Texas bill deadlines, deals, and re-writes dominate headlines: TWITP
The regular legislative session is coming to a close and deadlines, deals, and re-writes for several bills made the headlines this week
FOX 7 Austin's chief political reporter Rudy Koski and our panel of analysts discussed the big stories from This Week in Texas Politics
AUSTIN, Texas - This Week in Texas Politics started with a race to beat the clock at the Texas Capitol.
Deadlines, deals, and re-writes made headlines.
FOX 7 Austin's chief political reporter Rudy Koski and our panel of analysts discussed the big stories from This Week in Texas Politics.
Local perspective
RUDY KOSKI: A barn burner is a good way to describe how This Week in Texas Politics wrapped up. Let's get our headlines from our panel, and we'll start with Brian Smith with St. Edward's University. Brian, what's your headline for the week?
BRIAN SMITH: With Sine Die approaching, the legislature kicks into high gear.
RUDY KOSKI: Political analyst Karina Kling, what's your headline for the week?
KARINA KLING: Hundreds of Texas House Bills sent to the shredder after a critical deadline.
RUDY KOSKI: And Brad Johnson with The Texan, what's your headline for the week?
BRAD JOHNSON: Thousands of bills turn into pumpkins at the stroke of midnight.
RUDY KOSKI: The 225-page Senate re-write of the Education Funding Plan, HB2, finally got a hearing this week. The House and Senate versions of HB 2, remain at $8 billion, but differ in how the money is being spent, Brad. Initially, there was outrage about this.
BRAD JOHNSON: There's a lot of rural R's who are angry about this, and they're very upset because They went out all in support of Greg Abbott's ESA program as part of a deal. And part of that deal was the House's version of school finance. And now, we're seeing that kind of shifting possibly.
KARINA KLING: I assume and believe that a lot of House members are not going to be very happy with this, so. They're going to have to hash this out in these final few weeks.
BRIAN SMITH: And it might not be the best Bill, it might be a perfect Bill, but it'll be something that'll go into law. If they don't, then only the Republicans are to blame.
RUDY KOSKI: There was another education rewrite that happened this week. A Bill moved forward to end STARR testing and replace it with another exam.
KARINA KLING: There's still a lot of work to do out there, between the two chambers, but. I mean, some kind of overhaul is inevitable, and this is something that both chambers are pushing for.
RUDY KOSKI: Other notable shutdown bills this week included a ban on gun buyback programs. And a late arrival SB-3070. That cleared the Senate and, if approved by the House, could close down the Lottery Commission. Brian, the Senate Bill, moves the game to a new agency.
BRIAN SMITH: If you have an agency that's in trouble, sometimes one of the smartest things to do, is bury it within an existing agency. And if you put it in with licensing, the licensing agency, you're in there with like midwives and barbers and speech therapists and a hodgepodge of other industries. It'll take away independence and visibility. But any negative publicity won't escape from that level. And then be a drag on the government.
RUDY KOSKI: Alright, let's take a moment. Pause and remember all those bills that died at midnight, Thursday night. And there were a lot. Kumbaya and farewell. Brad, some of these bills could come back to life like zombies.
BRAD JOHNSON: Most of the bills on this calendar were not top-level, high-profile bills. They were a lot of pet projects by members, because everybody knew they were either on the chopping block or dead as a doornail. And so, the focus has always been on passing these Senate bills, and now we're in that time.
RUDY KOSKI: A notable Bill in Conference Committee limbo is SB 17. It prevents land purchases by people linked to hostile foreign nations. Bail reform, another round of property tax cuts and bills on gender identity. All were kept alive this week. Karina, give me a bill that you're watching that is on that thin ice situation.
KARINA KLING: I'm watching closely, the THC measure and what they're going to do with that. The Senate wants a full on ban. The House wants to reform some of that a bit more.
BRAD JOHNSON: I'll go with the tort reform proposal. This thing has been a massive, massive expensive fight.
BRIAN SMITH: Right, this is the time when those top issues come to the forefront. We've gotten rid of a lot of the bills that had no chance, so now it's time to see how strong the governor is in passing his emergency items? How powerful is the Lieutenant Governor and how unified is that Republican caucus in the House.
RUDY KOSKI: The primary battle between Senator John Cornyn and Ken Paxton is intensifying this week with the bigger social media mud fight going on. Some gasoline added to that mud this week with the report that internal polling has Paxton leading in the primary. But He could lose the general election. Brad, Politico's headline. Called this the "GOP train wreck" of the 2026 election cycle.
BRAD JOHNSON: This thing's going to be an absolute mess, and it's going to be fun to watch from the outside.
BRIAN SMITH: Again, I think people like Politico. When they're bored, they turn out that old, let's turn Texas blue type article. Because it's still too early to make anything out of the race, I think.
KARINA KLING: But Cornyn is a pro at fundraising. And once he starts inundating the airwaves, the game may change a little bit. We will see how this brutal fight over the airwaves plays out and who can win in that battle.
RUDY KOSKI: You can see our full discussion on the FOX 7 YouTube page, but let's wrap things up with one final word. Brian, we'll start with you. What's your word for the week?
BRIAN SMITH: Terminus.
KARINA KLING: Deadlines.
BRAD JOHNSON: Funding.
RUDY KOSKI: And that is This Week in Texas Politics
The Source
Information from interviews conducted by FOX 7 Austin's Rudy Koski
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
TACO not on the menu: Howard Lutnick says tariffs start August 1 with no extensions
Tariffs are coming on August 1 and there will be no more extensions, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said. President Donald Trump imposed his 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April, causing a rollercoaster stock market. A week later, he announced a 90-day pause, which has now expired, with many set to take effect Friday. Although the world may have gotten used to Trump announcing sweeping levies before backing out of them shortly thereafter, this time, there's no risk of TACO — the shorthand for "Trump Always Chickens Out" — the commerce secretary suggested. "No extensions. No more grace periods. August 1, the tariffs are set. They'll go into place," Lutnick said on "Fox News Sunday.' World leaders are still more than willing to talk to Trump after the August 1 deadline. 'Between now and then, I think the president's going to talk to a lot of people. Whether they can make him happy is another question, but the president is definitely willing to negotiate and talk to the big economies,' Lutnick continued. Lutnick's announcement of the hard deadline contrasts with the message of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent days earlier, when he suggested the tariff deadlines were flexible. 'The important thing here is the quality of the deal, not the timing of the deals,' Bessent told CNBC on Monday. The hard deadline comes months after the president earned the TACO acronym after he backed out of his sweeping tariff plan. On April 2, which he's dubbed Liberation Day, Trump declared the day would 'forever be remembered as the day American industry was reborn, the day America's destiny was reclaimed, and the day that we began to make America wealthy again.' Stock market turbulence ensued. The NASDAQ broke a record with its largest single-day point drop in the market's 50-year history as investors responded to Trump's tariff plan. Just one week after Liberation Day, he walked back on his grand plan and the stock market surged. That's when the acronym TACO emerged. Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong coined the term to describe the president's pattern of implementing trade policy threats, which investors predicted would cause the market to tumble, before he walks back on that policy, leading to a market rebound. Last month, he delayed the July 9 tariff deadline to August 1. Trump is meeting with European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen on Sunday to try to avoid a potential trade war. "We're working very diligently with Europe, the EU," Trump told reporters before he left for Scotland on Friday. "I would say that we have a 50-50 chance, maybe less than that, but a 50-50 chance of making a deal with the EU." Lutnick also commented on Sunday's meeting. Speaking on 'Fox News Sunday,' he remarked: 'The question is, do they offer President Trump a good enough deal that is worth it for him to step off of the 30% tariffs that he set.' Trump has announced trade deals with several countries, including Japan, Indonesia, the Philippines, Vietnam and the United Kingdom. He's said letters had been sent out earlier this month to dozens of countries with tariff rates. 'We'll have a straight, simple tariff of anywhere between 15 percent and 50 percent," Trump said this week. "We have 50 [percent] because we haven't been getting along with those countries too well." Economic experts have warned that consumers could pay the price for the new levies. "Now that the Trump administration is concluding deals that would see the tariff rate facing most trading partners settling at between 15% and 20%, with even higher rates levied on Chinese imports, we suspect retailers will be forced to finally raise the prices paid by consumers,' Paul Ashworth, chief North America economist with Capital Economics, said in a research note, CBS News reported. Some companies have preemptively taken action. Trump has threatened a 50 percent tariff on Brazil. The steep levy threats against the country have prompted a New Jersey-based orange juice manufacturer to sue the Trump administration, arguing that the 50 percent tariff could result in a $70 million hit to its business. Sign in to access your portfolio
Wall Street Journal
10 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
America Should Travel Fast
Regarding Allysia Finley's 'California's Bullet Train Is a Model of Progressive Governance' (Life Science, July 21): Every highway and airport in America is subsidized—by billions more than we've ever given to high-speed rail. The $6 billion private line in Florida isn't high-speed, which costs more. But the benefit of true high-speed rail is that more people ride it because it's more convenient than driving or flying. Dozens of other countries, even those with far fewer resources than America, such as Morocco, build it because it's a better return on investment. I conducted a financial analysis of the California high-speed rail with some Harvard Business School colleagues more than a decade ago, and we came to two conclusions: It will cost more than they say, and it will still cost less than expanding highways or airports. The rail project should be reformed, not tanked.
Wall Street Journal
10 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Readers Respond to Gavin Newsom on Energy
Regarding Gov. Gavin Newsom's 'Clean Energy Powers California's Economic Growth' (op-ed, July 24): Mr. Newsom brags of two-thirds of California energy being 'cheap, abundant, clean power.' Meanwhile, in the real world, a kilowatt hour of California electricity is among the highest in the country at around 32 cents—more than double the median state's 15 cents. This results in excess energy costs to consumers and businesses in California of billions of dollars a year. The extra dollar per gallon for gasoline adds insult to injury. If a President Newsom had his druthers, annual U.S. energy costs would be nearly $1 trillion higher if California policies were applied nationally.
