logo
The Strategic Blind Spot Holding Back Your Growth

The Strategic Blind Spot Holding Back Your Growth

Forbes03-07-2025
David Goldstein is an entrepreneur and CEO of The 9% Club, a community for founders that provides tools and wisdom for business success.
Companies love to celebrate when a new customer signs on. But what happens next?
Too often, the answer is: not much.
Once the contract is signed, attention shifts to the next lead. Meanwhile, the customer—full of potential—starts to drift. Not because they're unhappy, but because no one is making sure they're actually getting what they came for.
It's not a lack of care. It's a lack of follow-through. 'Customer success' may be the title, but in many organizations, it's still just customer support with a new name—reactive, ticket-driven and disconnected from outcomes. And that's where growth quietly slips away.
Success Isn't Just Solving Problems
Many teams are stuck in response mode. A customer asks for help, and someone answers. A quarterly check-in appears on the calendar, and the team shows up. But by the time a problem surfaces, the damage may already be done.
Proactive success is different. It's about knowing your customer's goals and helping them get there without being asked. It's about building momentum, not just removing friction. The companies that lead fix things quickly, but they also keep things on track.
The Growth You're Overlooking
Everyone agrees it's cheaper to retain a customer than to win a new one. Yet acquisition still gets the lion's share of attention and budget, while the post-sale experience is treated as a follow-up task.
That mindset comes at a cost.
When customers don't feel supported or see progress, they rarely complain. They disengage quietly. Their usage drops. They don't expand. They don't refer. Eventually, they leave. Not out of frustration, but indifference. But when customers are consistently moving forward, the story changes. Retention improves. Revenue compounds. Loyalty grows stronger, and growth becomes more predictable.
What Proactive Success Actually Looks Like
Being proactive doesn't mean adding more check-ins or overloading your team. It means building a smarter system—one that knows where the customer is, what matters next and when to step in.
Here's what that can look like:
Before onboarding begins, ask: What does success look like for this customer? What will make them say, 'This was worth it'? Lock in those answers early and align your team around them.
Look beyond support tickets. Watch for signs like usage drop-offs, missed milestones or features left untouched. These are quiet red flags. You don't need sophisticated software, just a clear view of the customer journey.
Success isn't just a post-sale function. Sales sets expectations. Product shapes experience. Marketing reinforces value. Everyone should understand the customer's goals and feel a sense of ownership in helping them get there.
Ask Yourself:
• Do we know what success means for each of our key customer segments?
• Can we identify when a customer is falling off course before they raise their hand?
• Are we helping customers make progress or just responding when things break?
If these questions are hard to answer, that's your blind spot.
Retention Isn't A Metric—It's A Strategy
Customer retention isn't just about keeping churn low; it's about making sure your customers continue to see value. That requires attention, consistency and a culture that treats retention as a core growth lever, not a reactive function.
Too often, retention is buried in dashboards and quarterly reports. But it should be front and center because it's one of the most powerful (and underused) growth strategies you have. And you don't need a massive team to make this shift. What you need is intent. A mindset that says: Our job doesn't end when the deal closes. That's when it begins.
Final Thought
You're not losing customers because something went wrong. You're losing them because nothing noticeably went right. The companies that stand out don't just deliver a product; they deliver progress. They know what their customers are trying to achieve, and they commit to helping them get there.
That's how retention becomes a growth engine. Not through last-minute saves, but through consistent, proactive success by design.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)'s CEO Has A Great Relationship With Trump, Says Jim Cramer
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)'s CEO Has A Great Relationship With Trump, Says Jim Cramer

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)'s CEO Has A Great Relationship With Trump, Says Jim Cramer

We recently published . NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. After bleeding close to $600 billion in market value in January amidst the DeepSeek selloff, Wall Street's AI chip darling, NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is once again the most valuable company in the world. The firm has benefited from growing investor bullishness about the long-term prospects of AI. NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA)'s shares closed the week 1% higher after big tech's continued persistence to spend billions of dollars to buy AI chips. Cramer discussed the impact and the CEO's relationship with President Trump: 'All CapEx go up, it's all NVIDIA. . .it's really good for NVIDIA. But of course, NVIDIA, the President talking about breaking them up, we'll get to that later. It was an out of body comment. Previously, the CNBC TV host commented on NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA)'s shares and parabolic moves: 'What is the solution to this? Look, in my forthcoming book, How to Make Money in Any Market, I have banished my antiparabola bias. I have a method I reveal of picking five stocks to go alongside an index fund with some money added each month. I state point blank that if you are in your 30s or older, you should own one speculative situation like an Oklo, okay, or a Joby. Just one. It could fail you after going parabolic. Moreover, if you're under 30, you can pick two speculative names out of five because you've got enough time to make back any potential losses. Photo by Javier Esteban on Unsplash Now, you may think I'm reckless for endorsing any of these even with caveats, but it's time to admit that for many years now, speculative stocks with great growth, they've worked. Oh, and let's not forget, they don't have to stay speculative. NVIDIA stock has had many parabolic moves, including the one that started in April. To keep yourself out of these runs because of a principle that stopped working ages ago, that's to be blind to change, and I don't like it. I don't want to be that way.' While we acknowledge the potential of NVDA as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.

I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class
I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class

There are many questions that don't have simple answers, either because they're too complex or they're hypothetical. One such question is what it might mean for billionaires to pay taxes at the same rate as the upper middle class, whose income starts, on average, at around $168,000, depending on where you live. Find Out: Read Next: ChatGPT may not be an oracle, but it can analyze information and offer trends and patterns, so I asked it what would happen if billionaires were required to pay anywhere near as much as the upper middle class. Here's what it said. A Fatter Government Larder For starters, ChatGPT said that if billionaires paid taxes like the upper middle class, the government would bring in a lot more money — potentially hundreds of billions of dollars more every year. 'That's because most billionaires don't make their money from salaries like upper-middle-class workers do. Instead, they grow their wealth through investments–stocks, real estate, and businesses–which are often taxed at much lower rates or not taxed at all until the assets are sold,' ChatGPT told me. Billionaire income is largely derived from capital appreciation, not wages. In other words, they make money on their money through interest. And as of yet, the U.S. tax code doesn't tax 'unrealized capital gains' so until you sell your assets, you could amass millions in appreciation and not pay a dime on it, ChatGPT shared. Learn More: What Do Billionaires Pay in Taxes? Right now, many billionaires pay an effective tax rate of around 8% or less, thanks to loopholes and tax strategies. Meanwhile, upper-middle-class households earning, say, $250,000 might pay around 20% to 24% of their income in taxes. (Keep in mind that the government doesn't apply one tax bracket to all income. You pay tax in layers, according to the IRS. As your income goes up, the tax rate on the next layer of income is higher. So you pay 12% on the first $47,150, then 22% on $47,151 to $100,525 and so on). So, if billionaires were taxed at the same rate as those upper-middle-class wage earners, 'it would level the playing field–and raise a ton of revenue that could be used for things like infrastructure, education or healthcare,' ChatGPT said. The Impact on Wealth Equality I wondered if taxing billionaires could have any kind of impact on wealth equality, as well. While it wouldn't put more money in other people's pockets, 'it could increase trust in the tax system, showing that the wealthiest aren't playing by a different set of rules,' ChatGPT said. It would also help curb 'the accumulation of dynastic wealth,' where the richest families essentially hoard wealth for generations without contributing proportionally to the system. But it's not a magic bullet. 'Wealth inequality is rooted in more than just taxes–wages, education access, housing costs, and corporate ownership all play a role,' ChatGPT said. Billionaires paying taxes doesn't stop them from being billionaires, either, it pointed out. Taxing Billionaires Is Not That Simple While in theory billionaires paying higher taxes 'would shift a much bigger share of the tax burden onto the very wealthy,' ChatGPT wrote, billionaires are not as liquid as they may seem. 'A lot of billionaire wealth is tied up in things like stocks they don't sell, so taxing that would require big changes to how the tax code works.' Also, billionaires are good at finding loopholes and account strategies — it might be hard to enforce. What's a Good Middle Ground? We don't live in a black and white world, however. There's got to be a middle ground, so I asked ChatGPT if there is a way to tax billionaires more, even if it's not quite how the upper middle class are taxed. A likely compromise would come from a policy decision, which isn't likely to be forthcoming anytime soon. President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill only offered more tax breaks to the wealthiest. However, policy proposals that have been floated, include: A minimum tax on billionaires where they might pay around 20% of their overall income Limiting deductions and closing tax loopholes that allow them to significantly reduce taxable income Tax unrealized gains (those assets that have only earned but not yet been sold), gradually. ChatGPT agreed that billionaires could pay more than they currently do, even if they don't pay exactly what upper-middle-class workers pay in percentage terms. 'The key is to design policies that are fair, enforceable, and politically feasible.' I asked how realistic such policy proposals are, and ChatGPT told me what I already knew: They're 'moderately realistic' but only with the 'right political alignment.' More From GOBankingRates 9 Downsizing Tips for the Middle Class To Save on Monthly Expenses This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información

Not Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) But RTX, Say A Lot Of People According To Jim Cramer
Not Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) But RTX, Say A Lot Of People According To Jim Cramer

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Not Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) But RTX, Say A Lot Of People According To Jim Cramer

We recently published . Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) is a key American defense contractor when it comes to the aerospace industry. Its fighter aircraft form the backbone of US air superiority. The shares have lost 11.9% year-to-date on the back of a major 10.8% dip in July after its Q2 profit dipped by a whopping 80% on the back of a classified $1.6 billion loss on a classified aeronautics project. Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT)'s Q2 revenue of $18.16 billion also missed analyst estimates of $18.57 billion. No wonder Cramer made the following remarks about the firm: 'RTX, by the way, pushed by a number of people, saying that's the defense stock you want to be in, not Lockheed Martin.' Source: Pexels Previously, Cramer had advised viewers to stay long on Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT): 'I like Lockheed Martin too much to tell you to do that. Every time I see Jim Taiclet, I say to myself, why does anyone want to sell that stock with a 3% yield and a great book of business and a terrific CEO? No, you stay long, Lockheed Martin.' While we acknowledge the potential of LMT as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store