Gold Eases Lower as Traders Seek Clarity on US Trade Deal Talks
Foreign Buyers Swoop on Cape Town Homes, Pricing Out Locals
Trump's Gilded Design Style May Be Gaudy. But Don't Call it 'Rococo.'
Massachusetts to Follow NYC in Making Landlords Pay Broker Fees
NYC Commutes Resume After Midtown Bus Terminal Crash Chaos
What Gothenburg Got Out of Congestion Pricing
Bullion traded near $3,325 an ounce, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent indicating a possible extension to talks, saying that some countries lacking an agreement by Wednesday will have a three-week window to continue discussions. Many major US trading partners are hurrying to secure deals or lobby for extra time, with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick telling reporters on Sunday that country-by-country tariffs will take effect Aug. 1.
Trump has long threatened that if countries fail to reach deals by July 9, he would impose higher rates on them. Concerns about the potential for a growing US-led trade war have underscored gold's appeal as a haven asset.
Bullion is up by more than a quarter this year, trading about $170 shy of a record set in April, with investors seeking safety in the metal amid heightened geopolitical and trade tensions. Inflows into bullion-backed exchange-traded funds have helped support the rally, alongside ongoing strong demand from global central banks.
Spot gold was down 0.4% to $3,325.05 an ounce as of 8:10 a.m. in Singapore. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index dipped, following a weekly loss of 0.4%. Silver, palladium and platinum were all little changed.
For Brazil's Criminals, Coffee Beans Are the Target
SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too
Sperm Freezing Is a New Hot Market for Startups
Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate
China's Homegrown Jewelry Superstar
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Some wealthy New York elites surprisingly back NYC socialist candidate who wants to tax them more
Despite his socialist proposals, New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani has several millionaires backing his candidacy amid his calls to tax the wealthy to fund expansive social programs. James Hueston, a 27-year-old venture capitalist, is part of a group called the Mamdani Millionaires in a Wall Street Journal piece published Monday. "In my eyes, I should absolutely be paying my fair share for the people that need it," Hueston told the newspaper. "I don't think that he's increasing taxation for the sake of it. I think that he's doing it to fund very explicitly good policies." Socialist's Nyc Mayoral Win Sparks Fierce Debate Over Feasibility Of Radical Policy Agenda Voting data showed that about a third of the city's wealthiest residents supported Mamdani in the primary, the New York Post reported. Many donors, some from Wall Street and large law firms, have remained anonymous. Other high-earning supporters of Mamdani include Ahmed Haque, the founder and CEO of consulting firm Didactic Labs. Read On The Fox News App "For immigrants coming to this country, these small businesses represent the single path for upward mobility that they have," he said. Bradley Tusk, a venture capitalist who ran Michael Bloomberg's third campaign for mayor of New York City, wrote on LinkedIn that New Yorkers should "do what we can to help him succeed." Socialist Mayoral Candidate Zohran Mamdani Under Fire For Plan To Tax 'Richer And Whiter Neighborhoods' In an Instagram post, Keith McNally, owner of Balthazar, a French restaurant, called Mamdani "fantastic." "More so, when my affluent, paranoid friends tell me Mamdani's dangerous," he wrote. Kathy Wylde, president of the Partnership for New York City, a major business group, told The Journal that she met with Mandani in September, long before his candidacy was taken seriously. "I'm not in favor of government taking over your business," Wylde recalled him telling her. She added that "he has already acknowledged that the housing crisis is only going to be addressed if there's an increase in private supply. So he's not just talking about social or socialized housing solutions."Original article source: Some wealthy New York elites surprisingly back NYC socialist candidate who wants to tax them more
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.S. Veterans Affairs will cut nearly 30,000 jobs, far fewer than planned
By Christian Martinez (Reuters) -The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs will make two-thirds fewer employee cuts this fiscal year than it first targeted, reducing staff by about 30,000 people rather than 80,000, the agency said on Monday. The agency employed about around 480,000 people at the start of the Trump administration and expects to end the fiscal year in September with nearly 450,000 staff. Under President Donald Trump's program to downsize the federal government, the agency had planned to reach just under 400,000 employees. That proposal drew widespread condemnation from military veteran groups and Democrats. The agency said in a statement it was on pace to reduce its staff "through the federal hiring freeze, deferred resignations, retirements and normal attrition." It did not say why it no longer needed to make further cuts. The scale of the original planned layoffs was far greater than proposed cuts at other government agencies and potentially posed a political risk for Trump, who portrays himself as a champion of the U.S. military and its members. Between January and June, the agency shed nearly 17,000 employees and expects "nearly 12,000 additional VA employees to exit" by September 30, the VA said. "A department-wide RIF is off the table, but that doesn't mean we're done improving VA," VA Secretary Doug Collins said in a release, referring to a reduction in force, which means permanent layoffs. Just under 9 million veterans were enrolled in the VA Health Care System in March, according to the VA website.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Veterans Affairs Dept. drops plan to lay off thousands in August
The Department of Veterans Affairs has dropped plans revealed in a memo earlier this year to lay off tens of thousands of personnel in August, a news release from the department indicated Monday. The VA announced it's currently on pace to reduce its staff by about 30,000 employees by the end of this fiscal year, in September, thereby "eliminating the need for a large-scale reduction-in-force," or RIF. The department originally planned to reduce its staff to 2019 levels, or just under 400,000, according to a memo obtained by CBS News in March. The VA said in its release that it had "roughly 484,000 employees on Jan. 1, 2025" — meaning the initial plans would have required the VA to cut upwards of 80,000 jobs. In a statement included in the release, Secretary of Veterans Affairs Doug Collins said that as a result of a "holistic" department-wide review, the VA "is headed in the right direction — both in terms of staff levels and customer service. A department-wide RIF is off the table, but that doesn't mean we're done improving VA." The VA acknowledged in the release that the agency "had been considering a department-wide RIF to reduce staff levels by up to 15%," but said "employee reductions through the federal hiring freeze, deferred resignations, retirements and normal attrition have eliminated the need for that RIF." A spokesperson for the VA said in a statement Monday that it spent "nearly four months conducting a holistic review of the department to see what needs to be changed." The department claimed that in recent months, the VA has improved services for veterans, citing "huge drops in the number of Veterans waiting for disability benefits, sizeable increases in claims processing productivity, and extraordinary progress regarding our electronic health record modernization." The spokesperson said the original number of 80,000 staff cuts "got employees thinking outside of the box to come up with new and better ways of serving Veterans," and the "main goal all along has been creating the best possible experiences and outcomes" for veterans and their families. Under the Biden administration, the VA hired tens of thousands of workers, in part to help administer the PACT Act, which addresses toxic exposures veterans suffered while serving in the military. The Trump administration initially looked at cutting staff levels to pre-Biden administration levels. The Trump administration imposed a broader hiring freeze on many government jobs earlier this year, part of a push to cut the size of the federal workforce. The VA exempted some roles from that freeze, including many health care jobs at the agency's hospital network. The administration also offered a voluntary "deferred resignation" deal that allowed thousands of federal workers to leave their jobs in early February and get paid until September. Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut took note of the reversal of the planned mass layoffs at the VA and blamed the work environment at the department. "This announcement makes clear VA is bleeding employees across the board at an unsustainable rate because of the toxic work environment created by this Administration and DOGE's slash and trash policies," Blumenthal, the top Democrat on the Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee, said in a statement. "This is not 'natural' attrition, it is not strategic, and it will inevitably impact veterans' care and benefits — no matter what blanket assurances the VA Secretary hides behind." Blumenthal noted the VA workforce usually expands by about 10,000 "in a typical year," and its statement that it was losing 30,000 this year means the VA "still stands to lose tens of thousands more employees than ever before." He complained that the administration "repeatedly refused to share any additional information about this plan to cut 83,000 VA employees and what positions would be targeted." Death toll rises as desperate search for Texas flash flood survivors continues Sabrina Carpenter on the biggest misperceptions about her How Lady Liberty became a beacon for immigrants
