Land sinking in Red Bluff, Corning: What it means for Tehama and can it happen in Redding?
For those who wonder, Redding and the rest of Shasta County aren't having the same problem, in part because Shasta's groundwater is replenished by the ACID Canal, flowing from the Sacramento River. It's also because Shasta doesn't have as much agriculture stressing the groundwater supply, according to groundwater experts in both counties' public works departments.
Mid- to southwestern parts of Tehama County are suffering land subsidence, a drop in the Earth's crust when too much groundwater is removed. The soil collapses into the space left by the lack of water, making the ground above it sink.
One cause is groundwater partially dried up during years of heavy drought. But the main issue in Tehama County is people are pumping too much water out of the ground in places like the Red Bluff and Corning sub-basins, said Justin Jenson, Tehama's public works deputy director. More than 90% of that pumped-out groundwater goes to the county's agriculture — mostly almond, walnut and pistachios orchards, Jenson said.
If Tehama County doesn't take steps to reverse the problem, repercussions could be devastating, geologists say.
Most land subsidence in California and other parts of the world is caused by humans pumping too much water out of the ground, according to U.S. Geological Survey. It's a slow process that can take years to become a disaster — and can take as long to fix, when fixes are still possible.
Note to readers: If you appreciate the work we do here at the Redding Record Searchlight, please consider subscribing yourself or giving the gift of a subscription to someone you know.
Subsidence compacted the ground in parts of the San Joaquin Valley, dropping ground level almost 30 feet in the 50 years between 1925 and 1977, according to USGS geologists.
Even slight shifts in ground level can cause damage to buildings and infrastructure like bridges and overpasses, Jenson said.
If left unchecked, land subsidence can permanently reduce the amount of groundwater an aquifer can hold by reducing its storage space. In worst cases, that could mean less to no groundwater for people, crops and wildlife living in the area, according to the USGS.
Worst case scenarios also include holes and fissures opening up as the dry, brittle ground collapses. This happened in the Mojave Desert near the now-dry Lucerne Lake in San Bernardino County. Geologists reported fissures more than 3 feet deep and 3 feet wide opened up as the ground crumbled and collapsed.
Shasta County is spared land subsidence for a few reasons, according to Shasta's Public Works Director Troy Bartolomei.
First, Shasta has less agriculture pumping out groundwater.
Second, the county's 'very large heavy aquifers' can replenish Shasta's groundwater faster than Tehama's.
The third reason Shasta isn't sinking has to do with the way it irrigates valley farms south of Redding, toward the Tehama County line. Water flows from the Sacramento River via the ACID (Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District) canal. 'All that irrigation helps to charge the aquifer' and keep it healthy, Bartolomei said.
More: After seeing land sinking in Red Bluff and Corning areas, Tehama County calls meeting
ACID Canal serves approximately 800 customers and irrigates approximately 7,000 acres of farmland, according to the district's website.
Future long-term drought or increasing demand for groundwater could change that delicate balance, so Shasta County participates in a voluntary groundwater monitoring program with other California counties. 'Because we have a healthy aquifer that recharges itself, we don't need expensive monitoring by the state' like Tehama County does, Bartolomei said.
Tehama County's sinking problem could become irreversible if people don't make changes soon, according to Jenson.
That's because as empty underground water channels fill with collapsed soil, the space for water sources to refill the underground reservoirs becomes smaller. Even during wet winters like 2024-25, there's less opportunity for those water sources to recharge those aquifers fast enough to save them.
One of the areas losing groundwater the fastest is between Red Bluff and Corning, where there's a lot of competition for water, Jenson said.
The good news, he said, is the problem is still likely reversible.
However, it will take long-term community action to change it. That's because "both the cause of subsidence and the fix … take a really long time. If you don't pre-plan to resolve the issue then you can cause a future problem that you cannot fix." The Tehama County Board of Supervisors is trying to do just that, Jenson said.
The board announced it will host a public meeting on Tuesday, June 3 to discuss possible solutions to the county's land subsidence problem.
Tehama had "observable land subsidence on a scale that has never been recorded," county officials said in the announcement.
Jessica Skropanic is a features reporter for the Record Searchlight/USA Today Network. She covers science, arts, social issues and news stories. Follow her on Twitter @RS_JSkropanic and on Facebook. Join Jessica in the Get Out! Nor Cal recreation Facebook group. To support and sustain this work, please subscribe today. Thank you.
This article originally appeared on Redding Record Searchlight: Why Red Bluff, Corning are sinking but Redding in Shasta County is not
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
a day ago
- Newsweek
China's 'Project of the Century'—World's Biggest Hydropower Dam—Is Underway
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Construction has officially commenced on what is set to become the world's largest hydropower dam, China's premier Li Qiang announced on July 19. Located on the eastern rim of the Tibetan Plateau, the multi-dam cascade is expected to generate 300 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity annually—equivalent to the total electricity consumption of the United Kingdom last year, according to Reuters. Described by Li as a "project of the century," the megastructure will be built along the lower reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo River, which drops more than 6,500 feet in just 31 miles, presenting vast hydroelectric potential. The project is expected to cost approximately $167.8 billion and will include five cascading power stations, according to China's state news agency Xinhua. "This dam can almost power the state of Texas," Mat Merten, the owner and principal engineer of the functional safety consultancy group SIL Safe, told Newsweek. "It is a remarkable project and will bring decades of reliable power to the region." Merten added that the scale of the dam's energy production is "simply astounding." Stock image: A portion of the Yarlung Zangbo River is seen from above. Stock image: A portion of the Yarlung Zangbo River is seen from above. Getty The project will surpass the capacity of the current largest dam in the world—the Three Gorges Dam on the Yangtze River, which has held the top spot since 2012 with a generating capacity of 22,500 megawatts (MW), according to the United States Geological Survey (USGS). In contrast, the Grand Coulee Dam in Washington, the largest in the United States, has a capacity of about 6,800 MW, placing it fifth globally. The dam is projected to begin operations sometime in the 2030s, and Beijing says it will meet growing electricity needs both in Tibet and across China. Authorities claim it will not significantly affect downstream water supplies or the environment, according to Reuters. Chinese officials maintain the new Tibetan Plateau dam will prioritize ecological preservation and special emphasis "must be placed on ecological conservation to prevent environmental damage," Li said, according to Xinhua via Reuters. For Chinese policymakers, the dam also represents a strategic piece in the country's broader energy and climate agenda, according to Erin Sikorsky, director of the Center for Climate & Security. "Beijing is keen to diversify energy away from fossil fuels and sees hydropower as a key tool in its toolbox," Sikorsky told Newsweek. "It also views such projects as having economic benefits." Aidan Charron, associate director of echoed this view, calling the initiative part of a broader dual-energy strategy. "China's vast and intricate river system provides a strong and obvious natural base for growing their hydropower capabilities," Charron said, noting the expansion of solar and wind projects underway in parallel. "This dual strategy not only supports China's ambitious carbon reduction goals … but also strengthens its position in the global energy market." However, the project's scale, location, and geopolitical implications have drawn criticism and concern from environmental and security experts alike. "While this large-scale project is framed as a means to support development in the Tibet Autonomous Region, it appears more closely tied to China's broader goal of reaching net-zero emissions by 2060, and possibly as a strategic tool to influence downstream nations," said Professor Y. Nithiyanandam, head of the geospatial research program at the Takshashila Institution in India. Nithiyanandam cautioned that the environmental and geopolitical trade-offs are considerable. "Changes to the river's natural flow … could threaten water security," he said. "These alterations may lead to disasters, affect the climate, and disrupt ecological balance, as the river's natural rhythm is vital for the rich biodiversity in the lower riparian regions." Nithiyanandam also warned that China's past actions, such as damming the Mekong River, show how upstream control can impact nations downstream. "It's not just a concern for India; Bangladesh should be even more worried, as it already faces the consequences of poor water management and pollution downstream," he added. Sikorsky also flagged regional security implications, saying: "The dam could easily exacerbate tensions between China and its downstream neighbor, India. India has repeatedly expressed concerns about China manipulating water levels." Kit Conklin, senior vice president of risk and compliance at Exiger, a global supply chain AI company, went further, labeling the dam a potential "geopolitical weapon." Conklin, who previously served as senior adviser to the U.S. House Select Committee on China, told Newsweek: "By controlling the Brahmaputra's headwaters, the Chinese Communist Party can manipulate water flows to exert pressure or destabilize entire downstream economies whenever it wants." Conklin added: "India and China are nuclear-armed neighbors with a history of border tensions. When one side unilaterally takes control of a shared, life-sustaining resource like the Brahmaputra, it adds a volatile new layer to an already-fragile relationship." Newsweek has contacted the office of the State Council of China via email for comment. Do you have a travel-related story to share? Let us know via life@ and your story could be featured on Newsweek.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
The Environmental Protection Agency wants to bring back the weed killer dicamba
The Environmental Protection Agency has proposed allowing the weed killer dicamba for genetically engineered soybeans and cotton, two crops that are grown extensively in the United States. This week's recommendation comes after the first Trump administration made the same move, only to have courts block it in 2020 and 2024. This is the first year since 2016 that dicamba has not been allowed to be used on crops, according to Nathan Donley, the environmental health science director at the Center for Biological Diversity, a national conservation nonprofit. Environmental groups say they will once again go to court to try to block it. 'This is an unfortunate roller coaster ride that the country has been in for about 10 years now, and it's just incredibly sad to see our Environmental Protection Agency being hijacked by this administration and facilitating decisions that are objectively going to make our environment less healthy," Donley said. The EPA said via email that it 'will ensure that farmers have the tools they need to protect crops and provide a healthy and affordable food supply for our country' and the agency is 'confident these products won't cause issues for human health or the environment.' The EPA added that the proposal will be open for public comment for 30 days and included a list of proposed guidelines on the use of the three dicamba-containing products in question. Dicamba is a common weed killer and has been used for over 50 years in the U.S., but it has become more widespread on farms in the past decade, according to data from the EPA and the U.S. Geological Survey. Researchers have been working to better understand the health risks it might pose to humans. A 2020 study in the International Journal of Epidemiology found that dicamba exposure was linked to some cancers, including liver cancer and a type of leukemia affecting the blood and bone marrow. Dicamba can also drift far from its intended targets to kill other plants on neighboring farms and in local ecosystems, posing threats to wild flora and fauna, according to the National Wildlife Federation. An agency can tweak a decision after a court strikes it down, and then dicamba would be approved until a new legal challenge succeeds. Past court rulings on dicamba have taken years, 'leaving many farmers with questions and uncertainty in the middle of the growing season,' National Agricultural Law Center staff attorney Brigit Rollins said in a background summary of dicamba legal cases. ___ Follow Melina Walling on X @MelinaWalling and Bluesky @ ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at Melina Walling, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


The Hill
2 days ago
- The Hill
The Environmental Protection Agency wants to bring back the weed killer dicamba
The Environmental Protection Agency has proposed allowing the weed killer dicamba for genetically engineered soybeans and cotton, two crops that are grown extensively in the United States. This week's recommendation comes after the first Trump administration made the same move, only to have courts block it in 2020 and 2024. This is the first year since 2016 that dicamba has not been allowed to be used on crops, according to Nathan Donley, the environmental health science director at the Center for Biological Diversity, a national conservation nonprofit. Environmental groups say they will once again go to court to try to block it. 'This is an unfortunate roller coaster ride that the country has been in for about 10 years now, and it's just incredibly sad to see our Environmental Protection Agency being hijacked by this administration and facilitating decisions that are objectively going to make our environment less healthy,' Donley said. The EPA said via email that it 'will ensure that farmers have the tools they need to protect crops and provide a healthy and affordable food supply for our country' and the agency is 'confident these products won't cause issues for human health or the environment.' The EPA added that the proposal will be open for public comment for 30 days and included a list of proposed guidelines on the use of the three dicamba-containing products in question. Dicamba is a common weed killer and has been used for over 50 years in the U.S., but it has become more widespread on farms in the past decade, according to data from the EPA and the U.S. Geological Survey. Researchers have been working to better understand the health risks it might pose to humans. A 2020 study in the International Journal of Epidemiology found that dicamba exposure was linked to some cancers, including liver cancer and a type of leukemia affecting the blood and bone marrow. Dicamba can also drift far from its intended targets to kill other plants on neighboring farms and in local ecosystems, posing threats to wild flora and fauna, according to the National Wildlife Federation. An agency can tweak a decision after a court strikes it down, and then dicamba would be approved until a new legal challenge succeeds. Past court rulings on dicamba have taken years, 'leaving many farmers with questions and uncertainty in the middle of the growing season,' National Agricultural Law Center staff attorney Brigit Rollins said in a background summary of dicamba legal cases. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at