No obligation on Israel to remedy starvation in Gaza Strip, says minister
Gaza Strip
, an
Israeli government
minister said on Thursday that Israel had no duty to alleviate hunger in the territory and was seeking to expel its population.
Far-right politician Amichay Eliyahu, who leads Israel's heritage ministry, said in a radio interview that 'there is no nation that feeds its enemies,' adding that 'the British didn't feed the Nazis, nor did the Americans feed the Japanese, nor do the Russians feed the Ukrainians now'.
He concluded that the government was 'rushing toward Gaza being wiped out,' while also 'driving out the population that educated its people on the ideas of 'Mein Kampf'', an anti-Semitic text written by Adolf Hitler.
Life in the West Bank
Listen |
26:12
The office of
Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu
declined to comment on whether Mr Eliyahu's remarks had represented the government's position.
An Israeli military official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said Mr Eliyahu's comments did not reflect military policy.
Mr Eliyahu oversees historical and archaeological sites and institutions in Israel and has no authority over the military. He does not participate in meetings of a small group of ministers who oversee security decisions. His office did not reply to requests for clarification.
Mr Eliyahu's comments were swiftly condemned by Israeli opposition politicians, who said the minister did not represent the Israeli mainstream. Polling suggests a majority of Israelis favour reaching a ceasefire to release hostages held by Islamist group Hamas.
The interview came amid increasing cases of starvation in Gaza. Israel has blocked all food deliveries to the enclave between early March and late May. While Israel allows some food into Gaza, it has drastically reduced the number of places from which food is distributed, forcing Palestinians to receive food aid from a handful of sites that are hard to access.
The UN's Palestinian refugee agency (Unrwa) said that one in five children in Gaza City is malnourished and cases are increasing daily.
Unrwa commissioner-general Philippe Lazzarini cited a colleague telling him: 'People in Gaza are neither dead nor alive, they are walking corpses.'
More than 100 international aid organisations and human rights groups have also warned of mass starvation and pressed for governments to take action.
Israel says there is no siege and blames Hamas for the widespread malnutrition.
Israel and the United States, meanwhile, have recalled their delegations from ceasefire talks for consultations. US envoy Steve Witkoff accused Hamas of failing to act in good faith in the talks.
'While the mediators have made a great effort, Hamas does not appear to be co-ordinated or acting in good faith. We will now consider alternative options to bring the hostages home and try to create a more stable environment for the people of Gaza,' said Mr Witkoff on X.
.
— Department of State (@StateDept)
An Israeli official with knowledge of the talks said the answer presented by Hamas to the most recent ceasefire proposal 'does not allow for progress without a concession' by the group, but that Israel intended to continue discussions.
Mediators have been seeking to clinch an agreement that would secure a ceasefire and the release of hostages still held in the Gaza Strip.
Israel and Hamas are facing pressure at home and abroad to reach a deal after almost two years of war. The humanitarian situation inside the war-torn enclave is deteriorating sharply and Israelis are worried about the conditions in which remaining hostages are being held.
Elsewhere, a senior German government official said
Israel
was violating the law of
war
in
Gaza
, but insisted that
Berlin
will not be the 29th signatory to a letter demanding Israel 'end now' its military action.
[
Germany says Israel 'violating law of war' in Gaza but refuses to sign ceasefire letter
Opens in new window
]
Jürgen Hardt
, foreign policy spokesman for the ruling Christian Democratic Union (CDU), argued the letter was already being used by Hamas and other parts of the Arab world for propaganda purposes.
'That doesn't need to happen with German assistance,' he said.
However, Mr Hardt admitted German officials no longer believe Israel is doing everything it can to allow enough humanitarian aid into Gaza.
– New York Times/Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Mood shifts on Israel-Gaza, but will it bring change?
There's no doubt the mood has shifted on the Israel-Gaza war. In the past week, three powerful G7 nations - France, the UK and Canada – announced their intention to recognise the State of Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September. That means four of the five permanent members of the Security Council - the UN's highest decision-making body - will join the more than 140 member states that already recognise Palestine, leaving the United States diplomatically isolated on the issue. With pressure mounting over starvation in Gaza, the United Nations held a major conference this week aimed at reviving the "two-state solution" for Israel and Palestine, a decades-old idea favoured by most of the world, but largely written off as dead in the water - until now. Boycotting the two-day event, the Israeli ambassador called it "a circus" while the US State Department said it was "unproductive and untimely". But even here, in the US, where support for Israel has been an unshakeable article of faith across the political spectrum, but especially in the Republican Party, key allies of President Donald Trump have begun to dissent. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the MAGA congresswoman from Georgia, took to X to voice her opposition to American policy on Israel. "It's the most truthful and easiest thing to say that Oct 7th in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned, but so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza," she wrote. That made her the first Republican in Congress to call Israel's actions in Gaza a genocide. A handful of Democrats have already used that term. Previously, Ms Taylor Greene introduced an amendment to cut funding for Israel's missile defence system – although that failed to garner any real support in Washington. But outside of Congress, fellow MAGA leaders - including the former White House strategist Steve Bannon and the right-wing podcaster Tucker Carlson - have been damning of US policy in the Middle East, seeing it at odds with their "America First" doctrine. Mr Bannon – though still a staunch supporter of Israel – has little time for the current prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whom he once called a "bald-faced liar". Mr Carlson criticised US aid to Israel, arguing the money would be better spent at home to tackle the opioid epidemic, among other domestic crises. He also slammed the recent Israeli airstrike on a Catholic Church in Gaza City. "They're not allowed to use my tax dollars to bomb churches," he told a US podcast. "I'll put up with a lot of stuff, but I don't understand how any Christian leader in the United States can sit by and not say something about that," he said. Scepticism of American involvement in "forever wars" is certainly a hallmark of the MAGA movement. Indeed, last year, ahead of the election that returned Mr Trump to power, I reported from his rally at New York's iconic Madison Square Gardens. During an Israel-focused speech beamed onto the giant outdoor screen, a man in the crowd shouted, "why are you talking about Israel – what about America?". In another post on X this week, Ms Greene pressed that case. "Most Americans that I know don't hate Israel and we are not antisemitic at all," she wrote. "We are beyond fed up with being told that we have to fix the world's problems, pay for the world's problems, and fight all the world's wars while Americans are struggling to survive even though they work every day". Then there is President Trump himself, who this week made headlines when he contradicted Mr Netanyahu's denial of starvation in Gaza. Asked if he agreed with Mr Netanyahu's assessment, Mr Trump said: "Based on television, I would say not particularly, because those children look very hungry". "They have to get food and safety right now," he added. The following day, a UN-backed report found that the "worst-case" famine scenario was unfolding across Gaza. Mr Trump dispatched his Middle East special envoy Steve Witkoff and Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee to inspect aid distribution sites run by American contractors under the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). The GHF sites, set up to replace UN aid distribution networks which the US and Israel said were hijacked by Hamas, have become the scene of near-daily mass killings of starving Palestinians, prompting international outrage. The French Foreign Minister, Jean-Noel Barrot, co-chairing this week's conference, called it a "bloodbath". Last weekend, a group of Democratic senators wrote to the US Secretary of State Marc Rubio urging him to "immediately cease" all US funding for GHF and resume support for UN-led operations, with increased oversight. Adding to the pressure, a former US contractor with GHF gave an interview to the BBC saying that in his entire career, he had "never witnessed the level of brutality and use of indiscriminate and unnecessary force against a civilian population, an unarmed, starving population". Anthony Aguilar, a United States Army veteran, dismissed by the GHF as a disgruntled ex-employee, continued to speak out on US and international media platforms. Gaza aid today, he said, was like The Hunger Games. 'Turning point' With the mood apparently shifting in Washington and across the world, diplomats gathered for the UN's two-state solution conference this week feeling like the momentum was behind them. "It can and must serve as a decisive turning point," the UN Secretary General António Guterres said in his opening remarks. "One that catalyses irreversible progress towards ending the occupation and realising our shared aspiration for a viable two-state solution," he said. The sentiment was echoed over the following two days and the conference's final declaration won more support than diplomats initially expected. The ambitious seven-page document called for an immediate ceasefire, the release of Israeli hostages and Palestinian prisoners, recognition of Palestine by countries that have not yet done so, normalisation of relations with Israel, the disarmament of Hamas, and a commitment to a political solution with the Palestinian Authority, subject to major reforms in control of Gaza and the West Bank. Significantly, it was the first time a UN document, signed by Arab nations, officially condemned the Hamas-led attacks on Israel on 7 October, 2023. But two critical players – Israel and the United States – were not there. In their absence, was this a case of the UN shouting into the void? I asked Mary Robinson, former president and UN High Commissioner for Human Rights at a news conference on Monday. She said that she felt real pressure in the conference room that the world had to move forward. "I think that can't be ignored, even by a powerful United States supporting Israel, the current Israeli government," she said, adding, "they particularly can't ignore the widespread sense now of an unfolding genocide and the starvation of children, of women, pregnant women". This could be the point of realisation, she said, that the US "is becoming complicit in a genocide". "That could be enough," she said. It is certainly true that Americans' support for Israel's military campaign has waned. A recent Gallup poll showed just a third of US citizens polled backed Israel's actions in Gaza – the lowest since November 2023. It is also worth noting, as an aside, that New York could be on the brink of electing as mayor Zohran Mamdani – an outspoken critic of Israel's military assault on Gaza, who has said he would arrest Mr Netanyahu were he to come to the city. On Monday, the UN conference's co-chair Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud, Foreign Minister of Saudi Arabia, was upbeat about the prospects of finding common ground with the White House. After all, it was Mr Trump who brokered the Abraham Accords during his first term – a deal to normalise relations between Israel and the Arab states of United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Morocco. "I think we've all heard President Trump statements on many occasions that he is a man of peace, that he is someone who opposes war, and he is a humanitarian," Mr bin Farhan Al Saud told reporters at the conference. He said he believed US engagement, especially the engagement of President Trump, could be a "catalyst for an end to the immediate crisis in Gaza and potentially a resolution of the Palestinian Israeli conflict In the long term". Saudi Arabia's eventual sign-up to the accords was always the big prize for Mr Trump. But the Saudi foreign minister made it clear this week that there would be no negotiation on the matter, without an end to the war and the establishment of a Palestinian State. The Saudis certainly have a good deal of leverage in Washington. But then, so does Mr Netanyahu. Some experts remain sceptical that the shift in mood will yield any real change. "I think we've reached a turning point in terms of perceptions of the war, and I think a tipping point in the coverage of the catastrophe," Michael Hanna, US Programme Director at the International Crisis Group, an NGO aimed at conflict prevention. "I'm not yet sure that that is going to fully translate into a change in policy," he added. He said there was always a gulf between public opinion and the political class in the US. "That gap is shrinking in some respects - we see a rise in criticism," he said. "Again, criticism is not the same as policy shift". Ms Greene, for example, was largely alone in Congress on the Republican side, he said. Indeed, while the week started with Mr Trump sympathising with the plight of hungry Palestinians, by Thursday, he was issuing barely veiled threats against Canada over its intention to recognise a Palestinian State. The State Department also announced sanctions against the Palestinian Authority and Palestinian Liberation Organisation on Thursday, which means members will be unable to travel to the US for the UN General Assembly in September. As for diplomatic isolation at the UN, that is something the US is prepared to bear, Mr Hanna told RTÉ News. "It is notable when the isolation also encompasses other Western members of the permanent five, UK and France, so maybe it's magnified isolation. "But the US has been willing to endure that isolation for a very long time, so it's not clear that that is particularly uncomfortable," he said. A lot hinges on President Trump's own views of course, and it is anyone's guess what he will decide next. His approach to the Middle East has been "all over the map," Mr Hanna said. There have been moments of tension between Mr Trump and Mr Netanyahu, he added. "There were direct contacts with Hamas, which I think shocked the Israelis," he said, "then the U-turn on the Yemen campaign". Mr Trump abruptly declared an end to the bombing of Houthi rebel group positions in May. "And then, of course, then another big shift on intervention in Iran," he said in reference to the US joining Israel's bombing campaign of Iran's nuclear sites in a surprise move in June. The flip-flopping continued this week, when President Trump initially said he had "no view" on the matter, when the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced the UK's intention to recognise the State of Palestine. But within hours, Mr Trump had labelled recognition "a reward for Hamas". Amid all the rhetoric and noise, Mr Hanna said, the point is that there is "still no ceasefire in Gaza".
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Lammy not accepting Iran's claims over enriched uranium
Foreign Secretary David Lammy says he does not accept Iran's claims that the country is enriching uranium for academic purposes. Representatives from the United Kingdom, Germany and France held talks with Iran last week to try to break the deadlock over the country's nuclear programme. Tehran maintains it is open to diplomacy, though it recently suspended cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). A central concern for western powers was highlighted when the IAEA reported in May that Iran's stockpile of uranium enriched to 60% – just below weapons-grade level – had grown to more than 400kg. We would be very suddenly handing over to our children and grandchildren a world that had many more nuclear weapons in it than it has today. In a wide-ranging interview with The Guardian, Mr Lammy said: 'Its leaders cannot explain to me – and I've had many conversations with them – why they need 60% enriched uranium. 'If I went to Sellafield or Urenco in Cheshire, they haven't got anything more than 6%. The Iranians claim it's for academic use, but I don't accept that.' Mr Lammy warned that Iran developing nuclear weapons could lead to an escalation of tensions in the Middle East. Israel and the United States carried our strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in June. 'Many of your readers will have watched Oppenheimer and seen the fallout of (the US building an atomic bomb),' he said. 'So it's what (a nuclear Iran) might mean in terms of other countries in the neighbourhood who would desire one, too. And we would be very suddenly handing over to our children and grandchildren a world that had many more nuclear weapons in it than it has today.' The Foreign Secretary said he had heard Israeli arguments in favour of regime change in Tehran, but did not believe that was behind the US decision to strike. The Tottenham MP added any decision to topple the government was one for the Iranian people, with his focus 'on what the UK can do to stop Iran becoming a nuclear power'. Last month, Mr Lammy suggested that Britain, France and Germany could 'snap back' on sanctions against Iran unless the country gets 'serious' about stepping back from its nuclear ambitions. He told the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee: 'Iran face even more pressure in the coming weeks because the E3 can snap back on our sanctions, and it's not just our sanctions, it's actually a UN mechanism that would impose dramatic sanctions on Iran across nearly every single front in its economy. 'So they have a choice to make. It's a choice for them to make. 'I'm very clear about the choice they should make, but I'm also clear that the UK has a decision to make that could lead to far greater pain for the Iranian regime unless they get serious about the international desire to see them step back from their nuclear ambitions at this time.'
Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Letters: Gaza is a humanitarian disaster zone – observing reality is not antisemitic
That this should now be a common reaction is a mark of how dangerously narrow the conversation has become and how effective the Israeli government has been in conflating legitimate criticism with bigotry. The world is watching an immense humanitarian disaster unfold. The mounting civilian death toll, the chaos of aid distribution and the absence of any viable plan for Gaza's future are not matters of opinion; they are documented realities. To point to them is not to erase October 7, or to excuse Hamas; it is to insist that collective punishment cannot be the policy of any democracy that claims the rule of law. Many of Israel's closest allies are beginning to see this. The shift in Western public opinion, especially among the young, is not because of some sudden outbreak of latent antisemitism, but because people have eyes, ears and a conscience. Enda Cullen, Tullysaran, Co Armagh Substance abuse levels are growing: children need to be educated on dangers The Health Research Board reports that more people than ever are in treatment to help them tackle alcohol and drug abuse. Its annual report on problem drug and alcohol use covers an eight-year period from 2017 to 2024. It's reported that more than 8,500 people were treated for alcohol abuse last year. Alcohol remains the drug that most people need help with, but cocaine use alongside alcohol is also rising significantly. It seems that younger people are more inclined to poly-drug use, where the older demographic tends to be more alcohol-dependent. As a clinician, I have become accustomed to seeing people who may be experiencing a concern, like pain from an injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety or depression, and instead of addressing the root cause, one sees how substance misuse temporarily numbs pain or psychological health concerns. ADVERTISEMENT One might hear this being referred to as 'self-medicating', but it's a dangerous coping mechanism. All children and young people have a right to effective drug and alcohol education that not only teaches them the facts about substances and their effects, but equips them with the skills, strategies and attributes to manage their lives. John O'Brien, Clonmel, Co Tipperary Inflation may be up by only 1.6pc officially, but our pockets tell a different tale Is the inflation index becoming fake news these days? We are told by the CSO that inflation rose by 1.6pc to the end of July, and that at the same time foodstuffs rose by 4.6pc ('Shoppers buy cheaper cuts as food prices rise at three times inflation rate', Irish Independent, August 1). Now, I know that inflation is measured by a basket of items, not just foodstuffs, but it is taking the biscuit to say inflation only rose by 1.6pc. Pocket inflation to me is the real measure. Aidan Roddy, Cabinteely, Dublin 18 Social Democrats and the Labour Party are finally pulling in same direction It is no surprise that the Social Democrats are standing by acting party leader Cian O'Callaghan's decision to re-admit Eoin Hayes to the party after his eight-month suspension, despite giving incorrect information to the media about the sale of his shares in a US software company that supplied technology to the Israeli military. He will reinstate their numbers and this will be advantageous for the purpose of committee membership and chairs. Eight months was not a long time to spend in political purgatory. According to Tabitha Monahan's article, O'Callaghan's parliamentary secretary Martha Ní Riada was not very impressed. It is interesting to see that the Labour Party has joined the Social Democrats in its endorsement of Independent Socialist candidate Catherine Connolly. I believe this is the correct option for Labour as it had no credible candidate of its own. This could be a start to the unity of the left. We will just have to see if the numbers will strengthen. Thomas Garvey, Claremorris, Co Mayo Catherine Connolly only needs Sinn Féin to row in and it's a two-horse race Well done to the Labour Party for its decision to back Independent TD Catherine Connolly in her bid for the presidency. The onus now falls on Sinn Féin to complete the opposition line-up against the Fine Gael (and, so far, the only government party candidate) Mairead McGuinness. This could now turn out to be a two-horse race. If so, the famous races on all this week at Ballybrit may augur well for the Galway girl. John Glennon, Hollywood, Co Wicklow In rush to erase the Triple Lock, it seems we have forgotten our past Which will hit the tape first, the Coalition's goal of the Triple Lock or the slow bicycle race called the Occupied Territories Bill? The Triple Lock is puzzling, talking about freeing us up to militarily involve ourselves in wars of our choice. Wars of our choice tend to be wars of the US and UK's choice. Ironically, the plain people of the nation want the OTB passed, but find legal obstacles along the way. However, the Triple Lock seems locked and loaded before Halloween falls. We are a neutral nation that once carried moral clout. Playing war games with nations smeared in supporting current genocides wasn't what Connolly and Pearse envisaged. Or have the Soldiers of Destiny forgotten entirely their past? John Cuffe, Co Meath Shinners' lack of respect and tone when talking in Dáil shames the party When Leo Varadkar was taoiseach, he made an insightful comment about Sinn Féin's behaviour and attitude in the Dáil at the time. The party always engages in demonising and putting down the Government in a way that is not parliamentary or at all cordial. It is actually dull and boring and hypocritical, given they are talking about stuff like respect for those who need hospital treatment, for example. Could the party please take some time out this August to think about how it acts in the Dáil and the tone it uses when speaking? Liam Doran, Clondalkin, Dublin
