758 irrigation projects completed in Vidarbha, says Maha minister
In a written reply, the Minister told the state Assembly on Wednesday that of the total 858 irrigation projects, 758 projects have been completed as of June 2024 by the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation in the region.
Of the balance 100 projects, the work on 13 projects could not start as the administrative approval, including permission from the forest department, had already lapsed. The remaining 87 irrigation projects are under various stages of implementation.
He said this while responding to a question by Pravin Datke and others.
Of the total Vidarbha's irrigation potential of 22.31 lakh hectare, 14.23 lakh hectare of land has been irrigated, which comes to 64 per cent till June 2024. The implementation of 87 projects as of today is under way while 12 projects are pending due to forest land and other reasons. The irrigation potential of 87 irrigation projects is 12.60 lakh hectare, of which 4.81 lakh hectare have been irrigated by the end of June 2024.
According to the Index and Backlog Committee, the irrigation backlog in six districts from the Vidarbha region by the end of June 1994 was reported at 7,84,720 hectares. Of which, the irrigation backlog of 7,81,185 hectares, which is 94 per cent, has been cleared by the end of June 2025. The irrigation backlog of 43,535 hectares still exists in Akola and Buldhana.
The minister told the state council that the government is providing funds for the completion of pending irrigation projects through the Centre's Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchan Yojana, Baliraja Jalsanjeevani Yojana, loan under NABARD's Rural Infrastructure Development Fund and partial grant.
The fund is being provided as per the fund disbursement formula devised by the state Governor and the state's financial status. He said that the fund is being provided to complete irrigation projects to clear the backlog from the Amravati division and also for the Gosikhurd National Project from the Nagpur region.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Congress flags constitutional vacuum in Manipur, questions Assembly's validity
The Manipur Pradesh Congress Committee (MPCC) has raised serious constitutional concerns over the status of the 12th Manipur Legislative Assembly, following its suspended session and the imposition of President's Rule in the a memorandum to Governor Ajay Kumar Bhalla, the Congress demanded a public clarification on whether the Assembly remains constitutionally valid or stands automatically dissolved due to procedural last Assembly sitting was held on August 12, 2024, with the next session scheduled for February 10, 2025, as per a notification issued by the Governor on January 24. However, the session was abruptly cancelled on February 9, a day before it was to begin. This came shortly after Chief Minister N Biren Singh resigned and the Council of Ministers stood MPCC cited Article 174 of the Constitution, which mandates that a legislative assembly meet at least once every six months. With no session held since August and the February sitting revoked, the Congress argues the Assembly is now in constitutional default. It also referred to past Supreme Court judgments, suggesting that such lapses could lead to automatic party further questioned the Governor's authority to cancel a session after it has been summoned, warning that any move to reconvene the Assembly or conduct a floor test without resolving the constitutional issue could trigger legal has been under President's Rule since February 13, 2025, and the Assembly remains in suspended animation. The Congress maintains that the constitutional requirements for its continuity are no longer met, and has indicated it may move court if the Governor fails to the political crisis deepens, the legal status of the Assembly remains uncertain, and demands for restoring democratic governance continue to mount in the conflict-hit state.- EndsTrending Reel
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
SC seeks Centre's response on timeline for Prez assent to Bills
New Delhi: In a significant development, the Supreme Court on Tuesday sought responses of the Centre and all states on the Presidential reference raising constitutional issues on whether timelines could be imposed for dealing with Bills passed by the Assembly. Observing that the issues raised in the Presidential reference will affect 'the entire country', a five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice of India BR Gavai sought the replies in a week and fixed the reference for fixing timelines and other procedural details on July 29. "There are issues of interpretation of the Constitution. We have requested the Attorney General to assist us. Issue notice to the Union and all state governments. The Solicitor General will appear for the Union. All state governments be served through emails. List it on next Tuesday. Notice be also served to all standing counsel," ordered the bench which also comprised justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, PS Narasimha and AS Chandurkar. During a brief hearing, senior advocates KK Venugopal and P Wilson, representing Kerala and Tamil Nadu respectively, opposed the reference and questioned its maintainability. These objections can be raised later, the CJI said, adding the matter will be taken up in mid-August. In May, President Droupadi Murmu exercised powers under Article 143(1) to know from the top court whether timelines could be imposed by judicial orders for exercise of discretion by the President while dealing with the Bills passed by the state Assemblies. Article 143 (1) of the Constitution deals with the power of President to consult the Supreme Court "if at any time it appears to the President that a question of law or fact has arisen, or is likely to arise, which is of such a nature and of such public importance that it is expedient to obtain the opinion of the Supreme Court upon it, he may refer the question to that Court for consideration and the Court may, after such hearing as it thinks fit, report to the President its opinion thereon". The President's decision comes in light of the April 8 verdict of the apex court passed in a matter over the powers of Governor in dealing with bills questioned by the Tamil Nadu government. The verdict for the first time prescribed that the President should decide on the Bills reserved for her consideration by the Governor within three months from the date on which such reference is received. In a five-page reference, President Murmu posed 14 questions to the Supreme Court and sought to know its opinion on powers of Governor, President under Article 200 and 201 in dealing with bills passed by the state legislature. Article 200 deals with situations with regard to passage of Bills by the state Assembly and subsequent options available to the Governor on grant of assent, or withholding of assent or sending the Bill to the President for reconsideration. Article 201 deals with the Bills reserved for the President's consideration by the Governor. The rules prescribe for the review petitions to be heard by the same set of judges in the apex court in chambers while presidential references are heard and considered by a five-judge Constitution bench. Article 200, the reference underlined, which prescribes powers of Governor to be followed while assenting to bills, withholding assent to bills and reserving a bill for President's consideration, does not stipulate any time frame upon Governor for the exercise of constitutional options. The President said similarly Article 201, which prescribes the powers of President and the procedure to be followed while assenting to bills or withholding assent, therefrom does not stipulate any time frame or procedure to be followed by the President for the exercise of constitutional options under Article 201 of the Constitution. President Murmu also questioned the exercise of plenary power under Article 142 of the Constitution by the Supreme Court to make the bill re-presented to Tamil Nadu Governor, as deemed to have been passed. "Whereas the concept of a deemed assent of the President and the Governor is alien to the constitutional scheme and fundamentally circumscribes the power of the President and the Governor," the reference of May 13 said. President Murmu said the contours and scope of provisions in Article 142 of the Constitution in context of issues which are occupied by either constitutional provisions or statutory provisions also require an opinion of the Supreme Court. The verdict has set a timeline for all Governors to act on the Bills passed by the state Assemblies and ruled that Governor does not possess any discretion in exercise of functions under Article 200 of the Constitution in respect to any Bill presented to them and must mandatorily abide by the advice tendered by the council of ministers. It had said state governments can directly approach the Supreme Court if the President withholds assent on a bill sent by a Governor for consideration.
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
The Dharmasthala imbroglio shocks India
With a reputation of being the Hindutva laboratory in southern India, Dakshina Kannada region has been regularly in the news for over two decades for its communally charged atmosphere and frequent flare-ups between Hindus and Muslims. This zone has been almost out of bounds for the other communities as far as electing MPs and MLAs are concerned, including in the 2023 Assembly elections where it returned BJP candidates from the majority community overwhelmingly. Of course, the 2024 Lok Sabha polls was a walkover for the saffron party as the nation still reposed faith on Narendra Modi, albeit in a derated manner. The recent controversy over the mass burial issue in Dharmasthala has uncomfortably turned the spotlight on this region again. An unnamed person has declared that he was a witness to mass burials of many women over a two-decade long period in this holy town, which has made almost all concerned to sit up and take notice. The government has understandably been cautious on proceeding in this case. Quite interestingly, this town in Belthangady taluk has a Jain administration for the centuries-old Shiva temple, known locally as Manjunatha. Even more notable is that Hindu priests go about performing puja rituals based on Vaishnavite traditions. Given that both Shaivite and Vaishnavite sects have independent temples all over India, with its followers inter-dependent as far as belief in Hindu traditions go, Dharmasthala is surely under the scanner at present. The Jain community has stressed on an independent SIT enquiry, the Home Minister of the state has affirmed that he would take a comprehensive view of the ongoing affairs, while the political parties are waiting and watching, for the moment. Already, legal recourse to the wildfire in social media circles and electronic media has been sought to be capped with a court order restraining the media from publishing defamatory content. This was after the secretary of the temple knocked on the doors of the court when it threatened to implicate the officials of the temple overseeing the administration. Even as the court gagged media channels, they have moved an appeal in the Supreme Court seeking to quash this move, as per the latest developments. Secular elements, sensing an opening, have welcomed the setting up of SIT and have asked for an impartial investigation. Noting that the FIR in this case was registered 20 days back, the progressive sections of the State have even enquired why the bodies could not have been exhumed if the claim of burying 'hundreds of bodies' was true. With the Chief Minister writing on X declaring that 'there is a possibility that unnatural deaths, murders, rapes, and other serious crimes may have occurred in this area (sic)', it seems that the Pandora's Box has just been opened, with the buzz slowly gaining momentum. Accused of being a minority-appeasing government, the Congress would like to step in, with a forceful style of its own, even as the BJP is cautiously wording its responses, awaiting further developments. Is it going to be the next dharmayudh between the two political rivals? Only time will tell.
