Rochdale grooming gang fiends who abused girls as young as 12 still living in UK as Pakistan REFUSES to take them back
TWO prolific Rochdale grooming fiends are still living in the UK - because Pakistan refuses to take them back.
Qari Abdul Rauf and Adil Khan were part of a nine-strong gang of Asian men convicted of sex offences against vulnerable girls in 2012.
5
Up to 47 girls as young as 12 were plied with alcohol and drugs and gang-raped across Rochdale during a two-year reign of terror.
Then-Home Secretary Theresa May ordered the pair to be sent back to Pakistan in 2014 as it would as it would be "conducive to the public good".
But ten years later, Rauf and Khan still remain in Rochdale where their victims are forced to live alongside them.
It has now emerged Pakistan is refusing to take the predators back, The Telegraph reports.
An official claimed it would be "extremely difficult' to allow in such dangerous criminals.
The battle has also been further complicated by Rauf and Khan renouncing their Pakistani citizenship.
After they both exploited a loophole by ripping up their passports, they became "stateless", which can block a deportation.
Rauf and fellow gang leader Khan, who got a 13-year-old girl pregnant, lost a lengthy fight in 2018 against deportation alongside a third member of the gang, Abdul Aziz.
They subsequently launched another bid - insisting the order breaches their human rights as they both have wives and children in the UK.
Their appeals were rejected but both have remained in Britain ever since.
Sources for the Interior Ministry have said "progress" could be made if the UK were to take part in talks.
They also suggested returning direct flights to the UK by its national airline PIA, which were suspended for safety reasons, could help.
But UK officials said this suggestion had not been raised in discussions.
The subject of grooming gangs has been thrust back into the spotlight this week following a bombshell report by Baroness Casey.
The scathing review found councils, police and the Home Office repeatedly "shied away" from dealing with uncomfortable questions on the ethnicity of rapists who targeted young girls.
Rauf and Khan were ringleaders of a prolific grooming gang in Rochdale, which has been plagued by sexual exploitation.
Khan got a 13-year-old girl pregnant and trafficked another girl, 15, to others - using violence when she complained.
He was sentenced to eight years in 2012 and released on licence four years later.
Dad-of-five Rauf trafficked a 15-year-old girl and raped her in a secluded area before taking her to a flat in Rochdale where others had sex with her.
He was caged for six years and released in November 2014 after serving two years and six months of his sentence.
A Home Office spokesman said it would do 'everything in our power' to deport foreign nationals who commit 'heinous' crimes in the UK.
He added: 'The UK and Pakistan are working in partnership on shared migration and return priorities.
"Both countries recognise and respect our common obligations to return those with no right to remain in our respective countries."
5
5
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
'I'm British but I can't live in my own country with my partner'
The UK government is facing calls to scrap an immigration policy which puts "untold stress" on British citizens who choose to marry or cohabit with someone from and settled residents wanting to sponsor their partner's visa application must earn a minimum income of £29,000 or have savings of £88, in Bristol and Stroud are urging the government to scrap the requirement which was brought in by the Conservatives to curb migration."What the government does next will make or break many families who just want to be together," said Caroline Coombs of the campaign group Reunite Families UK.A Home Office spokesperson said the minimum income policy "needs to balance a respect for family life while also maintaining the UK's economic stability" and it is considering findings from a Migration Advisory Committee review. For Rebecca Gray, 32, from Stroud in Gloucestershire, scrapping the policy would mean she could move back to the UK with her Turkish husband."I don't think people have any idea of how much harm the visa rules cause," she with a UK business but unable to meet the minimum income requirement, she has been living in Turkey for the past four with her husband, Baran, 31, they have been saving to apply for a visa through the savings said: "We're holding off having children because we've been so focused on saving money to get him a visa."Ms Gray said the couple has stronger family ties to the UK as her husband has lost both of his parents."We want to be close to family. Between us, we only have one parent left, that's my mum. "I'm forced to live thousands of miles away from my family if I want to be with my husband."Some countries, like the UK, set a minimum income requirement for a spouse while other countries, like France and the Netherlands, align it to their national minimum wage, the UK sets it at a higher Migration Observatory estimates that roughly half of the UK working population earn under £29,000. 'My kids think I'm the man in the phone' For a large number of applicants, the minimum income policy is not the only financial fees and NHS surcharges can cost more than £7,000 for a five-year route to settlement, excluding any legal fees."It's unfair that only the wealthy can bring their partner here," said Leighton Allen, from Worcester. Mr Allen, 30, works in retail and said he cannot meet the salary threshold to bring his Tanzanian fiancée and his two young children to the said he tries to see them as much as possible, which can be three weeks in a year."All I want is to be a father to my children but I feel that choice is taken away from me. I'm financially supporting them but they don't see me."He added: "They think I'm in the man in the phone."The minimum income requirement was first introduced in 2012 to ensure the British partner or settled resident earned enough to financially support their foreign partner in the UK without resorting to public funds. Last year, the salary threshold increased for the first time, from £18,600 to £29,000. 'I can't come home to care for my parents' Following Brexit and the end of free movement between the UK and EU countries, some British citizens who had been living abroad - like Sarah Douglas - are also finding it hard to return to the UK with their 42-year-old lives in Italy with her husband Matteo and their three wants to move back home to Scotland with her family to be close to her elderly parents, and help care for to follow the minimum income route, Ms Douglas would need to return without her Italian husband and accrue six months of UK payslips to apply for a spouse visa for him. "I could work as a teacher in the UK and my husband is a software engineer who would find work easily. "We're financially stable, we don't rely on any support, but we're able to do that because we're together," she avoid separation, they have been struggling to save £88,500 in order to apply via the savings route."Saving this much money is putting financial strain on us and it's taking years, but we feel it's our only option."She added: "If we were forced to separate, it would have a huge impact on us as a family. I've seen what that does to children and I don't want to put my children through that."A report by children's charity Coram found children in separated families showed signs of stress, anxiety and inability to focus in school. It also said that children living in families affected by the current minimum income requirement were likely to experience exacerbated challenges and poor mental report was commissioned by Reunite Families UK, a not-for-profit representing families affected by the UK family visa co-founder and executive director, Caroline Coombs, said: "We have nearly 6,000 couples and families who are suffering on a daily basis."People feel completely unheard by their own government and they can't understand why they can't be here with their loved ones," she added. Earlier this month, the Home Office said it would examine findings from a Migration Advisory Committee review and issue a response in due experts suggested lowering the current threshold and gave a number of possible said, for example, lowering it to £24,000 would help ease family reunification and increase net migration by roughly 1-3%.A Home Office spokesperson said: "We understand the Minimum Income Requirement for family visas needs to balance a respect for family life while also maintaining the UK's economic stability, which is why the Home Secretary commissioned the independent Migration Advisory Committee to undertake a review."We are now considering its findings and will respond in due course." Migration is 'too high' Conservative MP for Kent, Katie Lam, who is opposition assistant whip, defended an increase in the minimum income requirement."Migration has been far too high for the last two decades and remains so," she said."The public has consistently asked successive governments to lower migration. "The last (Conservative) government promised to do exactly this, but like the governments before it, it did not deliver it."At a parliamentary debate about the family visa income requirement in January, she said: "The question is not should British citizens be able to bring their foreign spouses to the UK. "The question is, does it benefit the country as a whole for British citizens on lower salaries to bring foreign spouses here who are unable to get a visa any other way?"But co-leader of the Green Party and Bristol Central MP, Carla Denyer, who has called the minimum income requirement a 'tax on love', - and wants it scrapped."The Home Office is failing not just people who are moving to the UK but British people who already live here and just want to enjoy family life in peace," she said. "The minimum income requirement puts untold stress on couples and families and it should be scrapped entirely."Family doctor and Labour MP for Stroud, Simon Opher, sponsored an exhibition in the Houses of Parliament last week which showcased the human impact of the family visa rules. "We're splitting up people who love each other, splitting families who are the bedrock of our society, and I think it's the wrong policy," he said.
BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
MP Kemi Badenoch calls for prison at Wethersfield
A prison should have been built at the former RAF air base at Wethersfield in Essex, MP Kemi Badenoch Conservative leader said her party promised to turn it into a prison during the 2019 election and "that should have been built by now". However, the site, which has housed hundreds of single male asylum seekers since July 2023, was set to be expanded under the Labour government's plans to end the use of asylum hotels and save money.A government spokesperson said: "No decision has been made on the long-term future of this site." 'Need more prison places' While the North West Essex MP visited Carver Barracks, she said: "I know many people in the area did not necessarily want a prison, but the people in the surrounding area of Essex did want one and we have to do the right thing..."We need more prison places. I stood on a manifesto to deliver that." The last government produced proposals for two prisons at Wethersfield in 2021, which could have housed 3,430 government at the time said it would create local jobs and help meet demand for prison was local opposition with campaigners arguing the site was too remote and lacked the road infrastructure for the prisons to be government instead used a special development order to use the former RAF base to house migrants, to reduce the use of Labour government announced plans to build four new prisons by 2031 and increase capacity in jails by 14,000 places; however, Wethersfield was not part of the current prisons BBC understood that asylum facilities, such as Wethersfield and another in Huddersfield, were under consideration for came after Chancellor Rachel Reeves pledged to stop using taxpayer-funded hotels by 2029 in her Spending Review, saying this would save £1bn. One of the ways the Home Office hoped to achieve this was by moving asylum seekers from hotels into cheaper alternative forms of accommodation. Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
Leeds Parents 'fearful' of Little Owls nursery privatisation
Parents have said they are "fearful" for the future of seven council-run nurseries that could be taken over by schools or private year, Leeds City Council closed three of its Little Owls sites and said it would pull out of running 12 others as part of its drive to address a budget shortfall of £273m over five month, however, parents received letters confirming five of the sites would now remain under council campaigners welcomed the partial U-turn, parent Jon Wood said putting any of the remaining nurseries into private ownership would be "absolute cultural vandalism". "It is the poorest that suffer," said the father-of-one. "Council-run nurseries are a lot cheaper than private-run nurseries."We are going through a cost of living crisis, our incomes are not matching outgoings, it is going to prevent parents being able to work."For the past three years, Mr Wood's son has attended a Little Owls nursery which the council said could be taken over by private to assume control have been submitted by private providers for the Bramley, Meanwood, Rothwell and Shepherds Lane sites. "We are fearful it is going to be some big chain that is just not going to provide the same level of care," said Mr Wood."It is not fair on families; it is a deprived area where good, affordable childcare is absolutely essential. "To put these nurseries into private ownership, is just absolute cultural vandalism". Parent Kath Owen said she was worried about losing a connection to the local area."The Little Owls nurseries are part of the support systems for families," said the 45-year-old."I will be really sad to see it sold off because we are going to lose more than something that could be measured on a balance sheet."The St Mary's Hunslet, Parklands and Hawksworth Wood Little Owls sites are currently co-located with to Leeds City Council, discussions as to whether the schools will take over management of the sites are Dalton, from the Save Little Owls Nurseries campaign, urged the council to fight harder to keep control of all the remaining father-of-one, whose child attends a nursery run by the council, said: "If there is not sufficient money to do that, campaign for that money, call for that money off the government."We will continue to challenge this because as parents you want the best quality education and childcare and having seen how much my son progressed at Little Owls you do not want that being taken away." A council spokesperson said no suitable alternative providers had been found for five of the nurseries: Burley Park, City & Holbeck, Hunslet Rylestone, Osmondthorpe and Quarry a result, it would continue to operate these sites to ensure "sufficient high-quality childcare places in these areas".Irshad and Fareen Hassan said it was a "relief" to know their daughter's nursery would continue to be operated by the council."It was very uncertain" Mrs Hassan said."I was really depressed at a point."It was fantastic news".Mr Hassan added: "The moment [his daughter] started going [to nursery] we could see a significant development in her."She gained confidence, loves going and she reckons Little Owls is her second home."Leeds City Council said it wanted to "reassure families and staff that in the event discussions do not reach a satisfactory conclusion, the council's default position is to retain direct delivery of these settings."We would like to once again thank parents, carers and staff for their support and patience through this process and reaffirm our commitment that all ongoing provision continues to be child-centred and ensures the most vulnerable children in the city are well catered for." Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
