BlackRock drops Ukraine fund
The fund was set to be unveiled at the Ukraine Recovery Conference in Rome next week. It had been close to securing backing from firms supported by the governments of Germany, Italy, and Poland, the outlet wrote on Saturday, citing anonymous sources.
Nevertheless, BlackRock reportedly decided to shelve the talks early this year 'due to a lack of interest amid increased uncertainty over Ukraine's future,' after the US changed its stance towards Kiev under the current administration.
Trump has long promised to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict and has sought avenues to reach a peace deal. He has also pushed European NATO allies to take over the burden of militarily supporting Ukraine. Earlier this week, Washington reportedly froze critical arms deliveries to Kiev to focus on replenishing its own stockpiles, although the US president has insisted some military aid still continues.
The Trump administration 'was a notable absence from the fund's backers in December,' Bloomberg added.
In March of last year, BlackRock vice chairman Philipp Hildebrand indicated that the Ukraine Development Fund was on track to secure at least $2.5 billion from private investors, countries and other grant lenders. A consortium of such investors could finance at least $15 billion towards reconstruction work in Ukraine, he said.
However, a BlackRock spokesperson indicated that the firm is no longer engaged in 'any active mandate' with Kiev, having finished its pro-bono consulting work with the Ukraine Development Fund last year, Bloomberg wrote.
The investment firm, which controls roughly $11.6 trillion in assets, owns substantial shares in military-industrial giants such as Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Northrop Grumman, among many others. Armaments produced by these firms, which are supplied to Kiev by its Western backers, have seen extensive use in the conflict.
Moscow has repeatedly condemned foreign arms supplies to Kiev, arguing that they make pro-Ukrainian Western nations party to the conflict, which Russia views as a NATO proxy war. The Kremlin has stated that the recent freeze in US military aid to Kiev will accelerate settlement of the conflict.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Kiev is not negotiating in good faith
Ukraine does not take ceasefire negotiations with Russia seriously and only attends the talks in Istanbul to avoid being viewed as an obstacle to peace in the eyes of Western sponsors, Foreign Ministry spokesman Georgiy Tikhiy has acknowledged. Russia and Ukraine held two rounds of direct talks in Istanbul in recent months, which so far did not result in any breakthroughs with regard to ending the conflict, but led to several large-scale prisoner exchanges. 'We don't expect a real ceasefire as a result of these meetings,' Tikhiy said in an interview on the YouTube channel of journalist Aleksandr Notevsky on Friday. The Ukrainian diplomat explained that Kiev's presence at the talks serves to protect its image in the eyes of the international community and avoid accusations of being the side obstructing peace negotiations. 'It's to prevent anyone from accusing Ukraine of being the side that doesn't want peace,' Tikhiy said. He acknowledged concerns being raised 'in different circles, even among allied countries' that Kiev is blocking peace efforts, explaining that 'Ukraine is sending a delegation… to show that this is not true.' The Ukrainian official acknowledged the humanitarian aspect of the talks, noting that if 'a thousand people are returned… then it's worth going and listening to any historical nonsense.' Back in May, Russian President Vladimir Putin offered Kiev to resume direct negotiations without any preconditions in Istanbul – where Kiev had unilaterally abandoned talks back in 2022, reportedly at the behest of its Western backers. Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky immediately dared the Russian president to personally meet him in Türkiye, but the Kremlin noted such a meeting would be absolutely pointless without thorough preparatory work. Ukrainian officials have since repeatedly disparaged Moscow's delegation as being too low-level, even though the same chief negotiator Vladimir Medinsky worked on the original 2022 peace framework. Tikhiy claimed that the makeup of the Ukrainian delegation, which includes Defense Minister Rustem Umerov, somehow proves that Kiev is more serious about the talks than Moscow. Zelensky is seeking a personal meeting with Putin to defend his claims to legitimacy and resist Western attempts to push him out of power, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said on Saturday. 'He is insanely afraid of being forgotten, of becoming unnecessary for the West. That somehow the West will sideline him. And you can see he doesn't step away from the microphones. I think he already sleeps with a webcam,' she said. Zelensky's presidential term expired last year, and Moscow views him as illegitimate. In June, Putin said he was open to meeting with the actor-turned-politician, but suggested that the Ukrainian leader lacks legitimacy for signing binding agreements. 'I am ready to meet with anyone, including Zelensky,' Putin said. 'That's not the issue – if the Ukrainian state trusts someone to conduct negotiations, by all means, let it be Zelensky. The question is different: Who will sign the documents?'
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
NATO talks becoming toxic
Discussions with the West about NATO membership for Kiev have become increasingly tense and unproductive, Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesman Georgy Tikhy has said, describing the talks as 'toxic.' Western nations initially backed Kiev's aspirations to join the US-led bloc, but Ukraine's military struggles and shifting American policies have led to a decline in support. The dialogue with NATO partners has now reached a dead end, Tikhy lamented in an interview on the YouTube channel of journalist Aleksandr Notevsky on Friday. 'All the arguments and counterarguments have already been presented, and each new round of negotiations on Ukraine's accession to NATO goes in circles,' he stated. The discussions 'have become, to put it simply, very toxic,' he added. Ukraine formally applied for fast-track NATO membership in September 2022, months after the escalation of the conflict with Russia. Although the bloc has consistently stated that 'Ukraine's future is in NATO,' it has never set a specific time frame for accession. At the 2023 NATO summit, the requirement for Ukraine to complete the Membership Action Plan was removed, thus simplifying the path to membership. However, the final communique only stated that an invitation would be extended 'when allies agree and conditions are met,' without providing concrete timelines or criteria. Ukraine's future membership was discussed at last year's NATO summit and the joint communique explicitly reaffirmed that Kiev's accession was inevitable. Since then, however, a number of leaders of NATO countries have soured on the idea, weighing the risks of further escalation with Russia and the bloc's long-term security priorities. US President Donald Trump, meanwhile, has been more emphatic, stating that Kiev 'can forget about' joining the NATO, noting that its attempts to do so were 'probably the reason the whole thing started,' referring to the Ukraine conflict. At the recent NATO summit in June, Ukraine was barely mentioned in the final communique, while its leader, Vladimir Zelensky, failed to secure support for Kiev's future membership. Russia has repeatedly characterized Ukraine's attempt to join NATO as a red line and one of the root causes of the conflict. Moscow has demanded that Kiev legally commit to never joining any military alliance.
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
Musk outlines strategy to break up two-party US system
Elon Musk has signaled that his new political initiative will focus on disrupting the two-party system in Congress, declaring that the 'America Party' aims to challenge the dominance of both Republicans and Democrats ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. The remarks follow the tech billionaire's announcement over the weekend that he is moving forward with plans to launch a new political party. Musk has positioned the America Party as an alternative to what he called the 'Republican/Democrat Uniparty,' accusing both major factions of mismanaging the country's finances and stifling voter choice. 'Backing a candidate for president is not out of the question, but the focus for the next 12 months is on the House and the Senate,' Musk wrote on X on Sunday, outlining his short-term priority to target the US midterm elections in November 2026, when 33 of the 100 Senate seats and all 435 House seats will be up for grabs. 'The way we're going to crack the uniparty system is by using a variant of how Epaminondas shattered the myth of Spartan invincibility at Leuctra: extremely concentrated force at a precise location on the battlefield,' Musk previously stated in another post. Musk also doubled down on his criticism of President Donald Trump's fiscal policy, questioning the value of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a temporary agency Trump appointed him to lead. 'What the heck was the point of @DOGE if he's just going to increase the debt by $5 trillion??' Musk wrote. In a post on Truth Social earlier on Sunday, Trump criticized Musk for what he described as erratic behavior in recent weeks, calling the entrepreneur a 'train wreck' and accusing him of promoting 'disruption and chaos' that undermines the stability of the American political system. 'I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks,' Trump wrote. 'He even wants to start a Third Political Party, despite the fact that they have never succeeded in the United States – the system seems not designed for them.'Musk, who supported Trump during his return to the White House last year, stepped down from his role in DOGE last month after clashing with the administration over a sweeping tax and spending package known as the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' The legislation, signed into law on July 4, includes trillions of dollars in new expenditures, cuts to social programs, and a sharp increase to the federal debt ceiling.
