Plans unveiled for 70 affordable homes on former County Durham industrial site
Believe housing wants to transform 2.77 hectares of disused land on the North East Industrial Estate, off Armstrong Road, in Peterlee, into a community with 70 new affordable homes.
The plan, made in collaboration with planning consultant Lichfields and regional housebuilder Oaktree Living, includes eight bungalows and 62 houses, all with private gardens and parking, that would be available for social rent or affordable home ownership.
The proposal is being shared with neighbouring residents for feedback.
Further details and an opportunity to provide feedback on the proposed development, by Wednesday, July 23, can be found at lichfieldsdraft.wixsite.com/armstrongroad.
This feedback will help shape the final proposal before a planning application is submitted to Durham County Council.
Tom Winter, assistant director of development at believe housing, said: "Our nearby Weavers Close development has been very popular, providing the high-quality affordable homes people deserve.
"However, more homes are needed, and we believe this site is perfect for development.
"We aim to deliver energy-efficient, affordable homes that are healthy and affordable to run while regenerating this eyesore site, which has been vacant for more than two years and is no longer needed for industrial use.
READ MORE:
Rare breed of horse cherished by the late Queen joins Bishop Auckland theatre show
Town to step out in style for ball in memory of 'much-loved' Grace and Wendy
Plans to transform Grade II-listed church into housing, offices, and gym approved
"The site is well-positioned for access to amenities and employment opportunities in Peterlee, as well as Durham, Sunderland, Newcastle, and beyond.
"If approved, this project will improve lives, enhance the area, support local infrastructure, and boost local jobs and businesses during construction."
Building work could start next year, if planning permission is approved and government funding towards redevelopment costs is secured.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Council to hold public event to discuss sale of Sussex beach
A council is hosting an event giving residents the opportunity to discuss the sale of part of a Sussex beach. Adur District Council will host the public engagement event on July 28 at Southwick Community Centre. The event will begin at 6.30pm until 8pm, offering residents the chance to find out more about the beach's potential sale to Shoreham Port. The sale comprises the area of Carat's Café, the car park at Basin Road, public conveniences attached to the café building, beach huts and the remaining section of beach and foreshore in Arun District Council ownership. The council is considering the sale because it says it lacks the necessary funding to adequately invest into the current infrastructure or ensure the future protection of the shoreline. However, the proposal has raised serious concerns from residents who fear the sale could mean the loss of public access to the section of the beach. At a council meeting on July 1, Councillor Julia Watts described the sale as "catastrophic". She said: 'It's hard to overstate how important the beach is to Southwick. "While the report describes the sale as rationalisation of the asset portfolio, I would argue the beach and the café are essential components of our identity both for health and wellbeing and how we see ourselves as a coastal community. 'The loss of the use of the beach would be catastrophic for Southwick.' Shoreham Port has since promised to retain the areas public access forever. It said: 'We recognise that the port and beaches are very important places for people,' a port spokesman said. 'We currently own and maintain the beaches either side of this potential purchase and have made considerable investments in improving these over recent years. 'As part of the potential purchase we have committed to retain public rights of access to the beach forever.' Read more Post office closed amid widespread national outages Timing of first Sussex mayoral election revealed Thunderstorm warning issued following weeks of heatwaves The port went on: 'We are currently working on a large coast protection scheme with the Environment Agency which will see further improvement to beach access over the next couple of years. "Should this transaction proceed, we would integrate the coastal protection liability of this area into our existing commitments.' The public event will be led by Councillor Jeremy Gardner, leader of Adur District Council, and will also be attended by council officers and representatives of Shoreham Port. Adur District Council has set up an online booking page for those wishing to attend, with tickets available on a first come, first served basis. Residents who are unable to attend will also have the opportunity to submit any questions via news@ These must be submitted by 5pm on July 23.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
A tech billionaire vows to make homeless housing affordable and profitable
A call for proposals to develop a surplus Metro property on the corner of Wilshire and Crenshaw boulevards drew bids from seven heavyweights in the world of homeless housing. Along with big non-profits like Abode, PATH and Bridge Housing, an eighth bidder — one that has yet to produce a single apartment — presented a bold plan to do what none of the others could. Better Angels, a nonprofit founded by a billionaire tech entrepreneur who has turned his attention to homelessness, said it will build 212 affordable units on the property, plus a medical office building, without needing a dime of taxpayer money. Unlike the other bidders, whose proposals rely on tax credits and other government grants, Better Angeles says it will supply 30% of the capital as equity and finance the rest with conventional loans, allowing it to build faster and at much less cost than typical affordable projects. Among several homelessness initiatives launched by its founder, Adam Miller, Better Angels has set out on an ambitious mission to debunk the conventional wisdom that affordable housing can't be produced without taxpayer subsidies. "The goal is to show the way to make money doing affordable housing because we believe that ... the only way you are going to solve the affordable housing crisis is by letting capitalism work," Miller said. With a $300-million investment fund, Miller is trying to lure for-profit developers away from the luxury market and create an opportunity for small-scale developers to think beyond duplexes and ADUs. Concurrently with its Metro proposal, Better Angels is bidding on a project to redevelop a former Kaiser Permanente facility in Pasadena. It proposes a housing and mental health hub with a mix of 300 market rate, affordable and supportive units for formerly homeless people. It also has entered a bid in a Los Angeles Community College District competition for proposals to produce student housing. If selected, it would build a 54-unit apartment near Sunset Junction in Silver Lake for Los Angeles City College students with preference for those in or exiting foster care. Metro and LACCD have announced that winners will be named this summer. Bidding on the Pasadena project closed in May, and a decision is expected sometime this year. Win or lose on those bids, Better Angels is backing two smaller projects that are well on their way to completion. A groundbreaking will be held in later this summer for a 51-unit apartment that will replace an abandoned single-family home in South Los Angeles. Later in the year, permits are expected to be issued for an eight-story, 72-unit building a block from Manchester Avenue in Westchester. Miller promotes his housing model as an alternative to the decades-old system of double subsidies that use tax credits supplemented by other government grants to finance construction and rental subsidies to support ongoing operation. Tax-credit development is slow and costly because the rental subsidies have to be secured before capital can be raised, and the financing can be a years-long process involving competitive applications to multiple agencies. All the while the developer, in most cases a nonprofit homeless services provider, accrues carrying costs for the land. By providing capital up front with the stroke of a pen, Better Angels potentially cuts years off the process. "It's a very uncomplicated structure," said Anthony Gude, lead developer of the Westchester project. "You don't have to use public subsidies. That makes the capital stack simpler and more reliable." Gude said the 72-unit project will cost $15.5 million. At $215,000 per unit, that's roughly a third of the current cost of construction financed with tax credits. But there is a trade-off for the savings in time and cost. Though classified as affordable, the project will not become part of the homeless housing system. To be profitable, its rents will exceed the very low level needed to get people directly off the streets. As part of the approval process, Gude committed to limit rent of 55 units at low income (for people making 80% of area median income) and 15 units at moderate income levels. On average, that would be about $2,000 for the low-income units, he said. While that would be roughly 40% lower than rents in other new high-rise buildings going up in the bustling area just north of LAX, it's well above the very-low income levels required of tax-credit projects. That differential is evident in the applications for Metro's Wilshire/Crenshaw project. Better Angels' Metro proposal would provide 170 units at 80% of the area median income and 42 units at 110% of median, the latter a level commonly known as workforce housing. The seven competing proposals, all using tax-credit financing, would have some units available for people with incomes of only 30% of the median, considered acutely low-income, and most below 60% of the median. André F. Bueno, Better Angels' director of housing and chief investment officer, said the goal is to create new housing with guaranteed affordability that would serve homeless people directly through master leases to nonprofit agencies or, if not master leased, indirectly by renting to people who have federal Section 8 vouchers but can't use them in the competitive rental market. Miller described it as a homeless housing with "downside protection." "We have flexibility to ensure our limited partners get their return," he said. "We're trying to prove out that there is a different better way to do this that is less costly to the government and more effective at creating housing." Miller, who built Cornerstone OnDemand into a global training and development company, turned his focus on philanthropy after its 2021 sale. After forming an organization that supports research seeking solutions on gun control, Miller and his wife Staci Miller turned their attention to homelessness as their primary local mission, creating the STEP Fund, a no-interest, forgivable micro-loan program to help people facing evictions. It has given out 700 loans with a return rate of 65%. In 2023, the Millers incorporated Better Angels United Inc. as the umbrella for several initiatives. It conducts Resource Days around the county to help homeless people connect with services. It also employs a technical team working to create a mobile phone app for outreach workers and a centralized shelter database. After the Los Angeles fires, Better Angels built a resource navigator app and set up a relief fund. Its Affordable Housing Fund is a for-profit subsidiary of Better Angels created to attract capital to develop affordable housing. "We expect the returns on these projects are going to be market rate — double-digit internal rate of return — and we think that is going to encourage a lot of other people to get in this space and build net new affordable housing," Miller said. Miller is planning to promote three types of housing. About 45% of the fund will go to standard new housing construction. Another 20% will be invested with Good River Partners, whose founder Daniel Heimpel aspires to build housing for youths transitioning out of foster care. With the remainder, Miller hopes to partner with housing developer and modular manufacturer SoLa Impact to help longtime South Los Angeles homeowners convert their properties into multi-family apartments. "The idea is not only to create new affordable housing but to provide an opportunity for intergenerational wealth with people in the neighborhoods," Miller said. Gude and Andrew Slocum, who is leading the project in South Los Angeles, said their plans were possible only because of state and local incentives for affordable housing, including Mayor Karen Bass' Executive Order 1 that streamlined approvals. Among the other bonuses, the five-story building in South Los Angeles and the eight-story building in Westchester require only minimal setbacks from the street and no parking. "We needed every lever that was pulled," said Gude. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Alberta gov't fell short of its affordable housing goal last year: annual report
The provincial government completed fewer new or refurbished affordable housing units last year than the previous three years, according to figures in the Seniors, Community and Social Services Ministry's annual report. Provincial funding contributed to the creation of 388 new units in fiscal 2024, while another 410 households received rent supplements — payments that help people pay rent in market-housing units, the annual report says. But the combined number of 798 units and subsidies fell short of the ministry's target of 1,500 for the year, the report says "The provincial government has been failing at creating more affordable housing, particularly for low-income people," said Carolyn Whitzman, a senior housing researcher at the University of Toronto's School of Cities. Last year, the Alberta government created 641 affordable housing units — through new builds and refurbishments — and allocated 1,661 rent supplements. In the 2021 Stronger Foundations report, the province's 10-year strategy for affordable housing, the government set a goal to expand the capacity of its affordable housing system, so it could support 25,000 more households by 2032. That figure combines new builds, renovations to existing units and rent subsidies. During a media availability Friday, Assisted Living and Social Services Minister Jason Nixon told reporters that the provincial government is on track to reach its goal. He said providing rent supplements for existing market housing is part of the plan. "Rent supplement units are new units," Nixon said. "Taking a unit on, that would be in the open market, and creating a rent supplement for that unit creates an affordable unit that would not have been affordable before this." The annual report said an additional 1,626 units were under construction as of March 31. Nixon's press secretary, Amber Edgerton, said in a written statement that the figure in the annual report shows the projects completed within a fiscal year, and that most affordable housing projects are currently being built. "Construction of affordable housing doesn't happen in a fiscal year — these are long-term projects that will benefit Albertans for decades to come," she wrote. On Friday, Nixon and Eleanor Olszewski, the federal minister of emergency management and community resilience and MP for Edmonton Centre, announced that the federal and provincial governments will spend $203 million combined to build 2,300 affordable housing units across Alberta. The provincial government has spent $386 million through its Affordable Housing Partnership Program since 2022, and plans to spend another $655 million over the next three years. Provinces could do better Whitzman, the U of T researcher, sees problems with Alberta's use of subsidies to help make market housing more affordable. The payments, she said, don't always make up the difference between the rent charged for a unit and what a lower-income tenant can afford. Rent subsidies also keep tenants in the private market, which may not provide the same kind of rent stability as a unit in a community-housing or non-market unit., she said. Nixon rejects calls for Alberta to implement rent control while the province builds out its affordable housing supply. He argues rent caps provide a disincentive to developers who build new apartment and homes. Whitzman said that isn't the case in jurisdictions like Quebec, which has rent control. No provincial government is doing a great job building affordable housing, Whitzman said, but Alberta is failing on several fronts. She said Alberta has a growing rate of evictions, and that the government needs to improve benefits so people can afford to live. The Alberta government can also change the building code and provide guidance to municipalities on how they can change zoning bylaws to allow more apartment buildings, she said. Calgary, and particularly Edmonton, are doing well with zoning changes, but only because they did so on their own, Whitzman added. Opposition NDP housing critic Janis Irwin, the MLA for Edmonton-Highlands-Norwood, said she isn't surprised the government fell short of its affordable-housing goals. Nixon often cites increases in market housing starts as proof Alberta is building more housing, which in turn will make more apartments available as tenants move into new homes. But Irwin argues the UCP government needs to spend more on new non-market housing, and reiterated a call to institute a rent cap. She said Nixon could spend more on new affordable housing builds, noting the government ended the 2024-25 year with a $8.2 billion surplus. "They could be using that money to invest in new affordable housing. They could be upgrading the affordable housing that we know is in disrepair," Irwin said. "We know that investments in housing will will pay dividends down the road. These should be viewed as investments and not expenses."
