logo
Two children charged after alleged car theft and police chase

Two children charged after alleged car theft and police chase

News.com.au11-07-2025
Two siblings have been charged after allegedly stealing a car and ramming a police vehicle, sparking a police chase in northeast NSW.
Police arrested a 13-year-old boy and his 12-year-old sister following a short pursuit.
Police said the incident began just after noon on July 10 when a car was reported stolen from an automotive business on Vivian St in Inverell.
Police spotted the vehicle shortly after on Byron Lane.
They allege the boy, who was driving, rammed their police car before speeding away.
A pursuit began but ended shortly after when the car crashed into another vehicle on Laurence St.
Paramedics treated the pair for minor injuries before they were taken to Inverell District Hospital.
Police confirmed no one in the other vehicle was hurt.
The boy was charged with taking and driving a car without the consent of the owner, negligent driving, and using an offensive weapon to avoid arrest.
He was refused bail and is due to appear in a Children's Court on July 11.
The girl was charged with being carried in a car without consent of the owner.
She was granted conditional bail and is expected to front a Children's Court on August 7.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Salim Mehajer breaks silence after walking from prison
Salim Mehajer breaks silence after walking from prison

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Salim Mehajer breaks silence after walking from prison

Disgraced former politician and convicted domestic violence offender Salim Mehajer has shared his 'deep gratitude' in his first social media post after walking free from prison on Friday morning. Mehajer exited the gates of John Morony Correctional Centre at Berkshire Park in northwestern Sydney just after 9:30am and into a black Mercedes hire car, giving him his first taste of freedom in almost five years. In a heartfelt Instagram post on Saturday morning, Mehajer said he wanted to 'formally convey his deep gratitude' for the opportunity granted to him by the State Parole Authority. 'I am fully committed to fulfilling the expectations placed before me,' he wrote. 'Additionally, I express my sincere appreciation for the unwavering support of my family and friends, as well as the dedication of my legal representative, who has consistently stood by me throughout this journey.' Mehajer added that he requests privacy, ahead of his appeal scheduled for three weeks time. Meanwhile, the former politician's first stops after freedom on Friday were to Parramatta Westfield, Service NSW for a new drivers' licence and to a cosmetic dentist in Hornsby to fix his smile after years behind bars, the Daily Mail reported. Hornsby Dental offers teeth whitening from $549, composite veneers starting at $700 and full mouth implants starting at $24,990 per arch. He did not stop to speak to waiting media as he left custody, but his lawyer, Zawat Zreika of Zreika Law, told NewsWire the former Auburn Mayor's concern was primarily for his family. 'Mr Mehajer has now been released from custody,' she said. 'This is a long awaited and deeply personal moment for him and his family. 'He asks that their privacy be respected during this time.' The 39-year-old former Auburn deputy mayor was released after the expiry of a non-parole period he was serving for domestic violence and fraud offences. He has been in prison just short of five years and has served back-to-back sentences for multiple offences.

Why Mark Latham is likely to remain in NSW parliament
Why Mark Latham is likely to remain in NSW parliament

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Why Mark Latham is likely to remain in NSW parliament

As politicians call for Mark Latham's conduct in parliament to be investigated by the privileges committee, a top constitutional lawyer says it would be "very, very difficult" to have him expelled even if the allegations were proven. It follows media reports he allegedly took photos of female colleagues speaking in parliament and made disparaging comments about them in private messages and participated in a consensual sex video in his office. Mr Latham has denied any wrongdoing. In posts on X, Mr Latham said the media had used his messages out of context, cherry-picking and missing in-jokes. Of the alleged sex video, Mr Latham has repeatedly said no media claimed to have seen the alleged tape and there was "no suggestion of any law or rule broken". NSW Premier Chris Minns said on Thursday if proved true, Mr Latham's alleged behaviour in the parliamentary chamber "almost certainly" broke standing orders. Mr Minns said the privileges committee should investigate the allegations and "make a decision about sanctioning him". in an interview with 2SM, Mr Latham said he had not breached any standing order of NSW parliament. The leader of government in the upper house, Penny Sharpe, has also said she would move a motion to refer Mr Latham to the privileges committee for allegedly "disclosing authorised information" after he used parliamentary privilege to allegedly reveal confidential information from a psychologist's report prepared for civil proceedings brought by MP Alex Greenwich. Mr Latham said his remarks were not based on confidential information. He asked for a fair go from voters who said he should leave parliament. "They've got a rigorous process there about behaviour inside the parliament, a complaints officer, a committee of woke people who monitor what you do in the building," he said. "I've never received notification of any complaint through that process. "So for any of you listeners saying kick him off, what happened to the principle of innocent and innocent until proven guilty?" Mr Latham's parliamentary term expires in 2031. University of Sydney professor of constitutional law Anne Twomey said NSW parliament had the power to expel MPs — unlike in federal parliament after such powers were abolished in 1987. But she added that in NSW it was "very, very hard to expel" an MP. Professor Twomey said an MP could face expulsion if they committed criminal offences or engaged in conduct that brings the house into disrepute; however, this has very rarely happened since the 1800s. "As a general principle, it only gets used when the person has had findings made against them," she said. Mr Latham is not accused of any criminal offences, and no inappropriate conduct has been proven. While Mr Minns said if the allegations against Mr Latham were proven "in a typical workplace, he'd be gone tomorrow", he acknowledged it was voters who elected him to parliament. Professor Twomey said the threshold for expulsion was very high, and there were many historic examples of MPs who had avoided expulsion threats. In 1997, NSW Labor MP Franca Arena faced a motion calling for her suspension until she apologised after using parliamentary privilege to allege a criminal conspiracy by certain politicians to cover up paedophilia, which a special commission concluded was false. She refused to apologise but read a statement of regret, which attracted enough support from enough Coalition and crossbench MPs to avoid suspension. Another ground for expulsion is bankruptcy. In Victoria, former state Liberal leader John Pesutto narrowly avoided bankruptcy and possible expulsion from parliament after he was able to secure a loan from the party to help cover a $2.3 million legal payout he owes MP Moira Deeming from a defamation case. Mr Latham was last year ordered to pay $140,000 in a defamation suit after making graphic, homophobic comments in a tweet about Mr Greenwich and has appealed. The extent of Mr Latham's financial resources and ability to pay is not clear. The NSW parliament also has powers to temporarily suspend MPs and in 2022 the then-Coalition government suspended two of its MPs. Professor Twomey said the power to expel or suspend MPs was problematic, as it could be used for political purposes. "I think the better answer would be maybe shorter terms for the Legislative Council so that the people in the end get to decide."

Victoria's children's commissioner concedes 'no-one' overseeing key decisions of office, Joshua Brown red flag
Victoria's children's commissioner concedes 'no-one' overseeing key decisions of office, Joshua Brown red flag

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Victoria's children's commissioner concedes 'no-one' overseeing key decisions of office, Joshua Brown red flag

Victoria's children's commissioner has conceded "no-one" is overseeing key decisions of her office after revelations it failed to act on red flags raised about accused child abuser Joshua Brown. The ABC revealed on Saturday that the Commission for Children and Young People was aware Mr Brown's employer had investigated and substantiated two complaints that he was aggressive towards children in the two years before his arrest. The finding would typically trigger a Working with Children Check review but the commission used discretionary powers not to escalate his case, clearing the way for him to continue working with an exclusive interview with the ABC, the commission's Acting Principal Commissioner Meena Singh refused to say whether it was the wrong decision, pointing to laws that prevented her from speaking about specific cases. "I'm not commenting on whether it is the wrong decision," Ms Singh said. Ms Singh said the decision was ultimately made by the children's commissioner at that time, Liana Buchanan. Asked directly who oversaw the commission's use of its discretionary powers, Ms Singh conceded: "No-one." The commission is now reviewing similar cases where it used its discretionary powers not to refer substantiated findings for a Working with Children Check review. But its actions in Mr Brown's case will not be scrutinised as part of a "rapid review" of safety in childcare — the state government excluding the operation of the regulators from its terms of reference. "We will be reviewing our work," Ms Singh said. "We also welcome any other scrutiny that the government might feel appropriate." Mr Brown, 26, has been charged with 70 offences, including sexual assault, related to eight children at Point Cook's Creative Garden childcare centre between April 2022 and January 2023. Authorities took the rare step of publicly identifying him and listing the 24 centres where he worked, as they called for 2,000 children to be tested for sexually transmitted diseases. The ABC has been examining Mr Brown's work history, uncovering a series of red flags that have raised questions about how he was able to move from centre to centre. He was sacked from Nido Early Learning in 2021 over his handling of an incident report, three months before he started work at Creative Garden, the centre where he is alleged to have abused children. The operator of Creative Garden, G8, notified authorities of two "reportable allegations" about Mr Brown's conduct, finding he "aggressively" picked up a child in 2023 and "forcibly" handled two others in a separate incident the following year. Both reports came after Mr Brown's alleged sexual offending but more than two years before he was arrested. He resigned during the second investigation but, with no review of his Working with Children Check, went on to work at 13 other centres. The ABC understands only the worker, childcare operator and family at the centre of an investigation are informed of the outcome, leaving future employers in the dark about previous allegations. "I'd like to see organisations be able to access the information that they need to be able to determine whether someone is not only eligible to work with children and young people … but also whether they're suitable," Ms Singh said. "Sometimes that information isn't readily available for organisations." The commission's handling of Mr Brown's case has brought into focus its operation of the Reportable Conduct Scheme. Through the scheme, the commission oversees how organisations such as childcare centres respond to and investigate allegations of sexual or physical misconduct involving a child. Victoria has recorded a sharp rise in the number of notifications to the scheme — up 30 per cent in the year to 2023-24, and 136 per cent since it began seven years earlier. But Ms Singh said government funding to operate the scheme had not increased. The ABC understands the commission has previously lobbied for more funding but has been knocked back. "I think we're compromised in delivering the Reportable Conduct Scheme to its fullest benefits," Ms Singh said. "Sometimes we're not able to pick up on or dive deeper into those lower-level things that you might find that could indicate a potential pattern of behaviour or potential types of behaviour that indicate certain other things," she said. "I'm not saying this to make excuses but there's a lot that we see that we wish we could do more with."The government did not respond to the ABC's questions about whether it would increase the commission's funding, or whether it would give the commission more powers to share details of investigations or findings with childcare operators. Liana Buchanan also declined to comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store