Vehicle crashes off hairpin turn on Mount Seymour Road in North Vancouver
Collision reconstruction experts were called to the winding mountain road that leads to Mount Seymour Resort on Saturday morning after a vehicle went off the roadway at a hairpin turn.
Images from the scene show a break in the concrete barriers along the side of Mount Seymour Road where the vehicle left the roadway. The vehicle itself cannot be seen from the road, as it has crashed down an embankment and into dense vegetation.
Cpl. Dave Noon, of the RCMP's Lower Mainland Integrated Collision Analysis and Reconstruction Service, posted on social media that the service had been deployed to the scene.
One lane of the road remained open in each direction, Noon said, adding that 'there is no anticipated time for fully reopening the roadway.'
District of North Vancouver firefighters could also be seen at the scene.
B.C. Emergency Health Services told CTV News it received a call about the crash shortly before 6:10 a.m. and dispatched two ambulances, one with primary care paramedics and the other with advanced care paramedics.
No patients were transported to hospital, BCEHS said.
CTV News has reached out to North Vancouver RCMP for more information about what happened and any fatalities that may have resulted from the crash. This story will be updated if a response is received.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
4 hours ago
- National Post
Everything you need to know about Ontario's bike-lane ruling
Article content With that, individual cyclists and an organization that advocates for cyclists in Toronto filed a lawsuit in January 2025, claiming that this amendment is a violation of Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms because it would infringe the right to life and security of the person by putting cyclists at greater risk of injury and death. They also argued that restoring the lanes for motor vehicles will not alleviate traffic congestion, which was the provincial government's stated purpose with its legislative changes. Article content The government said that if the applicant's position was found correct, it would make all traffic decisions subject to Charter scrutiny. The Ontario government also argued that if bike lanes were removed, it would help solve traffic issues in Toronto. Article content In April 2025, Schabas granted an injunction, which prevented the government from removing the bike lanes until a decision had been reached. Article content In June 2025, the amendments announced in November 2024 were changed by the government. Now, instead of requiring that the bike lanes be removed, the amendment stated that it would 'restore a lane for motor vehicle traffic … by reconfiguring the bicycle lanes.' With that, the provincial government said the lawsuit was no longer relevant, as the amendment was differently worded. Article content Article content (The court only found out a month after the changes were enacted.) Article content However, according to Schabas, the new changes made no meaningful change to the law or the dispute between the parties. Article content After reviewing the evidence from both parties, Schabas said that evidence shows that restoring lanes for cars will not result in less congestion, as it will induce more people to use cars and any reduction in congestion would only be over a short distance and, eventually, will lead to more congestion. The evidence provided by cyclists also showed that bike lanes can actually help alleviate traffic congestion, as it offers another safe option of transportation in the city. Article content 'The evidence presented by the (Ontario government) consists of weak anecdotal evidence and expert opinion which is unsupported,' said Schabas in his decision. Article content According to Schabas, the government has the right to make decisions about roads and traffic infrastructure, but if it puts people at risk, its actions can be restricted by the Charter. Article content Article content That has been one of the main criticisms of the ruling. However, Bruce Ryder, a professor emeritus of law at Osgoode Hall Law School, says that's not quite accurate. Article content 'We don't have a right to bike lanes … but we do have a right to not have governments taking actions, including the removal of bike lanes, that put lives and safety at risk,' said Ryder. Article content Ryder said that if there was evidence showing that removing bike lanes actually helped improve traffic flow, there would be no issue with having them removed. But because that is not the case, the government cannot prove that the decision achieves its goals. Article content 'If they (the government) did have evidence that removing the bike lanes would improve traffic flow, and if they did take steps to ensure that there were alternative routes that would protect people's safety, there would be no problem. There would be no constitutional issue,' said Ryder. Article content Schabas also said that the cyclists are not asking for the whole bill to be changed or for more bike lanes to be built, but just that these specific bike lanes are kept in the way they are. Article content When did Toronto build these bike lanes? Article content Since 2016, the city of Toronto has been expanding bike lanes in the city. In a 2024 report, the city outlined the investment for bike lanes and bike share, and said that by having that, Toronto would be a more successful city by giving people more choices to get around. Article content Since the bike lanes project started, there has been a decrease in traffic accidents involving cyclists, and an increase in the number of people using bikes to get around, according to the evidence presented in court. Article content The bike lane on Bloor Street. was completed in late 2016. The bike lanes on both University Avenue and Yonge Street. were first installed through ActiveTO, a project created by the city during the COVID-19 pandemic. About $27 million was spent to install these target bike lanes in three of the main roads of Toronto. Article content What were the reactions to the plan to remove the bike lanes in Toronto? Article content In statements, comments and open letters, Ontario Traffic Control, Ontario Professional Planners Institute, 120 physicians and researchers from the University of Toronto, Ontario Society of Professional Engineers and Toronto Parking Authority were all concerned about the bike lanes removal, claiming it would actually make traffic worse and give less transportation options to citizens. Article content The City of Toronto released reports showing why bike lanes are important and how there was nowhere to put them in the city without redesigning the road system. Mayor Olivia Chow also asked the provincial government to respect the local government's decision making around cycling infrastructure. Article content At the request of the provincial government, CIMA, an engineering company, provided a report on the matter. In the report, they said that while restoring a lane of motor vehicle traffic may seem to reduce traffic over a short distance, over a longer distance the benefits of it could not even be noticed due to other factors that influence traffic, like on-street parking, transit stops, bridges, and delays at intersections. Article content Schabas noted that just like internal advice before Bill 212 was passed, the CIMA report was only produced by the government when required in this court application and not before the bill was passed. Article content At the same time, the provincial government provided evidence explaining how the restoration of a lane for motor vehicles would help fix traffic in Toronto. However, Schabas said in his decision that the statements of Prabmeet Singh Sarkaria, the minister of transportation, and Premier Doug Ford are not supported by any data or internal analysis or advice. Article content Article content The government also claimed that only 1.2 per cent of trips are made by bicycle, which is inconsistent with the data the government had at the time. Just in June 2024, there were more than 760,000 trips made with bike share in the city. Article content The counsel for the provincial government argued that the experts consulted by the cyclists in this case are cycling advocates and that would make them biased. However, all the claims made by the experts in the case were made based on research, Schabas concluded. Article content What it might mean for other provinces/cities with similar plans Article content Following in Ontario's footsteps, the Alberta government is looking into making some changes in bike lanes in both Calgary and Edmonton. Article content Despite the recent developments in Ontario, Devin Dreeshen, Alberta's transportation minister, said that it's not ruling out the removal of bike lanes. The minister had a meeting with Calgary's mayor, Jyoti Gondek, to discuss the future of bike lanes in the city. Differently from Ontario, the two seemed to keep the conversation open to finding a solution for it.
CBC
4 hours ago
- CBC
Digging deeper: Saskatchewan producers look for greener way to mine lithium
Saskatchewan is home to large lithium deposits and a handful of the province's mining companies are betting on a green approach to take them global. Lithium is the main element in batteries, powering everything from smartphones to electric vehicles (EVs), which made up 17 per cent of all new cars sold in Canada in 2024. According to the United States Geological Survey, the global demand for lithium was up by nearly 18 per cent last year. "Demand is expected to continue to grow and that's coming mainly in the form of EVs," said Paul Schubach, chief operating officer for EMP Metals Corporation. He said there's a strong international interest in lithium, of which nearly 95 per cent of the metal comes from countries like Australia, Chile, China and Argentina. The majority of the mineral is then processed in China, which dominates the manufacturing of electric vehicle batteries. Schubach said Canada is far behind when it comes to producing lithium. " There's a lot of attention right now on North America and the EV boom that was expected to be there just hasn't quite taken off yet," he said. Environmental concerns around mining lithium There are many ways that lithium can be mined, but not all of them are environmentally safe. For instance, in South America, lithium is mined through expansive salt pools that hold salty water containing metals and minerals. In places like Chile, Bolivia and Argentina, the salty water is pumped to the surface, where it sits in massive pools to naturally evaporate, separating lithium from the other minerals. However, the extraction of brine has been found to reduce water levels in these areas, which can contaminate water sources with dangerous materials, becoming a danger to humans and animals who depend on it. The other common way of getting lithium is strip mining, or open pit mining, where lithium is removed by digging into hard rock below the ground. This can cause groundwater to dry up in nearby lakes, rivers and streams. There's also toxic chemicals used that can leak into water sources if not properly managed. With so many risks, some experts say that while extracting lithium is important, it shouldn't be thought of as a magic solution to climate change just because it powers the EV industry. What does that mean for Saskatchewan? It's no secret to Saskatchewan producers that lithium production can pose a harm to the environment. That's why a handful of companies in the province are looking to change that by pioneering a new way of getting the mineral out of the ground. Benjamin Sparrow, CEO of Saltworks Technologies, said instead of using traditional methods like hard rock mining or strip mining, more producers are now using direct lithium extraction (DLE), which takes it right out of the ground, separates out the lithium and recycles the groundwater. "It's underway and specifically underway in Canada," Sparrow said. He said DLE has the smallest environmental footprint and a "very small" land footprint for wells, electricity and water. Evaporation ponds are often not using a freshwater resource. Instead, Sparrow said they use a brine that is not intended for farming, drinking or other means because it's low-quality water. "The environmental footprint is largely associated with the ponds themselves, and as long as the ponds and the geotech is done right, there should not be any environmental concerns," he said. Teresa Kramarz, a mining expert at the University of Toronto, cautions this type of technology is still being tested and has yet to be tried on a large commercial scale in Saskatchewan. She said while in theory it uses less water and land, it needs to be studied further. There's not a lot of research to demonstrate whether direct extraction uses less water than the salt ponds in South America, Kramarz said. She said the potential for the technology is promising, but it remains to be seen if it will be cost effective and widely used. What's stopping Saskatchewan's lithium industry from starting commercial production? Sparrow said what stands out about Saskatchewan's resource is there's a high concentration of lithium and it's close to the surface, so it's very cost effective to extract. Areas like Kindersley and Estevan, both have large reserves of an underground brine, or water, that contains lithium. Additionally, Sparrow points to the province's infrastructure and labour available from the oil and gas industry, which isn't the case for other regions. At the same time, the current cost for lithium is $8,000 to $10,000 a ton. Sparrow said while the low cost makes DLE technology not the most economic, that hasn't put a damper on the Saskatchewan mining industry. "Innovation can change the cost equation," Sparrow said. "And that's exactly the work that's underway in Saskatchewan to drive the cost down below today's market price." Saskatchewan mining companies are betting the demand for lithium will quickly outpace supply. Schubach said he is confident that will happen.
CBC
6 hours ago
- CBC
Macdonald Bridge will be closed to vehicles for part of Sunday
The Angus L. Macdonald Bridge will be closed to vehicle traffic for part of Sunday to accommodate the MacPass Miles road races in the morning and the annual bridge walk in the afternoon. The closure begins at 7 a.m. and ends at 5 p.m. The bridge will remain open to cyclists and pedestrians. At 2 p.m., the pedestrian walkway will be closed and pedestrians will be able to use the bridge deck to cross. Cyclists will be able to use the bicycle lane as usual. Halifax Harbour Bridges said in a news release thousands of people participate in the bridge walk to take in views, enjoy live entertainment and see displays from community groups and organizations. It said more than 30 groups are participating in the free, family-friendly event. The entertainment this year includes performances from the Stadacona Band, City of Lakes Chorus and John Alphonse Band as well as a wrestling show by Kaizen Pro Wrestling. Attendees will also have a chance to get a close-up look at antique and modern fire trucks, a military vehicle, a Halifax Transit electric bus and some vehicles from the bridge commission's fleet. The Philae Shriners will also be driving around the bridge on their tiny cars. Anyone with questions about the bridge can talk to experts at the commission's Ask an Engineer booth.
