The DA is failing dismally
The DA performed much better as the official opposition than it did in its self-appointed role as the party that would galvanise the government of national unity (GNU).
The same is true of its leader, John Steenhuisen. Its ministers have executed their duties with a zeal that puts their ANC counterparts to shame. But its larger strategy has fallen flat.
The DA believed this link-up for the greater good with its former foe was a prerequisite for achieving the economic lift-off that would drag in its slipstream a fleet of benefits, such as revitalised institutions. It is self-evident that nothing like that has happened.
ALSO READ: Steenhuisen has made a bad situation worse with tactical blunders
Instead, the DA has been house-trained by the ANC. It barks furiously and still strains at the leash on occasion, but it will sit up and beg on President Cyril Ramaphosa's command. While I don't share the disdain of many journalists for Steenhuisen, some of the criticism is deserved.
As DA leader, he has misjudged every single power play made by the ANC, from accepting a poor partnership deal at the outset to being goaded into making meaningless threats that he has been forced to back off from.
Every passing week brings a new reversal for the DA. This week, its support ensured that the Appropriation Bill for all government departments was passed at its first reading. It's about as complete a climbdown as can be imagined for a party that had threatened to block the Bill.
The plan had been that this would be the DA riposte to Ramaphosa's sudden firing of the DA's Andrew Whitfield, Steenhuisen had been incandescent.
'If this situation is not corrected, it will go down as the greatest political mistake in modern SA history,' he warned parliament.
On the face of it, it was a brilliantly simple move. The DA would counter the ANC by singling out only departments headed by ministers implicated in corruption.
ALSO READ: Steenhuisen warned of 'insubordination' over national dialogue stance
Unless Ramaphosa sacked those ministers within 48 hours, the DA would join the uMkhonto weSizwe party and the department of economic development in voting down their departmental budgets, thus stymying the passage of the Appropriation Bill.
The DA, said Steenhuisen, would vote against the departmental budgets of Nobuhle Nkabane (higher education), Thembi Simelane (human settlements) and 'corruption-accused ANC ministers'. The DA would also withdraw from the National Dialogue, no doubt the DA was chortling at its genius.
At least three 'compromised' ANC politicians would bite the dust and the DA would be perceived to be guardians of governmental integrity.
It didn't work out quite like that. Ramaphosa did indeed fire Nkabane, but it had more to do with ANC self-interest than the DA ultimatum. She was already fatally politically wounded and facing cross-party, including ANC, sanctions from the parliamentary ethics committee.
ALSO READ: 'Long overdue' – Opposition parties welcome Nkabane's removal
And in a real up-yours, Ramaphosa didn't fire any of the other DA-named ministers. This turned out to be just another dismally misjudged power play by Steenhuisen.
But Steenhuisen has hinted that he has one card to play: proposing a motion of no confidence. This would not mean a general election – constitutionally, the earliest this could happen is in 2027 – but if it succeeded, Ramaphosa would have to resign.
In that kind of scramble, because the ANC is so deeply divided, the DA could, at last, influence the direction of the state by choosing the person at the top, rather than merely lending the party their votes. It's time for the DA to etch a steely red line.
READ NEXT: 'Right-wing nexus': Presidency cautions South Africans against the DA
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
11 minutes ago
- The Citizen
What triggered Emma Powell's fall?
Emma Powell recently resigned from her position as DA spokesperson for International Relations citing a targeted campaign of intimidation. Politicians are fond of saying: 'If you expect loyalty, get a dog.' To which journalists might reply: 'If you expect basic human decency from a politician, get a grip.' Last week, the DA allowed the ANC to hound from office its own foreign policy lead. Emma Powell resigned from the position after a protracted campaign of abuse and threats from the ANC, which mobilised the state security apparatus and pliant media against her. Astoundingly, the DA parliamentary leadership uttered not a public word of rebuke that Powell felt so beleaguered by the campaign against her by their government of national unity partner that she threw in the towel. The biggest challenge for the DA in its partnership with the ANC was always going to be retaining its political integrity. It had to balance its place holder role – keeping at bay an alternative ANC coalition with the hard left – while continuing to challenge a corrupt and incompetent government. John Steenhuisen has failed to manage this tension well. The principled opposition part of the package has been largely abandoned. It's been traded for a handful of ministerial positions and the giddy excitement of accompanying Cyril Ramaphosa and Paul Mashatile on foreign jaunts, where the DA leader is trotted out as a show pony to illustrate the GNU's legitimacy. Not everyone in the DA is happy with this. While the parliamentary caucus and, more specifically, the ministerial handful, are preoccupied with preserving access and proximity to power, many within the party's broader membership base remain committed to the DA's traditional liberal-democratic values. Appeasement backfiring Ironically, appeasement does not strengthen Steenhuisen's hand with the ANC, but weakens it. Every DA red line that the ANC turns into a skipping rope makes inevitable the next concession. The campaign against Powell was orchestrated across multiple fronts, driven by intersecting resentments within the ANC, department of international relations and cooperation (Dirco). At the heart of it was her effectiveness – despite her comparative youth and only a couple of years in the job – as a critic of South Africa's foreign policy. This made her intolerable to a government that is increasingly allergic to scrutiny. First came ANC fury over Powell's participation, alongside then deputy minister of trade and industry Andrew Whitfield, in a DA delegation to Washington in March. Then came the backlash from the powerful pro-Hamas clique in Dirco to a fact-finding visit to Israel by opposition MPs. Perhaps most damaging to Steenhuisen's tjommie relationship with President Cyril Ramaphosa – now performing on the international circuit as the Smooth Cyril and Jovial John show – is her exposure of our president as a fantasist and flat-out liar about Mcebisi Jonas. Powell released an explosive statement asserting that the US had denied Jonas a diplomatic visa in May, had formally rejected his credentials as interlocutor and that the Presidency had repeatedly been told this. Now the heavy artillery was brought to bear. A leaked intelligence report originating from the National Security Council claimed that Powell was under investigation for treason for 'spreading misinformation' during her US trip. Again, the DA remained tjoepstil. In the face of the scale of ANC's disenchantment with Powell, it's not beyond imagining Ramaphosa laying down his own red line with Steenhuisen: get rid of that troublesome spokesperson, or else. NOW READ: The Jaundiced Eye: The building is burning – but it's fine
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Tariffs: SA not even a blip on the United States' radar
Tariffs imposed on other nations show the United States is not singling out South Africa for special treatment. To those who claim the ANC brought the new US 30% tariff down upon South Africa, we have just one word: Canada. There are no – last time we looked, anyway – ANC politicians in America's northern neighbour, nor does Ottawa pursue anything like broad-based black economic empowerment (B-BBEE), yet Canada has been clobbered with a 35% tariff. While US President Donald Trump has used South Africa to make political capital with his right-wing supporters, the reality is that his 'liberation day' tariffs are all about overhauling the global trade system. So, even playing nicely – as our government of national unity is trying to do in getting him to accept a grovelling trade deal – is unlikely to work. Besides, our total trade with the US is only a fraction of the turnover of a medium-sized American city… so we're not even a blip on Washington's trade radar. Two things might come out of this, however. One might be a toning down of the B-BBEE strictures – and senior ANC politicians have already hinted at this – while the tariffs will force us to look for other trade partners. By not putting all our export eggs in a few, risky baskets, we increase our options. NOW READ: 'It's just gone' – Trump's tariffs cost SA company R750m overnight
IOL News
13 hours ago
- IOL News
Panyaza Lesufi reshuffles department heads after damning audit report
Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi has taken tough action taken against departmental heads following the release of a damning forensic report revealing that at least R1.8 billion in budget underspending and missed service delivery targets in the province. On Sunday, Lesufi addressed the media on the outcomes of the recently concluded a set of forensic investigation reports, which have been finalised by the Provincial Forensic Audit Unit. This latest release follows an earlier briefing held on 24 June 2025, where the Premier made public the outcomes of 47 forensic reports. "On the 17th of July, I responded to matters from our ethical council that responded to members or heads of departments who could not finish or conclude their lifestyle audits. I also indicated on the 17th of July that there were departments that underspent seriously. The total underspending at the time was R1.8 billion. It has now gone to R1.3 billion after the authorisation of some of the transactions that we requested be carried over. To me, this was a serious underspending by heads of departments. Some departments have missed their departmental performance targets, and we took serious exception," he said. Lesufi said some of the reasons are due to service delivery challenges, and as a result, he has acted to ensure that this does not continue. "With the serious challenges of service delivery, we cannot afford departments that are missing their targets. We also found some audit outcomes, which indicated that some departments are not performing ideally. Within that context, I have decided to reshuffle and reset heads of departments and remove other heads of departments from their responsibilities. From the 1st of August," he stated. Responding to Lesufi, the DA Provincial Chief Whip in the Gauteng Legislature, Mike Moriarty stated: "Our experience is that this Premier has the habit of creating positive spin to cover failure. For example, he refers to having previously issued 47 such reports, and now he is following this up with others. "The fact is, we have examined those previous reports, and indeed, they only relate to 37 cases and not the 47 that he claims. Moreover, these reports are heavily redacted and convey no information as regards people implicated therein and give no details regarding the disciplinary and criminal consequences that should have arisen in this case." Lesufi said the affected changes and reshuffle to HODs and other personnel, include e-government, infrastructure, education, treasury, COGTA, transport, human settlements, agriculture, environmental development, education, health, among others. "I am pleased that I have appointed a new HOD for the Department of Economic Development, Mr Matlatjo Moholwa, who brings a wealth of experience into public service. He has served as part of economic research and chief economist in the City of Johannesburg and the lead economist for the Land Bank, and Deputy Director General in Mpumalanga and the Gauteng Department of Economic Development. With the challenges that we are going to have with the US in terms of the tariffs, and the need for us to reposition the economy of Gauteng, we needed a chief economist to lead us in this department," he stated. [email protected]
