logo
‘Nepo baby' Zohran Mamdani is still a breath of fresh air

‘Nepo baby' Zohran Mamdani is still a breath of fresh air

Boston Globe5 hours ago

If Zohran Mamdani's 'luxury beliefs' turn out to be even half as effective as those of fellow 'nepo baby' Franklin Delano Roosevelt's — social security, minimum wage, and that pie-in-the-sky idea of a 40-hour workweek — he will be a great mayor.
Sandy Huckleberry
Jamaica Plain
Globe Opinion writer Carine Hajjar's analysis of Zohran Mamdani's victory in the New York mayoral primary fails on several counts.
First of all, her accounts of being harassed on the New York City subway presumably happened under current or prior administrations. None of them are socialist. How Mamdani will handle subway crime is unknown at this point. Bernie Sanders, a strong supporter of Mamdani, is hardly a self-soothing progressive. He is a genuine populist, and presumably so is Mamdani, who cites Boston's Mayor Michelle Wu as a role model.
Get The Gavel
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
As for calling him a nepo baby, where does that come from? His father is a professor and his mother is a film director. So what? Is no one with a college degree allowed to be a populist?
Advertisement
Michael Keating
Cambridge
In her recent column, columnist Carine Hajjar turns her sights on Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for New York City mayor. She paints a picture of a city beset by dangerous, mentally ill, unhoused people, and insinuates that 'nepo baby' Mamdani doesn't have the best interests of New York's most vulnerable, particularly women, at heart. She cynically pits various groups against each other to advocate for more policing.
Advertisement
Ironically, she fails to acknowledge that the aforesaid crimes and misdemeanors are happening on the watch of 'tough on crime' Mayor Eric Adams. Similarly, while bemoaning the experiences of harassment faced by women, she makes no mention of Andrew Cuomo's well-known history of harassing his female staffers and employees. Cuomo, a former New York governor, conceded New York City's Democratic mayoral primary to Mamdani on Wednesday.
Hajjar suggests that Mamdani's ideas for advances in mental health care and community violence prevention are pointless — dangerous, even. Yet we know from our experience here in Boston that these types of innovative community violence prevention efforts do, in fact, work. It is just such initiatives, put in place by Mayor Michelle Wu, that have helped crime rates in our city
Katie Sutton
Hingham
New Yorkers rejected the Democratic status quo
While no one can predict how successful Zohran Mamdani will eventually be, there is little doubt that his victory was due to an overwhelming desire on the part of New Yorkers to believe in, to quote from his victory speech, 'the power of the politics of the future: one of partnership and sincerity.'
Bruce Goldberg
Newburyport
Mamdani only promises more chaos
Carine Hajjar states that the current NYC policies — such as neglect of the mentally ill and the homeless, and the deliberate nonenforcement of misdemeanor crimes, have made everyday life more miserable and dysfunctional in the city.
Mamdani promises more of the same, only less law enforcement in the interest of public safety and even more neglect. How would that lead to better personal security, cleaner neighborhoods, and an improved quality of life?
Advertisement
J Q Public

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate Republicans are in a sprint on President Donald Trump's big bill after a weekend of setbacks
Senate Republicans are in a sprint on President Donald Trump's big bill after a weekend of setbacks

Chicago Tribune

time37 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Senate Republicans are in a sprint on President Donald Trump's big bill after a weekend of setbacks

WASHINGTON — After a weekend of setbacks, the Senate will try to sprint ahead Monday on President Donald Trump's big bill of tax breaks and spending cuts despite a series of challenges, including the sudden announcement from one GOP senator that he won't run for reelection after opposing the package over its Medicaid health care cuts. An all-night session to consider an endless stream of proposed amendments to the package, in what's called a vote-a-rama, was abruptly postponed, and it's now scheduled to launch as soon as the Senate gavels open. With Democrats united against the Republican president's legislation and eagerly lined up to challenge it, the voting could take all day. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said the 'hardest choices' for Republicans are still to come. His side plans to bring 'amendment after amendment after amendment to the floor, so Republicans can defend their billionaire tax cuts and so they can try to explain their massive cuts to Medicaid to people back home.' The hours ahead will be pivotal for the Republicans, who have control of the Congress and are racing against Trump's Fourth of July deadline to wrap up work. The 940-page 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' as it is now formally titled, has consumed the Congress as its shared priority with the president, with no room politically to fail, even as not all Republicans are on board. A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law. It also said the package would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion over the decade. House Speaker Mike Johnson's leadership team has recalled lawmakers back to Washington for voting in the House as soon as Wednesday, if the legislation can first clear the Senate. But the outcome remains uncertain, especially after a weekend of work in the Senate that brought less visible progress on securing enough Republican support, over Democratic opposition, for passage. Few Republicans appear fully satisfied as the final package emerges. GOP Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who announced Sunday he would not seek reelection after Trump badgered him over his opposition to the package, said he has the same goals as Trump, cutting taxes and spending. But Tillis said this package is a betrayal of the president's promises not to kick people off health care, especially if rural hospitals close. 'We could take the time to get this right,' he thundered. At the same time, some loosely aligned conservative Senate Republicans — Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming — have pushed for steeper cuts, particularly to health care, drawing their own warning from Trump. 'Don't go too crazy!' the president posted on social media. 'REMEMBER, you still have to get reelected.' GOP leaders barely secured enough support to muscle the legislation past a procedural Saturday night hurdle in a tense scene. A handful of Republican holdouts revolted, and it took phone calls from Trump and a visit from Vice President JD Vance to keep it on track. As Saturday's vote tally teetered, attention turned to Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who was surrounded by GOP leaders in intense conversation. She voted 'yes.' Several provisions in the package including a higher tax deduction for native whalers and potential waivers from food stamps or Medicaid changes are being called the 'Polar Payoff' designed for her state. But some were found to be out of compliance with the rules by the Senate parliamentarian. All told, the Senate bill includes some $4 trillion in tax cuts, making permanent Trump's 2017 rates, which would expire at the end of the year if Congress fails to act, while adding the new ones he campaigned on, including no taxes on tips. The Senate package would roll back billions of dollars in green energy tax credits that Democrats warn will wipe out wind and solar investments nationwide and impose $1.2 trillion in cuts, largely to Medicaid and food stamps, by imposing work requirements, making sign-up eligibility more stringent and changing federal reimbursements to states. Additionally, the bill would provide a $350 billion infusion for border and national security, including for deportations, some of it paid for with new fees charged to immigrants. Unable to stop the march toward passage, the Democrats as the minority party in Congress are using the tools at their disposal to delay and drag out the process. Democrats forced a full reading of the text, which took 16 hours. Then Democratic senators took over Sunday's debate, filling the chamber with speeches, while Republicans largely stood aside. 'Reckless and irresponsible,' said Sen. Gary Peters, a Democrat from Michigan. 'A gift to the billionaire class,' said Vermont's Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent who caucuses with Democrats. 'Follow what the Bible teaches us: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you,' said Sen. Ben Ray Lujan, D-N.M., as Sunday's debate pushed past midnight. Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, the ranking Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, raised particular concern about the accounting method being used by the Republicans, which says the tax breaks from Trump's first term are now 'current policy' and the cost of extending them should not be counted toward deficits. 'In my 33 years here in the United States Senate, things have never — never — worked this way,' said Murray, the longest-serving Democrat on the Budget Committee. She said that kind of 'magic math' won't fly with Americans trying to balance their own household books. 'Go back home,' she said, 'and try that game with your constituents.'

Letters: What the SCOTUS ruling on judges will let Trump do to the founding ideals of the U.S.
Letters: What the SCOTUS ruling on judges will let Trump do to the founding ideals of the U.S.

San Francisco Chronicle​

time38 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Letters: What the SCOTUS ruling on judges will let Trump do to the founding ideals of the U.S.

Regarding 'SCOTUS deals huge blow to judges' power to rein in Trump in birthright citizenship case' (Politics, June 27): Six justices of the Supreme Court delivered a scathing opinion, ruling to limit the powers of an independent judiciary to protect the rights of all citizens. As Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in dissent, 'No right is safe in the new legal regime the Court creates.' What an irony that this week we celebrate our country's birth — founded on the principles and values of freedom, liberty and justice for all — while the occupant of the White House plots his next move to destroy those ideals. Alyson Jacks, San Francisco Cars and transit needed Regarding 'Three ideas to save S.F. Muni that have nothing to do with cutting service' (Open Forum, June 23): Joe DiMento blames San Francisco's transit crisis on 'public subsidies for private cars.' That's misleading. Drivers already pay registration fees, parking fees and gas taxes — much of which funds roads and transit. Everyone wants Muni to succeed. But ridership is falling, routes are shrinking and the budget gap is growing. Blaming cars distracts from real issues: ballooning labor costs, outdated infrastructure and a transit system that hasn't adjusted to post-pandemic patterns. Dismissing residential parking as a luxury ignores reality. Many who rely on street parking aren't driving luxury SUVs — they're working-class people who live far from reliable transit. Taking away affordable parking doesn't help Muni; it just punishes people with few choices. This shouldn't be a war between drivers and riders. We need smart investments to improve public transit — not a crusade against curb space. Let's be honest about equity. Eliminating low-cost parking doesn't hurt the wealthy — it hurts the working class. Muni needs stable funding and practical reform, not scapegoating. That's how we build a city that works for everyone, not just the car-free few. Marie Hurabiell, executive director, ConnectedSF and InspireSF So much narcissism Every day, I read the Chronicle's Letters to the Editor, and I'm struck by the theme running through them all: me, me, me, me, me. I want a park, and screw whoever it inconveniences. I want this or that and am damned well going to take it from someone else or make them pay for it. I demand that someone paint their house the color I want. I don't want some eyesore torn down, so I'm going to fatuously label it 'historic' because my opinion trumps everyone else's. What a depressingly intolerant and self-centered part of the world we live in. Andrew James, San Carlos Faith in humanity restored After 44 years in the Bay Area's cutthroat commercial real estate business, I've become a bit cynical about my fellow man. However, my outlook shifted recently. I was driving on El Camino Real in Burlingame, a busy, four-lane road known for aggressive drivers. As I was dodging traffic, the driver in front of me suddenly braked, pulled across our two lanes, put on his emergency flashers, got out of his car and waved all four lanes in both directions to a stop. Who or what did he hit? Road rager? No, he noticed a mother duck and her five ducklings on the side of the road, fretting to cross the busy boulevard. Like a crossing guard, he held up his arms while mama and her brood crossed El Camino Real single-file in his care. In those 90 seconds, no motorist honked, yelled or flipped the bird. We all watched intently, quietly and admired this hero. It was a moment of glorious humanity in our darkening world that restored my faith in my fellow human. I get a catch in my throat just thinking about this heroic act. He reminded me that we all have the instinct to do the right thing, and that anyone, anywhere and anytime can be a hero. David Klein, Burlingame

PolitiFact declares Zohran Mamdani is not a communist in fact-check of Trump
PolitiFact declares Zohran Mamdani is not a communist in fact-check of Trump

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

PolitiFact declares Zohran Mamdani is not a communist in fact-check of Trump

The fact-checking website PolitiFact defended Democratic New York City mayoral hopeful Zohran Mamdani from President Donald Trump's claims he was a "communist" last week, saying the rejoinder was false. Mamdani, a 33-year-old democratic socialist, effectively clinched the Democratic nomination for the 2025 mayoral race in New York last week in an upset over establishment favorite Andrew Cuomo and other candidates. Trump lashed out at Mamdani on Truth Social, calling him a "100% Communist Lunatic," adding, "We've had Radical Lefties before, but this is getting a little ridiculous." PolitiFact, after quoting other conservative and Republican figures also labeling the far-left candidate a communist, decried what it called a "red scare tactic that has existed in U.S. politics for decades" in a post on Thursday. "New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's platform proposes free buses and day care, rent control and city-owned grocery stores to make city living more affordable," PolitiFact wrote. "Mamdani's platform is not akin to communism, a system of government which calls for government takeover of private property and control of industry." Mamdani's Political Earthquake Rocks Democrats, Dividing Party On Path Forward It went on to quote several experts who said Mamdani's appeal lay in his efforts to combat affordability problems in New York, one of the most expensive cities in the country. Read On The Fox News App "Mamdani is NOT a communist," wrote Anna Grzymala-Busse, Stanford University professor of international studies, in an email to PolitiFact. "Communism involves a centrally planned economy, with no market forces. Prices and quantities are set by a central government authority. There is no democratic political competition, and instead a single party rules the country. He is not calling for any of this." "Many western democracies — from France to Canada — have policies such as free or heavily subsidized child care and public transit," Oxana Shevel, a Tufts University associate professor of comparative politics," told PolitiFact. "Under a communist agenda, the government would own everything and entirely control prices, not only rent control or operating some supermarkets. And under communism, there are no political parties other than the communist party," the fact-check argued. Dem Socialist's Nyc Primary Upset Signals 'Generational' Shift In Democratic Party, Strategists Say It concluded the claim by Trump was "false." Notably, it fell short of being declared "Pants on Fire," the notorious designation the fact-checking website has for political and media claims it deems so outlandish that calling it "False" doesn't adequately condemn it. Examples of Trump's remarks that earned the designation including suggesting Ukraine had "started" the war with Russia and claiming Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia had "MS-13" tattooed on his knuckles. Trump has been fact-checked by PolitiFact more than 1,000 times. His declarations have been deemed "False" or "Pants on Fire" 57% of the time. The White House and Mamdani's campaign didn't immediately respond to requests for article source: PolitiFact declares Zohran Mamdani is not a communist in fact-check of Trump

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store