
Kagame urges African unity, self-reliance at Africa CEO Forum panel
ABIDJAN – Rwandan President Paul Kagame on Monday called for greater cooperation among African nations and less dependence on external powers, urging the continent to set its own course during remarks at the Africa CEO Forum 2025 in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
'We can't keep depending on what others are saying or doing about us,' Kagame stated during a presidential panel discussion on the first day of the forum. 'We need to be working with each other and other countries on the global stage that offer what we need, and offer what they need.'
Kagame emphasised the need for long-term planning over reactive policymaking. He argued that Africa should focus on building internal resilience rather than solely reacting to decisions made elsewhere, referencing potential policy shifts under leaders like US President Donald Trump.
'I think we have to put everything into context,' Mr Kagame elaborated. 'Whatever Trump President Trump has decided or whatever anybody else will decide in the near future there is a history to how we've been going about things for decades as Africa. So it isn't like we should just wake up one morning and uh because of what somebody has done that affects us we should have been building up the momentum in terms of what we need to do to make Africa self-dependent and resilient and also in how Africa works with other continents and other countries. So that that is the context.'
He added: 'So uh in in this case it is as well that uh President Trump decided to do what uh he did. If that was only to add to many other reminders or things that should wake us up to as Africa be able to do what we ought to do and and there are many opportunities. Uh we always talk about- potential of our continent but when do we realize really what this potential uh is all about in reality? I think that has always been the question. And that comes back to us as a continent as a people of this continent to take the bull by its horns and and deal with the problem.'
The presidential panel also included South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, Mauritanian President Mohamed Ould Ghazouani, and Ivorian Vice President Tiémoko Meyliet Kone.
Ramaphosa echoed the theme of African agency, particularly concerning peace processes on the continent. 'But in the endwe must also remember the principle that we have adopted as Africa that African problems Or African solutions for African problems,' he said. 'In the end the end and President Kagame knows this whatever discussions are happening in the end has to be endorsed signed off and owned and appropriated by us as Africans. Because this is our continent. We are in charge of the future of this continent and we must build peace ourselves because we live on this continent and therefore we have a deep responsibility to ensure that peace does indeed prevail.'
Acknowledging the role of international partners, Mr Ramaphosa added: 'And what they are doing with Qatar US or whoever is part of the peace-building process but it is inherently African. And we must thank and applaud those who are assisting because they are our partners but we are the owners of the whole process ourselves as Africans.'
Addressing peace efforts specifically, including the conflict in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, Ramaphosa stated: 'I'd like to compliment rather than contradict what President Kagame is saying the processes that have been happening on the continent either the Nairobi Process or the Luanda Process or the AU Process have been very very essential in building a foundation of peacemaking and also confidence-building up to and including agreements that have been reached for a ceasefire between the belligerents up to and including the withdrawal of say the SADC forces as they are withdrawing now.' He also noted the cooperative relationship between himself and President Kagame, despite potential perceptions of conflict.
Mauritanian President Mohamed Ould Ghazouani focused on the role of the private sector. 'It is true that in Mauritania we are in a vision that gives a capital importance of the private sector in the creation of jobs creation of uh of added valued and make the private sector a locomotive of uh economic development,' he said.
Ghazouani stressed that increased pressure on governments to deliver necessitates a greater role for private enterprise. 'Indeed you know that uh the pressure has increased on the government for the accomplishment of their mission- and we are actually trying to mobilize public resources. And uh this reality is uh obliging the private sector to be a key sector that is essential for financing and also the uh provision of the of services in favor of development.'
He added that state commitment is essential for the private sector to fulfil this role effectively. 'We are convinced that uh the private sector cannot uh fully uh play this role if the states is not committed and putting necessary reforms to build an environment that will be more attractive that will guarantee the legal security of the investments whether na- at the national level international level mo- modernization of infra- infrastructure promotion of human resources.' He cited Mauritania's efforts, including new electricity codes and investment laws, as confirmation of the 'willingness to favoremergence of a dynamic private sector that will bring uh more growth and also um employments as well.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily News Egypt
8 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
Egypt deepens global transport, industrial partnerships through strategic engagement at Connectivity Forum
During his visit to Türkiye to participate in the Global Transport Connectivity Forum 2025, Egypt's Deputy Prime Minister for Industrial Development and Minister of Industry and Transport, Kamel Al-Wazir, spearheaded a comprehensive diplomatic and investment outreach aimed at reinforcing Egypt's global role in transport and industrial integration. Al-Wazir's mission included a series of high-level meetings with international industry leaders, starting with Ugur Dalbeler, Vice President of the World Steel Association and Deputy Head of Türkiye's Steel Producers Association. The two sides discussed expanding collaboration in the iron and steel sector, a strategic industrial priority for Egypt. Al-Wazir underlined Egypt's determination to localise heavy industries, enhance domestic manufacturing, and grow exports through the adoption of advanced global technologies and mutually beneficial partnerships. At a roundtable hosted by the Turkish Independent Industrialists' and Businessmen's Association (MÜSİAD), the minister addressed leading Turkish investors across sectors such as textiles, chemicals, food processing, logistics, and energy. He presented Egypt's competitive edge, including its young and cost-efficient labour force, prime geographic location linking Africa, Asia, and Europe, and preferential access to international markets through over a dozen free trade agreements. These advantages, he said, establish Egypt as a prime hub for manufacturing, exports, and global trade. Al-Wazir also took part in the forum's high-level ministerial session, 'The Future of Connectivity in a Fragmented World,' alongside Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan and representatives from the United Nations. In his remarks, he spotlighted Egypt's investment in multimodal transport corridors that integrate regional production zones with international trade routes. He stressed the central role of the Suez Canal—through which over 100 vessels transit daily—and detailed ongoing upgrades to Egypt's seaports, logistics centres, and high-speed rail lines as part of a broader vision to reinforce the country's logistical connectivity. Further advancing regional cooperation, Al-Wazir met with Bulgarian Deputy Prime Minister Grozdan Karadjov to accelerate bilateral agreements in maritime and logistics. Key among these was a planned memorandum of understanding between Alexandria Port and Bulgaria's Port of Burgas. The talks also explored joint industrial ventures focused on technology transfer and coordinated exports to African markets. Al-Wazir stressed that Egypt is transitioning from a traditional transit corridor to a fully integrated hub for transport and production. He presented Egypt as a stable and strategic partner within global supply chains, contributing actively to initiatives such as China's Belt and Road Initiative, the India-Middle East-Europe Corridor (IMEC), and the emerging Development Road linking Iraq, the Gulf, and Europe. Concluding his visit, Al-Wazir reaffirmed Egypt's commitment to strengthening regional and global economic integration. He extended an open invitation to international partners—particularly from Türkiye and Bulgaria—to invest in Egypt's transport infrastructure and manufacturing sectors. Emphasising the importance of shared infrastructure, technology-driven planning, and resilient logistics networks, he reiterated Egypt's readiness to support investors committed to engaging with its real economy and contributing to a redefined regional trade landscape.


Daily News Egypt
9 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
Digital services tax sparks new trade dispute as US halts talks with Canada
US President Donald Trump on Friday halted all trade negotiations with Canada over Ottawa's new digital services tax, which will affect American tech giants. Trump described the tax as a 'blatant attack' on the United States, escalating political tensions amid his ambitions to potentially annex Canada. 'Based on this egregious tax, we are hereby ending all trade discussions with Canada, effective immediately,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'We will be notifying Canada of the tariffs they will be paying to do business with the United States within the next seven days.' Trump has repeatedly expressed his opposition to digital services taxes during trade negotiations with other countries, viewing them as a 'non-tariff trade barrier.' Canada's new digital tax is scheduled to take effect next Monday and will be applied retroactively from 2022. In response, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said Friday that he still wishes to continue negotiations with the United States. 'We will continue to conduct these complex negotiations in the best interest of Canadians. These are negotiations,' he told reporters. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent commented on CNBC on Friday, stating, 'We knew it was coming, and we were hoping it would not be implemented.' He added, 'We think it's fundamentally unfair to make it retroactive. This is a Trudeau-era issue, so we were hoping as a sign of goodwill that the new Carney administration would at least hold off on this tax during trade negotiations. But apparently, they did not.' Bessent indicated that if the Canadian government proceeds with the tax, Trump is prepared to impose higher tariffs on all Canadian goods, without specifying the rate. Canada is the largest buyer of American goods, importing $349bn worth last year, according to US Department of Commerce data. In turn, Canada exported $413bn in goods to the US, making it the third-largest source of foreign goods for the American market. The imposition of higher tariffs could provoke retaliatory measures from Canada, which some estimates suggest would cause economic harm to both nations. What is the Digital Services Tax? The government of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau passed Canada's Digital Services Tax Act in June 2024, with its rules coming into effect the same month. The federal tax applies to large foreign and domestic companies that meet two specific criteria: total global revenues of €750m or more, and annual earnings exceeding $20m from Canadian sources. The legislation imposes a 3% tax on digital services revenue exceeding $20m. It applies retroactively to January 1, 2022, which according to some estimates, means Ottawa could collect billions of dollars. Taxable revenues include earnings from online marketplaces, digital advertising, social media, and user data, which will primarily affect US tech giants such as Amazon, Apple, and Meta Platforms. Pierre Poilievre, leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, wrote in a social media post that he hoped both sides would return to the negotiating table: 'I am disappointed that trade talks have stalled. Hopefully they will resume soon.' Several Canadian companies and groups have expressed concern about proceeding with the tax, fearing an escalation of trade tensions with the US Why is Canada Imposing This Tax? A primary reason is to increase revenue. The Parliamentary Budget Office estimated last year that the tax would generate more than C$7bn over five years. The Liberal Party of Canada, under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, had promised to introduce the tax during the 2019 federal election. However, its implementation was delayed for several years as a number of countries hoped to reach a unified international digital tax plan. As delays continued, Canada decided to proceed with its own plan. In addition to raising revenue, Ottawa is promoting the tax as a way to modernise its tax system to include profits generated within Canada by foreign companies that do not have a physical presence in the country, according to the Toronto Star. What is the US Position on the Tax? The United States has strongly opposed the tax from the outset because it primarily affects American tech giants. US officials have argued that the tax discriminates against American companies. In a rare display of unity, both Democrats and Republicans in Congress have rejected Canada's plan and have been united in their criticism. Early in his second term, Trump had threatened to impose a 25% tariff on all Canadian exports, with the possibility of raising it further for some products. To date, most Canadian goods remain exempt from these tariffs, provided they comply with the United-States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which Trump negotiated during his first term. The most notable exceptions have been a 25% tariff on all foreign cars and parts, steel, and aluminum. Trump later doubled the tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to 50%. Canadian goods not compliant with the USMCA faced combined tariffs of 50%. In response to the auto tariffs, Canada imposed a 25% tariff on non-compliant US cars. It also retaliated against Trump's original steel and aluminum tariffs by imposing a 25% tariff on nearly $43bn of US goods, including alcoholic beverages, sports equipment, and home appliances. Despite Trump's latest tariff threats, US markets ended Friday on a high note. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq, which dipped slightly after Trump's post, rose 0.52% to close at record highs. The Dow Jones Industrial Average also climbed 432 points, or 1%. Why is Canada Not Delaying the Tax Amid Trade Tensions? Although Canadian and American business groups, organisations representing US tech giants, and several US lawmakers have signed letters in recent weeks calling for the tax to be repealed or at least postponed, Canadian Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne has stated that the law has been approved by Parliament and that Canada will move forward with its implementation. The Canadian Chamber of Commerce has argued that the tax could increase costs for consumers and risks 'damaging our mutually beneficial trading relationship with the United States.' 'In an effort to get trade talks back on track, Canada should immediately offer to repeal the Digital Services Tax in exchange for the removal of tariffs from the United States,' Goldy Hyder, the Chamber's President and CEO, told Bloomberg. How Could the United States Respond? Trump said he would withdraw from bilateral trade negotiations because Canada intends to proceed with the digital services tax, calling the move 'a direct and blatant attack on our country.' This has cast doubt on whether a 30-day deadline to reach an agreement in the trade dispute can be met. The previous administration of President Joe Biden also opposed the tax but sought to resolve the dispute differently. In August 2024, it requested dispute settlement consultations with Canada under the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). The US has said that American companies are obligated to pay Ottawa $2bn under the digital services tax. In a statement issued in February, Trump said, 'America alone should be allowed to tax American companies.' In response to the Canadian rules, tech giant Google is imposing an additional 2.5% fee on advertisements shown in Canada, effective October 2024. Google stated that the surcharge, named the 'Canada DST Fee,' will cover 'a portion of the costs of complying with Canada's DST legislation.' Do Other Countries Apply Similar Taxes? Yes. France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom, among others, all have such tax systems. According to the Tax Foundation Europe, about half of the European OECD countries have announced, proposed, or implemented a digital services tax. The United States has met these proposals with threats of retaliatory tariffs. France's Council of State, which advises the government on draft laws, has referred the country's digital services tax to the Constitutional Council for review, marking the first constitutional challenge to a DST since the legislation was passed in 2019.


Watani
9 hours ago
- Watani
US strikes on Iran: Point of no return?
The early hours of 22 June carried news and photographs of an arrogant, jubilant President Trump announcing that the U.S. had offered Israel the logistic and military support that enabled it to strike three nuclear reactor sites in Iran. Mr Trump praised the strike and lauded its masterful execution by Israel, sarcastically saying that that would not be a standalone operation, but would be followed by others if needs be. Other operations, he said, would naturally be easier given that Iran's claws have been clipped by the first strike and its nuclear capabilities curtailed. The American-led strike took many by surprise since Mr Trump had, just on the eve of the strike, talked of giving Israel and Iran 15-days to negotiate in Muscat, Oman, an agreement on Iran's nuclear programme. Yet I say it was no surprise, given that lies have recently gained ground as a modern means of strategic deception in conflict management, and promises of peace are made while preparing for stabs in the back. I see no excuse for the Iranians to have swallowed the US bait a second time, following the initial strike by Israel on 12 June. Now, with the second strike on Iran that targeted three nuclear sites, have we reached the point of no return? Does Iran have any power to avenge itself against Israel? And will any other country rush to support Iran just as the US supported Israel? As I write this, I see the coming days bringing on severe hazards that do not point at any peace between Iran and Israel. There are fears that Iran might, in desperation, execute some irrational retaliatory action; it brings to mind the saying: the hero is the one who's lost everything.. who has nothing left to lose. Today, I bring to my readers excerpts from a rich dialogue that, even if it took place prior to the US strike on Iran, introduced arguments that are still valid. The dialogue, which was broadcast on 20 June on Judge Andrew Napolitano's podcast 'Judging Freedom' under the title 'What if the US does attack Iran', took place with John Mearsheimer, 77, American political scientist and international relations scholar, R. Wendell Harrison Distinguished Service Professor at University of Chicago. Judge Napolitano started by asking: Is Israel prevailing in its war against Iran, as the mainstream in the West claims? In reply, Prof Mearsheimer said: 'No, Israel is in serious trouble… President Trump said Israel is winning… but the question is: what does winning mean?' To win, the Professor said, is to have a goal and the strategy to achieve it. Israel, he explained, has three stated goals: to eliminate the nuclear capability of Iran, to bring about a regime change and, as articulated by President Trump himself, unconditional surrender by Iran. The first goal cannot be achieved by Israel without US support, and even then Irans's nuclear programme, the uranium enrichment cannot be eliminated. As to the second goal, he said, regime change can never be achieved without invading Iran, something no one in his right mind would do. The third goal of unconditional surrender is laughable, because Iranians will fight till the last person before that happens. So Israelis have no way of achieving the goals they set out to do. Do any serious players actually believe that Iran has nuclear weapons? 'There's no evidence now that Iran has nuclear weapons… but there's no question that Iran has significant nuclear enrichment capabilities that takes them close to having a bomb… but they're a good distance from that now. But you can't tell that to Trump and Netanyahu.' Do you foresee a circumstance under which the Russians or the Chinese will get involved militarily? 'If you're talking about them getting directly involved in the fight, absolutely not. If you're talking about diplomatic, economic, or military support, the answer is certainly yes.' He explained that there is a vested interest for Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran to stick together against the US, Israel and Ukraine. So they will support one another but not get into the fight. Shouldn't there be in America a great debate about the nature and extent of our involvement in a war that could be disastrous? Why should a person who changes his mind every 10 minutes meet with five people who tell him what he wants to hear make this decision rather than great debates in the House and the Senate on America's role in the world? 'Oh it's very simple. You can't have a great debate on any issue involving Israel. It's just impermissible; the lobby won't allow it. And the reason is that if you have a debate it won't come out in Israel's favour, and this cannot be allowed.' The Professor joined Judge Napolitano in decrying the state of freedom and democracy in the US, and the manner in which decisions are taken. It all ran against the elevated principles that once prevailed in the West, they said, but which are now never upheld, even as the Israeli lobby wields authority over politicians and mainstream media, and as wars, destruction, and genocide are unashamedly promoted under false pretexts. This, they agreed is how the wars in Ukraine, Gaza, and Iran, are explained off. Watani International 27 June 2025 Comments comments