital spending. Sonic booms on pathology demand Atlas's Dive nominates Sonic Healthcare (ASX:SHL), the world's biggest pathology provider trading on an approximate 4.5% yield. Sonic benefits from an older population and one of the few companies genuinely likely to benefit from AI. Unlike other health companies, pathology providers don't have to spend a poultice on R&D. At the smaller end, Plato Investment Management's Peter Gardner likes Ventia Services (ASX:VNT), which manages infrastructure and public assets. In December the competition regulator took the company to task over defence contracts, but the company seems to have weathered the storm. Ventia yields round 5%. Digging up dividend delights Despite their earnings being subject to volatile commodity prices, the miners are cementing a new reputation for reliable dividends. Given the resilient iron price, the payouts from BHP, Rio Tinto (ASX:RIO) and Fortescue could pleasantly surprise. Fortescue's dividend capacity is bolstered by the $1 billion-plus it won't spend on two ditched hydrogen projects. Price notes BHP paid an interim div one-third of that of two years ago. But the miner's final payout should equate to an attractive yield (of around 3.5%, before franking). So not all of the Magnificent Seven posse should be run out of town. For the gold miners, cash is flowing in like rivers of – er -gold. These days, they're more inclined to share the spoils with investors rather than chase the next El Dorado deposit.
