
The cost of being: A manager who ‘hates paying full price and always wants a deal'
Want to be part of The Cost of Being? Fill out the questionnaire here.
Gender: Female.
Age: 45.
Ethnicity: Kiwi and Pasifika.
Role: Full time senior manager, with hubby and two kids (preschooler and primary).
Salary/income/assets: Earn $200,000. Own our home and investment property. $200,000 in KiwiSaver. $500,000 life insurance.
My living location is: Suburban.
Rent/mortgage per week: $750 per week, shared with hubby. We are paying about $350 a fortnight more then the minimum payment, to pay it off faster and reduce the interest.
Student loan or other debt payments per week: Paid off my $65,000 student loan. Pay the credit card in full every month. Only debt is mortgages. Rental mortgage is $2,000 per fortnight, rent doesn't cover it, so we top up $1,000 every fortnight. Didn't realise we were buying at the top of the market! Repayments are interest only, but saving so we can make a lump sum payment when our five year term ends.
Typical weekly food costs
Groceries: $450 for two adults and two kids.
Eating out: Rare. We are homebodies.
Takeaways: Up to $400 on UberEats. Some weeks only $100, others closer to $300. It's not cheap but we have stressful lives and it makes our evenings easier. I cook for the kids and we eat takeout.
Workday lunches: Try not to eat out, will take leftovers or make a sandwich.
Cafe coffees/snacks: $20 for coffee. Necessity to function.
Savings: $1,000 per fortnight. But we dip into it for big bills/rates etc.
I worry about money: Rarely.
Three words to describe my financial situation: Comfortable, fortunate, secure.
My biggest edible indulgence would be: Extra virgin olive oil from New Zealand – around $30 a bottle.
In a typical week my alcohol expenditure would be: Zero. Our partying days are behind us!
In a typical week my transport expenditure would be: $80 petrol I think. Hubby fills the cars up so not really sure. Have a fuel efficient SUV.
I estimate in the past year the ballpark amount I spent on my personal clothing (including sleepwear and underwear) was: $400 – mostly for work clothes and I buy my fave brands from Trade Me. Saves me a fortune and not contributing to fast fashion, better for the planet.
My most expensive clothing in the past year was: $50 for a pair of jeans. I am the queen of deals and bargains.
My last pair of shoes cost: $40 pair of Lightfeet jandals. Like walking in a cloud, great arch support. Live in them year round.
My grooming/beauty expenditure in a year is about: $3,500. Sheesh that is a sobering number, haven't added it up before. But my job requires me to be well groomed and I can afford it. Beautician is $200 six weekly ($1,600 pa). Hairdresser is $215 six weekly ($1,690 pa). $200 for makeup.
My exercise expenditure in a year is about: Nil. Walking at beaches/parks etc.
My last Friday night cost: Nothing. Chilled at home.
Most regrettable purchase in the last 12 months was: $25 for a jacket that I bought on Trade Me which looks horrible on me. What was I thinking?!
Most indulgent purchase (that I don't regret) in the last 12 months was: $100 for a body massage.
One area where I'm a bit of a tightwad is: Everything. I hate paying full price and always want a deal.
Five words to describe my financial personality would be: Relaxed, careful, flexible, risk-averse, clinical.
I grew up in a house where money was: Often really tight and not discussed. As a kid I worked and gave my parents my paycheck (cultural norm) so I didn't build up proper savings. Had poor financial habits until I met my hubby, who taught me how to be a good steward of it.
The last time my Eftpos card was declined was: Many years ago.
In five years, in financial terms, I see myself: Better off. Having paid off more mortgage debt and earning more from having progressed up the corporate ladder.
I would love to have more money for: Debt repayment. I can't wait to be mortgage free! It's a few years away.
Describe your financial low: Defaulted on a debt many years ago. Not intentional, mail went to an old address. Stuffed up my credit for seven years. Never want to go through that again.
I give money away to: Approximately $200 a year to Givealittles.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsroom
an hour ago
- Newsroom
NZ's wobbly economy steadying?
1. Tariffs, but with happy markets US tariffs and trade negotiations are back on the front page. That's dashed some hopes the prior 90-day tariff pause might slide into permanency. But a string of recent trade deals has helped produce a vastly different reception amongst financial market participants and forecasters this time around. Indicators of global risk appetite remain healthy and global equity markets have blasted through record highs. That's helpful for confidence, to the extent it lasts. Alongside this and, most importantly for NZ's economic plight, the recent trend stabilisation in global growth expectations has held. Consensus forecasts for global growth were even nudged up a touch this month, for both 2025 and 2026 (to 2.3%= percent year on year and 2.4 percent respectively). Continued resilience in the global economic data pulse, particularly in the US, has helped. We won't add to speculation on whether this is all too optimistic ahead of another trade deal deadline on Friday, and the effective US tariff rate rising above 15 percent. Suffice to say, the dragging uncertainty associated with US trade policy, while lower than previously, looks set to stick around, a negative impost on investment particularly. 2. Investment appetites stirring? Despite this uncertainty, we're encouraged by a sprinkling of indications NZ investment appetites may at least be stirring. Surveyed investment intentions have not only established a foothold at above-average levels but have pushed on further in recent months (ANZ survey, July edition out Wednesday). Admittedly, buoyant rural sector cash flows are having an outsized impact here, per the chart. Boosting the odds these intentions are ultimately acted upon is anecdote suggestive of reasonable interest in the Government's Investment Boost scheme. And perhaps also the lift in investment-related imports we noticed in last week's merchandise trade figures. There's a heap of month-to-month volatility in these data, but in June we saw plant and machinery imports up 13 percent year-on-year imports of transport equipment rising 19 percent, and those for intermediate goods up 21 percent. It's all partial stuff but, taken together, helps assuage some of our prior concerns sluggish business investment might be a dragging anchor for the broader recovery. 3. Steadying of the wobble Other June economic data to hand paint a picture of a partial steadying from May's surprise and unwelcome wobble. Most 'high-frequency' indicators have pulled back a bit from the brink. The underlying sense of the recovery so far failing to launch remains though. Indicative of such, two of the better monthly indicators we watch – the Performance of Manufacturing and Performance of Services indices – continue to openly question the extent of growth uplift we've got on the board. And that's even after our second quarter GDP forecast was pruned to -0.2 percent quarter on quarter. The Reserve Bank's new Kiwi-GDP 'nowcast' sits at -0.3 percent. We still think the mid-year activity air pocket will pass. The underlying drivers of the recovery remain in place and should reassert themselves in coming quarters. But the recent weakness does push back the likely timing of the eventual labour market recovery. We doubt the current undershoot of firms' labour requirements relative to worker availability will change appreciably this side of Christmas. Our forecast peak in unemployment has been shunted out to 5.4 percent in the final quarter of the year. Wage growth should thus continue to slow through to the middle of next year. 4. Inflation (slightly) less threatening We think the supply overhang in the labour market is symptomatic of what's going on in the broader economy. And it's central to our expectation the current burst of inflation will peter out early next year. Our updated forecasts have CPI inflation peaking at 2.9 percent year on year in the current (third) quarter (forecast table at back of document). That's a touch lower than previously and follows the nudge up to 2.7 percent in Q2 revealed by Stats NZ last week. Hikes in food and energy prices are expected to feature prominently again in Q3, as well as this year's annual rates increase. Thereafter, a brisk return to the mid-point of the Reserve Bank's 1-3 percent target range is anticipated through the first half of 2026. An eye-catching but perhaps not surprising feature amongst the detail of the June inflation numbers was the downward pressure on many of the components linked to the sluggish housing and construction markets. Construction costs fell outright in Q2 for the first time since 2011. We've got additional declines pegged for the next two quarters, in part reflecting past weakness in house prices. Annual inflation in property maintenance prices fell to 1.4 percent, with that for household supplies and services at 1.5 percent. Meanwhile, household appliances and domestic accommodation experienced annual deflation in Q2 of 0.9 percent and 6.3 percent and respectively. Notably, these CPI subgroups comprise five of the top 10 most sensitive to interest rates, according to recent research by the Reserve Bank. 5. Rent declines confirm excess supply Annual rent inflation was marked at a still robust 3.2 percent year on year in June. Rents in the CPI are measured on the stock of all rental properties. But note that rents for new tenancies – a flow measure collected by MBIE more closely aligned to market conditions – are now deflating at a (smoothed) annual rate of around 2 percent. That's around the weakest in the history of a series going back to the mid-90s. It puts the median new tenancy rent back at late 2023 levels around $560/week. It fits with the general state of rental market oversupply highlighted in our recent research, a development noted as most obvious in Auckland and Wellington. Heightened supply, alongside the fact net migration remains, not only weak, but also subject to continued downward revisions, points to the strong likelihood CPI rental (stock) inflation falls back towards 2 percent over the coming 12 months. Still, one development worth highlighting is that available rental listings, according to the data we collect from Trademe, appear to have stopped rising. On our estimates, rental vacancy rates have tracked roughly sideways at 3.3 percent for the past two months. If sustained, this would cap a multi-year uptrend and mean rental supply capacity, while still large, is no longer expanding. 6. Runway to a sub-3 percent OCR looking clearer It's been relatively quiet on the interest rate front recently. There's been a pause in the trend declines in most retail interest rates (chart below). However, the net of recent growth and inflation goings on described above is sufficient in our view to reintroduce some gentle downward pressure, should the RBNZ resume Official Cash Rate cuts in August as we expect. A 25bps cut in August is as close to fully priced as it gets and we think the combination of sputtering demand and contained inflation supports the case for a follow up in October. That is, there's no change to our long-held forecast for a 2.75 percent low in the OCR cycle. At a high level we still think the risks are falling evenly either side of this view but more recently there's probably been more of a skew to the downside. Disclaimer: This publication has been produced by Bank of New Zealand. This publication accurately reflects the personal views of the author about the subject matters discussed, and is based upon sources reasonably believed to be reliable and accurate. The views of the author do not necessarily reflect the views of BNZ. No part of the compensation of the author was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related to any specific recommendations or views expressed. The information in this publication is solely for information purposes and is not intended to be financial advice. If you need help, please contact BNZ or your financial adviser. Any statements as to past performance do not represent future performance, and no statements as to future matters are guaranteed to be accurate or reliable. To the maximum extent permissible by law, neither BNZ nor any person involved in this publication accepts any liability for any loss or damage whatsoever which may directly or indirectly result from any, opinion, information, representation or omission, whether negligent or otherwise, contained in this publication.

RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Savings momentum building - but who's struggling?
File photo. Photo: 123RF Savings momentum is building, Kiwibank says, unless you're Māori, Pacific, or a woman. It has released its latest State of Savings Index, which tracks how New Zealanders are balancing daily financial pressures with long-term goals. Chief executive Steve Jurkovich said it showed progress. "Young people are showing real savings discipline and financial confidence is on the rise. Larger businesses are also moving beyond survival mode, with growing optimism. After a tough stretch, that's a promising sign." But Māori, Pacific peoples and women were struggling to save considerably more than the average, he said. Māori reported struggling to save at a rate of 79 percent, Pacific peoples at 82 percent and women at 71 percent, compared to an average of 63 percent and men at 55 percent. Jurkovich said for those struggling to save, the cost of living was the biggest barrier. "The number one view expressed is the cost of living. It's a hurdle to how people are struggling to stick to their budgets. It shows regardless of what your intent is, the reality of bills and things you have to face into is really challenging." But he said it was possible that the experience of high inflation in recent years had reinforced to many people how important it was to have a goal and save what they could. "However, the good news is that for now, the risk of persistently high inflation appears low, especially with significant spare capacity still in the Kiwi economy and signs that price increases are becoming less pronounced. And falling mortgage interest rates are offering a measure of relief to homeowners, helping to ease pressure and potentially stabilise household finances. We anticipate further rate relief as the RBNZ looks through volatile movement ahead of its next OCR decision." While almost 95 percent of people said it was important to be financially prepared for unexpected events, less than half were saving regularly. Just under half of respondents with saving outside KiwiSaver said they had dipped into long-term savings in the past year to cover short-term expenses. Māori and Pacific peoples were more likely to do so, at just over 60 percent. High numbers of people have also been withdrawing money from KiwiSaver in the past year for hardship reasons. Jurkovich said it was preferable that people dipped into KiwiSaver to cover emergencies rather than taking out high-interest debt or putting it on a credit card. "It's a long term savings vehicle and KiwiSaver performance will go up and down, you want to get capital in there ... if you were able to take some out and put some back in it would certainly seem to be a much better financial outcome than suspending contributions to KiwiSaver over the long term." Jurkovich said the improvement in the economy was being driven by the South Island. Kiwibank had opened a Christchurch office in part because of the demand from staff to move there. "Agriculture and tourism are providing a tailwind for those areas." Just over half the businesses surveyed said they were financially stronger than a year ago, but this was primarily among larger organisations. "There's a confidence gap between larger organisations and smaller businesses. While large businesses (more than 100 people) report they are investing and growing, many sole operators are still just trying to stay afloat. The drive and ambition are there, but the data shows they're often missing the tools to act on it." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.


Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Letters to the Editor: nitrate, milk and mallards
Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including the risk of nitrate poisoning in Gore, the price of milk products, and a magic moment for a mallard. Think again on overdue fines clamp down plan The government will trial new technology which will help clamp and seize cars of people evading paying court fines, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith says. There are some obvious and yet poorly considered difficulties with his measure. Many of those who incur fines have other liabilities such as child support arrears and debt to third tier lenders. Compounding this paradigm will not result in compliance. You cannot get blood from a stone. I sense that many of the cars clamped or impounded will be non-compliant — that is without WoF or registration. The relevant authorities will quickly accumulate scrap metal, and there is no shortage of old and non-compliant cars to replace those seized. The measure will restrict urban mobility, which means important family connectivity will be lost: those who work will be unable to do so, and school absenteeism will worsen. That said, the obvious work around will be to use a vehicle belonging to someone else. Enforcement costs will also exponentially exceed repaid fines. The solution is for realistic and structured deductions to be made electronically at source irrespective of its source. The reality is that many who owe fines are deprived and recipients of state support — life is difficult enough without the burden of fines — perhaps the expectation of payment should be considered before their imposition. Doing butter better One size fits all. Yeah right. If one size for all is wrong, then how can one price for butter, the export price, be right for all? It seems to me that the reason we are being told that one price is right is because one company has been allowed to dominate. What to do? One answer would be to break up the company. That is not likely to be palatable. Another would be to make remaining one company dependent upon looking after the domestic market. One price for exports, another lower price for the domestic market. Under the current arrangement, winning for Fonterra on prices, means losing for domestic consumers, other businesses, inflation and interest rates. Two prices and we could have win-win. If that change was made then I might agree with Fonterra's slogan on their website: "You, me, us together. Tãtou, tātou. Let us make it so. Those were the days Over 50 years ago, when our family first came to New Zealand, milk was price-controlled by government to 4c a pint. I think it actually cost about 25c a pint, but 4c was what you paid wherever you bought it. I think most New Zealanders would think this was a good use of public funds . Or you could insist Fonterra sell half the New Zealand requirement at a reduced price (as part of a licence to operate) and the government pay for the other half. Or better still, make Fonterra foot the whole bill and cap public company salaries at $750,000 a year. If it was done 50 years ago surely it could be done now. The modern equivalent would be making a one-litre can of milk 50 or 60c. This would affect everyone and could easily be transferred to the price of locally sold butter and cheese. Share the street On the subject of Albany St, why not just slow the traffic right down and make it a shared street? This would mean minimum disruption and cost, no loss of car parks and no removal of trees. Misfortune for mallard source of mirth for others Salutations to Stephen Jaquiery, your stellar photographer. His front page depiction ( ODT 25.7.25) of the mallard's icebound touchdown in the botanical gardens is a stunning tribute to his eye for capturing a magic moment, and his tenancity in waiting for it to happen. Fighting inflation I had a good laugh today at Ian Pillan's thoughts about a councillor's outraged reaction to questions surrounding fiddling with Albany St carparks ( ODT 26.7.25). It is a sad fact that the world is ruled by men, even in the 21st century still. Another sad fact that occurs to me is that many men, even with small amounts of power, have a very inflated sense of their own worth, often despite evidence to the contrary. We have some flagrant examples right around the world, at the moment, from Israel to Gaza to the US and elsewhere. I'd love the world to give women a proper go at it. It would be hard to do worse. State of Southland rivers in which I once fished and swam appalls The risk of nitrate poisoning has turned off tap water in Gore during the last weekend. Elevated nitrate levels, as we know now can cause health problems especially with pregnant women and babies. This is a fact that has been with us for many years now and the link has been made with intensive dairying. Ground water and many source streams and springs are utilised in town supplies and domestic outlying communities. This is a potentially dangerous situation, that despite warnings from health professionals and especially a fresh water ecologist Dr Mike Joy, is continuing. Greenpeace has now become involved to try and draw attention to this dilemma by doing what Greenpeace does; a little signage and minor vandalism. Now the irony. As Russel Norman points out after Federated Farmers Southland calls for Greenpeace to be stripped of its charity status. The SFF president Mr Herrick stated that the famous brown trout statue was made to look as if it had died.( ODT 24.7.25). Well the plastic trout may look dead but its real river lookalikes in many rivers are not there any longer because of abstraction and pollution (all smaller rivers and streams in Otago, Southland and Canterbury are polluted and or depleted). I know personally because as a youngster I fished and swam in all of them and even drank the water. Even the mighty Mataura River is suffering. There are over 600,000 dairy cows in Southland now. It might be time for Federated Farmers Southland to accept that intensive dairying threatens the wellbeing of others, see the water as common to all citizens, and really think about the role of Greenpeace in trying to keep our whenua safe. No to chemical fertilisers In the middle of the last century Americans brought chemical fertilisers to New Zealand and demonstrated how easy they are to use. Farmers adopted them and initially drilled superphosphate into the soil when sowing pasture or crops. This did little damage. From the 1980s farmers, particularly dairy farmers, added nitrogen to fading pastures by topdressing with synthetic nitrogen. This practice created runoff into nearby streams and rivers polluting the water and changing the environment. Recently it has been reported that the Gore drinking water had a reading of 11.4mg per litre of nitrogen. The recommended limit level of nitrates in drinking water in the USA is 10mg/L. Any level of nitrogen in drinking water is damaging to health, especially to young children and babies. Federated Farmers Southland president Jason Herrick seems to think that farming to the limit of drinking water impregnation is passable. I don't, the lowest amount of pollution is to be aimed for. The health and safety of our people should be of paramount importance. There is no longer an excuse for using chemical fertilisers in farming. Over the last few years research into regenerative farming using deep-rooted legumes in pasture by Professor Pablo Gregorini and medical researcher Dr Sagara Kumara at Lincoln University proved that organic/regenerative methods are more economic and produce as much produce as industrial methods. In fact, regenerative methods produce healthier soils, animals and healthier produce for people. It's here too There is no doubt about the origins of increased nitrates in Gore ground water. The same problem has appeared in Selwyn, Waimate and many other places in the Canterbury Plains and Otago low country for decades. A solid body of peer reviewed scientific papers show that elevated nitrate levels come primarily from large herds of dairy cows on bare ground during winter grazing regimes. In the absence of plant material the nitrates seep down to aquifers sometimes over a few days after heavy rain. Regional councils, which have the legal responsibility and authority to prevent this from happening, have known about the issue for at least 20 years. To suggest farmers and local authorities don't know the source of this threat to human health is disingenuous at best. Cottage owner backed My good friend Lou, of Crossans Cottage ( ODT 26.7.25) fame, has been dealt a low blow by the Central Otago District Council and I wish to express my anger, disappointment and confusion at the actions of council. (Oh I forgot to add frustration.) The council seems happy to hand out permission to those with bulging back pockets to build whatever, wherever and whenever but when it comes to this amazing woman who saw a dream in a few dilapidated stone walls to call it her own they have made her dream a nightmare. With the blessing of the descendants of the original owners she put in the hard yards to create an orchard and an amazing garden, which has made her self sufficient, alongside the most beautiful living space. No electricity but that's not a bother. I have been witness to an extraordinary Christmas cake being cooked in the oven of the coal range. Come on CODC show your softer side (if you have one) and accord this lady some empathy and a bit of gratitude for the fact she has restored our heritage in her own way. Draft apology Can we say to the CODC to pull its horns in, and cease its harassment of Mrs Lou Farrand ? One of the charms of Roxburgh is its collection of delightful old stone buildings, reeking of history. They would rather she demolish, and live on the streets? I offer this draft letter from the council to Mrs Farrand, which it may wish to consider sending her: "Dear Mrs Farrand, We write to apologise most abjectly for the high-handed bureaucratic thuggery we had inadvertently visited upon you, and at your stage of life. Indeed, we must thank you, and congratulate you, for your public-spirited work in maintaining your cottage as part of the lovely historic fabric of your wee town. How wonderful that it used to be a blacksmith shop. We want to ensure that your final years are spent in comfort in your delightful cottage, in full enjoyment of the way you have made it to be, free from outside aggravation. We acknowledge that, for all our local laws and regulations, Charles Dickens had a point, and hereby withdraw all financial demands, and will reimburse you for those already made. Apologetically, &c." My fee for providing this letter will be a great deal less than the four figure amount the council has levelled at Mrs Farrand. Providing peace We are a group of older Dominican women and are very concerned about the money and resources being put into armaments. NATO countries have increased their spending and it seems to us like an arms race we have experienced in our lifetime. This did not lead to protection or peace in the past and we are sure it will not do so now. The result was war on a large scale. It is of considerable concern to see that our government is following this trend and lauding evermore war preparations. A recent Faith and Reason column (Opinion ODT 18.7.25) provides statistics on what is happening. We do know what will prove to provide for peace is a very different direction. It will be to provide adequate shelter for everyone, healthcare from cradle to the grave, lifelong education, mutual respect for differences, giving shelter to migrants and care of our common home the earth. Sitting back How long does the world sit back and watch the appalling genocide of the Palestine people? Of all the countries in the world I would have thought Israel would have been the last country considering what they endured during World War 2, yet they are doing exactly the same to the people of Palestine. We have learned nothing from history I can't believe the world sits back and watches Israel kill innocent men women and children with the backing of many countries around the world. New Zealand led the world in the 80s with its anti-nuclear stance, although that didn't stop the warmongers of the world. But it made a statement to the world: as yet we hear no outrage from this government. Let's start by kicking the Israeli ambassador out of the country and to stay out till a ceasefire and peace talks begin Palestinians are dying in their thousands not only by bullets but by starvation possibly the worse kind of death imaginable. How many deaths is the world willing to put up with before they do something? Council thanked I would like to thank our Dunedin city councillors for their support of the Green Party's proposal to sanction Israeli politicians for occupying Palestinian territory. Night after night we see on our television screens the unimaginable suffering of Palestinian men, women and children whose only crime is to be born Palestinian and live in Gaza. One feels so helpless wondering why the rest of the world appears to do so little to stop this appalling situation. Now I hope other political bodies will follow the example of our council. Government complicity If I was to judge New Zealanders reactions to, and opinions of, the horror being played out in Gaza, by our government's official response, I could be forgiven for thinking that as a nation we deem this to be just another one of those conflicts in foreign parts; a situation where both sides are similarly responsible and should get around the table and sort out their differences. Winston Peters and the government's response appears to be driven by how other nations are responding (waiting for the other bystanders to speak out) rather than reflecting, not only the outrage but the emotional reaction of normal New Zealanders in the street and on the couch. Many of us are moved to tears or physically sickened by the daily stories and images representing the systematic destruction of the Palestinian people. To most decent people around the world, this is genocide. New Zealand was once considered a leader in international issues; speaking out against racism, environmental issues, climate change, anti-nuclear stance, to name just a few. However, this government has swiftly reduced us to a nation of followers happy to wait for other nations to act first before we squeak "yeah us too!" Our government will go down in history as having sat on its hands and waited until it was too late and thus become complicit in the horror. A little to give I note Givealittle has made it virtually impossible to get any money into Gaza for fear this money might fall into the hands of Hamas, even when the money is gathered for a known family in Gaza. This ostensibly because under New Zealand's Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism regime the funds could fall into the hands of Hamas, designated as a "terrorist" entity. So, while Gaza burns, while Israel deliberately minimises access to life necessities such that we see many civilians starving and even more children dying, Givealittle is concerned the funds could be used by someone linked to Hamas. So do we just look on helplessly as Mr Netanyahu and his government continue their deadly purge? Forgetting never again The meaning of "never again" has been forgotten. What has been remembered is the historic lesson on how to implement the process of destroying a specific group people. How is this done? Over decades you bully, humiliate, stigmatise, control and dehumanise the group. You systematically destroy cultural institutions — schools, universities, museums, places of worship and anything else that expresses the identity of the people. You move them from place to place, surveil their every move, destroy their homes, farmland and orchards. In the process you destroy communities, sow hatred and suspicion and also teach your children to hate. You deny your actions are responsible for the formation of resistance groups. You then use a horrific revenge attack as an excuse to destroy the entire population. Bomb and starve, cut off aid and blame it all on the people themselves. Prevent any objective reporting by banning journalists and assassinating local journalists. Convince the world that what you have done must never be seen in a negative light because of your past suffering. As the eternal victim no one can speak out against you. Governments and the media play the game. Stay silent, let the suffering continue until the broken and destroyed people can be hidden. Your greatest success may be that you will have destroyed memory. What? Did these people ever exist? The land was always yours. What happened to "never again"? Will our government and others ever take meaningful action or will they remain complicit? Solar farm In response to Ian Breeze on the proposed Helios Energy solar farm (Letters ODT 23.7.25), the benefits from photovoltaic power in lowering carbon emissions are real, but such facilities are not environmentally neutral as is suggested. Over a decade, I drove weekly between Durham and London along the M1 motorway and saw multiple building sites in designated areas of natural beauty. At first, I assumed this was housing but after the first photovoltaic panels appeared I realised this was different. Working at the Durham Energy Institute, (on nuclear power) I asked colleagues about what this was about; farmers were paid to set aside land for environmental reasons and the panels, in theory, are not buildings. Therefore, Peter Rabbit could frolic as usual and plants can grow around the infrastructure. This has not turned out to be true; the environment was impacted; this is a form of creeping urbanisation, a curse that affects countries in Europe as much its does New Zealand. There is a better way. In many countries planning consent for all new buildings can include mandatory rooftop solar. Tax credits are available for converting existing roof tops and carparks. Imagine all the large supermarkets and stores across Dunedin with solar panels on the roof and as shades in the car park? Imagine the impact on energy security as on sunny days we can reduce the hydro output, mitigating the impact of dry years and reducing natural gas imports. We need wind and solar. We are behind the global curve. With our hydropower as a strategic reserve (supplemented by a pumped hydro scheme at Lake Osbourne) we have an opportunity for solar and wind — we are closer to the equator than countries with significant solar power — to provide a secure source of energy. We held a referendum I refer to the letter from Dr Bernard Fouke (Letters ODT 24.7.25) and his statement: "I challenge the government to submit a referendum to let the public decide if the taxing system should be changed to support an adequately sized public system". May I suggest such a referendum has taken place. It was our last general election, both parties put forward their tax policies. Neither proposed a capital gain tax or adjustment to superannuation. During Covid we saw a $60 billion injection primarily for our health response. This is double our annual health budget. The interest on this loan is $3b annually. So the present government is injecting an extra 10% of the health budget into our health system to continue to pay for our Covid response. If 20,000 were saved from death by the government's Covid response, $60b divided by 20,000 equals $3 million per person. The question is, can we borrow more money or change a tax system that many may resist? The consequences will be the next generation will have to pay for the debt we incur today. Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@