Our teeth evolved from fish 'body armor' over 460 million years, scientists discover
Our sensitive teeth originally evolved from the "body armor" of extinct fish that lived 465 million years ago, scientists say.
In a new study, the researchers showed how sensory tissue discovered on the exoskeletons of ancient fish is linked to the same "genetic toolkit" that produces human teeth.
"This shows us that 'teeth' can also be sensory even when they're not in the mouth," study co-author Yara Haridy, a paleontologist and evolutionary biologist at the University of Chicago, said in a statement. Haridy and colleagues published their findings Wednesday (May 21) in the journal Nature.
Originally, the researchers set out to identify the earliest vertebrate in the fossil record, seeking out fossil specimens from the Cambrian and Ordovician periods (541 million to 443 million years ago). One telltale sign of a vertebrate species is the presence of internal tubules for dentine, a calcified tissue that is found just underneath the enamel in human teeth, but that is found in external bumps in ancient fish armor.
While using high-resolution CT scans to investigate the jawless "first fish" species Anatolepis heintzi, the researchers discovered what looked like pores filled with dentine. To confirm this, they compared A. heintzi to a coterie of ancient fossils and modern marine life.
But as they looked more closely, they realized that the supposed dentine-lined pores were actually more like the sensory organs on the shells of crabs. A. heintz was therefore an ancient invertebrate arthropod — not a vertebrate fish.
Related: Scientists discover new 15 million-year old fish with last meal fossilized inside its stomach
RELATED STORIES
—The Mariana Trench is home to some weird deep sea fish, and they all have the same, unique mutations
—This fish has 555 teeth … and it loses 20 every day
—Likeness of Cambrian critter finally revealed, and it looks like a taco
Clearing up the confusion about the categorization of A. heintz led to an important new insight: Ancient vertebrates like fish and ancient arthropods were making the same mineralized tissue to help them sense their environment. Eventually, that mineralized tissue evolved into dentine — and into our sensitive teeth.
The new study supports the idea that sensory structures evolved on exoskeletons at least 460 million years ago, and then later in evolutionary history, animals used the same "genetic toolkit" to make teeth.
"Viewed through this evolutionary lens, the fact that teeth in the mouth are extremely sensitive is less of a mystery, and more a reflection of their evolutionary origins within the sensory armor of early vertebrates," the researchers wrote in the study.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
E&E News
31 minutes ago
- E&E News
Marjorie Taylor Greene introduces ‘weather modification' ban
One of President Donald Trump's top allies on Capitol Hill has introduced legislation to stop potential human meddling with the weather. On Tuesday, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) said she filed the 'Clear Skies Act' to ban 'weather modification' and geoengineering. It comes as online conspiracy theorists claim without evidence that weather-altering technology was behind the recent catastrophic flooding in Texas. 'Finally, we can really take the fight in Washington to protect our skies, protect our water, protect our atmospheres, and most of all, protect our families,' Greene said in a video posted on social media. Advertisement Greene's office provided the text of the bill, which has been designated H.R. 4403.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Dramatic rise in gastrointestinal cancers in people under 50
There has been a dramatic rise in gastrointestinal cancers in people under the age of 50, according to a new review. Gastrointestinal cancers, such as colorectal cancer and pancreatic cancer, 'represent the most rapidly increasing early-onset cancer in the US,' researchers wrote in a review published in The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Thursday. Colorectal cancer, which develops in the colon or rectum, was the most common among early-onset gastrointestinal cancers in the U.S. in 2022, with just over 20,800 people diagnosed. There were 2,689 diagnoses of Gastric cancer, which develops in the stomach lining, that year, followed by 2,657 diagnoses of pancreatic cancer and 875 diagnoses of esophageal cancer. There has been a dramatic rise in gastrointestinal cancers in people under the age of 50, according to a new review (Getty Images) Most early-onset gastrointestinal cancers are linked to risk factors that could be changed, such as obesity, poor-quality diet, and a somewhat inactive lifestyle. Smoking cigarettes and drinking alcohol are other risk factors. 'It's really what people were doing or exposed to when they were infants, children, adolescents that is probably contributing to their risk of developing cancer as a young adult,' Dr. Kimmie Ng, the review's co-author and director of the Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer Center at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, told NBC News. There are also risk factors that patients don't have control over such as family history and hereditary syndromes. People with early-onset colorectal cancer could have inflammatory bowel disease. Researchers wrote in the review: 'The prognosis for patients with early-onset GI cancers is similar to or worse than that for patients with later-onset GI cancers, highlighting the need for improved methods of prevention and early detection.' The American Cancer Society recommends people at average risk of colorectal cancer start regular screening at the age of 45. Before 2018, the ACS recommended screenings start at the age of 50. 'It never used to happen in this age group, and now a very significant rise in 20-, 30- and 40-year-olds are getting colon cancer,' Dr. John Marshall, chief medical consultant at the nonprofit Colorectal Cancer Alliance, who was not involved in the review, told NBC News. It's still unclear why young patients with gastrointestinal cancers could have worse survival rates than older patients. 'My personal feeling is that it's because we're finding them at a more advanced stage, because people don't really think of colon or other GI cancers when they see a young person with these nonspecific complaints,' Dr. Howard Hochster, director of gastrointestinal oncology at Rutgers Cancer Institute and RWJBarnabas Health in New Jersey, who was not involved in the review, told NBC News. But Ng said even when taking the stage of cancer into account, young patients still seem to have worse survival rates, and questioned whether there's a biological reason.
Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
Underserved students interested in STEM are often overlooked
The STEM talent shortage in the U.S. isn't caused by lack of student interest in science, technology, engineering, and math. It is caused by us overlooking and under-supporting the students who are most capable of driving the innovation economy forward. For years, policymakers have rung alarm bells about the shrinking American STEM pipeline. The data is sobering: While Japan, China, and Korea award over 40% of their college degrees in STEM fields, the U.S. lags behind at under 20%, according to the Center for Security and Emerging Technology. As the global economy becomes more knowledge-based, America's ability to compete depends on whether we can widen and diversify the pool of STEM talent. Much of the public narrative around STEM has mainly focused on students who are behind grade level and need additional supports to catch up. But an equally urgent and far less discussed issue is the vast population of students who are ready to accelerate but remain invisible in our systems. Schools need to actively recruit students According to a report by The Education Trust and Equal Opportunity Schools (EOS), more than 640,000 Black, Latino, and low-income students who are academically capable are missing from Advanced Placement (AP) and International Baccalaureate courses each year. These students often attend schools that offer advanced coursework, but they are not actively enrolled in those programs. The problem isn't one of supply. The courses exist. The opportunity gap lives inside the enrollment lists. Even more telling, College Board data shows that many Black and Latino students have already demonstrated their potential to succeed in AP-level math and science through PSAT performance. Yet they are never invited to take the leap. The result? A leaky pipeline that loses capable students who might have become engineers, data scientists, or biotech innovators. At EOS, we've partnered with hundreds of districts across the country to identify and enroll these 'missing students.' Our work proves that when schools take an intentional, data-driven approach to proactively recruit underrepresented students into rigorous courses the results are transformative. Students are ready for advanced coursework This isn't about fixing students; it's about fixing opportunity and adult mindsets. A rigorous independent evaluation by George Smith and researchers at Mathematica found EOS significantly increased AP course enrollment—particularly among underserved students. Practically, this means enrolling an average of 52 additional students per school—two full classrooms of previously overlooked young people. Furthermore, there was no difference in the schools' average AP exam performance, which underscores an important truth: These students were always ready for advanced coursework. Without proactively identifying and enrolling them, they would have continued to fall through the cracks. Targeted supports yield substantial returns Identifying and enrolling students is only the beginning. To ensure students and teachers thrive, capacity-building must follow enrollment. The National Math and Science Initiative (NMSI) College Readiness Program has shown that, in participating schools, students enrolled in more AP science courses and increased the number of earned college credits. Female students and Black students, in particular, saw significant gains. Within six years, 28% of Black NMSI students earned STEM degrees—compared to 12% of the general national student population. Among female students, 27% of NMSI students earned STEM degrees within six years—versus 12% nationally. What made the difference? A multi-tiered support system: ongoing teacher training, student prep sessions, curriculum resources, reduced exam fees, and targeted incentives. This type of capacity-building suggests that small, targeted investments can yield substantial returns. Unlike intensive interventions designed to help students reach grade-level proficiency, many high-potential students hovering just below AP readiness may benefit from lighter-touch supports such as adaptive learning tools to fine-tune gaps, short-term tutoring to reinforce core concepts, and professional development that equips teachers to deliver rigorous, culturally affirming instruction. The good news is this approach may be more scalable than we think. The marginal cost of providing these additional supports for students who are already academically proximate to advanced coursework is relatively low compared to the long-term payoff in postsecondary success and workforce readiness. Strategic touchpoints with adaptive learning, targeted tutoring, and additional resources can significantly propel students forward. Unleashing the full potential of those ready to soar—especially when so many of them have been overlooked for far too long, yields meaningful dividends for students. EOS-identified students have passed over 290,000 AP exams since 2011-2012, which would amount to roughly $345 million in college tuition and fee savings for EOS-partner students and their families based on trends in pricing. Final thoughts The STEM pipeline isn't just leaking at the bottom—it's leaking at the top too. Policymakers, educators, and business leaders must center opportunity as the foundation for improving outcomes. Bold action is required, such as establishing competitive grant programs for states and districts to increase enrollment and success of underrepresented students in advanced coursework. Investing in students ready to accelerate, leveraging adaptive learning and targeted tutoring, and scaling proven initiatives like EOS and NMSI are essential next steps. Our economic future and national competitiveness depend on fully tapping all of America's talent.
