
Why Scotland's protests about Trump should concern every American
The headline, referring to President Donald Trump, seemed like a joke, but it was real — and a sad commentary on how the people of Scotland view the president.
I wasn't disheartened because I felt the paper was inaccurate — it wasn't. I was disheartened by the lack of respect in those words.
The negativity didn't end with a headline. On Saturday, Trump played golf at his course in Turnberry, Scotland. Meanwhile, hundreds of protesters flooded the streets of Britain to protest his visit.
The Stop Trump Coalition —'a group of campaigners across the UK determined to resist Trump and Trumpism' — organized the protests Saturday, which included signs protesters waved: 'No to Trump,' 'Trump not welcome' and 'Scotland Hates Trump.'
Some protesters objected to Trump's policies on immigration, climate change and the war on Gaza — but the overwhelming focus was personal. They didn't reject the policy alone. They rejected America's president.
Regardless of your personal feelings for Trump, this chilly reception should give you pause. I get it — Trump is a convicted felon. Yes, there are still questions about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. And no, Trump is not the statesman Americans are used to seeing in the Oval Office.
But this disrespect for him extends to the office he holds. And that's bad for the United States now and in the future.
In fairness, Trump isn't without culpability. He has spent years making politics personal, insulting opponents and threatening world leaders, often prioritizing personal feuds rather than focusing on policy. The vitriol on display in Scotland didn't come out of nowhere.
Additionally, his own disregard for presidential decorum has created a permissive structure that allows others to abandon restraint and follow his lead.
But as my mother used to say, two wrongs don't make a right.
While our allies have previously disagreed with America's foreign policy, our critics generally respected the office, if not the occupant. During a visit to London in 2003, for example, protesters opposed former President George W. Bush's policy on Iraq and his relationship with Blair. The protests were over the Iraq War, not Bush's character flaws.
A similar protest happened in 1984, when thousands of demonstrators in London rallied against then-President Ronald Reagan's nuclear policy during an economic summit.
The protest was organized by the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, and when asked about its goal, Roger Spiller, a deputy president of the group, said, ''This is not an anti-American protest, but one opposing Mr. Reagan's policies.''
The protests in Scotland were different. They called Trump a dictator and a felon, focusing on his character and his presence in Scotland, rather than calling for policy changes.
That distinction matters.
When I first started in politics, there was an unspoken rule: Never call your opponent a liar. Now that's the starting point. And the lack of civility hasn't just taken hold here in America. It's been exported.
It's sad but not surprising that this is where we find ourselves.
Public vilification of the leader of the free world has serious implications. Some may argue that Trump deserves this type of backlash given his checkered history and questionable behavior. But that argument is short-sighted.
When protesters attack the person rather than the policies, they're diminishing the institution itself. And if we normalize these personal attacks, it sets a precedent that won't end with Trump's presidency.
We can — and should — debate policies. That's a hallmark of a healthy democracy. But when an American president is greeted with public disrespect by from citizens of an allied nation, it threatens something larger: the respect for democratic institutions.
Preserving that institutional respect isn't about protecting Trump. It's about protecting the office of the presidency for whoever comes next.
Mary Anna Mancuso is a member of the Miami Herald Editorial Board. Her email: mmancuso@miamiherald.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
44 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump tells Schumer to ‘GO TO HELL' over Senate nominee deal after negotiations blow up
Hours of tense negotiations to strike a deal on President Donald Trump's nominees blew up Saturday night, and now lawmakers are headed home. Senate Republicans and Democrats were quick to point the finger at one another for the deal's demise, but it was ultimately Trump who nuked the talks. Advertisement In a lengthy post on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump accused Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., of 'demanding over One Billion Dollars in order to approve a small number of our highly qualified nominees.' 'This demand is egregious and unprecedented, and would be embarrassing to the Republican Party if it were accepted. It is political extortion, by any other name,' Trump said. 'Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL!' 'Do not accept the offer,' he continued. Advertisement 'Go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing, and have done, for our Country. Have a great RECESS and, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!' Instead of finding a pathway to vote on as many as 60 of the president's nominees, all of which moved through committee with bipartisan support, lawmakers rapid-fire voted on seven before leaving Washington until September. But prior to the president's edict, both sides of the aisle believed they were on the verge of a breakthrough to both meet Trump's desire to see his nominees confirmed and leave Washington. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said that there were 'lots of offers' made between him and Schumer over the course of negotiations. Advertisement 3 President Trump called out Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on Truth Social, accusing him of 'demanding over One Billion Dollars in order to approve a small number of our highly qualified nominees.' AP 'There were several different times where I think either or both sides maybe thought there was a deal in the end,' he said. Senate Democrats wanted the White House to unfreeze billions in National Institute of Health and foreign aid funding, in addition to a future agreement that no more clawback packages would come from the White House. In exchange, they would greenlight several of Trump's non-controversial nominees. Advertisement Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., accused Schumer of going 'too far' by upping the price tag on his demands. 3 Trump also said in his post, 'Go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing, and have done, for our Country.' 'We've had three different deals since last night,' he said. 'And every time it's been, every time it's 'I want more,'' Mullin said of Schumer's demands. He said that Republicans weren't caught off guard by Trump's call to halt talks, and noted that the White House had been heavily involved in negotiations. 'You get to a realization that there was, it was never about making a deal,' he continued. 3 Lawmakers decided to only vote on 7 of Trump's 60 nominees for positions in his administration. AP 'They want to go out and say the President's being unrealistic, and because he can't answer to his base to make a deal like we have in every other president in history.' Advertisement Now, Republicans won't pursue recess appointments, but Mullin noted that moving ahead with a rule changes to the confirmation process when lawmakers return in September was going to happen in response. Senate Democrats, on the other hand, countered that their offer never changed, and that Republicans kept increasing the number of nominees they wanted across the line, and attempted to include in more controversial, partisan picks. 'The ask evolved on both sides quite a bit over time,' Thune said. 'But in the end, we never got to a place where we had both sides agree to lock it in.'


Boston Globe
44 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Senate heads home with no deal to speed confirmations as irate Trump tells Schumer to ‘go to hell'
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Schumer said a rules change would be a 'huge mistake,' especially as Senate Republicans will need Democratic votes to pass spending bills and other legislation moving forward. Advertisement 'Donald Trump tried to bully us, go around us, threaten us, call us names, but he got nothing,' Schumer said. The latest standoff comes as Democrats and Republicans have gradually escalated their obstruction of the other party's executive branch and judicial nominees over the last two decades, and as Senate leaders have incrementally changed Senate rules to speed up confirmations — and make them less bipartisan. Advertisement In 2013, Democrats changed Senate rules for lower court judicial nominees to remove the 60-vote threshold for confirmations as Republicans blocked President Barack Obama's judicial picks. In 2017, Republicans did the same for Supreme Court nominees as Democrats tried to block Trump's nomination of Justice Neil Gorsuch. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (center) during a news conference after a policy luncheon at the Capitol on Tuesday. Mariam Zuhaib/Associated Press Trump has been pressuring Senate Republicans for weeks to cancel the August recess and grind through dozens of his nominations as Democrats have slowed the process. But Republicans hoped to make a deal with Democrats instead, and came close several times over the last few days as the two parties and the White House negotiated over moving a large tranche of nominees in exchange for reversing some of the Trump administration's spending cuts on foreign aid, among other issues. The Senate held a rare weekend session on Saturday as Republicans held votes on nominee after nominee and as the two parties tried to work out the final details of a deal. But it was clear that there would be no agreement when Trump attacked Schumer on social media Saturday evening and told Republicans to pack it up and go home. 'Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL!' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'Do not accept the offer, go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing, and have done, for our Country.' Thune said afterward that there were 'several different times' when the two sides thought they had a deal, but in the end 'we didn't close it out.' It's the first time in recent history that the minority party hasn't allowed at least some quick confirmations. Thune has already kept the Senate in session for more days, and with longer hours, this year to try and confirm as many of Trump's nominees as possible. Advertisement But Democrats had little desire to give in without the spending cut reversals or some other incentive, even though they too were eager to skip town after several long months of work and bitter partisan fights over legislation. 'We have never seen nominees as flawed, as compromised, as unqualified as we have right now,' Schumer said.


The Hill
44 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump trade adviser: President has ‘real concerns' about jobs data after BLS firing
U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer weighed in on President Trump's decision to fire the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner Erika McEntarfer, saying the commander-in-chief has 'real concerns' about the jobs numbers that extend beyond the dismal Friday report. 'Even last year during the campaign, there were enormous swings in the jobs numbers, and so sounds to me like the President has real concerns. You know, not just based on today's but everything we saw last year,' Greer said during his Friday appearance on CBS News' 'Face The Nation.' 'You want to be able to have somewhat reliable numbers. There are always revisions, but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways. And it's, you know, the President is the President. He can choose who works in the executive branch,' Greer, one of Trump's top tariff negotiators, told host Margaret Brennan. Trump fired McEntarfer after a Friday morning jobs report from the Labor Department showed the U.S. added 258,000 fewer jobs in May and June than what was previously reported. The report also said the country added 73,000 jobs in July. Trump axed the BLS chief Friday afternoon, accusing her of manipulating data to make him and Republicans look bad. 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump wrote Friday on Truth Social. The firing of McEntarfer was met with criticism from Democrats, but also by William Beach, who was appointed as BLS head during Trump's first term. Greer said on Friday that the nation will see a 'big' increase in the number of manufacturing jobs now that Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' was signed into law.