FNC discusses cooperation with parliamentary delegations at Sixth World Conference of Speakers of Parliament in Geneva
Dr. Al Nuaimi met separately with Andrija Mandić, Speaker of the Parliament of Montenegro; Amir Ohana, Knesset Speaker, and Konstantin Kosachev, Deputy Speaker of the Federation Council of the Russian Federation.
During the meetings, discussions focused on enhancing bilateral cooperation and strengthening parliamentary ties between the FNC and the respective legislative bodies.
They also emphasised the importance of coordination on issues of mutual interest within regional and international parliamentary forums.
Dr. Al Nuaimi underscored the vital role that parliaments play in fostering dialogue and promoting understanding between nations.
He also noted that such bilateral meetings on the sidelines of international events offer a valuable platform for exchanging perspectives and boosting parliamentary collaboration.
The meetings were attended by several FNC members.
Follow Emirates 24|7 on Google News.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
10 hours ago
- Zawya
Oil producer pressure, Trump rollbacks threaten last-chance global plastics treaty
Hopes for a "last chance" ambitious global treaty to curb plastic pollution have dimmed as delegates gather this week at the United Nations in Geneva for what was intended to be the final round of negotiations. Diplomats and climate advocates warn that efforts by the European Union and small island states to cap virgin plastic production - fuelled by petroleum, coal and gas - are threatened by opposition from petrochemical-producing countries and the U.S. administration under Donald Trump. Delegates will meet officially from Tuesday for the sixth round of talks, after a meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-5) in South Korea late last year ended without a path forward on capping plastic pollution. The most divisive issues include capping production, managing plastic products and chemicals of concern, and financing to help developing countries implement the treaty. Delegates told Reuters that oil states, including Saudi Arabia and Russia, plan to challenge key treaty provisions and push for voluntary or national measures, hindering progress toward a legally binding agreement to tackle the root cause of plastic pollution. Government spokespeople for Saudi Arabia and Russia were not immediately available for comment, Andres Del Castillo, senior attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), a non profit providing legal counsel to some countries attending the talks, said oil states were questioning even basic facts about the harm to health caused by plastics. "We are in a moment of revisionism, where even science is highly politicized," he said. The U.S. State Department told Reuters it will lead a delegation supporting a treaty on reducing plastic pollution that doesn't impose burdensome restrictions on producers that could hinder U.S. companies. A source familiar with the talks said the U.S. seeks to limit the treaty's scope to downstream issues like waste disposal, recycling and product design. It comes as the Trump administration rolls back environmental policies, including a longstanding finding on greenhouse gas emissions endangering health. Over 1,000 delegates, including scientists and petrochemical lobbyists, will attend the talks, raising concerns among proponents of an ambitious agreement that industry influence may create a watered-down deal focused on waste management, instead of production limits. ISLAND STATES VULNERABLE Plastic production is set to triple by 2060 without intervention, choking oceans, harming human health and accelerating climate change, according to the OECD. "This is really our last best chance. As pollution grows, it deepens the burden for those who are least responsible and least able to adapt," said Ilana Seid, permanent representative of Palau and chair of the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS). Small island states are particularly impacted by plastic waste washing ashore, threatening their fishing and tourism economies. They stress an urgent need for dedicated international funding to clean up existing pollution. "Plastics are a concern for human health because (plastic) contains about 16,000 chemicals, and a quarter of these are known to be hazardous to human health," said Dr. Melanie Bergmann of the Alfred Wegener Institute in Germany. Jodie Roussell, global public affairs lead at food giant Nestle and a member of a 300-company coalition backing a treaty to reduce plastic pollution, told Reuters that harmonizing international regulations on packaging reduction and sustainable material use would be the most cost-effective approach. French politician Philippe Bolo, a member of the global Interparliamentary Coalition to End Plastic Pollution, said that a weak, watered down treaty that focuses on waste management must be avoided. Bolo and a diplomatic source from a country attending the talks said the potential of a vote or even a breakaway agreement among more ambitious countries could be explored, as a last resort. Inger Andersen, executive director of the United Nations Environment Programme, however, said countries should push for a meaningful pact agreed by consensus. "We're not here to get something meaningless... you would want something that is effective, that has everybody inside, and therefore everybody committed to it," she said. (Reporting by Olivia Le Poidevin in Geneva; Valerie Volcovici in Washington and additional reporting by Alexander Marrow in London; Editing by Susan Fenton)
The National
12 hours ago
- The National
The UK is losing its millionaires, even if it's not sure how many
One of the hidden traps in dealing with British markets is that the basic set-up is seldom as straightforward as it appears. That is becoming more apparent every day in the fraught debate over a reported billionaire exodus. This phenomenon was first triggered by Brexit, compounded by the Ukraine war and then moved into overdrive by the targeting of non-domiciled tax residents, followed by the abolition of the advantageous status altogether. There are no good figures in this trend. Where there are statistics, these are overlapping and incomplete. In recent weeks, a number of analysts have started to conclude that the rush to the exits is overblown and quite possibly largely bunkum. Something is definitely going on that appears to sum up the UK's decline as an attractive economy, but its impact may not be that easy to properly gauge. The golden passport firm Henley and Partners predicted that 16,500 people would quit the UK this year alone. The non-domiciled population in the UK was 74,000 when the advantageous status was abolished. Official budget planners expected a quarter of that number to quit the UK as a result of the changes, which is just over 18,000. Surveys then suggested that this exodus was being boosted by a large chunk of the country's dollar millionaires. Prominent leavers reportedly included Nassef Sawiris, the Egyptian tycoon; Shravin Bharti Mittal, the Indian businessman; John Fredriksen, the Cypriot shipping magnate; and Richard Gnodde, the South African-born vice president of Goldman Sachs. Mr Fredriksen, who told a Norwegian newspaper that Britain had 'gone to hell', was said to be putting his £250 million ($332 million) Chelsea mansion – The Old Rectory – on the market. In truth, the 'hell' that matters is the budget deficit. Much like US President Donald Trump and his tariffs raid, the UK government is searching for novel areas to tax in order to make up the fiscal gap. The governing Labour party has clearly decided that a form of wealth taxation is its way of plugging a shortfall that seems only likely to widen as AI is brought into the economy. The missing figure that Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves appears to be aiming for is $45 billion annually. A modern, mobile population has options. They can move themselves, their asset base and ultimately their investment income out of the country. The report for Henley and Partners faced debunking last week from the lawyer Dan Neidle, for putting the total number of UK dollar millionaires at about 578,000. Its figures relied on the scraping of social media and other inventive data capture techniques to get the numbers it reported. However, the UK's Office for National Statistics suggests that the number in its surveys is about 300,000. And that is part of the problem: the state is using surveys, too. The UK system has no way of knowing how many millionaires are in the country. The government cannot peer even into every bank account let alone estimate any other holdings. When a viral video went around recently suggesting that the UK was triggering checks on people leaving the country, the suggestion was that authorities were rattled by the exodus and going to turn the taxman's gaze on the richer in this way. But no such checks are possible for the reasons above. And in any case, the UK does not record when people fly out, only when they enter the country. In truth, the 'hell' that matters is the budget deficit But wait, there is more. Beauchamp Estates, the very high-end property broker active in places like Knightsbridge, Mayfair and Belgravia, says that there's been a twist in the saga. In the first half of this year, it confirms that those involved in the 27 sales of properties were former non-doms and the majority of those left to relocate to Dubai as their prime primary residence. It noted that the market has speeded up since March. It also said that there is a clear trend of 'house-swapping' where people selling to move to the UAE are selling to buyers from the Gulf. Alongside buyers from North America, these two groups make up more than half the market in London. Some of the buyers in the pipeline are willing to pay up to £150 million. Experts suggest that what is really hurting the UK government in its wealth tax drive is the imposition of inheritance tax on the estates of the wealthy. That is an emotional issue that even saw Mr Trump give Prime Minister Keir Starmer a lecture on the 'death tax' when they met in Scotland last week. Pragmatic consideration should now force a rethink. The UK government won't, in the end, be able to tax what is no longer there. The figure for the number of people moving in this trend are, as we see, highly uncertain. But the high-profile examples given above tell a tale. Before it is too late, the Chancellor should recognise what Beauchamps detects; that the UK market has real and enduring appeal. Dislocation happens every now and then in a market that is deep and liquid. It is not too late to find more subtle ways to manage upwards the tax take from a dynamic economy that is popular with wealth creators. London, for example, is still a platform for global wealth. For her part, Ms Reeves is trying to make investing in the UK even more attractive. Starving the supply of sensational headlines about the exodus of the rich, when something more nuanced is actually taking place, would be a good place to start.
The National
14 hours ago
- The National
Egyptians head to polls for Senate vote amid limited opposition presence
Egyptians began voting on Monday in elections for the Senate, the upper chamber of parliament, with the political landscape characterised by pro-government party dominance and limited opposition. The two-day vote will determine 200 out of the chamber's 300 seats, with the remaining 100 to be appointed directly by President Abdel Fattah El Sisi. Much of the election's focus has centred on the 'National List for Egypt ', a coalition of 13 political parties aligned with the government, including the dominant Mostaqbal Watan (Nation's Future) party. Out of the 200 seats, 100 are kept for individual candidates and the remainder are expected to be secured by the so-called closed list vote, in which the coalition of parties are putting members forward. It includes both long-standing opposition parties, such as the liberal Wafd party and the leftist Tagamoa, and newer parties such as the National Front, which is led by the former housing minister Essam El Gazzar and backed by businessman Ibrahim Al Organi, a close ally of the President. Beyond the party list, a total of 428 candidates are competing for the individual seats, including 186 independents and 242 party-affiliated candidates. The election is taking place under judicial supervision in nearly 9,000 polling stations across the country. The results are expected to be announced on August 12, with any necessary run-offs to follow later this month. Should there be any need to recount, the final vote will be announced on September 4. The Senate is largely seen as symbolic. It does not hold legislative authority but serves in an advisory capacity. It reviews constitutional amendments, laws, and policies before passing them to the more powerful House of Representatives, where pro-government forces also dominate. The Senate used to be called the Shura Council before its abolition in 2014 during Mr El Sisi's first term. The chamber was revived as the Senate in 2019 under a series of constitutional reforms. The Senate will convene for a five-year term, with its first session expected after all results are finalised. Despite a heated promotion campaign from the government and from senators whose banners can be seen hanging all over Cairo's districts, rich and poor, there is little to no interest in the election among the people and only brief mentions of it in local press, both pro and anti-government. Mr El Sisi and Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly cast their votes during televised ceremonies on Monday morning, as did a number of other government ministers and the Grand Mufti. The Egyptian government launched a national dialogue in 2022 to engage opposition voices. However, rights groups say political freedom remains tightly restricted, with tens of thousands of political prisoners still detained. Meanwhile, attention will soon shift to the upcoming House of Representatives elections, scheduled for November, which will complete Egypt's latest electoral cycle.
