Immigration enforcement takes toll on Texas agriculture
Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller states that increased immigration enforcement is negatively impacting the agricultural industry.
Federal immigration officials are continuing enforcement, despite a brief pause by President Trump in sectors heavily reliant on migrant labor.
Farmers are experiencing significant disruption as many undocumented workers are not showing up for work for fear of deportation.
ELLIS COUNTY, Texas - State Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller says stepped-up immigration enforcement is taking a toll on the industry.
As the effects are being felt not just here in Texas, but beyond, federal immigration officials say they're just doing their jobs.
Local perspective
Just 40 miles or so south of Dallas sits Lee Calvert's 2,000-acre Ellis County family farm.
Calvert knows he's lucky, not having to rely on farmhands to check the chores off, because those who do say absenteeism among hired migrant help has disrupted their entire operations.
Big picture view
Recent video posted to immigration-rights groups' social media channels shows federal agents conducting raids on California farms.
President Donald Trump in the last week briefly paused this type of enforcement within a handful of economic sectors, which rely heavily on migrant labor, like agriculture. Then, it was back to business.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates that more than 40 percent of the nation's farm workers are undocumented.
What they're saying
Calvert is able to run his farm without having to rely on migrant workers.
"My father helps me, obviously. My little sister helps. My wife is a huge help, and I've got three sons and they're coming along, doing what they can," Calvert said.
Miller, a Republican, says many farms across the country are not so fortunate.
"They hear that ICE is coming, or see somebody from INS roll up. Well, they just don't show up, they're scared to come to work," Miller said.
Miller tells FOX 4 that dairy farmers have been hit the hardest.
"On a dairy, those cows never stay milked. You milk them three times in a 24-hour period. So if the crew doesn't show up, these dairymen go into panic mode," Miller said.
According to Vice President JD Vance, they plan to continue their path towards clearing the country of undocumented migrants.
"We're enforcing everywhere. In other words, the President has said if you are an illegal immigrant in this country, you ought to voluntarily go back and come through the proper channels."
Folks like Calvert agree there's no place in America for migrants with violent criminal backgrounds. But the farmer wishes there was more "gray area."
"I think there needs to be a distinction made and a path for people who do want to come here, obey our laws, integrate into our societies, work in our factories, fields, wherever," Calvert said.
The Source
Information in this article comes from Sid Miller, Lee Calvert, and previous FOX reporting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Intercept
a minute ago
- The Intercept
Border Patrol Wants Advanced AI to Spy on American Cities
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, flush with billions in new funding, is seeking 'advanced AI' technologies to surveil urban residential areas, increasingly sophisticated autonomous systems, and even the ability to see through walls. A CBP presentation for an 'Industry Day' summit with private sector vendors, obtained by The Intercept, lays out a detailed wish list of tech CBP hopes to purchase, like satellite connectivity for surveillance towers along the border and improved radio communications. But it also shows that state-of-the-art, AI-augmented surveillance technologies will be central to the Trump administration's anti-immigrant campaign, which will extend deep into the interior of the North American continent, hundreds of miles from international borders as commonly understood. The recent passage of Trump's sprawling flagship legislation funnels tens of billions of dollars to the Department of Homeland Security. While much of that funding will go to Immigration and Customs Enforcement to bolster the administration's arrest and deportation operations, a great deal is earmarked to purchase new technology and equipment for federal offices tasked with preventing immigrants from arriving in the first place: Customs and Border Protection, which administers the country's border surveillance apparatus, and its subsidiary, the U.S. Border Patrol. One page of the presentation, describing the wishlist of Border Patrol's Law Enforcement Operations Division, says the agency needs 'Advanced AI to identify and track suspicious activity in urban environment [sic],' citing the 'challenges' posed by 'Dense residential areas.' What's considered 'suspicious activity' is left unmentioned. Customs and Border Protection did not respond to questions posed about the slides by The Intercept. A slide from the CBP presentation showing the wishlist for the Coastal Area of Responsibility. Screenshot from CBP Presentation The reference to AI-aided urban surveillance appears on a page dedicated to the operational needs of Border Patrol's 'Coastal AOR,' or area of responsibility, encompassing the entire southeast of the United States, from Kentucky to Florida. A page describing the 'Southern AOR,' which includes all of inland Nevada and Oklahoma, similarly states the need for 'Advanced intelligence to identify suspicious patterns' and 'Long-range surveillance' because 'city environments make it difficult to separate normal activity from suspicious activity.' Although the Fourth Amendment provides protection against arbitrary police searches, federal law grants immigration agencies the power to conduct warrantless detentions and searches within 100 miles of the land borders with Canada, Mexico, or the coastline of the United States. This zone includes most of the largest cities in the United States, including Los Angeles, New York, as well as the entirety of Florida. The document mentions no specific surveillance methods or 'advanced AI' tools that might be used in urban environments. Across the Southwest, residents of towns like Nogales and Calexico are already subjected to monitoring from surveillance towers placed in their neighborhoods. A 2014 DHS border surveillance privacy impact assessment warned these towers 'may capture information about individuals or activities that are beyond the scope of CBP's authorities. Video cameras can capture individuals entering places or engaging in activities as they relate to their daily lives because the border includes populated areas,' for example, 'video of an individual entering a doctor's office, attending public rallies, social events or meetings, or associating with other individuals.' Last year, the Government Accountability Office found the DHS tower surveillance program failed six out of six privacy policies designed to prevent such overreach. CBP is also already known to use 'artificial intelligence' tools to ferret out 'suspicious activity,' according to agency documents. A 2024 inventory of DHS AI applications includes the Rapid Tactical Operations Reconnaissance program, or RAPTOR, which 'leverages Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance border security through real-time surveillance and reconnaissance. The AI system processes data from radar, infrared sensors, and video surveillance to detect and track suspicious activities along U.S. borders.' The document's call for urban surveillance reflect the reality of Border Patrol, an agency empowered, despite its name, with broad legal authority to operate throughout the United States. 'Border Patrol's escalating immigration raids and protest crackdowns show us the agency operates heavily in cities, not just remote deserts,' said Spencer Reynolds, a former attorney with the Department of Homeland Security who focused on intelligence matters. 'Day by day, its activities appear less based on suspicion and more reliant on racial and ethnic profiling. References to operations in 'dense residential areas' are alarming in that they potentially signal planning for expanded operations or tracking in American neighborhoods.' Automating immigration enforcement has been a Homeland Security priority for years, as exemplified by the bipartisan push to expand the use of machine learning-based surveillance towers like those sold by arms-maker Anduril Industries across the southern border. 'Autonomous technologies will improve the USBP's ability to detect, identify, and classify potential threats in the operating environment,' according to the agency's 2024 – 2028 strategy document. 'After a threat has been identified and classified, autonomous technology will enable the USBP to track threats in near real-time through an integrated network.' The automation desired by Border Patrol seems to lean heavily on computer vision, a form of machine learning that excels at pattern matching to find objects in the desert that resemble people, cars, or other 'items of interest,' rather than requiring crews of human agents to monitor camera feeds and other sensors around the clock. The Border Patrol presentation includes multiple requests for small drones that incorporate artificial intelligence technologies to aid in the 'detection, tracking, and classification' of targets. A computer system that has analyzed a large number of photographs of trucks driving through the desert can become effective at identifying similar vehicles in the future. But efforts to algorithmically label human behavior as 'suspicious' — an abstract concept compared to 'truck' — based only on its appearance has been criticized by some artificial intelligence scholars and civil libertarians as error-prone, overly subjective if not outright pseudoscientific, and often reliant on ethnic and religious stereotypes. Any effort to apply predictive techniques based on surveillance data from entire urban areas or residential communities would exacerbate these risks of bias and inaccuracy. 'In the best of times, oversight of technology and data at DHS is weak and has allowed profiling, but in recent months the administration has intentionally further undermined DHS accountability,' explained Reynolds, now senior counsel at the Brennan Center's liberty and national security program. 'Artificial intelligence development is opaque, even more so when it relies on private contractors that are unaccountable to the public — like those Border Patrol wants to hire. Injecting AI into an environment full of biased data and black-box intelligence systems will likely only increase risk and further embolden the agency's increasingly aggressive behavior.' 'They're addicted to suspicious activity reporting because they fundamentally believe that their targets do suspicious things.' The desire to hunt 'suspicious' people with 'advanced AI' reflects a longtime ambition at the Department of Homeland Security, Mohammad Tajsar, an attorney at the ACLU of Southern California, told The Intercept. Military and intelligence agencies across the world are increasingly working to use forms of machine learning, often large language models like OpenAI's GPT, to rapidly ingest and analyze varied data sources to find buried trends, threats, and targets — though systemic issues with accuracy remain unsolved. This proposed use case dovetails perfectly with the Homeland Security ethos, Tajsar said. 'They're addicted to suspicious activity reporting because they fundamentally believe that their targets do suspicious things, and that suspicious things can predict criminal behavior,' a notion Tajsar described as a 'fantasy' that 'remains unchallenged despite the complete lack of empiricism to support it.' With the rapid proliferation of technologies billed as artificially intelligent, 'they think that they can bring to bear all of their disparate sources of data using computers, and they see that as a breakthrough in what they've been trying to do for a long, long time.' Read Our Complete Coverage While much of the presentation addresses Border Patrol's wide-ranging surveillance agenda, it also includes information about other departmental tech needs. A slide from the CBP presentation. Screenshot from CBP presentation The Border Patrol Tactical Unit, or BORTAC, exists on paper to execute domestic missions involving terrorism, hostage situations, or other high-risk scenarios. But the unit has become increasingly associated with suppressing dissent and routine deportation raids: In 2020, the Trump administration ordered BORTAC into the streets of Portland to tamp down protests, and the special operations unit has been similarly deployed in Los Angeles this year. According to the presentation, CBP hopes to arm the already heavily militarized BORTAC with the ability to see through walls in order to 'detect people within a structure or rubble.' Another page of the document, listing the agency's 'Subterranean Portfolio,' claims CBP is preparing to lay an additional 2,100 miles of fiber optic cable along the northern and southern border in order to detect passing migrants, as part of a sensor network that also includes seismic, laser, visual, and cellular tracking.
New York Post
a minute ago
- New York Post
Trump admin sent 6,000 ICE detainers to NYC — nearly all of them have been ignored, DHS says
The Trump administration has issued more than 6,000 immigration detainers pushing NYC authorities to hand over illegal immigrant criminals to the feds as part of its mass deportation effort, the Department of Homeland Security said Wednesday. That's a 400% increase compared to the Biden administration as the Trump administration surges Immigration and Customs Enforcement to sanctuary cities, DHS said. However, 'sanctuary politicians' in the Big Apple have 'honored only a handful' of the 6,000 detainers, 'sending violent criminals back onto the streets,' the agency said in a post on X. Advertisement 3 The Trump administration sent 6,000 ICE detainers to NYC, pushing local authorities to hand over illegal immigrant criminals to the feds as part of its mass deportation effort. James Messerschmidt 'Every New Yorker should know: their sanctuary politicians are working against law enforcement and RELEASING criminal illegal aliens with prior convictions for rape, murder, and drug trafficking back into their communities,' DHS said Wednesday. 'ICE will continue to enforce the law and protect American neighborhoods,' DHS added. 3 'ICE will continue to enforce the law and protect American neighborhoods,' the Department of Homeland Security stated. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement DHS Secretary Kristi Noem tore into Eric Adams on Monday over the city's sanctuary policies, blaming him for the shooting of an off-duty Customs and Border Protection officer by an illegal immigrant who had a lengthy rap sheet. Adams has said he wants to change sanctuary laws in New York, but he's constrained by the city council. 3 DHS Secretary Kristi Noem blames Mayor Eric Adams for the shooting of an off-duty Customs and Border Protection officer by an illegal immigrant who had a lengthy rap sheet. Getty Images Dominican illegal migrant Miguel Francisco Mora Nunez, 21, had already received a deportation order before he allegedly ambushed the officer and his female companion in Fort Washington Park late Saturday, Noem said. Advertisement 'There's absolutely zero reason that someone who is scum of the earth like this should be running loose on the streets of New York City,' Noem told reporters from Harlem Hospital, where she and President Trump's border czar Tom Homan said they met with the wounded 42-year-old agent's family. 'Make no mistake, this officer is in the hospital today, fighting for his life, because of the policies of the mayor of the city and the City Council and the people that were in charge of keeping the public safe refused to do so,' she said. 'When I look at what Mayor Adams has done to New York City, it breaks my heart to see the families that have suffered because of his policies.'
The Hill
a minute ago
- The Hill
US automakers say Trump's 15% tariff deal with Japan puts them at a disadvantage
WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. automakers are concerned about President Donald Trump's agreement to tariff Japanese vehicles at 15%, saying they will face steeper import taxes on steel, aluminum and parts than their competitors. 'We need to review all the details of the agreement, but this is a deal that will charge lower tariffs on Japanese autos with no U.S. content,' said Matt Blunt, president of the American Automotive Policy Council, which represents the Big 3 American automakers, General Motors, Ford and Jeep-maker Stellantis. Blunt said in an interview the U.S. companies and workers 'definitely are at a disadvantage' because they face a 50% tariff on steel and aluminum and a 25% tariff on parts and finished vehicles, with some exceptions for products covered under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement that went into effect in 2020. The domestic automaker reaction reveals the challenge of enforcing policies across the world economy, showing that for all of Trump's promises there can be genuine tradeoffs from policy choices that risk serious blowback in politically important states such as Michigan and Wisconsin, where automaking is both a source of income and of identity. Trump portrayed the trade framework as a major win after announcing it on Tuesday, saying it would add hundreds of thousands of jobs to the U.S. economy and open the Japanese economy in ways that could close a persistent trade imbalance. The agreement includes a 15% tariff that replaces the 25% import tax the Republican president had threatened to charge starting on Aug. 1. Japan would also put together $550 billion to invest in U.S. projects, the White House said. The framework with Japan will remove regulations that prevent American vehicles from being sold in that country, the White House has said, adding that it would be possible for vehicles built in Detroit to be shipped directly to Japan and ready to be sold. But Blunt said that foreign auto producers, including the U.S., Europe and South Korea, have just a 6% share in Japan, raising skepticism that simply having the open market that the Trump administration says will exist in that country will be sufficient. 'Tough nut to crack, and I'd be very surprised if we see any meaningful market penetration in Japan,' Blunt said. Major Japanese automakers Toyota, Honda and Nissan did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the trade framework, nor did Autos Drive America or the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, organizations that also represent the industry. There is the possibility that the Japanese framework would give automakers and other countries grounds for pushing for changes in the Trump administration's tariffs regime. The president has previously said that flexibility in import tax negotiations is something he values. The USMCA is up for review next year. Ford, GM and Stellantis do 'have every right to be upset,' said Sam Fiorani, vice president at consultancy AutoForecast Solutions. But 'Honda, Toyota, and Nissan still import vehicles from Mexico and Canada, where the current levels of tariffs can be higher than those applied to Japanese imports. Most of the high-volume models from Japanese brands are already produced in North America.' Fiorani noted that among the few exceptions are the Toyota 4Runner, the Mazda CX-5 and the Subaru Forester, but most of the other imports fill niches that are too small to warrant production in the U.S. 'There will be negotiations between the U.S. and Canada and Mexico, and it will probably result in tariffs no higher than 15%,' Fiorani added, 'but nobody seems to be in a hurry to negotiate around the last Trump administration's free trade agreement.'
