Overflow crowd packs West Wildwood meeting as threat of losing police department looms
Community members in West Wildwood packed the room where a board of commissioners meeting was held Friday night so much so, the meeting had to be moved outdoors to accommodate the overflow crowd.
On the docket? The possible loss of the West Wildwood Police Department.
WEST WILDWOOD, N.J. - West Wildwood residents showed up to a Board of Commissioners meeting Friday night in droves, pushing the meeting out of the building into the parking lot, all to make their voices heard over the future of the town's police department.
What we know
"I really want to keep our police here," a resident commented.
"That's one reason whey we bought houses back here for the safety of the police being in the area," another resident explained.
West Wildwood neighbors packed the Board of Commissioners meeting Friday night, geared up with Back Bay blue t-shirts and signs.
Borough Hall was over capacity and the meeting had to be moved outside to a park across the street.
There West Wildwood leaders outlined their predicament and possible solutions, including contracting with a neighboring police department, which is not an idea many residents care for.
What they're saying
"The police are always seen around here. If there's a problem, they're at your place immediately. If Wildwood police take over, that's not gonna happen," Denise Slocum stated.
Randy Collins said, "They're saying it'll be cheaper for Wildwood to do it. You know it's gonna be for a year, then our taxes are gonna go up and up and up."
"Stone Harbor had to reorganize their police department. You know why? They're trying to cut cause they have to. Budgets have to be cut," Lisa Rippo remarked.
Borough leaders say the small seaside community has had trouble retaining officers, who have been leaving for bigger towns for bigger salaries.
"We're kinda off the beaten path. The time it would take for the police to get here if we have a problem – it's not right. I think it's all about money," Ron Fleming said.
Leaders laid out the potential choices and warned of future tax hikes. Some may be willing to pay more to keep their hometown officers and their ultra-fast response times.
"Without having a police force and relying on other towns to come and assist during an emergency, a crisis, a break-in, a medical emergency. That's what we worry about," Melanie Smith pointed out.
Kami Smith said, "Even if we would call the cops and stuff it would take 10 minutes, five minutes just to get over here."
Joseph Talucci added, "We settled here cause it's such a great community, a great hometown feeling and losing our police department would be a very big detriment to us. Once you lose it, you're never gonna get it back."
What's next
The mayor and commissioners said no final decision has been made. They're waiting for responses from the neighboring Wildwood towns on what the costs would be to share police.
The meeting went just like the town – peaceful and polite. Residents are pleading for it to stay that way.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
"What The F**ck": People Are Losing Their Minds Over This Really, Really Bizarre AI Interview With A Dead Teenager From The Parkland Shooting
Former CNN host Jim Acosta faced backlash on Monday after sharing what he called a 'one-of-a-kind interview' with an AI version of Parkland school shooting victim Joaquin Oliver, a bot created by his parents to honor their son on what would have been his 25th birthday. The interview — shared to Acosta's SubStack page — depicts Oliver, one of 17 who died in the 2018 massacre, remarking on the cause of death and stressing why it's 'important' to talk about gun violence in schools. The AI — when asked for its 'solution' to gun violence — emphasized a need for a mix of stronger gun-control laws, mental health support and community engagement. Related: The bot of Oliver proceeded to speak in a noticeably higher tone before discussing the late teen's interests in the Miami Heat and Star Wars. Acosta — who declared that the technology left him 'speechless' — called the conversation 'so insightful,' telling the late teen's father, Manuel Oliver, that it felt like the first time he really got to know his son. 'I felt like I was communicating with him, which is just so remarkable,' Acosta said. 'People say, 'Well, AI, you know, it could be bad, it could cause all these destructive things.' This is an example of how it might actually do some good, it might help some people who have suffered tremendous losses like your family have a way to hold on to who this person was, which I think is a beautiful thing.' @JimAcosta Related: Manuel Oliver and his wife, Patricia Oliver — co-founders of the gun-control advocacy group Change the Ref — have been involved in other projects that demand action against gun violence, including a school shooting video game, a play and a site that uses AI to recreate victims' voices for calls to Congress. Manuel Oliver — in a video shared to X, formerly Twitter — acknowledged that the AI was his and his wife's idea, adding that Acosta shouldn't be blamed for 'what he was able to do' in the 'interview.' 'If the problem that you have is with the AI, then you have the wrong problem,' he said. 'The real problem is that my son was shot eight years ago. So if you believe that that is not the problem, you are part of the problem.' Related: While Acosta restricted those who could reply to his posts on X, it wasn't the same case on his BlueSky account, where a number of critics were stunned by the AI move. 'Hey Jim. Quick question. What the fuck is wrong with you,' replied one user. And, naturally, users on X had a lot to say regardless. Check out what users said on Bluesky and X below. Related: This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds:
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump looks for ‘more ways to spend my money' on White House roof
Ever the developer-in-chief, President Donald Trump made a surprise appearance on the White House roof above the briefing room in an apparent effort to inspect future construction. The press, which had been pushed significantly down the driveway, attempted to figure out what was going on. "Mr. President, what are you doing up there?" MORE: Trump is building a new $200 million ballroom at the White House "Just taking a little walk," he shouted back. "What are you building?" "It goes with the ballroom, which is on the other side," he said. Pressed again by reporters, Trump said "Something beautiful," while pantomiming with his hands. Trump said it was "Just more ways to spend my money," adding "Just more ways to spend my money for the country." "Anything I do is financed by me," he stressed. Asked if he was considering an addition or a second story, Trump wouldn't say. The president was accompanied by a small group of aides and Secret Service. The group included architect Jim McCrery, who has been commissioned to add Trump's ballroom to the White House. The two men appeared engaged in intense conversation as they surveyed the grounds with lots of animated pointing. Trump then went out of camera range for several minutes, presumably to look out toward the South Lawn. When he returned, reporters again tried to get more information. "What are you trying to build?" one reporter shouted. "Missiles," Trump responded, presumably joking. "Nuclear missiles," he repeated while making the gesture of a rocket launching. Trump then ignored a question on Gaza and walked back inside.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Linamar's Hasenfratz urges Canada to hold the line on CUSMA amid rising tariff uncertainty
Linamar executive chair Linda Hasenfratz is urging Ottawa to defend the CUSMA trade pact, warning that any move to impose tariffs on auto parts could severely disrupt the industry's deeply integrated North American supply chain. Automakers have been hit hard by U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war due to tariffs on exported vehicles and metals, which have negatively impacted their bottom lines. Yet, within the automotive industry, the vast majority of products crossing the border, particularly parts, are CUSMA-compliant and operating under zero duties. Still, there's a risk that could change. Hasenfratz, board chair of the Association of Equipment Manufacturers, is urging the federal government to work hard to maintain the CUSMA agreement, warning that dismantling it would have a devastating impact on the economy. 'While its spirit and substance have been undermined by the Trump administration, the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement has thus far been key to Canada's perceived safety net,' said CIBC Capital Markets economist Avery Shenfeld. Canada's advantage from the CUSMA carve-out is only as strong as the agreement itself, which will lapse in 2026 unless all parties agree to renew it, he says. 'The cloud of uncertainty will hang over capital spending plans in a broad range of Canadian export sectors,' Shenfeld added, noting that Canada could lose its special exemption at any time. 'I still believe that if they put tariffs on parts, it would bring the industry to its knees because it's such an integrated supply chain of parts going back-and-forth the border multiple times,' Hasenfratz said. Trying to apply a tariff on each of those crossings would be enormously expensive, she says. After decades of free trade, trying to 'unscramble the eggs,' as many people have said, would be difficult, costly, and wouldn't create value, she adds. 'Let's address the concerns that exist and make sure that people are feeling comfortable with the trade agreement we have in any areas that are felt to be lacking,' Hasenfratz said. If CUSMA stays intact, Linamar stands to benefit as its customers look to onshore products currently sourced from Asia and Europe. With new international trade deals in place, clients are comparing tariff costs, and that's prompting many to consider localizing their supply chains. 'I see this as a real opportunity for us to potentially get some new business and we're quoting on such opportunities.' Hasenfratz is optimistic that Canada's automotive sector will remain a pillar of the economy. Suppliers, she notes, play an essential role and are poised for growth. She also believes Canada will continue to be a home for vehicle assembly due to its productivity, talent pool, and green, low-cost energy. These fundamentals are how one should decide where to manufacture, Hasenfratz says. 'Don't make long-term decisions on short-term tactics. Make long-term decisions on long-term fundamentals, and that's something Canada has in spades.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
