A look inside Florida's ‘Alligator Alcatraz' detention center
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida, a Republican, has positioned his state as particularly aggressive on immigration enforcement, deputizing state and local law enforcement to act as a 'force multiplier' for federal authorities.
Advertisement
But opening the detention center in the Everglades was a move with little precedent that relied on emergency state powers. Until recently, the federal government has been responsible for housing immigration detainees, and it has largely detained people who recently entered the country illegally, or who have criminal convictions or outstanding deportation orders. But immigration enforcement has changed substantially under Trump, sweeping up people who were not the focus before.
Advertisement
The Everglades facility serves as part of the local-federal immigration cooperation process known as 287(g). Under that system, local officials can arrest and detain migrants on behalf of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. It is unclear, however, if and when detainees at the Everglades center would be transferred to ICE custody before being deported.
Most detainees at the center do not have criminal convictions, according to a government official with knowledge of the data who requested anonymity because the official was not authorized to discuss it. At least some were transfers from local jails who had been taken into custody after getting pulled over for traffic violations; others had been transferred there from ICE custody.
Another government official who requested anonymity for the same reason said that in all, 60 percent of the center's detainees either have criminal convictions or criminal charges pending against them.
DeSantis is already considering opening another such facility in North Florida. The courts, however, have repeatedly held that immigration enforcement is a federal duty. Last week, the Supreme Court refused to revive an aggressive Florida immigration law blocked by lower courts that would have made it a crime for migrants without legal status to enter the state.
'States are not permitted to create their own immigration detention system,' said Lucas Guttentag, a former Justice Department official in the Biden administration. 'Everyone who values freedom and accountability should be deeply worried.'
Asked about the Everglades center, Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, said, 'Under President Trump's leadership, we are working at turbo speed on cost-effective and innovative ways to deliver on the American people's mandate for mass deportations of criminal illegal aliens.'
Advertisement
Although Trump made a splashy visit to the Everglades detention center two weeks ago, the federal government has distanced itself from the facility, saying it is Florida's responsibility. After environmental groups sued to halt construction of the center, Thomas P. Giles, a top ICE official, wrote in a statement responding to the suit that the agency's role 'has been limited to touring the facility to ensure compliance with ICE detention standards, and meeting with officials from the state of Florida to discuss operational matters.'
'The ultimate decision of who to detain,' he wrote, 'belongs to Florida.'
Detainees at the center do not show up in ICE's public database, making it difficult for relatives or lawyers to find them or know whether they have been deported. With 1,000 beds divided among fenced units that each house 32 men, it held about 900 detainees as of Saturday, according to members of Congress and state lawmakers. The vast majority were Hispanic.
Mass detentions have led to complaints of overcrowding and unsanitary and inhumane conditions at ICE detention centers across the country, though ICE has denied any problems. But some conditions at the Everglades detention center are specifically because of its rushed construction and remote location. It was built on an airfield with so little infrastructure that trash and sewage needed to be hauled away by large trucks.
State officials, who told lawmakers that they plan to expand the facility's capacity to 4,000 by next month, have dismissed detainees' descriptions of poor conditions as 'completely false.'
'The facility meets all required standards and is in good working order,' Stephanie Hartman, deputy director of communications for the Florida Division of Emergency Management, said in a statement.
Advertisement
Relatives and lawyers of detainees say they have not been allowed to visit. So far, detainees have been allowed to make unlimited calls at no cost, but they may be monitored or recorded. Some detainees and their relatives declined to be named for fear of retaliation.
Members of Congress and state lawmakers visited the facility by invitation Saturday, after Democratic state lawmakers had been denied entry earlier this month when they showed up unannounced. State Democrats have sued, arguing that they are entitled to such oversight.
After the tour, state Sen. Blaise Ingoglia, a Republican, described a bunk in an empty unit at the facility as 'better than my bed at home.'
Several Democratic lawmakers criticized the tour as 'sanitized' and said the conditions inside were worse than those in ICE detention centers. 'Every Floridian should be ashamed that our taxpayer money is being used to put people in these cages,' said Rep. Maxwell Alejandro Frost, D-Orlando.
The politicians' presence drew a modest crowd off US Highway 41, a two-lane road that crosses the Everglades from east to west. Among them was Benita Mendoza, whose husband, Jordan Márquez, who came to the United States from Cuba 19 years ago, was among the center's first detainees.
'He's always asking me, 'What time is it? What day are we in?'' she said, adding that Márquez, 43, told her he was not regularly getting his blood pressure medication.
Republicans have claimed that the center requires less security than others because of its inhospitable surroundings, inhabited by alligators and invasive pythons. Neither animal tends to attack people, and Native Americans, including the Miccosukee tribe, have long made their homes in the Everglades.
Advertisement
A busload of detainees, including Herrera, arrived last Wednesday but were not immediately processed. They were kept on the bus overnight, shackled at their hands and feet, with no food or drink, Herrera and another detainee said. Herrera had been told he was going to the Krome detention center run by ICE, closer to Miami, but arrived at the Everglades center instead.
The men were placed in one of eight fenced units inside a huge tent; those with serious criminal records were given red wristbands. Herrera, 55, was released from prison two years ago after serving time for carjacking. He has lived in the United States since he was 3 and has no record of citizenship in Argentina, where his family was from, making it difficult to deport him.
On Tuesday, guards told Herrera that he was being transferred, though they did not tell him where he was going.
The Everglades center was different from the federal prisons and ICE detention centers he had spent time in, he said: It had no posted regulations or contacts for an inspector general; no law library or religious materials, including Bibles; no outdoor recreation time, at least not for his unit; no commissary or vending machines. In the background during one phone conversation with Herrera, some men inside the unit could be heard yelling in Spanish, 'Libertad! Libertad!'
Alexander Boni, 32, a detainee from Cuba, said he had asked for a face mask after other detainees became sick but did not get one.
'We're desperate in here,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Not Gonna Lie': Jelly Roll Reveals The Big Trump Move He Thinks Is 'Awesome'
'Jimmy Kimmel Live' guest host Jelly Roll mostly shied away from politics during the show's opening monologue on Thursday night, but he did praise President Donald Trump for one recent decision. 'It's the UFC fight President Trump's planning on having on the South Lawn on the 4th of next July,' the rapper/country singer said. 'Now, listen, I know this is causing a little bit of controversy. But for me, I think it's awesome. I'm not gonna lie.' Trump said earlier this month that he was going to host a major UFC event on the White House grounds next year on Independence Day, with an audience of up to 25,000 spectators. Critics mocked Trump over the idea, but Jelly Roll said he sees this from another perspective. 'Where I'm from, watching two meth heads beat the piss out of each other on a lawn is just a part of our year,' he said. 'I tell you what, a UFC fight at the White House might not be what our Founding Fathers would have wanted. But our founding stepdads would have loved that shit.' He also offered another idea. 'We should put an octagon at the Pentagon and have a couple of geometry teachers fight it out,' he said. 'Let's settle this once and for all.' See more in his Thursday night monologue:
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's budget hacksaw leaves public broadcasting on precipice
Hundreds of television and radio stations across the United States risk seeing their resources evaporate, after President Donald Trump prevailed Friday in scrapping federal funding for public broadcasting. The cuts follow Trump's accusations of ideological bias and will deal a bitter blow to information dissemination nationwide, including rural areas with limited news resources. At the Republican president's urging, lawmakers along party lines approved the clawback of $1.1 billion in funding already allocated by Congress over the next two years to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Created in 1967 by president Lyndon Johnson, the non-profit CPB finances a minority share of the budgets of national radio and television mainstays NPR and PBS. But the unprecedented rescission will also critically impact some 1,500 local radio and TV stations, from the East Coast to Alaska, that air part of the public broadcasters' content. "Without federal funding, many local public radio and television stations will be forced to shut down," warned CPB president Patricia Harrison. - Connection - Stations have been sounding the alarm for months. Prairie Public Broadcasting, which has served North Dakota for 60 years, estimates it could lose 26 percent of its budget between combined cuts in state and CPB funding. For Vermont Public, a broadcaster in the US Northeast, $4 million in funding is at stake. "We're going to be forced to make some really difficult decisions about what local programming stays and what local programming we have to cut," said Ryan Howlett, who heads the financial arm of South Dakota Public Broadcasting, which oversees a dozen local radio stations and as many local TV stations. In this rural and conservative state, "you're going to lose a connection point that binds us together," he told AFP. Trump has made very public his hostility to the media, which he often brands "fake news" and the "enemy of the people," a driving force behind his political rhetoric. In early May, Trump issued an executive order requiring an end to the subsidization of NPR and PBS, saying "neither entity presents a fair, accurate, or unbiased portrayal of current events to taxpaying citizens." "These are partisan, leftwing outlets that are funded by the taxpayers, and this administration does not believe it's a good use of the taxpayers' time and money," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday. Howlett emphasized that there is little such criticism in local communities in South Dakota. "We're part of people's everyday lives," he said. - Turning point - The elimination of CPB funding, advocated by the "Project 2025" blueprint of the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank, marks a turning point. Other attempts in the past had met with opposition from lawmakers, including Republicans in rural areas. Dan Kennedy, a journalism professor at Northeastern University in Boston, stressed it is in those very areas where the funding cuts are likely to have "a devastating effect." For remote communities, "these stations are an absolute lifeline," he said. "This is where people go to find out a tornado is coming," or about other emergency news. Such arguments were rejected by Heritage Foundation fellow Mike Gonzalez, who wrote the chapter on public broadcasting in the Project 2025 blueprint. For him, "state and local governments can devise and set up systems that take care of the problem, on a much cheaper basis than the entire public broadcasting apparatus, and without the attendant ills that accompany the present system." The end of the federal funding is undoubtedly a blow to local news in the United States. Due to declining readership and the consolidation of titles under larger corporations, more than a third of the nation's newspapers have shuttered since 2005, a loss of 3,300 titles, according to a report from the Medill School at Northwestern University. According to a recent map drawn by analysis firm Muck Rack and the Rebuild Local News coalition, there are now only 8.2 journalists per 100,000 Americans, down from 40 in the early 2000s. arb/gl/mlm/abs/rsc
USA Today
20 minutes ago
- USA Today
PBS, NPR push liberal propaganda. Trump is right to cut their funding.
Why do conservatives have so much disdain for NPR and PBS? Since both are taxpayer funded, they are supposed to serve all the public. But both push leftist propaganda to a progressive audience. NPR and PBS were once one-stop shops for news and wholesome programs for families. The kids could watch "Sesame Street" while their parents listened to "All Things Considered." But now NPR and, to a lesser extent, PBS have become a cesspool of liberal bias that taxpayers have been forced to fund. From my perspective, President Donald Trump can't cut funding for these two liberal fortresses fast enough. Does that make me heartless or financially prudent? I say the latter. Trump is right to cut funding for public broadcasting At Trump's behest, the Senate voted July 17 to cut $9 billion in federal funds from public broadcasting and foreign aid programs. House Republicans are expected to concur and send the legislation to Trump for his signature. Opinion: Liberals claimed Trump would end democracy. They were wrong again. The executives who run NPR say that the public broadcaster gets only 1% of its funding directly from the federal government and member stations receive around 10% of their budgets from Washington. Yet, the progressives who love PBS and NPR can't stop screaming that the budget cuts will mean the end of public broadcasting as we know it. To which I say: Now, tell me the bad news. NPR pushes liberal propaganda Why do so many conservatives have so much disdain for NPR and PBS? Since both are taxpayer funded, they are supposed to, at least in theory, serve all the public. But both outfits push leftist propaganda and partisan talking points to a targeted audience of progressives. Even worse, executives like NPR CEO Katherine Maher refuse to admit the obvious. On CNN, Maher seemed befuddled about the suggestion of liberal bias. "As far as the accusations that we're biased, I'd stand up and say, 'Please show me a story that concerns you,'' she said. Hey, no problem. Here are a few headlines from NPR: Let's review: Republicans and their presidential nominee are racist and sexist. The Democratic nominee is the victim of that racism and sexism. Even "nice" White people are racist as is American society as a whole. And by the way, before you ask, none of those "news" stories were labeled as opinion. Yes, no bias here. Just keep those tax dollars flowing. The bias starts with executives like Maher, who in 2020 posted on social media that "America begins in black plunder and white democracy." NPR often frames its news coverage in ways that make Trump's conservative policies seem harmful, rather than simply reporting the facts. A progressive point of view is fine when presented as commentary, but NPR purports to be a neutral news source that serves all Americans. Opinion: Our schools are struggling because teachers unions don't put kids first Don't believe me? AllSides, a media literacy organization that rates news organization's biases, has repeatedly found that NPR's online content "leans left." And the calls about NPR's leftist bias have even come from inside the house. Longtime business editor Uri Berliner famously resigned last year after being suspended for publicly detailing his employer's history of newsroom bias. Taxpayers shouldn't be forced to financially support a news source that's so blatantly partisan. Trump's cuts can't happen soon enough. Hear that sound? It's liberals screaming into the void without NPR as their mouthpiece. Nicole Russell is an opinion columnist with USA TODAY. She lives in Texas with her four kids. Sign up for her newsletter, The Right Track, and get it delivered to your inbox.
