Five G+6 towers on AAI radar again after Gujarat tragedy
2
3
4
Kolkata: The Ahmedabad plane crash has again prompted the Kolkata airport authorities to raise concerns about unauthorised structures in high-rises as threats to flights moving in and out of the city.
They have turned their focus on a high-rise complex at Bablatala, which is right across the airport wall, claiming the two top floors of the five towers pose a risk.
The airport officials said they had served seven notices on Loharuka Green Complex, asking the office-bearers to pull down the two top floors at the earliest, which included lift rooms and water tanks, as they were potential hazards in the take-off funnel.
Residents of the complex, which has 102 2 BHK and 3 BHK flats spread across five towers, said the developers had repeatedly shown documents to the airport authorities, proving none of the floors was illegal. "The top floors were sold at a higher price as they offer a view of the airport and flights landing and taking off. Why should we suddenly raze them? They are all legal. We moved the High Court last month, seeking protection and clarity," said Dhrubajyoti Biswas, president of Loharuka Greens RWA.
The AAI last sent a notice to Loharuka Green Residency Association of Apartment Owners in Jan, saying a building was constructed 357m from the original location, a site for which the airport had granted the NOC in March 2014. "Airports Authority of India, NSCBI Airport Kolkata, has identified a structure (top of the building) that is penetrating the Obstacle Limitation Surface/Obstacle Free Zone and is violating the norms against the ministry of civil aviation - (Height Restrictions for Safeguarding of Aircraft Operations) Rules, 2015, and is a potential hazard for safe aircraft operations," the order states.
It advised the association to reduce the "obstacle" height from the top —10.7 m for blocks A and B, 11.2m for blocks C and D and 6.9m for Block E.
But residents said before the construction, builders had applied for height clearance from AAI in 2013, and the NOC for the particular site was granted in March 2014 "with permissible top elevation AMSL of 35.6 m, including 6m above mean sea level, for five years". "It was only after getting the NOC that the work was completed by June 2018.
BMC issued the CC in Nov 2019. The Co-ordinate Survey of India checked and said our buildings did not come in the aircraft funnel path," said Biswas.
"Our case in the HC will be heard after the vacation."
Residents said that before the project started, by an HC order in Dec 2012, the area was demarcated by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, North 24 Parganas in Barasat, in the presence of AAI. It was only upon a demarcation and issuance of revised sanctioned plan and other documents that AAI issued a height clearance NOC. "If our buildings are an obstruction for safe aircraft operations, why did they give the NOC? This project has 100-plus flats, all of which have been sold.
The request for reducing the height is not maintainable against the developer after the CC was issued. Let the court decide," said an official.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Noida International Airport issues advisory For Public and Builders
This clearance is not merely a regulatory formality but a vital requirement to safeguard flight operations and navigation infrastructure from potential obstructions, Jain informed. 'As Noida International Airport nears commissioning, it is imperative for the public, real estate developers, and local authorities to strictly adhere to the height restriction regulations laid down by the Ministry of Civil Aviation to ensure the safety and efficiency of aircraft operations," Jain said in a press statement. The statement further added that all concerned parties must approach local bodies before initiating any vertical development within the 20 km perimeter. These bodies will consult the Colour-Coded Zoning Map (CCZM) issued by AAI to assess permissible height limits. Based on the proposed construction height, the applicant may be directed to apply for a Height NOC via AAI's NOCAS portal, the press note said. This process is governed by GSR 751(E), Ministry of Civil Aviation (Height Restrictions for Safeguarding of Aircraft Operations) Rules, 2015, which prohibits any unapproved construction within safeguarded airspace. Any violation poses serious risks to Obstacle Limitation Surfaces (OLS) and the integrity of navigation systems, compromising overall flight safety. To enforce compliance, the Aircraft (Demolition of Obstructions caused by Buildings and Trees) Rules, 2023, empower authorities to initiate legal proceedings, including demolition of unauthorised structures or trees and imposition of penalties under the Aircraft Rules, the issued statement stated.
New Indian Express
a day ago
- New Indian Express
KEAM revised rank list out; state syllabus students lose top spots
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: The revised rank list of KEAM engineering entrance exam, that was published late on Thursday after reverting to the old mark standardisation formula following a High Court directive, saw state syllabus students losing out top spots compared to the rank list brought out on July 1. While a state syllabus student was the engineering entrance topper in the previous rank list, his position slipped to No 7 in the new rank list. The top spot in the revised rank list went to a CBSE syllabus student who was ranked fifth in the previous rank list. CBSE students also bagged the top six ranks. However, the seventh and eighth spots were bagged by students from the state syllabus. While 43 state syllabus students figured in top 100 ranks in the July 1 rank list, the revised rank list saw their numbers dwindling to 21. On the other hand, the number of CBSE students among the top 100 ranks rose from 55 to 79. Among the top 5,000 spots in the new rank list, there were 1,796 state syllabus students. Notably, their number was 2,539 in the July 1 rank list. The number of CBSE students in this category rose from 2,220 in the previous ranklist to 2,960 in the revised one. Earlier in the day, a division bench of the High Court upheld a single judge's order cancelling the KEAM 2025 results. The state government decided not to approach the Supreme Court against the High Court verdict on the grounds that the engineering admission process has to be completed by August 14, as stipulated by the All India Council For Technical Education.
Indian Express
2 days ago
- Indian Express
BMC starts work on north phase of coastal road project in Goregaon
The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation has commenced works on the second phase of Coastal Road Project along a 1.2 km stretch in Goregaon, which falls outside the limits of Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ). On Wednesday, Additional Municipal Commissioner (Projects) Abhijit Bangar conducted a site inspection where he took stock of the developments on the project. Set to connect Versova in the western suburbs with the satellite city of Bhayandar, the north phase of the Coastal Road Project encompasses interchanges, elevated roads and twin tunnels. The mega project passes through land and creeks with most of the area falling under the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ). On Wednesday, the civic body said that foundation work at a 1.2 kilometre stretch in Goregaon, which lies outside the CRZ boundary, has been commenced. According to officials, this stretch falls under the Package B of the project, which encompasses an overall area of 1.66 km between Bangur Nagar and Mindspace (Malad). For perspective, the coastal road has been divided into six packages between Versova and Dahisar. While carrying out inspection of the foundation work at the non-CRZ area in Goregaon, AMC (Projects), Bangar on Wednesday instructed officials to ensure that no work is undertaken in areas which are categorized under CRZ. Besides overlooking ongoing works at Goregaon, Bangar also conducted site visits at Versova, Andheri, Lokhandwala interchange, Malad mindscape among other pockets where he interacted with officials and took stock of several works being executed under the ambit of coastal road phase 2. Earlier this month, the BMC received the crucial in-principal (Stage I) approvals for the mangrove forest diversion proposal to develop the project through the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC). Having procured the stage I approvals, the civic body is now going to approach the High Court. According to officials, work can be commenced only after acquiring the working permissions from the High Court. Following this, the MoEFCC grants the Stage II (final) approvals for the project.
