
Nurse listed 13 staff opposed to allowing trans doctor in female spaces, tribunal told
Mrs Peggie returned to the witness box at her employment tribunal against NHS Fife and trans medic Dr Beth Upton, to counter claims that she was the only person who had voiced objections.
The 51-year-old told how she was upset as she had not wanted to reveal the identities of the staff from Kirkcaldy's Victoria Hospital, because of the 'toxic' way she has been treated.
They included receptionists, nurses and a consultant who objected to the born-male medic being given the go-ahead to use the women-only space by NHS Fife bosses.
She told her lawyer Naomi Cunningham: 'Since this happened and the way I was treated, I didn't want anybody else to be put in the same predicament.
'It's very toxic, and I didn't want any bad feeling towards them.'
The mum told Ms Cunningham she was 'quite sad' about having to name them because 'some of them are very close colleagues'.
The revelation came as Mrs Peggie, the final witness in the landmark tribunal, defended herself against claims of racism and a hate campaign against Dr Upton.
Mrs Peggie brought proceedings against NHS Fife and Dr Upton after she was suspended from work for challenging the trans medic in the female changing room on Christmas Eve 2023.
The tribunal has previously heard Mrs Peggie tell how she needed to use the changing room because she had a sudden and heavy period.
She took legal action claiming being made to change with a biological man is unlawful. Her case has become the most high-profile tribunal case in the country - and as it continues increasingly bitter.
Mrs Peggie named the 13 other hospital workers who agreed with her - adding to the three staff she revealed when she first gave evidence in February.
During an hour of questioning by both her lawyer and NHS Fife KC Jane Russell, the tribunal heard how colleagues who had been supportive turned to 'one of shock' when she informed them she had been suspended by the health board.
She told the tribunal: 'They couldn't believe what had happened to me.'
And she revealed how her Royal College of Nursing representative had told her to 'get a hobby' following her suspension.
In May we revealed the nurse, who had been a member of the RCN union for 30 years had launched legal action against them for failing to represent her.
Mrs Peggie also addressed claims that she was racist telling the tribunal that she had been in a group chat for years with colleagues she had holidayed with several times.
Messages revealed Mrs Peggie had shared jokes about the Pakistani floods, which had been described as 'racist' by one group member in evidence this week.
But Mrs Peggie insisted that while they were 'distasteful', the message was sent as 'dark humour to her friends'.
And she said that a comment she was alleged to have made about posting a 'packet of bacon through the letter box of a mosque', was in fact made by a paramedic.
NHS Fife's KC Ms Russell put it to her: 'Have you realised that these messages don't put you in a very good light and so you have thought of a way to explain them away, and you've come up with the explanation of 'dark humour' which you have repeated again and again?'
The nurse rejected this but admitted she had used racial slurs but said she was 'brought up like that'.
She rejected claims that she had embarked on a 'hate campaign' against Dr Upton.
The veteran nurse who has an unblemished record, told Ms Russell: 'I don't have any bad feelings towards trans people, I just don't believe they should be in women's changing areas.'
The tribunal was told Mrs Peggie asked a colleague for a picture of 'that weirdo Beth', and claims, which Mrs Peggie rejected, that she had called the medic a 'weirdo' at her birthday lunch.
The nurse, who was cleared of misconduct in a separate internal NHS probe earlier this month, said she did not think the medic was a 'weirdo'.
She told the tribunal: 'I think he looks strange because he's very obviously a man who wants to wear women's clothing.'
Mrs Peggie rejected Ms Russell's suggestion that the only reason she went to the changing room that night was to 'confront Dr Upton in a way that you knew was objectional'.
Earlier, Fife NHS Dr Maggie Currer claimed it was an 'error' to have told colleagues that Mrs Peggie had been referred to the Nursing and Midwifery Council.
When quizzed about Dr Upton being 'biologically male' the emergency department consultant told the tribunal: 'She's chromosomally male. And as far as I'm aware, although I have not examined Dr Upton, she is also, in terms of secondary sexual characteristics, in terms of genitalia, male but I have not examined her.'
The tribunal will reconvene in September for oral submissions.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


ITV News
29 minutes ago
- ITV News
Nurses in Northern Ireland lodge dispute over failure to implement pay award
The Royal College of Nursing has lodged a formal dispute over the failure to implement a pay award for nursing staff in Northern dispute has been lodged with the Northern Ireland Executive, Department of Health and health and social care a ballot, the RCN across the UK rejected a pay offer of 3.6%.Nurses in Northern Ireland have yet to receive the pay rise. An RCN statement said: 'We have made it clear that our members are not prepared to tolerate a repetition of their experiences in 2023-2024 and 2024-2025, whereby a pay award for staff working in the HSC on Agenda for Change terms and conditions was not confirmed for several months after it had been awarded elsewhere across the UK, and the uplift was not paid until the very end of the financial year.'Despite the recent welcome intervention of the Health Minister (Mike Nesbitt) in issuing his ministerial direction, it appears that we are, once again, in the same position.'Rita Devlin, RCN Northern Ireland executive director said: 'Nursing and other healthcare staff in Northern Ireland are once again on the brink of stepping out of pay parity with colleagues across the UK.'We have worked tirelessly to try and ensure that this does not happen again but there has been a failure in some political quarters to listen.'Our members do not understand why, yet again, they are being treated by their own Executive as second-class citizens and why, every year, the need to formulate a modest pay offer appears to catch the Executive unprepared.'The issue of pay should be accounted for in every year's budget and a failure to do this is a failure of government.'Ms Devlin added: 'Without staff there is simply no health service, and we are at an absolute loss to explain this attitude towards nursing staff who are the largest professional group in the health service.'As our recent pay consultation has shown, nursing staff in Northern Ireland and across the UK, don't believe a 3.6% pay rise is enough, but to not even get that is an insult.'In a statement issued through the Ulster Unionist Party, Nr Nesbitt said he shared the frustration of the added: 'In May, I announced that I was triggering the ministerial direction process to achieve delivery of these pay increases as soon as possible.'That reflected my commitment to maintaining pay parity with England.'In line with the ministerial direction process, my decision was referred to the wider Executive.'Unfortunately, that's where it still sits.'Our health workers deserve so much better.''I note that the RCN is today saying that the 'first step must be for the Northern Ireland Executive to deliver the long-overdue pay award for this year'.'I couldn't agree more.'


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
For Woman Scotland intervene in Sandie Peggie tribunal
For Women Scotland (FWS), the group responsible the landmark ruling in April, warned the employment tribunal's judgment could be open to "appeal on any point where Dr Upton's sex is relevant". He made the remarks while overseeing evidence in the tribunal dispute centred around transgender doctor Dr Beth Upton's use of the female changing room at Victoria Hospital in Dundee. During the tribunal, NHS Fife's lawyer Jane Russell KC repeatedly objected to Dr Upton being referred to as a "man" by Ms Peggie's barrister Naomi Cunningham. She described the FWS judgment - which ruled that the terms "sex", "man" and "woman" in the 2010 Equality Act referred to biological sex - as an "abstract case" that only related to the representation of public boards in Scotland. Ms Russell later told the tribunal that "Dr Upton was not a man, she is a transwoman". Ms Peggie's barrister Ms Cunningham referenced the FWS judgment, stating that "legally speaking, a transwoman is a man". Judge Kemp then intervened, stating on July 23: "I think that's a contentious matter, what exactly For Women Scotland says and what it means. "I think it would be appropriate to put this on a hypothesis that you have outlined - on the hypothesis of what you say is correct in law. "That would be appropriate. But until we have had the opportunity of hearing all the submissions and making our decisions on that, this is a point in dispute." Following that exchange, FWS asked for permission to intervene in the employment tribunal. Read more: Clerks from the Dundee Tribunal Hearing Centre wrote to the organisation on Thursday to state neither legal teams objected to the intervention. The submission from FWS's Trina Budge, Marion Calder and Susan Smith, said Ms Russell KC was "simply not factually correct", adding the organisation was "surprised" there was no correction by the tribunal. FWS then condemned the comments by the judge, adding: "This should not be a point in dispute by the court, nor regarded as contentious or a hypothesis to be tested." The organisation said it was "beyond doubt" that the Supreme Court ruled that the term woman was linked to biological sex. The submission said: "It is simply not a stateable argument for Ms Russell to propose that For Women Scotland does not say that Dr Upton is a man. "It may well be a matter for the court to decide whether the Supreme Court judgment has any applicability to the case in hand, but it is not open for Ms Russell, or the tribunal, to contest the findings of the apex court. "We are concerned about two things, firstly that closing submissions may attempt to re-litigate our case and debate the definitions of "sex", "woman", and "man" in the Equality Act, when these are settled matters in law. "And secondly, that if the tribunal does not make it clear to the parties (and the viewing public) that "what exactly For Women Scotland says" is in fact clear and settled in law and not "contentious", "a hypothesis" or "in dispute" then it may render the judgment open to appeal on any point where Dr Upton's sex is relevant." Read more: On Thursday, tribunal clerks wrote to FWS, stating: "The tribunal is not in a position to comment on the matters you raise until all submissions have been made by the parties." The tribunal resumes for oral submissions on September 1 and 2, with both legal teams appearing in person in Dundee. However, it is unlikely a decision will be made on the day, with the judge expected to take a significant period of time to consider the evidence. It could be until December before a judgment is declared. FWS's Supreme Court appealed the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act 2018 which aimed to increase the representation of women on public boards. The legislation stated a trans woman with a Gender Recognition Certificate should be treated as a woman. However, the ruling has had significant ramifications on UK-wide policy. The guidance is currently being considered by governments, while the Equality Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said in May that 'trans woman (biological men) should not be permitted to use the women's facilities and trans men (biological women) should not be permitted to use the men's facilities, as this will mean that they are no longer single-sex facilities'. Last week, the Museum Galleries Scotland, which supports 455 non-national museums and is Scottish Government-funded, said these proposals could force some museums to close or leave trans people with no facilities.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
NHS set for winter chaos as nurses and GPs threaten strike action
The Royal College of Nursing will ballot members for industrial action after 91 per cent rejected a 3.6 per cent pay offer, citing feeling 'deeply undervalued' and demanding improved pay and career progression. General Practitioners, represented by the British Medical Association, are also threatening strikes, with a September meeting planned to consider action over their role in the NHS 's 10-year plan and demands for contract investment. These new threats follow a five-day walkout by resident doctors, who were seeking a 29 per cent pay rise, which resulted in the cancellation of some vital cancer operations. The Department of Health and Social Care acknowledges the value of nurses but states they have received two above-inflation pay rises, while the Health Secretary has warned the British Medical Association against a prolonged dispute. The Royal College of Nursing emphasises that widespread vacancies, stunted career progression, and pay erosion are critical issues impacting patient safety, urging ministers to agree on a comprehensive investment plan.