Home loan balance transfer: 3 smart reasons why you should switch today
Now to facilitate the same, one such option is the Home Loan Balance Transfer (HLBT), which allows borrowers to shift and transfer their loans to another reputable lender offering more reasonable terms. Let us explore three smart reasons to consider home loan balance transfer along with the associated pros and cons.
A home loan balance transfer is the process of transferring your existing home loan from one bank or lender to another. This is usually done to take the advantage of improved loan terms, better interest rates, lower EMIs etc. Some salient features of transferring a home loan are discussed below:
Now, a home loan balance transfer helps in EMI savings as generally interest rates are reduced when the lender is changed. Transfer from a higher to a lower interest rate helps in boosting savings. For example: Shifting a ₹ 45 lakh loan from 9.5% to 8.5% can help in savings over ₹ 4.6 lakhs in interest.
As of April 2025, balance transfer rates range between 8.00% and 9.90%. For example: HDFC Bank provides for a transfer rate of 8.75%, SBI provides for 8.50%, LIC Housing Finance provides for 9.10% as defined by the following table:
Banks Transfer Rate State Bank of India 8.50% per annum HDFC Bank 8.75% per annum LIC Housing Finance 9.10% per annum Bank of Baroda 8.85% per annum
Note: The rates discussed above are illustrative in nature. For the exact figures refer to the official websites of the respective financial institutions.
Now it is a given that lower EMI burdens can improve monthly cash flow. They can hence leave a bigger amount of cash in the hands of the home loan borrower. All one needs in this case is efficient planning with a certified tax consultant.
HLBT is not just about lower interest rates. It also provides better clarity and repayment flexibility to the borrowers. Some lenders even provide tenures of up to 30 years and EMI modification and customisation opportunities.
Several others offer top up loans alongside transfer that can be used for expenses such as home redevelopment, medical needs and education.
Borrowers often consider switching due to hidden charges, processing fees, improper service at their existing financial institutions. New lenders might offer a more fair fee structure, seamless support and better digital platforms, making the switch more than just a financial decision. Processing fees: Typically 0.35% to 1% of the loan amount. Still, this can change with added processing fees depending on the financial institution.
Typically 0.35% to 1% of the loan amount. Still, this can change with added processing fees depending on the financial institution. Administrative & legal complications: This varies from lender to lender but needs to be kept in mind.
This varies from lender to lender but needs to be kept in mind. Prepayment penalties: There are no charges on floating-rate loans (as per RBI); fixed-rate loans may still attract fees. For more you should reach out to the customer support team of your respective financial institution.
There are no charges on floating-rate loans (as per RBI); fixed-rate loans may still attract fees. For more you should reach out to the customer support team of your respective financial institution. Hidden costs: Always check the fine print carefully. Then ask for a detailed fee breakdown, if possible ask for a printed brochure of the same.
Always check the fine print carefully. Then ask for a detailed fee breakdown, if possible ask for a printed brochure of the same. Cost-benefit analysis: Do make sure interest savings outweigh total switching costs.
With declining interest rates and competitive lenders, this entire year of 2025 is a smart time to consider a home loan balance transfer if the numbers are as per your expectations.
Disclaimer: Interest rates and charges mentioned are illustrative and subject to change. Please verify details with your lender or financial advisor before proceeding with a home loan balance transfer.
First Published: 25 Apr 2025, 01:26 PM IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Infomerics Valuation and Ratings eyes strategic investor to grow biz
While organic growth remains the focus, Infomerics would also scout for acquisition in analytics and technical support space Abhijit Lele Mumbai Listen to This Article Infomerics Valuation and Rating, a Delhi-based Reserve Bank of India (RBI)-accredited credit-rating agency, plans to rope in a strategic investor to enhance domain knowledge, and bring in technical expertise and systems to scale up business. Shubham Jain, group chief executive officer (CEO), Infomerics, told Business Standard: 'We are not looking at a financial investor. So, not a private equity (PE), or any such person. It has to be a strategic investor, because we need more domain expertise and technical assistance in terms of further strengthening methodologies, governance practices, and overall processes.' Infomerics is a cash-flow-positive company, which is sitting on
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Supreme Court to hear HDFC Bank MD's plea to quash FIR
The Supreme Court on Thursday (July 3, 2025) agreed to urgently hear on July 4 a plea filed by HDFC Bank CEO and MD Sashidhar Jagdishan to quash a First information Report (FIR) registered against him on a complaint filed by the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust, which runs the Mumbai-based Lilavati Hospital, accusing him of accepting a bribe of ₹2.05 crore. A Bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and Vinod Chandran listed the case for July 4 following an oral mentioning made by senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Mr. Jagdishan. The Trust has accused Mr. Jagdishan of accepting the money to provide financial advice to a certain group of trustees to retain illegal and undue control over the Trust's governance. The Trust accused him of interfering in its internal affairs and misusing his position as the head of a leading private bank. He was booked for cheating and criminal breach of trust. 'This is an urgent matter. I request listing tomorrow on behalf of the bank and its MD. A frivolous FIR has been lodged against the MD and the bank by trustees of Lilavati hospital who are litigating against the other group of trustees,' Mr. Rohatgi submitted. Mr. Rohatgi said the FIR was only an arm-twisting technique, and the bank was owed money. He said three Benches of the Bombay High Court had recused from hearing the case. The Trust had separately moved a plea in the High Court seeking a CBI probe.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
HDFC Bank CEO Moves SC Challenging FIR By Lilavati Trust; Hearing On Friday
The bench, comprising Justices M M Sundresh and K Vinod Chandran, says the matter would be listed for hearing on Friday. HDFC Bank CEO and MD Sashidhar Jagdishan on Thursday moved the Supreme Court challenging an FIR of cheating and fraud registered against him on a complaint filed by the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust, which runs the prominent Lilavati Hospital in Mumbai. Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Jagdishan, mentioned the matter for urgent listing before a bench of Justices M M Sundresh and K Vinod Chandran. The bench said the matter would be listed for hearing on Friday. 'This is an urgent matter. I request for listing tomorrow on behalf of the HDFC bank and its MD. A frivolous FIR has been lodged against the MD and the bank by trustees of Lilavati hospital who are litigating against the other group of trustees," Rohatgi told the bench. 'The bank has to recover money from them. In order to twist the arm, they have lodged an FIR through a magistrate against the MD," he submitted. Rohatgi said they had moved the Bombay High Court but three benches of the high court have so far recused themselves from hearing the matter. He said the next tentative date given for hearing in the high court was July 14. 'Everyday the bank is suffering," the senior advocate said. According to the complaint filed by the Trust, Jagdishan allegedly accepted a bribe of Rs 2.05 crore in exchange for providing financial advice to help the Chetan Mehta Group retain illegal and undue control over the Trust's governance. The Trust has accused Jagdishan of misusing his position as the head of a leading private bank to interfere in the internal affairs of a charitable organisation. Jagdishan's plea seeking quashing of the first information report (FIR) was first listed in the high court in June. The FIR against Jagdishan was registered at the Bandra police station following an order by a Bandra magistrate court under section 175 (3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), based on an application moved by the Trust. He was booked under alleged charges of cheating, criminal breach of trust, and criminal breach of trust by a public servant. In a public statement issued earlier this month, the Trust alleged that the Rs 2.05 crore payment was part of a larger conspiracy to 'loot" the Trust and manipulate its decision-making processes in favour of the Chetan Mehta Group. The Trust has also filed a petition before the high court seeking a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the matter. PTI)
