Syrian president meets US Congress member on an unofficial visit to Damascus
It said the meeting was attended by Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shibani, and comes in the wake of calls by Syria's new rulers for the lifting of sanctions imposed by the US and other Western nations early in the conflict. Since arriving in Syria on an unofficial visit Friday, Mills and Rep Marlin Stutzman of Indiana toured parts of Damascus, including the old quarter as well as one of the oldest synagogues in the world that was badly damaged and looted during the country's 14-year conflict that killed half a million people.
On Saturday, Stutzman visited the country's notorious Saydnaya Prison near Damascus, where tens of thousands of people were subjected to killings and torture during the 54-year rule of the Assad family. Al-Sharaa's Islamist Hayat Tahrir al-Sham group led the offensive that captured Damascus in early December, forcing Assad and his family to flee to his ally Russia, where he was given asylum.
Days after Assad was removed from power, the then-Biden administration decided not to pursue a $10 million reward it had offered for the capture of al-Sharaa, a former leader of al-Qaida's branch in Syria. The announcement in December followed a meeting between al-Sharaa and then top U.S. diplomat for the Middle East, Barbara Leaf, who led the first US diplomatic delegation into post-Assad Syria.
The Trump administration has yet to officially recognize the current Syrian government and Washington has not yet lifted harsh sanctions that were imposed during Assad's rule. After visiting the prison, Stutzman told reporters that he saw that the people of Syria now have energy and optimism, adding that as the country's new government makes decisions, "it will be very helpful having the United States understand what the changes are here and that the sanctions lifted would be a huge economic boom.' Any move to lift sanctions "would be President Trump's decision,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kuwait Times
7 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
US appeals court blocks Trump's order curtailing birthright citizenship
Ruling is first by a federal appeals court on merits WASHINGTON: A federal appeals court ruled on Wednesday that US President Donald Trump's executive order curtailing automatic birthright citizenship is unconstitutional and blocked its enforcement nationwide. The 2-1 decision by the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals marked the first time an appeals court has assessed the legality of Trump's order since the US Supreme Court in June curbed the power of lower court judges to enjoin that and other federal policies on a nationwide basis. The Supreme Court's June 27 ruling in litigation over Trump's birthright citizenship order limited the ability of judges to issue so-called universal injunctions and directed lower courts that had blocked the Republican president's policy nationally to reconsider the scope of their orders. But the ruling contained exceptions allowing courts to potentially still block it nationally again. That has already allowed a judge in New Hampshire to once again halt Trump's order from taking effect by issuing an injunction in a nationwide class action of children who would be denied citizenship under the policy. The 9th Circuit's majority in Wednesday's ruling said the Democratic-led states that had sued to block the policy - Washington, Arizona, Illinois and Oregon - likewise still were entitled to a nationwide injunction as a narrower order would not provide them 'complete relief.' 'The court agrees that the president cannot redefine what it means to be American with the stroke of a pen,' Washington Attorney General Nick Brown said in a statement. The Trump administration could either ask a wider panel of 9th Circuit judges to hear the case or appeal directly to the Supreme Court, which is expected to have the final word in the litigation. 'We look forward to being vindicated on appeal,' said White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson. In a statement, she said the 9th Circuit misinterpreted the US Constitution's 14th Amendment in reaching its decision. Day one order Trump signed the order on January 20, his first day back in office, as part of his hardline approach toward immigration. Trump's order directed federal agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of US-born children who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident, also known as a 'green card' holder. It was swiftly challenged in court by Democratic attorneys general from 22 states and immigrant rights advocates who argued it violates the citizenship clause of the US Constitution's 14th Amendment, long been understood to recognize that virtually anyone born in the United States is a citizen. The Constitution's 14th Amendment citizenship clause states that all 'persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.' The first judge to block Trump's directive was Seattle-based US District Judge John Coughenour, an appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan, who called it 'blatantly unconstitutional.' The 9th Circuit's ruling upheld his decision. US Circuit Judge Ronald Gould, writing for Wednesday's majority, said Coughenour rightly concluded that Trump's executive order violated the citizenship clause of the US Constitution's 14th Amendment by denying citizenship to many persons born in the United States. Gould said a geographically limited injunction would harm the four states by forcing them to overhaul their government benefits programs to account for how people denied citizenship under Trump's order might move into them. 'It is impossible to avoid this harm absent a uniform application of the citizenship clause throughout the United States,' Gould wrote. His opinion was joined by US Circuit Judge Michael Hawkins, a fellow appointee of Democratic President Bill Clinton. US Circuit Judge Patrick Bumatay, a Trump appointee, dissented, saying in his view the Democratic-led states lacked standing to challenge Trump's order, as he warned of the risks of 'judicial overreach.' — Reuters
Arab Times
12 hours ago
- Arab Times
207 Called Themselves 'Ana Kuwaiti' ...But DNA Revealed the Truth
KUWAIT CITY, July 25: In what is now being called one of the largest and most methodically dismantled cases of citizenship fraud in Kuwait's history, the nationality of 207 individuals has been officially revoked after an intense year-long investigation uncovered a sprawling network of identity forgery, primarily involving individuals of Syrian origin. The elaborate scheme, which authorities say spanned years and infiltrated official family registries, was cracked open thanks to an anonymous tip-off in July 2024 that triggered a domino effect of interrogations, DNA testing, and international cooperation. The Tip That Sparked the Storm It all began quietly last summer, when Kuwaiti security authorities received intelligence about a man named Qassem, a naturalized Kuwaiti suspected of fraudulently acquiring citizenship. According to the tip, Qassem was not Kuwaiti at all—but in fact, a Syrian national. Preliminary inquiries quickly confirmed that Qassem had a sister living in Kuwait, married to another Syrian man working in the contracting sector. When Qassem's name was flagged, investigators discovered he had already fled the country, raising suspicions further. His sister was promptly summoned for questioning. Under pressure, she admitted Qassem was her brother and confirmed his Kuwaiti citizenship status. She insisted, however, that their relationship had long since deteriorated and that she had no knowledge of his current whereabouts. DNA Uncovers Hidden Kinship Undeterred by Qassem's disappearance, investigators turned their attention to his children, one of whom is reportedly serving as a Kuwaiti officer. DNA samples were collected and compared to Qassem's sister and her husband. The results were indisputable: the children were biologically related to the Syrian couple, further validating Qassem's non-Kuwaiti origins. The Shocking Scale of the Fraud Digging deeper, authorities turned their focus to Qassem's official family file. It listed 22 names, allegedly all siblings. Of these, 16 individuals were genuine Kuwaiti citizens who confirmed their identities and tribal affiliation. But six names (including Qassem) were complete fabrications, added illegally to the file without the real family's knowledge. Investigators now realized they were dealing with a calculated and large-scale operation of identity infiltration. Tracing the Forged Network The true identities of the other five fake siblings remained unknown, as none of the legitimate family members could identify them. To unmask these individuals, a tripartite task force was formed between the Nationality Investigation Department, the Syrian authorities, and the Central Agency for Illegal Residents (Bedoon). It emerged that all five individuals, like Qassem, had either stateless or Syrian relatives residing in Kuwait. And all had vanished abroad following the initial investigation—presumably to avoid capture. Unmasking the Imposters By May 2025, two of the five remaining forgers had been positively identified through cross-border cooperation. Their citizenships (along with Qassem's and those of their direct relatives) were immediately revoked. To identify the final three, authorities undertook a series of DNA tests on their children residing in Kuwait. These samples were then matched with paternal and maternal relatives, particularly among Syrian and stateless families, leading to the same conclusive result: the individuals were biologically linked to Syrian families, not Kuwaiti ones. The Final Sweep: Citizenship Revoked from 207 People With solid genetic and documentary proof, the Supreme Nationality Investigation Committee acted swiftly, conducting a full 'disassembly' of all the forged files. Citizenship was stripped from 104 individuals in a final batch, while 103 others had their status revoked earlier as evidence was confirmed. Breakdown of the revocations: Zero Tolerance for Identity Fraud The Kuwaiti government has made it clear that any forgery uncovered (backdated) will be pursued with full legal force. Officials noted that comprehensive dismantling of fraudulent family links, marriages, and dependencies will continue as necessary. Authorities emphasized that citizenship is a matter of national security and identity, and anyone proven to have obtained it through deception will be held accountable—regardless of their current role, residency, or status. This case serves as a stark reminder of Kuwait's commitment to preserving the sanctity of its national records and taking decisive action against fraudsters who manipulate lineage and legal status for personal or economic gain.
Arab Times
18 hours ago
- Arab Times
France's first couple sue Candace Owens for defamation over claim Brigitte Macron is a man
PARIS, July 24, (AP): A lawyer for France's first couple said they'll be seeking "substantial' damages from U.S. conservative influencer Candace Owens if she persists with claims that President Emmanuel Macron's wife, Brigitte, is a man. The lawyer, Tom Clare, said in an interview with CNN that a defamation suit filed Wednesday for the Macrons in a Delaware court was "really a last resort' after a fruitless yearlong effort to engage with Owens and requests that she "do the right thing: tell the truth, stop spreading these lies." "Each time we've done that, she mocked the Macrons, she mocked our efforts to set the record straight," Clare said. "Enough is enough, it was time to hold her accountable." The Macrons have been married since 2007, and Emmanuel Macron has been France's president since 2017. In a YouTube video, Owens called the suit an "obvious and desperate public relations strategy,' and said the first lady is "a very goofy man.' Owens is a right-leaning political commentator whose YouTube channel has about 4.5 million subscribers. In 2024, she was denied a visa from New Zealand and Australia, citing remarks in which she denied Nazi medical experimentation on Jews in concentration camps during World War II. The 219-page complaint against Owens lays out "extensive evidence' that Brigitte Macron "was born a woman, she's always been a woman," the couple's attorney said. "We'll put forward our damage claim at trial, but if she continues to double down between now and the time of trial, it will be a substantial award," he said. In Paris, the presidential office had no immediate comment. In France, too, the presidential couple has for years been dogged by conspiracy theories that Brigitte was born as a man named Jean-Michel Trogneux, who supposedly then took the name Brigitte as a transgender woman. Jean-Michel Trogneux is, in fact, Brigitte's brother. Last September, Brigitte and Jean-Michel Trogneux won a defamation suit against two women who were sentenced by a Paris court to fines and damages for spreading claims about the first lady online. A Paris appeals court overturned the ruling earlier this month. Brigitte and her brother have since turned to France's highest court to appeal that decision, according to French media. The Macrons first met at the high school where he was a student and she was a teacher. Brigitte Macron was then Brigitte Auzière, a married mother of three children. Macron, 47, is serving his second and last term as president. The first lady celebrated her 72nd birthday in April. Macron moved to Paris for his last year of high school, but promised to marry Brigitte. She later moved to the French capital to join him and divorced before they finally married. Their relationship came under the spotlight in May when video images showed Brigitte pushing her husband away with both hands on his face before they disembarked from a plane on a tour of Southeast Asia. Macron later dismissed the incident as play-fighting, telling reporters that "we are squabbling and, rather, joking with my wife,' and that it had been overblown into "a sort of geo-planetary catastrophe.'
